[Bug c++/91933] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in build_simple_base_path, at cp/class.c:541

2019-09-29 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91933 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- clang++ 9 and icc 18 actually accept this code.

[Bug c++/91933] New: [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in build_simple_base_path, at cp/class.c:541

2019-09-29 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
) /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20190929/work/gcc-10-20190929/gcc/tree.c:9973 0x5bb172 build_simple_base_path /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20190929/work/gcc-10-20190929/gcc/tree.h:3390 0x8bfd62 build_simple_base_path /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10

[Bug fortran/87908] ICE in check_interface0, at fortran/interface.c:1841

2019-09-29 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87908 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug fortran/84245] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in delete_root, at fortran/bbt.c:150

2019-09-29 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84245 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery CC|

[Bug c++/80496] missing diagnostic regarding noreturn mismatch in function pointer initialization

2019-09-29 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80496 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/90043] Turn on -Winit-self by default for -Wuninitialized

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90043 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug middle-end/90043] Turn on -Winit-self by default for -Wuninitialized

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90043 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/60256] No -Wuninitialized warning for strcpy copying to self

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60256 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 60256, which changed state. Bug 60256 Summary: No -Wuninitialized warning for strcpy copying to self https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60256 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/35278] extern declaration causes uninitialized reference to go unnoticed

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35278 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Known to

[Bug middle-end/83859] Please add new attribute which will establish relation between parameters for buffer and its size

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83859 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||madcoder at debian dot org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/31893] Please provide an "inout" attribute for function parameters.

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31893 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, |

[Bug middle-end/31279] Uninitialized warning for call-by-reference arguments with known intent(in)

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31279 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- The C family patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-09/msg01690.html

[Bug middle-end/10138] warn for uninitialized arrays passed as const* arguments

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10138 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/90463] Documentation: -Wunused not listed among the options enabled by -Wall

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90463 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/88660] [8/9/10 Regression] Invalid report of "set but used variable" with -O

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88660 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/80806] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/83859] Please add new attribute which will establish relation between parameters for buffer and its size

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83859 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Component|c

[Bug target/91474] Internal compiler error when building mabi=32 mips64-elf cross-compiler: segfault in parallel_settings.cc

2019-09-29 Thread joey.dumont at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474 Joey Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added Version|9.1.0 |9.2.0 --- Comment #7 from Joey Dumont

[Bug target/91474] Internal compiler error when building mabi=32 mips64-elf cross-compiler: segfault in parallel_settings.cc

2019-09-29 Thread joey.dumont at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474 --- Comment #8 from Joey Dumont --- I realized I made a silly mistake after I posted this. I was meant to try this version for the target compiler, not the host compiler. I successfully built the target compiler (mips64-elf) with r273174. I

[Bug fortran/91641] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_is_contiguous_expr, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:2857

2019-09-29 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91641 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Sep 29 19:12:08 2019 New Revision: 276272 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276272=gcc=rev Log: 2019-09-29 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/91641 * check.c

[Bug c/44677] Warn for variables incremented but not used

2019-09-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #8) > I would expect handling -Wunused-but-set-variable during Gimplification to > make detecting these sorts of things possible at least in the basic cases. That is

[Bug c/44677] Warn for variables incremented but not used

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||89180 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor

[Bug c/41142] make implicit pointer conversions an error when sizeof(int) != sizeof(void *)

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41142 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86465] [7/8/9/10 Regression] C++17 triggers: ‘’ may be used uninitialized in this function

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86465 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org See

[Bug target/91851] [m68k] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept in future releases

2019-09-29 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91851 --- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- I have created a guide which explains how to install Debian inside an emulated qemu-system-m68k VM: > https://wiki.debian.org/M68k/QemuSystemM68k The guide is not complete yet, I will finish it

[Bug preprocessor/91932] New: #pragma does not silence floating constant overflow warnings

2019-09-29 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91932 Bug ID: 91932 Summary: #pragma does not silence floating constant overflow warnings Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/91714] Accepts type statement without delimiter in free form

2019-09-29 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91714 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Sep 29 16:19:58 2019 New Revision: 276270 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276270=gcc=rev Log: 2019-09-29 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/91714 * decl.c

[Bug target/29776] result of ffs/clz/ctz/popcount/parity are already sign-extended

2019-09-29 Thread steinar+gcc at gunderson dot no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29776 --- Comment #22 from Steinar H. Gunderson --- Yes; I had a project recently where I won 15% overall performance (!) by using an asm statement with bsf instead of ffsll(). (This skipped both the sign extension and the check for zero; my argument

[Bug target/29776] result of ffs/clz/ctz/popcount/parity are already sign-extended

2019-09-29 Thread david.bolvansky at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29776 Dávid Bolvanský changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/91931] [10 Regression] ICE in decompose, at rtl.h:2277

2019-09-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91931 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 46977 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46977=edit gcc10-pr91931.patch Untested fix.

[Bug rtl-optimization/91931] [10 Regression] ICE in decompose, at rtl.h:2277

2019-09-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91931 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/91931] [10 Regression] ICE in decompose, at rtl.h:2277

2019-09-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91931 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/91726] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3612

2019-09-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91726 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 29 10:12:42 2019 New Revision: 276269 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276269=gcc=rev Log: 2019-09-29 Paul Thomas PR fortran/91726 * resolve.c

[Bug bootstrap/90543] Build failure on MINGW for gcc-9.1.0

2019-09-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90543 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sun Sep 29 10:06:40 2019 New Revision: 276268 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276268=gcc=rev Log: PR bootstrap/90543 * optc-save-gen.awk: Fix up printing string

[Bug c++/88562] Incorrect pointer incrementing on SH4

2019-09-29 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88562 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|