https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #34 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to fdlbxtqi from comment #33)
> Created attachment 47574 [details]
> copy_backward bug fixed for the last patch
>
> going to further run testsuite
Your test does not contain any test cases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
fdlbxtqi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47559|0 |1
is obsolete|
[BUG: 93065] libgomp: destructor missing to delete goacc_cleanup_key
libgomp constructor creates goacc_cleanup_key on dlopen but doesn't delete key
on dlclose.
dlopen and dlclose of libgomp.so exhausts pthread keys, which results in
pthread_key_create failure.
pthread_key_delete needs to be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79412
--- Comment #8 from Kerem Kat ---
^ correction> not reproducible with 9.2.1, reproducible with gcc-10 trunk as:
$ gcc z1.c
79412-ice.c:6:5: error: conflicting types for ‘a’
6 | int a[] = {2};
| ^
79412-ice.c:1:5: note: previous
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93108
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|hp at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93095
fdlbxtqi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93066
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #32 from fdlbxtqi ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #31)
> Yes, you usually need to make a full bootstrap / make check twice
> which the same svn revision one with and one without your patch.
> You also should make sure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93108
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Commenting out 'GETA $2,LC:0' makes assembler get past the error.
'LC:0' is defined in '.rodata'. If I change '.rodata' manually to '.text'
assembler can assemble ELF file from modified source.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93108
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 47573
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47573=edit
min-bug.c
The bug initially discovered on gcc-9.2.0. creduce managed to shrink it down to
min-bug.c.
On it the
oot=/usr/mmix --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c --disable-nls
--with-native-system-header-dir=/include CFLAGS=-O0 CXXFLAGS=-O0
Thread model: single
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 10.0.0 20191230 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93066
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Dec 30 20:33:17 2019
New Revision: 279773
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279773=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/93066
* inclhack.def (hpux_c99_inttypes3): Fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92923
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92923
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Mon Dec 30 20:23:25 2019
New Revision: 279772
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279772=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix builtin functions needlessly using VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRs on their operands.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
--- Comment #37 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
On 30/12/2019 10.51, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
>> Obviously, it could be used to fold `a + i == b` to `0` if `a` and `b`
>> are two different known arrays and `i` is unknown
>
> That's indeed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #31 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Yes, you usually need to make a full bootstrap / make check twice
which the same svn revision one with and one without your patch.
You also should make sure that the test case actually is able to fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #30 from fdlbxtqi ---
Created attachment 47571
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47571=edit
Here is my stl_algobase.h after patch. You can try it directly.
Here is my stl_algobase.h after patch. You can try it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #29 from fdlbxtqi ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #17)
> (In reply to fdlbxtqi from comment #15)
> > What I am worried about is that whether revamping these functions would be
> > a new wave of ABI breaking.
>
> I don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #28 from fdlbxtqi ---
Created attachment 47570
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47570=edit
Testsuite
Testsuite :
cqwrteur@DESKTOP-7H7UHQ9:~/libstdcpp_testsuite$ runtest --tool libstdc++
Using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90677
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93104
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92833
--- Comment #6 from Kerem Kat ---
Created attachment 47569
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47569=edit
fix ice
PR c/92833
* parser.c (c_parser_consume_token): Fix peeked
token stack pop to support 4 available tokens.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90677
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47568
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47568=edit
gcc10-pr90677-2.patch
Untested fix for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93091
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libfortran |fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31016
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Correction: The rank-1 copying cases are now handled by the middle end,
the two-dimensional case isn't.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31016
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Excellent news: The __builtin_memcpy cases have been fixed in the
meantime, and using __builtin_memset for values of more than one
byte doesn't work.
I will commit a test case and then close.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 15:29:30 2019
New Revision: 279770
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279770=gcc=rev
Log:
Catch division by zero errors in array sizes.
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 15:27:08 2019
New Revision: 279769
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279769=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/92961
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92896
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|93104 |
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93101
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93107
Bug ID: 93107
Summary: unable to deduce initializer_list from function
template
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93107
--- Comment #1 from Barry Revzin ---
Meant to add the StackOverflow link:
https://stackoverflow.com/q/59517774/2069064
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93106
Bug ID: 93106
Summary: [c++2a] Deleted move constructor is not selected when
returning an automatic variable
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93104
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93104
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/10 Regression] Current |[10 Regression] Current
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93104
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49330
--- Comment #30 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
Sure, I've filed pr93105. Thanks for the analysis!
n", x);
}
--
$ gcc -std=c11 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra test.c && ./a.out
x = 2
$ gcc -std=c11 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -O3 test.c && ./a.out
x = 1
--
gcc x86-64 version: gcc (GCC) 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92993
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||93104
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92833
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
-
$ gcc -std=c11 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -O3 test.c && ./a.out
diff = 0
eq = 0
--
gcc x86-64 version: gcc (GCC) 10.0.0 20191230 (experimental)
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 13:10:37 2019
New Revision: 279767
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279767=gcc=rev
Log:
Catch division by zero errors in array sizes.
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49330
--- Comment #29 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to Alexander Cherepanov from comment #28)
> I see the same even with pure pointers. I guess RTL doesn't care about such
> differences but it means the problem could bite a relatively innocent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79412
Kerem Kat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||keremkat+gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93102
--- Comment #2 from vfdff ---
do you mean the optimization memtioned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47980
Yes, it can be with optimized option '-fmerge-all-constants', but it doesn't
active in default.
n", x);
}
--
$ gcc -std=c11 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra test.c && ./a.out
x = 2
$ gcc -std=c11 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -O3 test.c && ./a.out
x = 1
--
gcc x86-64 version: gcc (GCC) 10.0.0 20191230 (experimental)
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91651
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 12:35:05 2019
New Revision: 279766
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279766=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/91651
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91541
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> And please also fix the comment in the new test.
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13)
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #12)
> > (In reply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93104
Bug ID: 93104
Summary: [8/10 Regression] Current trunk can not build gcc 8
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91541
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And please also fix the comment in the new test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91541
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #12)
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #11)
>
> *sigh* corrected in the original PR.
Please add a 'fixup' to the bugdb.py file in the gcc-conversion repo,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93103
Bug ID: 93103
Summary: Generic function syntax does not check return concept
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93102
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92833
--- Comment #4 from Kerem Kat ---
Please assign to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92833
Kerem Kat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||keremkat+gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93102
Bug ID: 93102
Summary: [optimization] is it legal to avoid accessing const
local array from stack ?
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93084
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93084
>
> --- Comment #6 from fxue at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Could you share how you build clang with PGO, and train workload?
It needs a lot of patience. If
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93084
>
> --- Comment #6 from fxue at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Could you share how you build clang with PGO, and train workload?
It needs a lot of patience. If you have patch I can try it since I
still have the train data and corresponding gcc tree.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91651
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91651
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 10:47:39 2019
New Revision: 279765
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279765=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/91651
Fix PR numbers in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91541
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93101
Bug ID: 93101
Summary: [regression] ICE - aggregate initialization of base
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91651
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 10:43:38 2019
New Revision: 279763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279763=gcc=rev
Log:
Remove KIND argument from INDEX so it does not mess up scalarization.
2019-12-30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.0|9.2.1
Summary|[8/9/10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91541
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 10:43:38 2019
New Revision: 279763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279763=gcc=rev
Log:
Remove KIND argument from INDEX so it does not mess up scalarization.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 10:34:11 2019
New Revision: 279762
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279762=gcc=rev
Log:
Catch division by zero errors in array sizes.
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93100
Bug ID: 93100
Summary: gcc -fsanitize=address inhibits -Wuninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93099
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93099
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93099
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Emrich ---
That's with revision 279747.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93099
Bug ID: 93099
Summary: Multiple definition error while linking libobjc.dll.a
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93098
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93097
Arjen de Korte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
76 matches
Mail list logo
