https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88975
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0, 9.3.0
Summary|ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94026
--- Comment #4 from Fei Yang ---
(In reply to Fei Yang from comment #0)
> Created attachment 47966 [details]
> proposed patch to fix this issue
>
> Simple test case:
> int
> foo (int c, int d)
> {
> int a = (c >> d) & 7;
>
> if (a >= 2) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94182
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Considering it is documented in another place where char is signed or
> unsigned. I don't know if this needs to change.
Given only the compiler warning about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Bin Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4e9a59105a81cdd6c1328b0a5ed9fe4cc82840e
commit r10-7184-ge4e9a59105a81cdd6c1328b0a5ed9fe4cc82840e
Author: Bin Cheng
Date: Mon Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87733
--- Comment #36 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The kernel jumps back to an instruction *before* the syscall?!?
(I do not want to know about that any more, then, I am sure :-) )
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94186
Bug ID: 94186
Summary: compiler incorrectly accepts a requires clause with
predicate of non-bool type
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93248
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92068
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92909
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92909
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3747bca3849b1e06358db9cb2389d8089c49e3e
commit r9-8379-gc3747bca3849b1e06358db9cb2389d8089c49e3e
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92909
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eee8f2161e072c1b9da4f334f882c385a27baa1f
commit r8-10128-geee8f2161e072c1b9da4f334f882c385a27baa1f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92068
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fed9ac72ee6c1b36d20a9550803835daaac174db
commit r8-10127-gfed9ac72ee6c1b36d20a9550803835daaac174db
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93248
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23690790dd739f1cdd33a8249304b8f17e296c38
commit r8-10126-g23690790dd739f1cdd33a8249304b8f17e296c38
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93248
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb05d702a17476fb658a59a6661d1f69394da786
commit r9-8377-gcb05d702a17476fb658a59a6661d1f69394da786
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92068
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2fa5f9e380b794053a0dd8a8cc63f8bfab370d22
commit r9-8378-g2fa5f9e380b794053a0dd8a8cc63f8bfab370d22
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61872
Alexander Cherepanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ch3root at openwall dot com
---
zlib zstd
gcc version 10.0.1 20200315 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94184
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94182
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Considering it is documented in another place where char is signed or unsigned.
I don't know if this needs to change.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94184
Bug ID: 94184
Summary: Global variable inline constructor elision.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93903
Frédéric Recoules changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frederic.recoules@univ-gren
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94183
Bug ID: 94183
Summary: If constraints allow but only memory, expression
should be an lvalue
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94182
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94182
Bug ID: 94182
Summary: Document -Wchar-subscripts
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87733
--- Comment #35 from Rich Felker ---
> Oh, your real code is different, and $10 doesn't work for that? I see.
No, the real code is exactly that. What you're missing is that the kernel,
entered through syscall, has a jump back to the addu after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87733
--- Comment #34 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Oh, your real code is different, and $10 doesn't work for that? I see.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93952
Frédéric Recoules changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89229
--- Comment #33 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d74caf21be7025db8fef997e87ebf3b85acaf4a
commit r10-7182-g9d74caf21be7025db8fef997e87ebf3b85acaf4a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Mar 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94179
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94181
Bug ID: 94181
Summary: Misidentified dangling reference in container
implementation
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17898
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94157
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94180
Bug ID: 94180
Summary: inconsistent operand constraints: "+X"
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94179
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
A better test-case:
struct kgem_bo {
int rq;
int list;
int pinned_batches[];
} a;
int b;
void fn1() {
(struct kgem_bo *)((char *)_batches[b > 4096] -
(char *)&((struct kgem_bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94179
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94179
Bug ID: 94179
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at
gimplify.c:14399 since r10-7127-gcb99630f254aaec6
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67960
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94040
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92303
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94042
--- Comment #50 from Martin Liška ---
commit r10-7160-g5c7e6d4bdf879b437b43037e10453275acabf521
Author: Segher Boessenkool
Date: Thu Mar 12 07:12:50 2020 +
df: Don't abuse bb->aux (PR94148, PR94042)
The df dataflow solvers use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94105
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
commit r10-7168-g5c048755ec98645f8436b630df3f9294ca9cbc2a
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Tue Mar 10 19:03:37 2020 -0400
analyzer: handle NOP_EXPR in get_lvalue [PR94099,PR94105]
PR analyzer/94099
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94099
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
commit r10-7168-g5c048755ec98645f8436b630df3f9294ca9cbc2a
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Tue Mar 10 19:03:37 2020 -0400
analyzer: handle NOP_EXPR in get_lvalue [PR94099,PR94105]
PR analyzer/94099
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92379
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
commit r10-7169-g50c96067c8ed60f4b3fcbee89fe31c905241b356
Author: Aaron Sawdey
Date: Fri Mar 13 18:14:22 2020 -0500
Fix UBSAN error, shifting 64 bit value by 64.
2020-03-13 Aaron Sawdey
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94178
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 94178 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
0200315012740-g9c3cdb43c2b-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 10.0.1 20200315 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93566
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125
--- Comment #7 from bin cheng ---
Patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-March/542038.html
It's a latent bug exposed by the mentioned alias analysis change, however:
unsigned char b, f;
short d[1][8][1], *g = [0][3][0];
int
50 matches
Mail list logo
