[Bug tree-optimization/91699] [10 Regression] Bogus Wstringop-overflow in Fotran with -flto after revision r274997

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91699 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 91699, which changed state. Bug 91699 Summary: [10 Regression] Bogus Wstringop-overflow in Fotran with -flto after revision r274997 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91699 What|Removed

[Bug c++/90243] diagnostic notes that belong to a suppressed error about an uninitialized variable in a constexpr function are still shown

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90243 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kuzniar95 at o2 dot pl --- Comment #8

[Bug c++/93311] Missing "warning" when instantiating a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93311 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/22466] ICE on classes in template functions which attempt closure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22466 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alexander Monakov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c2e9f7a5d4b5db97f268ae247b3a82b1610a543 commit r10-6048-g2c2e9f7a5d4b5db97f268ae247b3a82b1610a543 Author: Alexander Monakov

[Bug testsuite/92829] [10 regression] several test case failures starting with r278983

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92829 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Only the gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-56.c failure. I still see the failures below in a recent test result (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2020-01/msg00764.html): FAIL: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25.c (test

[Bug c++/93311] New: Missing "warning" when instantiating a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93311 Bug ID: 93311 Summary: Missing "warning" when instantiating a constexpr function Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/93227] [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/std-layout1.C fails starting with r280065

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93227 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1a7789d0f4780b296b66e93f598bf2b2c109f43 commit r10-6046-gf1a7789d0f4780b296b66e93f598bf2b2c109f43 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug testsuite/93227] [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/std-layout1.C fails starting with r280065

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93227 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/93263] [9/10 Regression] -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263 --- Comment #12 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- Committed: master https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4a5f73449d7352ba8128fecbc9a9570d746abdb releases/gcc-9 https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f158d9197de75187fa0db26b74bc5d16b5aae242 Updated to URLs.

[Bug c++/93310] New: Incorrect constexpr virtual evaluation inside a constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93310 Bug ID: 93310 Summary: Incorrect constexpr virtual evaluation inside a constructor Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/93309] New: Wrong error about duplicate implicit none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93309 Bug ID: 93309 Summary: Wrong error about duplicate implicit none Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/92531] [9 Regression] ICE in uses_template_parms, at cp/pt.c:10471

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92531 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/69879] Create a pointer to the default operator new and delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69879 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 47671 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47671=edit Elide exception handling in nothrow new Here's a proof of concept showing how to make the nothrow operator work

[Bug c++/92531] [9/10 Regression] ICE in uses_template_parms, at cp/pt.c:10471

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92531 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eff9c61dfb082cb3ea26f354d795e4098ec76866 commit r10-6042-geff9c61dfb082cb3ea26f354d795e4098ec76866 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/93228] [[deprecated("message")]] on template struct/class drops message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93228 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c60a18f8056facdcf370ce0e5f51550c9df5b539 commit r10-6041-gc60a18f8056facdcf370ce0e5f51550c9df5b539 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug libstdc++/69879] Create a pointer to the default operator new and delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69879 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/92071] [10 regression][ARM] ice in gen_movsi, at config/arm/arm.md:5378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92071 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug preprocessor/93306] Unnecessary file I/O done for #if 0 && __has_include(...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93306 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf09d886a4be1031f7003073115af6cbc5575353 commit r10-6040-gbf09d886a4be1031f7003073115af6cbc5575353 Author: Nathan Sidwell Date:

[Bug preprocessor/93306] Unnecessary file I/O done for #if 0 && __has_include(...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93306 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/93307] ODR violations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93307 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Looks like a valid complaint to me; sorry about the breakage. Possibly a silly question, but how do you specify an LTO bootstrap? I'm wondering why I'm not running into this; I'm configuring with "lto" in

[Bug tree-optimization/93301] Wrong optimization: instability of uninitialized variables leads to nonsense

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93301 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Cherepanov --- The problem is much more serious. It's not that C has some guarantees about two values of `y` while gcc doesn't provide them. It's that one part of gcc assumes there are some guarantees about two

[Bug fortran/93308] New: bind(c) subroutine changes lower bound of array argument in caller

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93308 Bug ID: 93308 Summary: bind(c) subroutine changes lower bound of array argument in caller Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/69879] Create a pointer to the default operator new and delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69879 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Daniel Gutson from comment #0) > This issue comes from the following discussion: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2015-11/msg9.html > > In short: Pedro Alves suggested as a solution

[Bug analyzer/93281] Various analyzer testsuite failures for 32-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93281 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/93281] Various analyzer testsuite failures for 32-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93281 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f0303833d542b273da33e4b149974e739d350e5 commit r10-6039-g5f0303833d542b273da33e4b149974e739d350e5 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug target/92692] [9/10 Regression] Saving off the callee saved register between ldxr/stxr (caused by shrink wrapping improvements)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92692 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Wilco Dijkstra : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5e07b68187b9aa334519746c45b8cffc5eb7e5c commit r10-6038-ge5e07b68187b9aa334519746c45b8cffc5eb7e5c Author: Wilco Dijkstra Date:

[Bug bootstrap/92002] [10 regression] -Wuninitialized warning in gcc/wide-int.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92002 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- -Wno-error=uninitialized might be more appropriate for the workaround.

[Bug libstdc++/69879] Create a pointer to the default operator new and delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69879 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- N.B. the new patterns your patch adds to the gnu.ver script need to use '[jmy]' instead of 'm' for the size_t parameters, e.g. __default_operator_new_throw[jmy] Otherwise they will only match targets

[Bug analyzer/93307] New: ODR violations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93307 Bug ID: 93307 Summary: ODR violations Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyzer Assignee:

[Bug tree-optimization/93258] [10 regression] Missed constant folding from constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93258 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Fixed on trunk with g:r10-5888-ge0804c9b5efdf17bbfb692a787df36b86f71af8d. Bisecting latest revisions e0804c9b5efdf17b(10 Jan 2020 13:47)(ja...@redhat.com): [took: 4.921s] result: OK ;; Function fn1

[Bug testsuite/92165] [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp2a/nodiscard-once.C fails starting with r277200

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92165 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69879] Create a pointer to the default operator new and delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69879 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- I missed this question, sorry. The changes needed to add new symbols to libstdc++.so (including adjusting the tests) are documented at:

[Bug target/93133] __builtin_isgreater emits trapping compare instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93133 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/93301] Wrong optimization: instability of uninitialized variables leads to nonsense

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93301 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- So we perform if-conversion on the comparison with an undefined value and from there things go downhill (guess DOM would also happily propagate equivalences). I don't think that C guarantees that 'y' has

[Bug preprocessor/80005] cpp expands __has_include() filename parts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80005 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/91052] [10 Regression] ICE in fix_reg_equiv_init, at ira.c:2705

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #9) > I can't reproduce this on both powerpc64le-linux-gnu > (edabbec31e3bfc9a9757f80c8610706ed00e5a1a) and ppc64-redhat-linux (r278916), > IIUC I need the powerpc-e300c3

[Bug other/92784] [10 regression] ICE when compiling g++.dg/torture/pr59226.C after r278944

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92784 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/93306] New: Unnecessary file I/O done for #if 0 && __has_include(...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93306 Bug ID: 93306 Summary: Unnecessary file I/O done for #if 0 && __has_include(...) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug tree-optimization/93271] [8/9/10 regression] SRA producing wrong code on denormals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93271 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/93264] [10 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4522

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93264 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/93258] [10 regression] Missed constant folding from constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93258 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/93305] New: [OpenACC] 'acc_shutdown' vs. active data lifetimes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93305 Bug ID: 93305 Summary: [OpenACC] 'acc_shutdown' vs. active data lifetimes Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/93227] [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/std-layout1.C fails starting with r280065

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93227 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/93221] [10 Regression] ICE maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90) on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93221 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/93199] [8/9/10 Regression] Compile time hog in sink_clobbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93199 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/93169] [10 regression] Variable incorrectly put into readonly section.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93169 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug ipa/93144] [10 Regression] 459.GemsFDTD debug info size increase by 50% since r279563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93144 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 93144, which changed state. Bug 93144 Summary: [10 Regression] 459.GemsFDTD debug info size increase by 50% since r279563 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93144 What|Removed

[Bug testsuite/92955] [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr60505.c fails starting with r279392

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92955 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from Richard

[Bug c++/92918] [8/9/10 Regression] Does not do name lookup when using from base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92918 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/92909] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE on incorrect lambda inside variadic template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92909 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/92879] [10 Regression] incorrect warning of __builtin_memset offset is out of the bounds on zero-size allocation and initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92879 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/93304] RISC-V: Function with interrupt attribute use register without save/restore at prologue/epilogue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93304 --- Comment #1 from Kito Cheng --- Created attachment 47669 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47669=edit pr93304-v1.patch

[Bug lto/92588] [10 Regression] ICE nodes with unreleased memory found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92588 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > AFAIU this is just a warning that we fail to "free" some GC memory? It looks to me like this. Btw. I can't reproduce that on current master right now.

[Bug c++/92852] [8/9/10 Regression] location references block not in block tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92852 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug testsuite/92829] [10 regression] several test case failures starting with r278983

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92829 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/92822] [10 Regression] vfma_laneq_f32 and vmul_laneq_f32 are broken on aarch64 after r278938

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92822 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/92819] [10 Regression] Worse code generated on avx2 due to simplify_vector_constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92819 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/92815] [8/9/10 Regression] spurious -Wstringop-overflow writing into a flexible array of an extern struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92815 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/92788] [10 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2313

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92788 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug other/92784] [10 regression] ICE when compiling g++.dg/torture/pr59226.C after r278944

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92784 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug fortran/92779] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_funcall, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:4225

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92779 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c/92773] [8/9/10 Regression] GCC compilation with big array / header is infinite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92773 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug debug/92763] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_abstract_function, at dwarf2out.c:22659, or in force_type_die, at dwarf2out.c:26224

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92763 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/92718] [8/9/10 Regression] Bogus Wstringop-overflow in __builtin_memset() of an element of array of size 1 of struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92718 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/92071] [10 regression][ARM] ice in gen_movsi, at config/arm/arm.md:5378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92071 --- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > Agreed. Did anybody bisect what caused this? It only came to light when we added a check in the backend. So I'm not sure a bisect will be that helpful,

[Bug c++/92654] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in lookup_template_class_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92654 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug ipa/92606] [8/9/10 Regression][avr] invalid merge of symbols in progmem and data sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92606 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/92625] [8/9/10 Regression] Internal compiler error accessing element in static constexpr char array in template class using alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92625 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug ipa/92606] [8/9/10 Regression][avr] invalid merge of symbols in progmem and data sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92606 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/52985] Postincrement not applied after indexing ternary array expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52985 Roland Wintersteller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roland.wintersteller@wallne

[Bug target/91052] [10 Regression] ICE in fix_reg_equiv_init, at ira.c:2705

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91052 --- Comment #9 from Kewen Lin --- I can't reproduce this on both powerpc64le-linux-gnu (edabbec31e3bfc9a9757f80c8610706ed00e5a1a) and ppc64-redhat-linux (r278916), IIUC I need the powerpc-e300c3 environment header/library as sysroot for

[Bug target/93304] New: RISC-V: Function with interrupt attribute use register without save/restore at prologue/epilogue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93304 Bug ID: 93304 Summary: RISC-V: Function with interrupt attribute use register without save/restore at prologue/epilogue Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/92601] [9/10 Regression] error: type variant differs by TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92601 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug lto/92600] [9/10 Regression] ICE: symtab_node::verify failed, building 523.xalancbmk_r with -flto -fno-inline since r267359

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92600 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/92593] [10 Regression] ICE with CTAD using undeclared constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Priority|P3

[Bug lto/92588] [10 Regression] ICE nodes with unreleased memory found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92588 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c++/92583] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92583 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/92539] [8/9/10 Regression] -Warray-bounds false positive (loop unroll?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92539 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/92536] [10 Regression] ICE when trying to using deduction guide following unknown type error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92536 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/92531] [9/10 Regression] ICE in uses_template_parms, at cp/pt.c:10471

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92531 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/92517] [10 Regression] ICE on incorrect syntax involving requires and decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92517 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/92388] [10 Regression] ICE in insert_regs, at cse.c:1129

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92388 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug libstdc++/92376] [9/10 Regression] bootstrap fails with --disable-hosted-libstdcxx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92376 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/92328] [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92328 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/92303] [10 regression] gcc.target/sparc/ultrasp12.c times out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92303 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/92264] [10 Regression] Compile time hog in 521.wrf_r with -Ofast -march=znver2 -g since r276318

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/92190] [10 Regression] ICE in sp_valid_at, at config/i386/i386.c:6162 since r276648

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92190 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/92177] [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-22.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92177 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug testsuite/92165] [10 regression] g++.dg/cpp2a/nodiscard-once.C fails starting with r277205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92165 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/92152] [10 Regression] Wrong code (Resurrection of PR53663)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92152 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c++/92099] [9/10 Regression] static_assert of struct template of false_type succeed with GCC8 but not GCC9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92099 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug target/92071] [10 regression][ARM] ice in gen_movsi, at config/arm/arm.md:5378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92071 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection, wrong-code

[Bug c++/92068] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE on invalid in process_partial_specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92068 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/92031] [9/10 Regression] Incorrect "taking address of r-value" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92031 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug bootstrap/92002] [10 regression] -Wuninitialized warning in gcc/wide-int.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92002 --- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- > Did this somehow get fixed (the bootstrap?) or require some nonstandard > configuration? Not at all. I still cannot make any sense of the

[Bug c++/92542] [10 Regression] ICE with class template argument deduction following typo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92542 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- The ICE started with r277865 "Implement C++20 operator<=>." aka g:b7689b962dd6536bbb2567bfdec52e35109af7ab It was fixed with r278786 "Implement P1814R0, CTAD for alias templates." aka

[Bug c++/92010] [8/9/10 Regression] gcc internal error since 8x on warning write-strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug bootstrap/92002] [10 regression] -Wuninitialized warning in gcc/wide-int.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92002 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #8 from Richard

<    1   2   3   >