https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87106
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think that's the answer, yes (although I haven't refreshed my memory of the
issues completely). A call to memmove does not begin the lifetime of any
objects at the destination address.
For types that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57612
felix changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||felix.von.s at posteo dot de
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263
--- Comment #6 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #5)
> (In reply to markeggleston from comment #4)
> > - if (ns->save_all || !flag_automatic)
> > + if (!recursive && (ns->save_all ||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to markeggleston from comment #4)
> - if (ns->save_all || !flag_automatic)
> + if (!recursive && (ns->save_all || !flag_automatic))
> Does the trick. Now need to write the test cases and prepare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93285
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93285
Bug ID: 93285
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in cp_gimplify_expr, at
cp/cp-gimplify.c:931 since g:08f594eb399dab06
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93274
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93272
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93280
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93280
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93253
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo