[Bug middle-end/81172] Expected new warning option -Warray-bounds-pointer-arithmetic

2020-04-13 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81172 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/94583] [10 Regression] ICE in get_defaulted_eh_spec, at cp/method.c:2421

2020-04-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94583 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- We crash on the assert in get_defaulted_eh_spec: 2417 if (sfk == sfk_comparison) 2418 { 2419 /* We're in synthesize_method. Start with NULL_TREE, build_comparison_op 2420 will adjust as

[Bug c++/92416] ICE with spaceship and vector types

2020-04-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92416 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/94588] Improve redeclared parameter name diagnostic

2020-04-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94588 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/94588] Improve redeclared parameter name diagnostic

2020-04-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94588 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7eee265e6bd58bf48da70fef97f2ac7179a9f41c commit r10-7709-g7eee265e6bd58bf48da70fef97f2ac7179a9f41c Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

2020-04-13 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/94585] Automatic LHS reallocation issue with debug options

2020-04-13 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94585 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/94583] [10 Regression] ICE in get_defaulted_eh_spec, at cp/method.c:2421

2020-04-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94583 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/94588] Improve redeclared parameter name diagnostic

2020-04-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94588 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- ...nor in the outermost block of any handler associated with a function-try-block: void g (int i) try { } catch (...) { int i; }

[Bug c++/94588] Improve redeclared parameter name diagnostic

2020-04-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94588 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/94588] New: Improve redeclared parameter name diagnostic

2020-04-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94588 Bug ID: 94588 Summary: Improve redeclared parameter name diagnostic Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 92307, which changed state. Bug 92307 Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow on a memcpy into an array with out-of-bounds variable offset https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92307 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/92307] missing -Wstringop-overflow on a memcpy into an array with out-of-bounds variable offset

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92307 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/92326] [10 Regression] wrong bound in zero-length array diagnostics

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/92326] [10 Regression] wrong bound in zero-length array diagnostics

2020-04-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09f041390245da60411a9f0e08c4bedf7430585a commit r10-7706-g09f041390245da60411a9f0e08c4bedf7430585a Author: Martin Sebor Date: Mon

[Bug rtl-optimization/94587] New: Intrinsics optimization bug with -O2 -march=skylake-avx512

2020-04-13 Thread lopresti at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94587 Bug ID: 94587 Summary: Intrinsics optimization bug with -O2 -march=skylake-avx512 Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/94586] New: trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

2020-04-13 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 Bug ID: 94586 Summary: trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf' Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/30334] [meta-bug] Request for -Wundefined

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30334 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/94470] [8/9 Regression] Constexpr variable initialization with self-modifying constructor incorrectly rejected since r7-6728

2020-04-13 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94470 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] Constexpr

[Bug c++/94521] Infinite loop with decltype of function parameter of type decltype([]{})

2020-04-13 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94521 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78572] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4968

2020-04-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78572 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:077dd9b3f17710da8af6adce816754ddceb57b5a commit r10-7704-g077dd9b3f17710da8af6adce816754ddceb57b5a Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug c++/94521] Infinite loop with decltype of function parameter of type decltype([]{})

2020-04-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94521 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dcb779916502a44b4ae67d6bf60eb59474bd78c commit r10-7705-g1dcb779916502a44b4ae67d6bf60eb59474bd78c Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug c++/94470] [8/9/10 Regression] Constexpr variable initialization with self-modifying constructor incorrectly rejected since r7-6728

2020-04-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94470 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:077dd9b3f17710da8af6adce816754ddceb57b5a commit r10-7704-g077dd9b3f17710da8af6adce816754ddceb57b5a Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug c++/83028] Incorrect -Wsequence-point warning in correct C++17 code with new evaluation order rules

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83028 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug fortran/94585] New: Automatic LHS reallocation issue with debug options

2020-04-13 Thread jeremie.vandenplas at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94585 Bug ID: 94585 Summary: Automatic LHS reallocation issue with debug options Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/44004] gcc 4.5.0 vms-gcc_shell_handler.c needs #define __NEW_STARLET

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44004 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/89025] Wrong point of declaration for enumeration names

2020-04-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89025 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > None of the other compilers I've tried implement seem to implement this. s/implement//

[Bug target/94557] [9 regression] r9-8486 causes several builtin instruction test case execution failures on power 9

2020-04-13 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94557 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/89025] Wrong point of declaration for enumeration names

2020-04-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89025 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/49716] internal compiler error: in new_Cloog_Domain_from_ppl_Pointset_Powerset

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49716 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME CC|

[Bug target/94557] [9 regression] r9-8486 causes several builtin instruction test case execution failures on power 9

2020-04-13 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94557 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 48263 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48263=edit Proposed patch to fix the problem. This patch backports a necessary fix from the trunk to fix the problem.

[Bug c++/71218] Add a warning about "new T[integer-literal]"

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71218 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug middle-end/81172] Expected new warning option -Warray-bounds-pointer-arithmetic

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81172 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0 Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 81172, which changed state. Bug 81172 Summary: Expected new warning option -Warray-bounds-pointer-arithmetic https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81172 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/30334] [meta-bug] Request for -Wundefined

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30334 Bug 30334 depends on bug 81172, which changed state. Bug 81172 Summary: Expected new warning option -Warray-bounds-pointer-arithmetic https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81172 What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/94565] C++20: Comparing comparison category types against 0/nullptr is not noexcept

2020-04-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94565 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/94584] New: memw is missing before u8/u16 volatile loads

2020-04-13 Thread jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94584 Bug ID: 94584 Summary: memw is missing before u8/u16 volatile loads Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/94566] conversion between std::strong_ordering and int

2020-04-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94566 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/87732] Detect and eliminate unnecessary new/delete pairs

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87732 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78104] optimizer doesn't grok C++ new/delete yet

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78104 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla@poradnik-webmaster

[Bug web/94581] Error in upcoming release notes

2020-04-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94581 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/90629] Support for -Wmismatched-new-delete

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90629 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug driver/19856] GCC_EXEC_PREFIX used wrong

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19856 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-04-13 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/57974] std::pow(std::complex(0),1) returns (-nan,-nan)

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57974 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING CC|

[Bug target/94556] FAIL: nptl/tst-thread-exit-clobber

2020-04-13 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94556 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com

[Bug c++/94583] New: [10 Regression] ICE in get_defaulted_eh_spec, at cp/method.c:2421

2020-04-13 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94583 Bug ID: 94583 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in get_defaulted_eh_spec, at cp/method.c:2421 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/94454] ICE 'canonical types differ for identical types'

2020-04-13 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94454 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #10) > I cannot reproduce it, it is frustratingly difficult to do so. > but looking at the gist referenced in comment #1 I > see that the complaint is about two

[Bug ipa/94582] New: [10 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error: invalid calls_comdat_local flag)

2020-04-13 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94582 Bug ID: 94582 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error: invalid calls_comdat_local flag) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/94454] ICE 'canonical types differ for identical types'

2020-04-13 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94454 --- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell --- I cannot reproduce it, but looking at the gist referenced in comment #1 I see that the complaint is about two instances of the same instantiation of struct std::integral_constant > One of which has

[Bug target/84328] [8/9/10 Regression] -finline-small-functions and inline keyword lead to slowdown since version 6

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84328 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/92828] array out of bounds access in libcpp/mkdeps.c

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92828 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug web/94581] New: Error in upcoming release notes

2020-04-13 Thread schnetter at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94581 Bug ID: 94581 Summary: Error in upcoming release notes Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web

[Bug lto/48065] LTO: assertion failed in optimize_inline_calls, at tree-inline.c:4246

2020-04-13 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48065 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/92326] [10 Regression] wrong bound in zero-length array diagnostics

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|wrong bound in zero-length |[10 Regression] wrong bound

[Bug fortran/94270] [8/9/10 Regression] Bogus unused dummy argument warning/error

2020-04-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94270 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Not quite a one-liner, but looks good: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/interface.c b/gcc/fortran/interface.c index 75a50c999b7..8f041f0a0a8 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/interface.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/interface.c @@

[Bug middle-end/94580] missing warning accessing an interior flexible array member

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
bl b .bss .align 8 .type b, @object .size b, 8 b: .zero 8 .ident "GCC: (GNU) 10.0.1 20200413 (experimental)" .section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?

[Bug middle-end/94580] New: missing warning accessing an interior flexible array member

2020-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94580 Bug ID: 94580 Summary: missing warning accessing an interior flexible array member Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/94270] [8/9/10 Regression] Bogus unused dummy argument warning/error

2020-04-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94270 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/94270] Bogus unused dummy argument warning/error

2020-04-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94270 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug fortran/94110] Erroneous code compiling

2020-04-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94110 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/94571] Error: Expected comma or semicolon, comma found

2020-04-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94571 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/87644] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE due to variable named "parameters"

2020-04-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87644 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec72bb0c48cfbd8b9812a6df1049fbcbad472e15 commit r10-7700-gec72bb0c48cfbd8b9812a6df1049fbcbad472e15 Author: Thomas König Date:

[Bug c++/85278] [concepts] Garbled diagnostic

2020-04-13 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85278 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/94579] OVS compiled with gcc10 with -fanalyzer

2020-04-13 Thread u9012063 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94579 --- Comment #2 from William Tu --- libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I ./include -I ./include -I ./lib -I ./lib -Wstrict-prototypes -Wall -Wextra -Wno-sign-compare -Wpointer-arith -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wswitch-enum

[Bug c/94579] OVS compiled with gcc10 with -fanalyzer

2020-04-13 Thread u9012063 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94579 --- Comment #1 from William Tu --- Created attachment 48260 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48260=edit flow.i file in zip format

[Bug c/94579] New: OVS compiled with gcc10 with -fanalyzer

2020-04-13 Thread u9012063 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94579 Bug ID: 94579 Summary: OVS compiled with gcc10 with -fanalyzer Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/94192] ICE on wrong code

2020-04-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94192 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug fortran/94192] ICE on wrong code

2020-04-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94192 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efbf7392079222ef00db2d39998faf5513055181 commit r10-7699-gefbf7392079222ef00db2d39998faf5513055181 Author: Linus Koenig Date:

[Bug fortran/94578] Incorrect assignment of RESHAPE() result to a Fortran pointer

2020-04-13 Thread howisjw at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94578 --- Comment #2 from Jan-Willem Blokland --- Created attachment 48259 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48259=edit Program bug_reshape

[Bug fortran/94578] Incorrect assignment of RESHAPE() result to a Fortran pointer

2020-04-13 Thread howisjw at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94578 --- Comment #1 from Jan-Willem Blokland --- Below are the results of the test program. The results of array1d should have been identical to array2d. --- array2d --- 1 1 0.100E+01 0.100E+01 0.100E+01 0.100E+00

[Bug fortran/94578] New: Incorrect assignment of RESHAPE() result to a Fortran pointer

2020-04-13 Thread howisjw at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94578 Bug ID: 94578 Summary: Incorrect assignment of RESHAPE() result to a Fortran pointer Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/94426] [10 Regression] ICE in mangle_decl with -flto

2020-04-13 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94426 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

Chakravarthy Nelluri

2020-04-13 Thread Chakravarthy Nelluri
gcc bugs http://steellegframe.xyz/8e7GpAQ/caravan/ Chakravarthy Chakravarthy Nelluri abacaxi Image by Dooder (Shutterstock). Photos by SparkFun Electronics, Juhan Sonin, Blondin Rikard (Flickr). reputedly straggling entertainers unstructured impinged zgabefilu

[Bug c/94577] New: aarch64:Add error message in large code model for ilp32

2020-04-13 Thread duanbo3 at huawei dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94577 Bug ID: 94577 Summary: aarch64:Add error message in large code model for ilp32 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/94470] [8/9/10 Regression] Constexpr variable initialization with self-modifying constructor incorrectly rejected since r7-6728

2020-04-13 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94470 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/66573] Unexpected change in static, branch-prediction cost from O1 to O2 in if-then-else.

2020-04-13 Thread gcc-bugs at hussar dot me.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66573 --- Comment #12 from Jason --- This significant change appears to have been resolved in g++ v8.1.0. So now g++ does the same as the massive corpus of computer science and other compilers.

[Bug target/94556] [10 Regression] FAIL: nptl/tst-thread-exit-clobber

2020-04-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94556 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efc1f3577f38bb213b313661c025ac965baee953 commit r10-7697-gefc1f3577f38bb213b313661c025ac965baee953 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Mon Apr 13

[Bug c++/59980] Diagnostics relating to template-specialisations using enums.

2020-04-13 Thread gcc-bugs at hussar dot me.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59980 Jason changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/59980] Diagnostics relating to template-specialisations using enums.

2020-04-13 Thread gcc-bugs at hussar dot me.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59980 --- Comment #6 from Jason --- And lo! Finally! This appears to have been done in g++ v9.3.0. Amazing! Huzzah!

[Bug target/61837] missed loop invariant expression optimization

2020-04-13 Thread luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61837 --- Comment #5 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org --- "-O2 -funswitch-loops" could generate expected code for s<=0, unswitch-loops is enabled by -O3, so this issue is reduced to duplicate of PR67288? foo: .LFB0: .cfi_startproc cmpwi

[Bug tree-optimization/94574] aarch64: ICE during GIMPLE pass:ccp

2020-04-13 Thread yangyang305 at huawei dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94574 --- Comment #2 from yangyang --- (In reply to yangyang from comment #1) > A simple fix for this issue has been prepared https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/543760.html

[Bug tree-optimization/94574] aarch64: ICE during GIMPLE pass:ccp

2020-04-13 Thread yangyang305 at huawei dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94574 --- Comment #1 from yangyang --- A simple fix for this issue has been prepared

[Bug target/94576] Regression build newlib for Arm64

2020-04-13 Thread trass3r at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94576 --- Comment #1 from Trass3r --- Looks like it also happens with newlib-3.3: https://github.com/Trass3r/bleeding-edge-toolchain/runs/582133302

[Bug target/94576] New: Regression build newlib for Arm64

2020-04-13 Thread trass3r at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94576 Bug ID: 94576 Summary: Regression build newlib for Arm64 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c++/94575] New: Bogus warning: Used variable is “not” used

2020-04-13 Thread bisqwit at iki dot fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94575 Bug ID: 94575 Summary: Bogus warning: Used variable is “not” used Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/94574] New: aarch64: ICE during GIMPLE pass:ccp

2020-04-13 Thread yangyang305 at huawei dot com
f unsigned int v4si __attribute__((vector_size(16))); /* The aliasing is somewhat dubious here, but it must compile. */ v4si f2 (void) { v4si res; *(svuint32_t *) = svindex_u32 (0, 1); return res; } --- GCC version: 10.0.1 20200413 (experimental) Result: deref_1.c: In function ‘f2’: dere

[Bug libgomp/92843] [OpenACC] Wrong/missing dynamic reference counting for structured 'REFCOUNT_INFINITY'

2020-04-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92843 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a99a8431e670a6c0ac861d738249ff4d94d6552e commit r9-8495-ga99a8431e670a6c0ac861d738249ff4d94d6552e Author: Thomas

[Bug libgomp/92843] [OpenACC] Wrong/missing dynamic reference counting for structured 'REFCOUNT_INFINITY'

2020-04-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92843 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af4c92573dc462a17a6c345756889d28054ed591 commit r10-7693-gaf4c92573dc462a17a6c345756889d28054ed591 Author: Thomas Schwinge

[Bug target/94504] On powerpc, -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections is not as effective as expected for PIE and PIC

2020-04-13 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94504 --- Comment #7 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #6) > Since it is very unlikely that a bugzilla entry for gcc or binutils will > prompt anyone to write the necessary linker support or change gcc, I'm >