https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92372
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93322
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93329
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93319
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a2b60b581c373e4ebcee9ee37c0ab2866f98950
commit r10-6090-g1a2b60b581c373e4ebcee9ee37c0ab2866f98950
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Jan 20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93279
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93221
--- Comment #6 from Joel Hutton ---
The regression seems to be introduced by this commit:
commit 11b8091fb33c894cea20702d3e85389723987910
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: Wed Dec 18 23:03:23 2019 +
* ira.c (ira): Use simple LRA algorithm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93246
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Guenther
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20e9d78543493f2f6aeef19af4cea54696247fc8
commit r9-8147-g20e9d78543493f2f6aeef19af4cea54696247fc8
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92763
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Guenther :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:991b91497fd50f6e70e5f2c0cfa96e1b74157bdc
commit r10-6087-g991b91497fd50f6e70e5f2c0cfa96e1b74157bdc
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92763
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Summary|[8/9/10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93327
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93330
Bug ID: 93330
Summary: CHARACTER: Wrong kind=4 resolution + missing
string-length mismatch actual/dummy diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93328
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93329
Bug ID: 93329
Summary: ICE in omp_code_to_statement, at fortran/openmp.c:5902
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, openmp
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92816
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> It does not reproduce for me on bdver1 and also it does not seem to
> reproduce at skylake (with generic tuning)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92955
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
An even simpler test case. Changing the index in g() to unsigned avoids the
warning.
$ cat pr92955.c && gcc -O3 -S -Wall pr92955.c
typedef struct S { unsigned char n, a[4]; } S;
void f (S *s, const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93328
Bug ID: 93328
Summary: missed optimization opportunity in deserialization
code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93314
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92536
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92955
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92763
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92536
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paolo Carlini :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0757f0bbf3edf43a27ec3f7d2c33ab56f26eb15a
commit r10-6085-g0757f0bbf3edf43a27ec3f7d2c33ab56f26eb15a
Author: Paolo Carlini
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93199
--- Comment #25 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92ce93c743b3c81f6911bc3d06056099369e9191
commit r10-6084-g92ce93c743b3c81f6911bc3d06056099369e9191
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93326
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93297
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to fdlbxtqi from comment #3)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> > Thanks for the report. Can you please send us the command line used for the
> > compilation? Ideally output of -v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263
--- Comment #15 from Christophe Lyon ---
> Seen on arm too, both master and gcc-9
And aarch64 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93221
--- Comment #5 from Joel Hutton ---
There's some problem with inserting an OI before an OI, which requires an OI
before it etc.
18: r98:OI=r99:OI
REG_DEAD r97:V4SI
Inserting insn reload before:
19: r99:OI=r97:V4SI#0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92763
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So we're inlining A::omp declare reduction y~i(A::T&)operator()
(const struct ._anon_1 * const __closure) which has no abstract origin.
For the -fno-var-tracking-assignments case we are pruning the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93199
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Summary|[8/9/10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93159
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
SO, at which exact stage it is, can you attach preprocessed source + gcc
options if it is reproduceable with that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93301
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020, ch3root at openwall dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93301
>
> --- Comment #2 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
> The problem is much more serious.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93094
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93094
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Guenther :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c4f0d311810eba3f4faab1295c47eb57e695fcc
commit r10-6083-g9c4f0d311810eba3f4faab1295c47eb57e695fcc
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93313
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93327
Bug ID: 93327
Summary: Performance degradation of povray benchmark from gcc
8.3.1 to gcc 9.2.1
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91753
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93322
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93312
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
