[Bug ipa/93621] [10 Regression] ICE in redirect_call_stmt_to_callee, at cgraph.c:1443

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93621 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/93618] [10 Regression] : unknown array size in delete when using C++20 standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93618 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug tree-optimization/93616] Missed chance to use alias checks to vectorise invariant indirection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93616 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/93614] C++ compile error with struct in template class and < operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93614 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid --- Comment #2 from

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 --- Comment #213 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #212) > (In reply to Rich Felker from comment #211) > > If new reports are going to be marked as duplicates of this, then can it > > please be moved from SUSPENDED

[Bug ipa/93621] New: [10 Regression] ICE in redirect_call_stmt_to_callee, at cgraph.c:1443

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93621 Bug ID: 93621 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in redirect_call_stmt_to_callee, at cgraph.c:1443 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug fortran/93599] [9/10 regression] Bug in fortran asynchronous I/O wait function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/92875] GCC ignores the floating-point 'f' suffix in C11 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92875 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 --- Comment #212 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Rich Felker from comment #211) > If new reports are going to be marked as duplicates of this, then can it > please be moved from SUSPENDED status to REOPENED? The situation is far > worse than

[Bug middle-end/93195] -fpatchable-function-entries : __patchable_function_entries should consider comdat groups

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93195 Bug 93195 depends on bug 93536, which changed state. Bug 93536 Summary: -fpatchable-function-entries -ffunction-sections doesn't work with --gc-sections https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93536 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/93195] -fpatchable-function-entries : __patchable_function_entries should consider comdat groups

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93195 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- *** Bug 93536 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/93536] -fpatchable-function-entries -ffunction-sections doesn't work with --gc-sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93536 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 --- Comment #211 from Rich Felker --- If new reports are going to be marked as duplicates of this, then can it please be moved from SUSPENDED status to REOPENED? The situation is far worse than what seems to have been realized last this was worked

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 --- Comment #210 from Rich Felker --- If new reports are going to be marked as duplicates of this, then can it please be moved from SUSPENDED status to REOPENED? The situation is far worse than what seems to have been realized last this was worked

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugdal at aerifal dot cx --- Comment #209

[Bug c++/93620] Floating point is broken in C++ on targets with excess precision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93620 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/93620] New: Floating point is broken in C++ on targets with excess precision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93620 Bug ID: 93620 Summary: Floating point is broken in C++ on targets with excess precision Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/82318] -fexcess-precision=standard has no effect on a libm function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82318 Rich Felker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugdal at aerifal dot cx --- Comment #5

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #137 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2020-02-05 10:18 p.m., peter.bisroev at groundlabs dot com wrote: > I just had a chance to do some testing tonight. So attempting to bootstrap > 8.3.0 in stock configuration gives PCREL21B

[Bug rtl-optimization/93561] [bounds checking] memory overflow for spill_for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93561 --- Comment #3 from vfdff --- thanks very much!

[Bug analyzer/93288] ICE in supergraph.cc:180

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING

[Bug analyzer/93375] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93375 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING

[Bug analyzer/93405] Passing constant arguments to subroutines in Fortran ... and the analyzer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93405 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING

[Bug analyzer/93375] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93375 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- Does the patch in comment #6 fix the remaining test failures for everyone?

[Bug analyzer/93375] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93375 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13f5b93e6453d121abc15c718dfcc588aca976c3 commit r10-6496-g13f5b93e6453d121abc15c718dfcc588aca976c3 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug c++/91465] [9/10 Regression] unexpected expression of kind overload (ICE)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91465 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek

[Bug rtl-optimization/93565] Combine duplicates count trailing zero instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- What makes that move redundant? I don't see it.

[Bug target/93569] [10 regression] r10-6419 causes ICE in gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-15d.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93569 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/93569] [10 regression] r10-6419 causes ICE in gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-15d.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93569 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a66219dce7fcba068a0998dd926e2ffc6857f149 commit r10-6494-ga66219dce7fcba068a0998dd926e2ffc6857f149 Author: Michael Meissner

[Bug rtl-optimization/93565] Combine duplicates count trailing zero instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com --- Comment #6 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/93561] [bounds checking] memory overflow for spill_for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93561 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d26f37a16e3ed3d75a93ffb1da10c44c36a8a36d commit r10-6493-gd26f37a16e3ed3d75a93ffb1da10c44c36a8a36d Author: Vladimir N. Makarov

[Bug rtl-optimization/93565] Combine duplicates count trailing zero instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- IOW, we need hard numbers, not guesstimates :-)

[Bug rtl-optimization/93565] Combine duplicates count trailing zero instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93565 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Why would that be unlikely? It lengthens the lifetime of that pseudo, potentially significantly.

[Bug tree-optimization/93616] Missed chance to use alias checks to vectorise invariant indirection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93616 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/93616] Missed chance to use alias checks to vectorise invariant indirection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93616 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/93512] Introduce rotate_truncation_mask

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93512 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- I said (or I meant, at least) that as far as I see and know, all rotate instructions on all machines do this truncation. It is of course possible for targets to write it in RTL that only works for a

[Bug target/87612] Bad diagnostic for conflicting mcpu and march options on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87612 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/93619] New: aarch64 target testsuite is so broken with -mcpu=*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93619 Bug ID: 93619 Summary: aarch64 target testsuite is so broken with -mcpu=* Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/92517] [10 Regression] ICE on incorrect syntax involving requires and decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92517 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/70070] ICE on initializing character data beyond min/max bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70070 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #10 from kargl

[Bug fortran/70070] ICE on initializing character data beyond min/max bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70070 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug analyzer/93288] ICE in supergraph.cc:180

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm

[Bug fortran/70913] ICE in gfc_encode_character, at fortran/target-memory.c:227

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70913 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug analyzer/93405] Passing constant arguments to subroutines in Fortran ... and the analyzer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93405 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm

[Bug lto/93609] gcc -flto -fno-comon places symbols into ".text" section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93609 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #2) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > > Hello, it's a known and reported issue: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2020-01/msg00022.html >

[Bug target/90763] PowerPC vec_xl_len should take const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90763 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #2) > Whoops, that was not supposed to go to bz. Sorry about that. Hehe. Sure, I'll do it next time.

[Bug c++/86269] [concepts] ICE with intermediate concepts notation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86269 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 86269, which changed state. Bug 86269 Summary: [concepts] ICE with intermediate concepts notation https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86269 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 87441, which changed state. Bug 87441 Summary: [concepts] Found compiler internal error: in tsubst at cp/pt.c:13657 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87441 What|Removed

[Bug c++/87441] [concepts] Found compiler internal error: in tsubst at cp/pt.c:13657

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87441 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/79759] [concepts] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13509

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79759 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 79759, which changed state. Bug 79759 Summary: [concepts] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13509 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79759 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/80746] [concepts] ICE evaluating constraints for concepts with dependent template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80746 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80746] [concepts] ICE evaluating constraints for concepts with dependent template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80746 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 80746, which changed state. Bug 80746 Summary: [concepts] ICE evaluating constraints for concepts with dependent template parameters https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80746 What|Removed

[Bug c++/80773] [Concepts] Internal Compiler error on template parameter pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80773 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 80773, which changed state. Bug 80773 Summary: [Concepts] Internal Compiler error on template parameter pack expansion https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80773 What|Removed

[Bug c++/82740] [concepts] requires clause evaluated early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82740 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 82740, which changed state. Bug 82740 Summary: [concepts] requires clause evaluated early https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82740 What|Removed |Added

[Bug analyzer/93375] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93375 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from David

[Bug target/93532] RISCV g++ hangs with optimization >= -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wilson at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/93532] RISCV g++ hangs with optimization >= -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532 --- Comment #12 from Jim Wilson --- A bisection on mainline between the gcc-8 and gcc-9 releases shows that this testcase was fixed by a combine patch for PR87600 that stops combining hard regs with pseudos to reduce register pressure. The

[Bug lto/93609] gcc -flto -fno-comon places symbols into ".text" section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93609 --- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Hello, it's a known and reported issue: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2020-01/msg00022.html >

[Bug c++/93618] [10 Regression] : unknown array size in delete when using C++20 standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93618 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/91212] [8/9/10 Regression] const ignored for ctor arguments within return since r8-2493-g4ce8c5dea53d8073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91212 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 47793 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47793=edit Fix This patch fixes the pre-P1825 bug, but breaks the PR58051 test which is not actually allowed by DR 1579 (but is

[Bug target/91638] powerpc -mlong-double-NN (documentation) issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91638 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- That isn't documentation.

[Bug fortran/93497] ICE in gfc_conv_array_constructor_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:7594

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93497 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:38:05AM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > > --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 02:06:01AM +, sgk at troutmask dot >

[Bug c++/91212] [8/9/10 Regression] const ignored for ctor arguments within return since r8-2493-g4ce8c5dea53d8073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91212 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #5) > I think this is a bug in pre-P1825R0 handling of the restriction that the > first overload resolution fails "if the type of the first parameter of the > selected

[Bug c++/93618] New: [10 Regression] : unknown array size in delete when using C++20 standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93618 Bug ID: 93618 Summary: [10 Regression] : unknown array size in delete when using C++20 standard Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/91212] [8/9/10 Regression] const ignored for ctor arguments within return since r8-2493-g4ce8c5dea53d8073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91212 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- I think this is a bug in pre-P1825R0 handling of the restriction that the first overload resolution fails "if the type of the first parameter of the selected constructor is not an rvalue reference to the

[Bug c++/93617] Ternary operator calling a noreturn function should not cause type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93617 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Definitely invalid, even with the standard [[noreturn]] attribute.

[Bug rtl-optimization/87763] [9/10 Regression] aarch64 target testcases fail after r265398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763 --- Comment #66 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bba0c624c8b1d6e54dc58091dd21b0c2ab000434 commit r10-6485-gbba0c624c8b1d6e54dc58091dd21b0c2ab000434 Author: Richard Sandiford

[Bug rtl-optimization/87763] [9/10 Regression] aarch64 target testcases fail after r265398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763 --- Comment #66 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bba0c624c8b1d6e54dc58091dd21b0c2ab000434 commit r10-6485-gbba0c624c8b1d6e54dc58091dd21b0c2ab000434 Author: Richard Sandiford

[Bug rtl-optimization/87763] [9/10 Regression] aarch64 target testcases fail after r265398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763 --- Comment #65 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b65a1eb3fae53f2e1ea1ef8c1164f490d55855a1 commit r10-6484-gb65a1eb3fae53f2e1ea1ef8c1164f490d55855a1 Author: Richard Sandiford

[Bug c++/93614] C++ compile error with struct in template class and < operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93614 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/93617] Ternary operator calling a noreturn function should not cause type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93617 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/93597] [10 Regression] ICE in get_fns since r10-6219

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93597 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/93617] Ternary operator calling a noreturn function should not cause type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93617 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I doubt we are going to accept an extension here.

[Bug c++/93617] Ternary operator calling a noreturn function should not cause type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93617 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/93597] [10 Regression] ICE in get_fns since r10-6219

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93597 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a136a214ede91ef05caac017814b142883dc80d commit r10-6482-g4a136a214ede91ef05caac017814b142883dc80d Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug c++/93617] New: Ternary operator calling a noreturn function should not cause type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93617 Bug ID: 93617 Summary: Ternary operator calling a noreturn function should not cause type errors Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/93578] [10 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:1949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93578 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/90763] PowerPC vec_xl_len should take const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90763 --- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt --- Whoops, that was not supposed to go to bz. Sorry about that.

[Bug target/90763] PowerPC vec_xl_len should take const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90763 --- Comment #1 from wschmidt at linux dot ibm.com --- Hi Martin, Could you please CC me on all ppc bugs as well as Segher?  I do all of the "project management" activities for the IBM GCC team. Thanks! Bill On 2/6/20 8:28 AM, marxin at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/93616] New: Missed chance to use alias checks to vectorise invariant indirection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93616 Bug ID: 93616 Summary: Missed chance to use alias checks to vectorise invariant indirection Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/93561] [bounds checking] memory overflow for spill_for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93561 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov --- Thank you for reporting this. It seems the bug did not manifested itself before as the most targets have virtual hard registers as the last hard regs. I'll commit your patch today. Thank you again.

[Bug target/93611] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2207 since r10-6451-gb7b3378f91c0641f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93611 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #47788|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/93615] [10 Regression] unwind.h on arm can't be compiled with -std=c11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93615 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Untested fix: 2020-02-06 Jakub Jelinek PR target/93615 * config/arm/unwind-arm.h (gnu_Unwind_Find_got): Rename to ... (_Unwind_gnu_Find_got): ... this. Use __asm instead of asm.

[Bug target/93615] [10 Regression] unwind.h on arm can't be compiled with -std=c11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93615 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/93615] New: [10 Regression] unwind.h on arm can't be compiled with -std=c11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93615 Bug ID: 93615 Summary: [10 Regression] unwind.h on arm can't be compiled with -std=c11 Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/93581] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_dataptr_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:6951

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93581 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug c++/93614] New: C++ compile error with struct in template class and < operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93614 Bug ID: 93614 Summary: C++ compile error with struct in template class and < operator Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/93498] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_findloc, at fortran/iresolve.c:1844 since r9-3688-g01ce9e31a02c8039

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93498 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 07:24:36AM +, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93498 > > --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- > (In reply to kargl from comment

[Bug target/93594] Missed optimization with _mm256_set/setr_m128i intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93594 --- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > if we change the cast patterns so that they are a > vec_concat of the operand and UNSPEC_CAST that then represents just the > uninitialized higher part,

[Bug target/93613] Missed optimization with _mm256_permute2x128_si256 intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93613 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- I've tried: --- gcc/config/i386/sse.md.jj 2020-02-06 13:40:27.485007762 +0100 +++ gcc/config/i386/sse.md 2020-02-06 15:24:35.097743017 +0100 @@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ (define_c_enum "unspec" [ ;; For AVX2

[Bug target/93594] Missed optimization with _mm256_set/setr_m128i intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93594 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- _mm256_permute2x128_si256 issue moved to separate PR93613.

[Bug preprocessor/55971] Preprocessor macros with C++11 raw string literals fail to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55971 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid CC|

[Bug target/93613] New: Missed optimization with _mm256_permute2x128_si256 intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93613 Bug ID: 93613 Summary: Missed optimization with _mm256_permute2x128_si256 intrinsic Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/90746] __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc should not be tail called

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90746 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/90753] missing -Warray-bounds with an extern index in out-of-bounds range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90753 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >