[Bug c/94631] Wrong codegen for arithmetic on bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94631 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Rich Felker from comment #2) > So basically the outcome of DR120 was allowing the GCC behavior? It still > seems like a bad thing, not required, and likely to produce exploitable bugs > (due to

[Bug target/94630] General bug for changes needed to switch the PowerPC long double default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94630 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 48297 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48297=edit Patch to mangle *printf and *scanf built-ins if long double is IEEE-128

[Bug c/94631] Wrong codegen for arithmetic on bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94631 --- Comment #2 from Rich Felker --- So basically the outcome of DR120 was allowing the GCC behavior? It still seems like a bad thing, not required, and likely to produce exploitable bugs (due to truncation of arithmetic) as well as very

[Bug c/94631] Wrong codegen for arithmetic on bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94631 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/94631] New: Wrong codegen for arithmetic on bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94631 Bug ID: 94631 Summary: Wrong codegen for arithmetic on bitfields Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug rtl-optimization/93974] [10 Regression] ICE in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6403 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu since r10-6762

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93974 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/93974] [10 Regression] ICE in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6403 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu since r10-6762

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93974 --- Comment #24 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd75498db79675a1a0b73c25e5f110969ee72d9d commit r10-7764-gdd75498db79675a1a0b73c25e5f110969ee72d9d Author: Peter Bergner Date:

[Bug target/94630] General bug for changes needed to switch the PowerPC long double default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94630 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner --- When the default is changed, we will need to map __builtin_sprintf and company just like GLIBC will do it if the user includes stdio.h. Otherwise the gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c test fails because

[Bug target/94630] General bug for changes needed to switch the PowerPC long double default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94630 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 48296 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48296=edit Patch do the correct mapping for builtin math functions right when long double default is IEEE.

[Bug target/94630] General bug for changes needed to switch the PowerPC long double default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94630 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |meissner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/94630] New: General bug for changes needed to switch the PowerPC long double default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94630 Bug ID: 94630 Summary: General bug for changes needed to switch the PowerPC long double default Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/92187] [concepts] An abbreviated function template ignores type constraint in some circumstances

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92187 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 --- Comment #24 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 09:32:46PM +, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 > > --- Comment #23 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- > On 2020-04-16 5:07

[Bug c/92326] [10 Regression] wrong bound in zero-length array diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug c++/94359] new test case g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94359 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0ce5baeb642bab57252c687cdf0ffb522e7a2a3 commit r10-7762-gd0ce5baeb642bab57252c687cdf0ffb522e7a2a3 Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug other/94629] New: 10 issues located by the PVS-studio static analyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629 Bug ID: 94629 Summary: 10 issues located by the PVS-studio static analyzer Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/94567] [10 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94567 --- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Comment on attachment 48288 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48288 gcc10-pr94567.patch I think that'll work. If it passes, consider it approved.

[Bug c++/94628] segfault decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94628 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/94628] New: segfault decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94628 Bug ID: 94628 Summary: segfault decltype Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 --- Comment #23 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2020-04-16 5:07 p.m., sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > It is unclear to me if the patch will meet everyone's > expectation. In particular, there are currently no >

[Bug bootstrap/92008] Build failure on cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92008 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #21

[Bug target/94613] S/390: Wrong code generated for vec_sel builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94613 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target|s390x |s390x powerpc*-*-* Last

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 --- Comment #22 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 08:06:00PM +, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 > > --- Comment #21 from John David Anglin --- > Created attachment 48295 >

[Bug libstdc++/94627] New: [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94627 Bug ID: 94627 Summary: [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/94627] [9/10 Regression] std::match_results equality comparisons should not be noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94627 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.4.0 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/88754] [8/9/10 Regression] Constructor call wrongly assumed to be a variable declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88754 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/94426] [10 Regression] ICE in mangle_decl with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94426 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b084efe3fcdfcf88e1703800b9b99347e89beefb commit r10-7761-gb084efe3fcdfcf88e1703800b9b99347e89beefb Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Thu

[Bug libstdc++/91630] std::any SFINAE breaks valid code since 9.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91630 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler --- This looks like a variant fo bug 90415 to me.

[Bug c/94626] -Wstringop-truncation warning should mention attribute((nonstring))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94626 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 --- Comment #21 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 48295 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48295=edit Patch to fix float128 node selection on hpux With this change, the libquadmath routines are now selected on

[Bug target/94538] [10 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2223 (insn does not satisfy its constraints) with -mcpu=cortex-m23 -mslow-flash-data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538 --- Comment #15 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #14) > (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #11) > > (In reply to Wilco from comment #10) > > > Right, but the code is functional. > > It doesn't avoid the literal

[Bug tree-optimization/14441] [tree-ssa] missed sib calling when types change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14441 Rich Felker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugdal at aerifal dot cx --- Comment #11

[Bug target/93932] PowerPC vec_extract with variable element number has code regressions for V2DI/V2DF vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93932 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/94615] -Wstringop-truncation warns on strncpy() with struct lastlog (or utmp)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94615 Allison Karlitskaya changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/94626] New: -Wstringop-truncation warning should mention attribute((nonstring))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94626 Bug ID: 94626 Summary: -Wstringop-truncation warning should mention attribute((nonstring)) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/94615] -Wstringop-truncation warns on strncpy() with struct lastlog (or utmp)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94615 Allison Karlitskaya changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/6906] warn about asserts with side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906 felix changed: What|Removed |Added CC||felix.von.s at posteo dot de --- Comment #9 from

[Bug c/94615] -Wstringop-truncation warns on strncpy() with struct lastlog (or utmp)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94615 --- Comment #3 from Allison Karlitskaya --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Maybe use memcpy then, str* routines generally expect nul-termination "str* routines generally expect nul-termination" doesn't really fly as an

[Bug target/94611] gccgo hangs (infinite loop) on complex projects, seemingly in simplify-rtx.c/simplify_plus_minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94611 --- Comment #10 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Thanks. This may be another example of https://gcc.gnu.org/PR94466.

[Bug libfortran/94625] New: documentation of _gfortran_set_options does not match implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94625 Bug ID: 94625 Summary: documentation of _gfortran_set_options does not match implementation Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/94624] New: Nested lambda mutable capture of outer lambda non-mutable capture is not allowed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94624 Bug ID: 94624 Summary: Nested lambda mutable capture of outer lambda non-mutable capture is not allowed Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/93621] [10 Regression] ICE in redirect_call_stmt_to_callee, at cgraph.c:1443 since r10-5567

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93621 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/93621] [10 Regression] ICE in redirect_call_stmt_to_callee, at cgraph.c:1443 since r10-5567

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93621 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7123347c8b44571811c4b58506b06fb09969bccb commit r10-7760-g7123347c8b44571811c4b58506b06fb09969bccb Author: Martin Jambor Date:

[Bug target/94611] gccgo hangs (infinite loop) on complex projects, seemingly in simplify-rtx.c/simplify_plus_minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94611 --- Comment #9 from Daniel Kolesa --- it finishes with -fno-var-tracking, though it does take up a few gigs of memory and takes a while, this is consistent with the default behavior on x86_64 where it does the same thing.

[Bug target/94538] [10 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2223 (insn does not satisfy its constraints) with -mcpu=cortex-m23 -mslow-flash-data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538 --- Comment #14 from Wilco --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #11) > (In reply to Wilco from comment #10) > Right, but the code is functional. It doesn't avoid the literal load from flash which is exactly what pure-code and

[Bug c++/94483] [9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected type_pack_expansion, have error_mark in add_capture, at cp/lambda.c:607

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94483 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|error-recovery, |ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/94557] [9 regression] r9-8486 causes several builtin instruction test case execution failures on power 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94557 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/93932] PowerPC vec_extract with variable element number has code regressions for V2DI/V2DF vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93932 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Michael Meissner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:baf3a5a94244b4a260810825870be6ecc15fa35a commit r9-8504-gbaf3a5a94244b4a260810825870be6ecc15fa35a Author: Michael

[Bug target/94557] [9 regression] r9-8486 causes several builtin instruction test case execution failures on power 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94557 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Michael Meissner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:baf3a5a94244b4a260810825870be6ecc15fa35a commit r9-8504-gbaf3a5a94244b4a260810825870be6ecc15fa35a Author: Michael

[Bug target/94611] gccgo hangs (infinite loop) on complex projects, seemingly in simplify-rtx.c/simplify_plus_minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94611 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug d/94623] New: ice for ./gdc.test/compilable/interpret3.d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94623 Bug ID: 94623 Summary: ice for ./gdc.test/compilable/interpret3.d Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d

[Bug target/94538] [10 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2223 (insn does not satisfy its constraints) with -mcpu=cortex-m23 -mslow-flash-data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538 --- Comment #13 from Wilco --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #12) > I've posted a patch to fix the regression for your f3() examples: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/543993.html Yes that improves some of the

[Bug c++/94610] 'invalid use of incomplete type' error which show an alias, but without the real type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94610 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/94621] [9/10 Regression] GCC 9.2.1 segfaults when compiling file with -O3 since r9-5354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94621 --- Comment #5 from Ola Olsson --- My god. Insanely fast. Dobra robota/prace!

[Bug tree-optimization/94621] [9/10 Regression] GCC 9.2.1 segfaults when compiling file with -O3 since r9-5354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94621 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48294 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48294=edit gcc10-pr94621.patch Untested fix.

[Bug target/94622] testsuite/gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-1.c fails on powerpc64le with -mpcrel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94622 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-04-16

[Bug c++/94619] String literals as non-type template parameter fails to compile with partial specialization of calling function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94619 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug tree-optimization/94621] [9/10 Regression] GCC 9.2.1 segfaults when compiling file with -O3 since r9-5354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94621 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Summary|GCC 9.2.1

[Bug target/94622] New: testsuite/gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-1.c fails on powerpc64le with -mpcrel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94622 Bug ID: 94622 Summary: testsuite/gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-1.c fails on powerpc64le with -mpcrel Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/94611] gccgo hangs (infinite loop) on complex projects, seemingly in simplify-rtx.c/simplify_plus_minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94611 Daniel Kolesa changed: What|Removed |Added Target||ppc64le-linux-gnu --- Comment #7 from

[Bug target/94538] [10 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2223 (insn does not satisfy its constraints) with -mcpu=cortex-m23 -mslow-flash-data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538 --- Comment #12 from Christophe Lyon --- I've posted a patch to fix the regression for your f3() examples: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/543993.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/94618] [8/9/10 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions since r8-565-g7581ce9a1ad6df9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94618 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/34678] Optimization generates incorrect code with -frounding-math option (#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS not implemented)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34678 --- Comment #43 from Vincent Lefèvre --- Note that the effect of changing the rounding mode after a computation, whether -frounding-math is used or not, is not just that the change of rounding mode may not be honored. If can yield

[Bug c++/66519] [C++14] ICE when using decltype to detect callable return type during SFINAE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66519 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/91538] ICE with generic lambda.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91538 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c/94621] GCC 9.2.1 segfaults when compiling file with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94621 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 94620 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/94620] GCC 9.2.1 segfaults when compiling file with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94620 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug c/94620] GCC 9.2.1 segfaults when compiling file with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94620 --- Comment #1 from Ola Olsson --- Somehow I managed to create two bugs. Sorry about this. Let's do the conversation in the other one (94621).

[Bug c/94621] GCC 9.2.1 segfaults when compiling file with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94621 --- Comment #1 from Ola Olsson --- Created attachment 48292 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48292=edit Preprocessed file of the smallest example I could make

[Bug c++/68394] [concepts] segfault in valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68394 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- Regardless of an answer, it is a duplicate of PR68395.

[Bug c/94621] New: GCC 9.2.1 segfaults when compiling file with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94621 Bug ID: 94621 Summary: GCC 9.2.1 segfaults when compiling file with -O3 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/94620] New: GCC 9.2.1 segfaults when compiling file with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94620 Bug ID: 94620 Summary: GCC 9.2.1 segfaults when compiling file with -O3 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/94611] gccgo hangs (infinite loop) on complex projects, seemingly in simplify-rtx.c/simplify_plus_minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94611 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Kolesa --- Another thing of note, the gccgo command that hangs is the same on both x86_64 and ppc64le

[Bug target/94611] gccgo hangs (infinite loop) on complex projects, seemingly in simplify-rtx.c/simplify_plus_minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94611 Daniel Kolesa changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le-linux-gnu | --- Comment #5 from Daniel Kolesa ---

[Bug target/94606] [10 Regression] ICE creating fixed-length SVE predicate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94606 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/94606] [10 Regression] ICE creating fixed-length SVE predicate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94606 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26bebf576ddcdcfb596f07e8c2896f17c48516e7 commit r10-7759-g26bebf576ddcdcfb596f07e8c2896f17c48516e7 Author: Richard Sandiford

[Bug rtl-optimization/94618] [8/9/10 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions since r8-565-g7581ce9a1ad6df9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94618 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think the difference is much earlier, in cse_local dump there is (with additional --param=min-nondebug-insn-uid=1): deferring deletion of insn with uid = 10060. -deferring deletion of insn with uid =

[Bug rtl-optimization/94618] [8/9/10 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions since r8-565-g7581ce9a1ad6df9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94618 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94578] Incorrect assignment of RESHAPE() result to a Fortran pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94578 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Also wrong: program main implicit none type foo integer :: x, y end type foo integer :: i integer, dimension (2,2) :: array2d integer, dimension(:), pointer :: array1d type(foo),

[Bug fortran/94578] Incorrect assignment of RESHAPE() result to a Fortran pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94578 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- Somewhat smaller test case: program main implicit none type foo integer :: x, y end type foo integer :: i integer, dimension (2,2) :: array2d integer, dimension(:), pointer :: array1d

[Bug c++/94619] New: String literals as non-type template parameter fails to compile with partial specialization of calling function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94619 Bug ID: 94619 Summary: String literals as non-type template parameter fails to compile with partial specialization of calling function Product: gcc Version: 10.0

[Bug debug/94618] [8/9/10 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions since r8-565-g7581ce9a1ad6df9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94618 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/94383] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94383 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Thanks.

[Bug target/94611] gccgo hangs (infinite loop) on complex projects, seemingly in simplify-rtx.c/simplify_plus_minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94611 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Kolesa --- Oh, also, sorry, the process that *actually* gets stuck is go1, not gc1, that was a typo.

[Bug target/94383] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94383 --- Comment #9 from Matthew Malcomson --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > I'd like to ping this, it would be nice to at least decide if this should be > handled for GCC10 or postponed to GCC11 only. Hi Jakub -- I'm taking a look

[Bug target/94611] gccgo hangs (infinite loop) on complex projects, seemingly in simplify-rtx.c/simplify_plus_minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94611 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Kolesa --- The steps I took to reproduce the problem: 1) Grab a Go source release 2) Install gccgo including the 'go' command 3) Then do something like: cd go-1.x export GOROOT_BOOTSTRAP=/usr/lib/go/9.3.0 export

[Bug debug/94618] [8/9/10 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions since r8-565-g7581ce9a1ad6df9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94618 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.4.0 CC|

[Bug target/94611] gccgo hangs (infinite loop) on complex projects, seemingly in simplify-rtx.c/simplify_plus_minus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94611 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Kolesa --- It reproduces on any GCC 9.x series, and when building *any* version of the official Go compiler (tested 1.12-1.14), and many other projects (e.g. gitea). I'm not sure if it reproduces on x86_64, as I don't

[Bug c++/94483] [9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected type_pack_expansion, have error_mark in add_capture, at cp/lambda.c:607

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94483 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/94314] [10 Regression] Optimizing mismatched new/delete pairs since r10-2106-g6343b6bf3bb83c87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94314 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to work|

[Bug c++/94314] [10 Regression] Optimizing mismatched new/delete pairs since r10-2106-g6343b6bf3bb83c87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94314 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7a65edb629a010f7ef907d457343abcb569fab7 commit r10-7758-gd7a65edb629a010f7ef907d457343abcb569fab7 Author: Martin Liska Date:

[Bug libgomp/94612] Failed to build simple examples with offloading.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612 --- Comment #11 from Matthias Klose --- Created attachment 48290 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48290=edit example files

[Bug libgomp/94612] Failed to build simple examples with offloading.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libgomp/94612] Failed to build simple examples with offloading.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > It's likely dup of PR94129. Note that that one ICEs on matching compression algorithms which here the ICE notes the compressed data stream is corrupt. There

[Bug libgomp/94612] Failed to build simple examples with offloading.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Klose --- Both compilers have zstd support. $ gfortran-10 -v prod.f90 -fopenmp -foffload=nvptx-none -o test.x Driving: gfortran-10 -v prod.f90 -fopenmp -foffload=nvptx-none -o test.x -l gfortran -l m -shared-libgcc

[Bug fortran/94129] Using almost any openacc !$acc directive causes ICE "compressed stream: data error"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94129 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8) > > @Richi: Can you please enable zstd for our nvptx cross compiler: > > > > $

[Bug libgomp/94612] Failed to build simple examples with offloading.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #6) > $ /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/accel/nvptx-none/mkoffload -v > mkoffload: fatal error: COLLECT_GCC must be set. > compilation terminated. Then please: $ ldd

[Bug libgomp/94612] Failed to build simple examples with offloading.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #5) > > Perhaps Ubuntu has the offloading and non-offloading compiler configured > > differently, one with zstd compression support and the other without? > > how

[Bug tree-optimization/94617] Simple if condition not optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94617 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > (In reply to David Seifert from comment #5) > > just benchmarked the code on an oldish Ivybridge. GCC with vanilla_bandpass > > is 2.1x slower than GCC with

[Bug libgomp/94612] Failed to build simple examples with offloading.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94612 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose --- $ /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/accel/nvptx-none/mkoffload -v mkoffload: fatal error: COLLECT_GCC must be set. compilation terminated.

  1   2   >