https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93369
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
();
| ^~
0x684060 real_maxval(real_value*, int, machine_mode)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20200126/work/gcc-10-20200126/gcc/real.c:2593
0x12d8415 generic_simplify_336
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20200126/work/build/gcc/generic-match.c:15447
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93449
Bug ID: 93449
Summary: PCC: Missing conversion builtin from vector to
_Decimal128 and vice versa
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93448
Bug ID: 93448
Summary: PPC: missing builtin for DFP
quantize(dqua,dquai,dquaq,dquaiq)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90938
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90966
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90992
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #11 from Jason
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90992
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40bf3f1fd058028988b2625f89efe6bb811a4185
commit r10-6239-g40bf3f1fd058028988b2625f89efe6bb811a4185
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90992
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5035cd662459b09605370f2ba41b2238119c69b1
commit r10-6238-g5035cd662459b09605370f2ba41b2238119c69b1
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83832
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
bset, bclr, bnot insns can be utiized with inline asm:
asm volatile ("bclr %1,%0.B"
: "+Q" (*(volatile unsigned char*)byte_addr) : "ir" (bitnum) :
"memory");
When the bitnum is not a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83832
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
Another bit test case I ran into (on GCC 8) is something like
unsigned int bleh = (i & 4) == 0 ? 0 : 3;
An optimized result would be something like
tst #4,r1
stz #0,r14
stnz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78714
Howard Hinnant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howard.hinnant at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92924
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka ---
I further hacked the script to record only values that are useful, where useful
means with greater count then all / TOPN_VALUES / 2. I use same test in GCC
itself (that was bug in original luxou's patch that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93447
Bug ID: 93447
Summary: Value range propagation not working at -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93017
--- Comment #5 from Romain Geissler ---
Ah actually I see this on branch gcc 8 as well, with ISL 0.21. And apparently
it is not making "make check" return an error code, so it's very possible that
I had this error before without noticing it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242
--- Comment #36 from Andrew Pinski ---
MIPS is still broken. I might look into MIPS brokenness next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93436
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE |[9 Regression] ICE during
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93436
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab6cd364eda21d3d24a4df0072c588cc68ff61e0
commit r10-6235-gab6cd364eda21d3d24a4df0072c588cc68ff61e0
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93017
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92002
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> -Wno-error=uninitialized might be more appropriate for the workaround.
In fact one needs both -Wno-error=uninitialized and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92924
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #15)
> This is frequency scaled by #of executions:
>
> == Stats for /aux/hubicka/firefox2019-trunktest ==
> stats for indirect_call:
> total: 160451
> invalid: 542
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93083
Martijn Otto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martijntje at martijnotto dot
nl
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92601
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:091fe099ba9093b8577ad4a10b56e18c6ea3daea
commit r10-6232-g091fe099ba9093b8577ad4a10b56e18c6ea3daea
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93446
Bug ID: 93446
Summary: Improve -Wconversion warning message
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93445
Bug ID: 93445
Summary: Misnamed git tags
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93444
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #127 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-01-25 9:16 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote:
> As can be seen above, stage1 binaries are just under 9 times the size of final
> -O2 compiled binaries. I believe you have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92924
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
This is frequency scaled by #of executions:
== Stats for /aux/hubicka/firefox2019-trunktest ==
stats for indirect_call:
total: 160451
invalid: 542 (0.34%) freq:276193364 (33.87%)
tracked values:
0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93301
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov ---
Pasted that to new PR 93444 (should have done that right away, sorry).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93444
Bug ID: 93444
Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] unswitching introduces
unconditional use of uninitialized variable
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93301
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92924
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka ---
> This seems reasonable well, 542/(21514+3151+866+11) = 2%.
I think one needs to consider only calls that was trained and have at least two
possible targets. With this metric it is more like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92924
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #12)
> This is stat for Firefox with current mainline.
>
> == Stats for firefox2019-trunktest ==
> stats for indirect_call:
> total: 160451
> invalid: 542
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93443
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93443
Bug ID: 93443
Summary: gcc/cp/coroutines.cc:3555:23: runtime error: load of
value 255, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93442
Bug ID: 93442
Summary: lambda in if constexpr fails to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
opaque(y);
}
}
--
$ gcc -std=c11 test.c && ./a.out
x = 1; x - 1 = 0
$ gcc -std=c11 -O3 test.c && ./a.out
x = 1; x - 1 = 5
--
gcc x86-64 version: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92924
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
This is stat for Firefox with current mainline.
== Stats for firefox2019-trunktest ==
stats for indirect_call:
total: 160451
invalid: 542
tracked values:
0 values: 134367 times (83.74%)
1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93301
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> But the first use of the undefined value in the comparison makes
> everything wobbly.
So `if (x == y)` is UB. Or `x == y` is already UB?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93441
Bug ID: 93441
Summary: _Generic selections ought to be treated as
parenthesized expressions as far as
-Wlogical-not-parentheses is concerned
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93440
--- Comment #1 from ikonomisma at googlemail dot com ---
Created attachment 47712
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47712=edit
Minimal example c++ source code to trigger unreachable SIMD vector code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93440
Bug ID: 93440
Summary: scalar unrolled loop makes vectorized code unreachable
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
-64 version: gcc (GCC) 10.0.1 20200126 (experimental)
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93439
Bug ID: 93439
Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in gimple_duplicate_bb, at
tree-cfg.c:6277
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93412
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93412
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9947bac0799b0c91e21b7c612b80cd0b54016f0
commit r10-6230-ga9947bac0799b0c91e21b7c612b80cd0b54016f0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93430
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93430
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:322db86f4b4df1261308e8a02e69018d9cea98e9
commit r10-6229-g322db86f4b4df1261308e8a02e69018d9cea98e9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93438
Bug ID: 93438
Summary: ICE in operator[], at vec.h:867
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
50 matches
Mail list logo
