https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64372
Justin Bassett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbassett271 at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91335
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Ridge ---
(In reply to Nathan Ridge from comment #0)
> As a result, the only way to fix the warning is to lift the variable into
> the outer scope, which can be undesirable from a code style point of view:
(Well, or I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91335
Bug ID: 91335
Summary: False positive "unused variable" warning with variable
initialized in 'if' condition
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89943
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90985
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90985
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Aug 2 23:48:36 2019
New Revision: 274033
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274033=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-02 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/90985
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90297
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90986
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91334
Bug ID: 91334
Summary: [10 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90297
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Aug 2 21:28:58 2019
New Revision: 274031
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274031=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-02 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/90297
* match.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91312
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Kostas Sotiropoulos from comment #4)
> Any comments on my questions?
Yes go read the c standard about prompting to int here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91312
--- Comment #4 from Kostas Sotiropoulos ---
Any comments on my questions?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77712
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
Bug ID: 91333
Summary: [9/10 Regression] suboptimal register allocation for
inline asm
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91313
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 09:30:04AM +, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
> Should be fixed now.
>
Thanks! I can comfirm the issue is fixed on FreeBSD.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91326
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67033
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56428
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91332
Bug ID: 91332
Summary: ICE: Segfault in gfortran when compiling massive
function with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 7.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56428
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Aug 2 18:17:20 2019
New Revision: 274028
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274028=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/56428
* g++.dg/cpp0x/nontype4.C: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56428
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736
--- Comment #12 from Jonny Grant ---
If -Wenum-conversion is not enabled automatically, do those GCC build warnings
need to be cleaned up before it is added? It's a bit chicken and egg.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53009
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90786
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Aug 2 17:51:45 2019
New Revision: 274026
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274026=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-02 Thomas Koenig
Paul Thomas
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53009
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Aug 2 17:51:53 2019
New Revision: 274027
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274027=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/53009
* g++.dg/cpp0x/nontype3.C: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813
--- Comment #36 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Aug 2 17:51:45 2019
New Revision: 274026
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274026=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-02 Thomas Koenig
Paul Thomas
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53009
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77575
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77575
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Aug 2 17:26:02 2019
New Revision: 274024
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274024=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/77575
* g++.dg/cpp0x/nontype2.C: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77575
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736
--- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Discussions of the change continued into Aug / Sep 2017. In particular,
there were issues with warnings this introduced in the GCC build (of
target libraries), and questions about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91329
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88795
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90737
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression]|[8 Regression] inconsistent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90737
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Aug 2 17:05:34 2019
New Revision: 274022
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274022=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
PR c/90737 - [8/9/10 Regression] inconsistent address of a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90989
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 90989, which changed state.
Bug 90989 Summary: [9 Regression] incorrrect strlen result after second strcpy
into the same destination
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90989
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90989
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Aug 2 16:57:19 2019
New Revision: 274021
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274021=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
PR tree-optimization/90989 - incorrrect strlen result after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91046
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
There can't be any debug info issues specific to empty translation units,
given that
_Static_assert (1, "");
is valid as a translation unit in ISO C, and doesn't declare anything that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91331
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Please see PR91323. LTGT should trap on NaN.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91331
Bug ID: 91331
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c from r274005
fails
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91201
--- Comment #23 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Aug 2 15:46:02 2019
New Revision: 274018
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274018=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/91201
* config/i386/sse.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91278
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87100
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91330
Bug ID: 91330
Summary: JIT "dir" entry for info is incomplete
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87100
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #33 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Fri Aug 2 14:54:57 2019
New Revision: 274017
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274017=gcc=rev
Log:
darwin, backport driver fixes.
272260,r272479 - Darwin, Driver - Improve processing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91286
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
The reason for this is:
/* When checking, try to get a constant value for all non-dependent
expressions in order to expose bugs in *_dependent_expression_p
and constexpr. This can affect code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90989
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
I will backport it today. There are no followup fixes to this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91329
--- Comment #1 from Antony Polukhin ---
Ops, sorry. This is invalild. `i` could be negative.
Please close as invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88095
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91329
Bug ID: 91329
Summary: Unnecessary call to __cxa_throw_bad_array_new_length
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88095
--- Comment #3 from Tom Honermann ---
A patch for this issue has been submitted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-08/msg00150.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87100
--- Comment #4 from deller at gmx dot de ---
We do not have a RLIMIT_DATA default limit in the Linux kernel.
I suspect that's added somewhere outside, e.g. before building gcc/gnat.
You may disable the rlimit check by executing:
echo Y >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91325
--- Comment #3 from Jens Seidel ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Hm, I can't reproduce that with any version of GCC I have:
Was trying it now also on other computers:
On Debian 9 with g++ 6.3 and libc-2.24.so it works well, on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91328
Bug ID: 91328
Summary: stack-use-after-scope for in-class initialization of
std::vector member using initializer_list
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91327
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91327
--- Comment #2 from j.schleicher at pilz dot de ---
Created attachment 46662
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46662=edit
command line output during another compilation
Note: Free memory was still several hundred megabytes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91325
--- Comment #2 from Jens Seidel ---
I am using
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.23.so.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91230
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91230
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Aug 2 13:29:05 2019
New Revision: 274010
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274010=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/91230 - wrong error with __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ and generic lambda.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91327
--- Comment #1 from j.schleicher at pilz dot de ---
Created attachment 46661
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46661=edit
Preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91230
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Aug 2 13:26:06 2019
New Revision: 274009
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274009=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/91230 - wrong error with __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ and generic lambda.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91327
Bug ID: 91327
Summary: non-reproducible Internal Compiler Error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91326
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
For bar, we don't take advantage of the uninitialized variable enough, we still
have "a_3(D) == 0" at expansion time (RTL gets rid of it, but too
conservatively).
For foo, indeed computing the min and max
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88109
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka ---
The same applies for eg. division by zero; doing such vector operation results
in:
$ cat testcase-sanitize.c
int v __attribute__ ((vector_size (8)));
int
main (void)
{
return (v / v)[0];
}
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91326
Bug ID: 91326
Summary: VRP does not handle array value range
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77952
coypu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||coypu at sdf dot org
--- Comment #2 from coypu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91293
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 2 12:07:33 2019
New Revision: 274007
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274007=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-02 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2019-07-31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91280
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 2 12:07:33 2019
New Revision: 274007
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274007=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-02 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2019-07-31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91323
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> It also means that __builtin_islessgreater is confusingly named.
No, __builtin_islessgreater corresponds to the ISO C islessgreater
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91323
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #10)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> > quoting rtl.def:
> >
> > /* This is an ordered NE, ie !UNEQ, ie false for NaN. */
> > DEF_RTL_EXPR(LTGT,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91311
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91323
--- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> quoting rtl.def:
>
> /* This is an ordered NE, ie !UNEQ, ie false for NaN. */
> DEF_RTL_EXPR(LTGT, "ltgt", "ee", RTX_COMM_COMPARE)
In gensupport.c, we have:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91299
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91323
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #8)
> FWIW, using __float128 also traps on LTGT. The adapted testcase:
Eh, __float128 should trap on LTGT, but currently, it doesn't.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90947
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91323
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
FWIW, using __float128 also traps on LTGT. The adapted testcase:
--cut here--
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-add-options ieee } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target fenv_exceptions } */
#include
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91142
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
--- Comment #4 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90947
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
--- Comment #7 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90737
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Please consider backporting for GCC 9.2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91323
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Aug 2 09:58:04 2019
New Revision: 274005
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274005=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/91323
* config/i386/i386-expand.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91325
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91313
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
--- Comment #30 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 2 Aug 2019, luoxhu at cn dot ibm.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
>
> --- Comment #28 from Xiong Hu XS Luo ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
--- Comment #29 from Xiong Hu XS Luo ---
(In reply to Xiong Hu XS Luo from comment #28)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #24)
> > Btw, this is controlled by symtab_node::output_to_lto_symbol_table_p which
> > has
> >
> > /* FIXME:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91325
Bug ID: 91325
Summary: [ASAN] ASAN hangs at throw if called via dlopen
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91313
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Aug 2 09:23:56 2019
New Revision: 274003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274003=gcc=rev
Log:
Properly detect working jobserver in gcc driver.
2019-08-02 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
--- Comment #28 from Xiong Hu XS Luo ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #24)
> Btw, this is controlled by symtab_node::output_to_lto_symbol_table_p which
> has
>
> /* FIXME: Builtins corresponding to real functions probably should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91178
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 2 08:40:34 2019
New Revision: 274000
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274000=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-08-02 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2019-07-31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91178
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91323
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 2 Aug 2019, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91323
>
> --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91201
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Aug 2 08:28:31 2019
New Revision: 273998
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273998=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/91201
* config/i386/i386-expand.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91323
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> That means this is a target issue, LTGT isn't an unordered compare.
So, it should create COMISS then?
The patch is then simple:
--cut here--
Index:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79328
--- Comment #2 from Andrea Bocci ---
Created attachment 46658
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46658=edit
simple test case
Build with
g++-9 test.cc -Wshadow -o test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79328
Andrea Bocci changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fwyzard at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91323
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
quoting rtl.def:
/* This is an ordered NE, ie !UNEQ, ie false for NaN. */
DEF_RTL_EXPR(LTGT, "ltgt", "ee", RTX_COMM_COMPARE)
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
