[Bug target/92132] new test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-reduc-4.c fails with its introduction in r277067

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92132 --- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin --- Powerpc already support vcond where A and B are in the same mode or the same size mode. As Richard pointed out, this case requires some packs, it requires powerpc supports vec_cmpv2dfv2di and

[Bug ipa/92074] [10 regression] 26% performance regression on Spec2017 548.exchange2_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92074 --- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu --- Same regression on skylake.

[Bug c++/83534] C++17: typeinfo for noexcept function lacks noexcept information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83534 --- Comment #5 from Kamlesh Kumar --- Fixed on trunk

[Bug tree-optimization/92173] New: [10 Regression] ICE in optab_for_tree_code, at optabs-tree.c:81

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92173 Bug ID: 92173 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in optab_for_tree_code, at optabs-tree.c:81 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug fortran/87711] ICE in gfc_trans_transfer, at fortran/trans-io.c:2676

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87711 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/92172] ARM Thumb2 frame pointers inconsistent with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92172 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug tree-optimization/92128] fold more non-constant strlen relational expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92128 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Yes. I constrained strlenopt-80.c to only a subset of the targets where the optimization has been implemented but forgot to do the same for strlenopt-81.c. I'm traveling this week but I'll try to remember

[Bug c/92172] New: ARM Thumb2 frame pointers inconsistent with clang and ARM-THUMB Procedure Call Standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92172 Bug ID: 92172 Summary: ARM Thumb2 frame pointers inconsistent with clang and ARM-THUMB Procedure Call Standard Product: gcc Version: 8.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/92171] New: accept incorrect access of static constexpr member when read from a reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92171 Bug ID: 92171 Summary: accept incorrect access of static constexpr member when read from a reference Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/92163] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in bitmap_set_bit)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163 --- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 47079 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47079=edit Untested fix Does this patch look OK ? Thanks, Prathamesh

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output (CVE-2019-15847)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #26 from Kevin Shekleton --- Thanks for educating me on the numbering scheme, Segher. That's helpful info! Florian - I see you requested the CVE. Will you be working to get the NVD entry updated with the appropriate affected

[Bug driver/92170] Incorrect function names output when using -fstack-usage on C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170 --- Comment #1 from Austin Morton --- Created attachment 47076 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47076=edit current su output

[Bug driver/92170] Incorrect function names output when using -fstack-usage on C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170 --- Comment #2 from Austin Morton --- Created attachment 47077 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47077=edit expected su output

[Bug driver/92170] Incorrect function names output when using -fstack-usage on C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170 --- Comment #3 from Austin Morton --- Created attachment 47078 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47078=edit workaround patch

[Bug driver/92170] New: Incorrect function names output when using -fstack-usage on C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170 Bug ID: 92170 Summary: Incorrect function names output when using -fstack-usage on C++ Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output (CVE-2019-15847)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #25 from Segher Boessenkool --- There is no 9.2.1 release, and there will not be one either. See https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html for how our numbering scheme works. Very briefly, if the second number is 0, or the third number is

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output (CVE-2019-15847)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #24 from Kevin Shekleton --- Thanks, Segher. You mentioned 9.3 -- does that mean there won't be a 9.2.1 release? If so, will the 'Known to work' field here be updated? Also, will someone from the GCC team request an update to the

[Bug target/92168] Poor code generation for addcarry / subborrow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92168 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 gcc]$ cat c.c #include unsigned char foo (unsigned long long HxL0, unsigned long long LxH0, unsigned long long HxL1, unsigned long long LxH1) { unsigned char carry; carry =

[Bug gcov-profile/83434] [GCOV] A label after a non-executed if statement is wrongly marked as not executed in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83434 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Oct 21 20:19:28 2019 New Revision: 277270 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277270=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/83434 - typeinfo for noexcept function lacks noexcept information

[Bug c++/92169] New: crash on referring to a local class member by unqualified name from outside the enclosing function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92169 Bug ID: 92169 Summary: crash on referring to a local class member by unqualified name from outside the enclosing function Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output (CVE-2019-15847)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #22) > See https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html/timeline Sorry, that should be https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#timeline

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output (CVE-2019-15847)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #21) > No future releases for GCC have been announced. Judging from historical > trends the next (and last) GCC 7 release (7.5) will be in November, GCC 8 >

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output (CVE-2019-15847)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 --- Comment #21 from Segher Boessenkool --- It will be fixed in the next releases of all still supported branches (that's GCC 7, 8, and 9), and also in the upcoming GCC 10 release of course. If you are in a hurry, you can build your own

[Bug c++/92015] [9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_array_reference, at cp/constexpr.c:2568

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92015 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/92168] Poor code generation for addcarry / subborrow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92168 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/92168] Poor code generation for addcarry / subborrow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92168 --- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn --- Created attachment 47074 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47074=edit Source code example from Compiler Explorer

[Bug target/92168] New: Poor code generation for addcarry / subborrow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92168 Bug ID: 92168 Summary: Poor code generation for addcarry / subborrow Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/92015] [9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_array_reference, at cp/constexpr.c:2568

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92015 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 18:51:43 2019 New Revision: 277267 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277267=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/92015 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_component_reference,

[Bug c++/92062] [9 Regression] ODR-use by static_assert ignored for static member of class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92062 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] ODR-use |[9 Regression] ODR-use by

[Bug c++/92062] [9/10 Regression] ODR-use by static_assert ignored for static member of class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92062 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Oct 21 18:45:45 2019 New Revision: 277266 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277266=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/92062 - ODR-use ignored for static member of class template.

[Bug fortran/86248] [7/8/9/10 Regression] LEN_TRIM in specification expression causes link failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86248 --- Comment #5 from Bill Long --- Any progress on this?

[Bug c++/92106] [8/9 Regression] ICE with structured bindings and -Wreturn-local-addr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE |[8/9 Regression] ICE with

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output (CVE-2019-15847)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 Kevin Shekleton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kevin.shekleton at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/92106] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE with structured bindings and -Wreturn-local-addr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92106 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Oct 21 18:22:41 2019 New Revision: 277264 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277264=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/92106 - ICE with structured bindings and -Wreturn-local-addr.

[Bug libfortran/92027] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_10.f90 FAILs – conditional jump based on uninitialized memory in runtime/ISO_Fortran_binding.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92027 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/91548] [10 Regression] Regression in constexpr evaluation of std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91548 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Sorry about that. I've been working on new C++20 features in the dwindling stage 1 time, and kept kicking this can down the stage3 road. But hopefully I'll get to this after posting my aggregate paren init

[Bug c++/91548] [10 Regression] Regression in constexpr evaluation of std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91548 Hannes Hauswedell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||h2+bugs at fsfe dot org --- Comment

[Bug c/92167] New: Poor source location choice for diagnostic in macro expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92167 Bug ID: 92167 Summary: Poor source location choice for diagnostic in macro expansion Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/92165] [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp2a/nodiscard-once.C fails starting with r277205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92165 --- Comment #3 from JeanHeyd Meneide --- Thanks for pinging me about this. I'm at a WG14 Meeting so I won't be able to get to it immediately, but when I get back I'll get right on fixing!

[Bug testsuite/92165] [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp2a/nodiscard-once.C fails starting with r277205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92165 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||phdofthehouse at gmail dot com ---

[Bug testsuite/92165] [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp2a/nodiscard-once.C fails starting with r277205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92165 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also these: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/nodiscard-reason.C -std=gnu++2a (test for warnings, line 16) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/nodiscard-reason.C -std=gnu++2a (test for warnings, line 17) FAIL:

[Bug tree-optimization/92166] New: [10 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/vshift-5.c starting with r277241

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92166 Bug ID: 92166 Summary: [10 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/vshift-5.c starting with r277241 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/92165] New: [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp2a/nodiscard-once.C fails starting with r277205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92165 Bug ID: 92165 Summary: [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp2a/nodiscard-once.C fails starting with r277205 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/90835] Incompatibilities with macOS 10.15 headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||meta-bug Blocks|

[Bug tree-optimization/92162] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4252

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92162 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92162] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4252

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92162 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 21 13:43:19 2019 New Revision: 277261 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277261=gcc=rev Log: 2019-10-21 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/92162 *

[Bug c/92164] Wrong result using builtin rint/rintf optimization in x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92164 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- See PR34678 for issues of -frounding-math.

[Bug c/92164] Wrong result using builtin rint/rintf optimization in x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92164 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Note that if GCC would be standards-conforming here your program would still need #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON since you are accessing and modifying the floating-point state (where the pragma has no effect

[Bug c/92164] Wrong result using builtin rint/rintf optimization in x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92164 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Steffen Schmidt from comment #3) > Thanks for the quick reply. > > Just tested using -frounding-math and it seems to fix the issue. > Sorry, I was not aware of this option, according to GCCs

[Bug tree-optimization/92162] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4252

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92162 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Seems to hit 416.gamess as well. Patch in testing.

[Bug tree-optimization/91665] [8 Regression] ICE in build_vector_from_val, at tree.c:1904

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665 --- Comment #12 from David Binderman --- Scratch my comment. Wrong bug report. Sorry.

[Bug tree-optimization/92162] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4252

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92162 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Another test case seems to be: double *a; b() { int c, d = 1; for (; c < b; c++) for (; c < b; c++) if (a[c]) d = 0; if (d) e(); } -O3 required for this case. Bug seems to

[Bug tree-optimization/92162] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4252

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92162 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug tree-optimization/91665] [8 Regression] ICE in build_vector_from_val, at tree.c:1904

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/92163] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in bitmap_set_bit)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- tree-ssa-dse.c assumes need_eh_cleanup bitmap (which is static) is initialized at the start of the pass and handled at the end. So, do we need to add functions (init and fini) which ifcvt can call, or just

[Bug ipa/92160] The control variable of TLS variable alias be removed when use emutls(--enable-tls=no)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92160 --- Comment #2 from Pom --- Created attachment 47073 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47073=edit test code and makefile

[Bug tree-optimization/92163] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in bitmap_set_bit)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/92160] The control variable of TLS variable alias be removed when use emutls(--enable-tls=no)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92160 --- Comment #1 from Pom --- full source code: #define TLS __thread TLS int oldname = 7; extern TLS int newname __attribute__((alias("oldname")));

[Bug inline-asm/92151] Spurious register copying

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92151 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/91974] function not sequenced before function argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91974 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- The originally reported issue fixed for 9.3+ too. Not really sure if it is a good idea to backport the shift and array ref changes, those are quite invasive.

[Bug c++/91925] [9/10 Regression] -fpack-struct causes a decltype with template to ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91925 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88203] assert does not compile with OpenMP's pragma omp parallel for default(none)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88203 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |8.2.1 --- Comment #10 from Jakub

[Bug c/92164] Wrong result using builtin rint/rintf optimization in x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92164 --- Comment #3 from Steffen Schmidt --- Thanks for the quick reply. Just tested using -frounding-math and it seems to fix the issue. Sorry, I was not aware of this option, according to GCCs manual it is experimental. Please correct me if I'm

[Bug middle-end/91920] ggc 9.2.0 failing openmp compile on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91920 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/91723] [9 Regression] builtin fma is not optimized or vectorized as *+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91723 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/91623] [7/8 Regression] -msse4.1 -O3 segfault in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.3.0/include/smmintrin.h:270:10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] -msse4.1 |[7/8 Regression] -msse4.1

[Bug middle-end/91001] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91001 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 9.3+ too.

[Bug lto/91572] [9 Regression] lto1: error: type variant has different ‘TREE_TYPE’ since r269862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91572 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/91665] [8 Regression] ICE in build_vector_from_val, at tree.c:1904

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.2.1 Summary|[8/9

[Bug tree-optimization/91351] [9 Regression] -fstrict-enums generates incorrect code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92056] [10 Regression] ice in expr_object_size, at tree-object-si ze.c:675 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92056 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:49:18 2019 New Revision: 277259 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277259=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-10-17 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug fortran/87752] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:6776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87752 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:48:34 2019 New Revision: 277258 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277258=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-10-17 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug tree-optimization/91734] gcc skip an if statement with "-O1 -ffast-math"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91734 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:48:00 2019 New Revision: 277257 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277257=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-10-05 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/91925] [9/10 Regression] -fpack-struct causes a decltype with template to ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91925 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:46:21 2019 New Revision: 277255 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277255=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-10-01 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/91974] function not sequenced before function argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91974 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:47:09 2019 New Revision: 277256 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277256=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-10-04 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug bootstrap/90543] Build failure on MINGW for gcc-9.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90543 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:45:27 2019 New Revision: 277254 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277254=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-29 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/88203] assert does not compile with OpenMP's pragma omp parallel for default(none)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88203 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:44:53 2019 New Revision: 277253 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277253=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-27 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug middle-end/91920] ggc 9.2.0 failing openmp compile on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91920 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:43:16 2019 New Revision: 277252 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277252=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-27 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/89435] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -march=armv4 -fno-forward-propagate with __builtin_sub_overflow()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89435 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:42:37 2019 New Revision: 277251 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277251=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-11 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/91720] [10 Regression] wrong code with -Og -fno-forward-propagate -frerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-fre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91720 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:42:37 2019 New Revision: 277251 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277251=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-11 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug tree-optimization/91723] [9 Regression] builtin fma is not optimized or vectorized as *+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91723 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:41:40 2019 New Revision: 277250 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277250=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-11 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/89795] [7/8/9/10 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate -fno-sched-pressure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89795 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:42:37 2019 New Revision: 277251 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277251=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-11 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug tree-optimization/91665] [8/9 Regression] ICE in build_vector_from_val, at tree.c:1904

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91665 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:40:48 2019 New Revision: 277249 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277249=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-07 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug target/91106] internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid use of register 'frame'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91106 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:39:53 2019 New Revision: 277248 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277248=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-06 Jakub Jelinek *

[Bug middle-end/91105] internal compiler error: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91105 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:39:53 2019 New Revision: 277248 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277248=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-06 Jakub Jelinek *

[Bug middle-end/91001] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91001 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:39:53 2019 New Revision: 277248 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277248=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-06 Jakub Jelinek *

[Bug tree-optimization/91632] [10 Regression] Probably wrong code since r275026

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91632 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:39:04 2019 New Revision: 277247 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277247=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-02 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug middle-end/91623] [7/8/9 Regression] -msse4.1 -O3 segfault in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.3.0/include/smmintrin.h:270:10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91623 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:38:37 2019 New Revision: 277246 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277246=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-01 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug lto/91572] [9 Regression] lto1: error: type variant has different ‘TREE_TYPE’ since r269862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91572 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:37:41 2019 New Revision: 277245 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277245=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-01 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug tree-optimization/91351] [9 Regression] -fstrict-enums generates incorrect code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:36:36 2019 New Revision: 277244 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277244=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-02 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug go/91617] [10 regression] Many go test case failures after r275026

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91617 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:36:36 2019 New Revision: 277244 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277244=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-09-02 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c/91401] schedule + dist_schedule clauses rejected on distribute parallel for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91401 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 21 11:35:09 2019 New Revision: 277243 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277243=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-08-09 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug tree-optimization/92161] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_stmt_copy, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1687

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92161 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92161] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_stmt_copy, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1687

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92161 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 21 11:32:25 2019 New Revision: 277240 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277240=gcc=rev Log: 2019-10-21 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/92161 *

[Bug inline-asm/92151] Spurious register copying

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92151 Chris Hall changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at gmch dot uk --- Comment #2 from

[Bug tree-optimization/92163] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in bitmap_set_bit)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug c/92164] Wrong result using builtin rint/rintf optimization in x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92164 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Did you compile with -frounding-math?

[Bug tree-optimization/92162] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4252

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92162 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/92152] [10 Regression] Wrong code (Resurrection of PR53663)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92152 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/92164] Wrong result using builtin rint/rintf optimization in x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92164 --- Comment #1 from Steffen Schmidt --- Created attachment 47072 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47072=edit Test result output text.

  1   2   >