[Bug fortran/93329] ICE in omp_code_to_statement, at fortran/openmp.c:5902

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93329 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/91476] [9/10 Regression] const reference variables sharing the same name in two anonymous namespaces cause a multiple definition error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91476 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8158a4640819dbb3210326e37786fb874f450272 commit r10-6110-g8158a4640819dbb3210326e37786fb874f450272 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/93359] New: Miscompile (loop check omitted) in function with missing return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93359 Bug ID: 93359 Summary: Miscompile (loop check omitted) in function with missing return statement Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug analyzer/93356] ICE in add_constraint, at analyzer/constraint-manager.cc:672

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93356 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/93358] [10 Regression] 447.dealII regresses by 15% after r10-6025-gf5b25e15165adde1356af42e9066ab75c5b37a19

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93358 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/93358] New: [10 Regression] 447.dealII regresses by 15% after r10-6025-gf5b25e15165adde1356af42e9066ab75c5b37a19

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93358 Bug ID: 93358 Summary: [10 Regression] 447.dealII regresses by 15% after r10-6025-gf5b25e15165adde1356af42e9066ab75c5b37a19 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status:

[Bug c/93357] New: Misleading diagnostic for complex int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93357 Bug ID: 93357 Summary: Misleading diagnostic for complex int Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/91084] download_prerequisites fails on OpenBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91084 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/93057] -flto=64 -o "t#o" leads to an error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93057 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/92830] -fdiagnostics-url shows the wrong URL for warnings which are not in 'gcc' but e.g. in 'gfortran'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92830 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- I have a rather hackish patch which checks for CL_Fortran and uses a different page: + const cl_option *cl_opt = _options[option_index]; + + const char *html_page = "gcc/Warning-Options.html";

[Bug tree-optimization/61502] == comparison on "one-past" pointer gives wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502 --- Comment #44 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, ch3root at openwall dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502 > > --- Comment #43 from Alexander Cherepanov --- > The following example

[Bug testsuite/93058] FAIL: g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C -O2 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93058 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/93027] ICE: in match_reload, at lra-constraints.c:1060

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93027 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/92967] ICE in matching_typebound_op, at fortran/interface.c:4214

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92967 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/92960] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'component_ref' in add_decl_as_local, at fortran/trans-decl.c:261

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92960 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/92960] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'component_ref' in add_decl_as_local, at fortran/trans-decl.c:261

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92960 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug analyzer/93356] New: ICE in add_constraint, at analyzer/constraint-manager.cc:672

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93356 Bug ID: 93356 Summary: ICE in add_constraint, at analyzer/constraint-manager.cc:672 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/39695] [F03] ProcPtr function results: wrong name in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695 --- Comment #6 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 47688 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47688=edit attempt to fix remaining issues Initial attempt at fixing the remaining issues. See attached patch.

[Bug fortran/92959] ICE in gfc_conv_associated, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:8634

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92959 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/92830] -fdiagnostics-url shows the wrong URL for warnings which are not in 'gcc' but e.g. in 'gfortran'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92830 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug analyzer/93355] Missing diagnostic for missing fclose in gcc/intl/localealias.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93355 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug analyzer/93355] New: Missing diagnostic for missing fclose in gcc/intl/localealias.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93355 Bug ID: 93355 Summary: Missing diagnostic for missing fclose in gcc/intl/localealias.c Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/93045] gc bug with test "start_unit-test-1.c"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93045 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/93085] ICE in get_class_binding_direct and alias_ctad_tweaks, with C++20 NTTP + CTAD + alias template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93085 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/93090] RFE: Add a frontend for the Rust programming language

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93090 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/70129] [6 Regression] stdlib.h: No such file or directory when using -isystem /usr/include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70129 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Maxim Cournoyer from comment #9) > About not using it: sure, this works, but now how can a project enable > warnings just for their own headers and not those of the whole system? This >

[Bug c++/93107] unable to deduce initializer_list from function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93107 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/93148] Pointer-function-result as LVALUE variable – function called multiple times with copy-in/out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93148 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/91274] vec_splat_[us]64 missing for ppc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91274 --- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt --- The short answer is history. Those others were inherited from the old Altivec PIM. Having splat-immediates with different names for different sizes and signedness isn't consistent with the rest of the

[Bug target/93125] ICE in insert_regs, at cse.c:1128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93125 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93126] PPC altivec -Wunused-but-set-variable false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93126 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/80005] cpp expands __has_include() filename parts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80005 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED --- Comment #11 from Nathan

[Bug target/93127] PPC altivec vec_promote creates unnecessary xxpermdi instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93127 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/93154] can't constrain captured functions to be invocable w/ lambda arg - func/lambda template args mixed up?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93154 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93157] gcc should use -mabi=elfv2 on powerpc64-*-linux-*musl* target by default.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93157 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/93158] Coarray ICE when module and submodule are in separate files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93158 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/93164] variadic template function passed an initializer list fails with argument count mismatch error rather than expected "couldn't deduce template parameter" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93164 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug tree-optimization/93354] [10 Regression] Bogus remove of redundant store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93354 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/93165] avoidable 2x penalty on unpredicted overwrite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93165 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/93168] Error messages are full of control code garbage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93168 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93176] PPC: inefficient 64-bit constant consecutive ones

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93176 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93178] PPC: inefficient 64-bit constant generation if msb is off in low 16 bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93178 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/93181] -Wuninitialized fails to warn about uninitialized value; -Wmaybe-uninitialized should also warn.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93181 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/93354] New: [10 Regression] Bogus remove of redundant store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93354 Bug ID: 93354 Summary: [10 Regression] Bogus remove of redundant store Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug analyzer/93349] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: location references block not in block tree)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93349 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug analyzer/93352] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator not anti-symmetric: -2147483648, -2147483648)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93352 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug analyzer/93350] ICE in make_region_for_type, at analyzer/region-model.cc:5975, or in get_lvalue_1, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4609

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93350 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug d/91238] internal compiler error: in add_expr, at tree.c:7794

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91238 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/91321] commit mails with PR d/1234 do not get to bugzilla

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91321 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/91123] [10 Regression] no longer removes redundant store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91123 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- The mentioned issue should be fixed but we're now no longer using VN_WALKREWRITE because that would pick up unrelated alias-sets from an earlier store.

[Bug target/91274] vec_splat_[us]64 missing for ppc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91274 --- Comment #3 from Lauri Kasanen --- Then why is every other type supported, but not 64? It makes no sense.

[Bug target/91274] vec_splat_[us]64 missing for ppc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91274 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20623 --- Comment #41 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #40) > Follown file fails at all opt levels at both x86_64 and i?86: > > -- testcase.cpp -- > namespace { > bool bar(int i) { return i; } > } > int

[Bug target/93353] New: ICE: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3073 (error: could not split insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93353 Bug ID: 93353 Summary: ICE: in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3073 (error: could not split insn) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug preprocessor/80005] cpp expands __has_include() filename parts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80005 --- Comment #10 from Florian Weimer --- It only affects RISC-V, and the use is not in an installed header, so I think the glibc case is rather harmless. (But that's only because I watched out for this particular issue and requested changes from

[Bug analyzer/93352] New: ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator not anti-symmetric: -2147483648, -2147483648)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93352 Bug ID: 93352 Summary: ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator not anti-symmetric: -2147483648, -2147483648) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/92152] [10 Regression] Wrong code (Resurrection of PR53663)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92152 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- In particular this testcase seems to be exactly what is tested in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/alias-access-path-4.c: struct a {int v1; int v2;}; struct b {struct a a[0];}; union c {struct b b;}; int test2

[Bug tree-optimization/93334] -O3 generates useless code checking for overlapping memset ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93334 --- Comment #5 from N Schaeffer --- Elaborating a bit on this: I can eliminate this problem by using: -O3 -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns -fno-tree-loop-vectorize I wonder why -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns is not enough ? In that

[Bug preprocessor/80005] cpp expands __has_include() filename parts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80005 --- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell --- Florian, the trouble is the older glibcs are out there and people's code will immediately break. That would be bad.

[Bug preprocessor/80005] cpp expands __has_include() filename parts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80005 --- Comment #8 from Florian Weimer --- (And now the glibc stable release branches are fixed as well. Oops.)

[Bug fortran/93309] Wrong error about duplicate implicit none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93309 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/93309] Wrong error about duplicate implicit none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93309 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b31f80231df9ce6d9b50c62d28b8d2a4654ef564 commit r10-6108-gb31f80231df9ce6d9b50c62d28b8d2a4654ef564 Author: Tobias Burnus Date:

[Bug ipa/93351] [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:4014

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93351 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/92372] [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:3671 since r277780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92372 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- > > I'm attaching the preprocessed sources. Build with -std=gnu++17 -fopenmp -O2 > x86-64-linux-gnu. It's something different, please take a look at PR93351.

[Bug ipa/93351] New: [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:4014

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93351 Bug ID: 93351 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:4014 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/80005] cpp expands __has_include() filename parts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80005 --- Comment #7 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #6) > Reopening. Sadly my fear turned out to be true. real code out there > presumes __has_include__ (with the trailing underbars) is how to get at this > feature.

[Bug preprocessor/80005] cpp expands __has_include() filename parts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80005 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug analyzer/93350] New: ICE in make_region_for_type, at analyzer/region-model.cc:5975, or in get_lvalue_1, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4609

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93350 Bug ID: 93350 Summary: ICE in make_region_for_type, at analyzer/region-model.cc:5975, or in get_lvalue_1, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4609 Product: gcc Version:

[Bug tree-optimization/92328] [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92328 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Guenther : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01e9f1812c72c940172700971179d7726b7a3050 commit r10-6107-g01e9f1812c72c940172700971179d7726b7a3050 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/90883] Generated code is worse if returned struct is unnamed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90883 Bug 90883 depends on bug 92328, which changed state. Bug 92328 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5497 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92328 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/92203] [9 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5492

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92203 Bug 92203 depends on bug 92328, which changed state. Bug 92328 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5497 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92328 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/92328] [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_stmt, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:5497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92328 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/93348] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93348 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/93321] Unlimited recursion in prepare_block_for_update

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93321 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/93321] Unlimited recursion in prepare_block_for_update

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93321 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6fc2f9337311c11dabcc464c808cbef205f17a52 commit r10-6106-g6fc2f9337311c11dabcc464c808cbef205f17a52 Author: Andrew Pinski Date:

[Bug analyzer/93349] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: location references block not in block tree)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93349 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp --- Comment #1 from Richard

[Bug libfortran/92836] segfault with inquire()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836 --- Comment #17 from Janne Blomqvist --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #15) > Did we conclude that this is an expected race condition? > > I run the example comment 14 and it just hangs for me. Well, hangs in what sense? For me it

[Bug analyzer/93349] New: ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: location references block not in block tree)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93349 Bug ID: 93349 Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: location references block not in block tree) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug fortran/91413] [F2018]: Procedures are recursive by default; switching from stack to static allocation is not safe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91413 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6) > Currently, direct recursive use is still not permitted: > > Error: Function ‘faculty’ at (1) cannot be called recursively, as it is not > RECURSIVE > > This

[Bug driver/91220] -Q --help=common displays options limited to subsets of languages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91220 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/93348] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93348 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.0|8.4 Summary|[10 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/92152] [10 Regression] Wrong code (Resurrection of PR53663)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92152 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > OK, so this happens in visit_reference_op_store which hits > > if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS)) > fprintf (dump_file, "Store matched

[Bug target/93341] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_do_track_speculation, at config/aarch64/aarch64-speculation.cc:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > > /* We should be able to reverse all conditions. */ > > gcc_assert

[Bug fortran/93263] [9/10 Regression] -fno-automatic and RECURSIVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93263 --- Comment #19 from Janne Blomqvist --- This latest commit fixes the testsuite failure. Thanks for the quick fix.

[Bug target/93341] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_do_track_speculation, at config/aarch64/aarch64-speculation.cc:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341 --- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > /* We should be able to reverse all conditions. */ > gcc_assert (inv_cond_code != UNKNOWN); > > Obvious this code is broken

[Bug ipa/92372] [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:3671 since r277780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92372 --- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer --- Created attachment 47686 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47686=edit Preprocessed C++ sources from graph-tool (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > (In reply to Florian Weimer

[Bug target/91274] vec_splat_[us]64 missing for ppc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91274 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/91277] test.cpp:5:55: internal compiler error: in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:41206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91277 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/92372] [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:3671 since r277780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92372 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #4) > Is this the bug that causes graph-tool to > fail to build with GCC 10? Can you please provide a build log?

[Bug target/91276] Doc typos in __builtin_crypto_vpmsum*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91276 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93341] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_do_track_speculation, at config/aarch64/aarch64-speculation.cc:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/92372] [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:3671 since r277780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92372 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug target/93341] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_do_track_speculation, at config/aarch64/aarch64-speculation.cc:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- /* We should be able to reverse all conditions. */ gcc_assert (inv_cond_code != UNKNOWN); Obvious this code is broken because The quiet UN* was converted into the an

[Bug fortran/93337] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_dt_upper_string, at fortran/module.c:441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93337 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/93337] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_dt_upper_string, at fortran/module.c:441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93337 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/93338] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/92593] [10 Regression] ICE with CTAD using undeclared constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- Another testcase: template struct ref_view { ref_view(T) { }; }; ref_view r{1};

[Bug target/93341] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_do_track_speculation, at config/aarch64/aarch64-speculation.cc:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- The assert triggering is: enum rtx_code inv_cond_code = reversed_comparison_code (cond, insn); /* We should be able to reverse all conditions. */

[Bug fortran/93339] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2830

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93339 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/93341] [10 Regression] ICE in aarch64_do_track_speculation, at config/aarch64/aarch64-speculation.cc:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |richard.sandiford at arm dot com

<    1   2   3   >