[Bug fortran/93956] Wrong array creation with p => array_dt(1:n)%component

2020-04-19 Thread mscfd at gmx dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93956 --- Comment #3 from martin --- Sorry, indeed the line 'n=1' is missing. Not sure how that single line got lost. There are a few possibilities as a work around for this simple case, but the context where I came upon this bug is (as often)

[Bug c++/94628] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in invalid_nonstatic_memfn_p at cp/typeck.c:1979 since r9-640-g1268ecc26fc1289b

2020-04-19 Thread xerofoify at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94628 --- Comment #7 from Nicholas Krause --- After adding this it seems to work for me, Patrick: case TYPE_ARGUMENT_PACK: if (value_dependent_expression_p(TREE_TYPE(*tp))) return *tp; if (TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARAMETER_PACK(*tp))

[Bug rtl-optimization/94665] New: missed minmax optimization opportunity for if/else structure.

2020-04-19 Thread z.zhanghaijian at huawei dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94665 Bug ID: 94665 Summary: missed minmax optimization opportunity for if/else structure. Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/33799] Return value's destructor not executed when a local variable's destructor throws

2020-04-19 Thread mm-nospam at outlook dot co.nz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33799 mm-nospam at outlook dot co.nz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mm-nospam at outlook dot

[Bug c/94196] Multiple issues with attributes

2020-04-19 Thread nate at thatsmathematics dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94196 Nate Eldredge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nate at thatsmathematics dot com ---

[Bug plugins/94664] build_function_call() on functions with __attribute__((format (printf, ...))) may lead to ICE: SIGSEGV

2020-04-19 Thread yon.goldschmidt at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94664 --- Comment #4 from Yonatan --- > So GCC plugin API is just internal APIs which means there is no plugin > specific API. Yes, that I understood haha, that's why I used build_function_call() in the first place. I saw it in c-common.h so it made

[Bug plugins/94664] build_function_call() on functions with __attribute__((format (printf, ...))) may lead to ICE: SIGSEGV

2020-04-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94664 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Yonatan from comment #2) > Thanks for the reply. > > > NO, the main API was only for Objective-C/c++ code. THIS function is much > > older than the plugin support. > > Shouldn't it be marked

[Bug plugins/94664] build_function_call() on functions with __attribute__((format (printf, ...))) may lead to ICE: SIGSEGV

2020-04-19 Thread yon.goldschmidt at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94664 --- Comment #2 from Yonatan --- Thanks for the reply. > NO, the main API was only for Objective-C/c++ code. THIS function is much > older than the plugin support. Shouldn't it be marked somehow? By comments, or by removal from public

[Bug plugins/94664] build_function_call() on functions with __attribute__((format (printf, ...))) may lead to ICE: SIGSEGV

2020-04-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94664 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/94645] incorrect concept evaluation with decltype, plus internal erropr

2020-04-19 Thread rafael at espindo dot la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94645 --- Comment #2 from Rafael Avila de Espindola --- This reduces to just template concept HasMapInterface = requires(a t) { t.cend; }; template requires HasMapInterface struct l {}; struct mymap { int cend(); }; struct p { static mymap

[Bug objc/94637] [10 Regression] @selector() broken for selectors containing repeated colons

2020-04-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94637 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug plugins/94664] New: build_function_call() on functions with __attribute__((format (printf, ...))) may lead to ICE: SIGSEGV

2020-04-19 Thread yon.goldschmidt at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94664 Bug ID: 94664 Summary: build_function_call() on functions with __attribute__((format (printf, ...))) may lead to ICE: SIGSEGV Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0

[Bug middle-end/94387] Excess read instructions are generated in case of writing to fields of volatile + packed type (structure)

2020-04-19 Thread petro.karashchenko at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94387 --- Comment #7 from Petro Karashchenko --- Is it still 'UNCONFIRMED'? Or it can be moved to 'CONFIRMED' or 'ASSIGNED' state?

[Bug other/94629] 10 issues located by the PVS-studio static analyzer

2020-04-19 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629 --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #14) > There is also this one from cppcheck: > > trunk.git/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/formatter.h:302:40: warning: Redundant > assignment of

[Bug other/94629] 10 issues located by the PVS-studio static analyzer

2020-04-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2c0fa35d0dc8912b0c1a658234221de61e60840 commit r10-7806-ga2c0fa35d0dc8912b0c1a658234221de61e60840 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug target/94663] New: [missed optimization] _mm512_dpbusds_epi32 generates excess vmovdqa64

2020-04-19 Thread gcc at kheafield dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94663 Bug ID: 94663 Summary: [missed optimization] _mm512_dpbusds_epi32 generates excess vmovdqa64 Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/94644] Wrong is_nothrow_move_constructible result if used in a template first

2020-04-19 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94644 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||41437 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/94662] New: __attribute__ aligned is ignored

2020-04-19 Thread petro.karashchenko at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94662 Bug ID: 94662 Summary: __attribute__ aligned is ignored Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug fortran/93364] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_set_array_spec, at fortran/array.c:879

2020-04-19 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93364 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/94661] coroutine ramp function return value ICE for default copy CTOR.

2020-04-19 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94661 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug c++/94661] New: coroutine ramp function return value ICE for default copy CTOR.

2020-04-19 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94661 Bug ID: 94661 Summary: coroutine ramp function return value ICE for default copy CTOR. Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/94660] Wrong subroutine called at runtime than the one called in the source code with deferred subroutines

2020-04-19 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94660 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-04-19

[Bug middle-end/19466] [meta-bug] bit-fields are non optimal

2020-04-19 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19466 Bug 19466 depends on bug 15826, which changed state. Bug 15826 Summary: don't use "if" to extract a single bit bit-field. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15826 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/15826] don't use "if" to extract a single bit bit-field.

2020-04-19 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15826 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/19987] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations in general

2020-04-19 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987 Bug 19987 depends on bug 15826, which changed state. Bug 15826 Summary: don't use "if" to extract a single bit bit-field. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15826 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/19987] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations in general

2020-04-19 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987 Bug 19987 depends on bug 15348, which changed state. Bug 15348 Summary: [tree-ssa] Convert (x < 0) || (y < 0) into (x | y) < 0. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/15348] [tree-ssa] Convert (x < 0) || (y < 0) into (x | y) < 0.

2020-04-19 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com

[Bug d/94455] no [] operator overload for type

2020-04-19 Thread ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94455 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug d/94455] no [] operator overload for type

2020-04-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94455 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f81d84c9ff84f057628de58ebd009112f9d46f9 commit r10-7804-g3f81d84c9ff84f057628de58ebd009112f9d46f9 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Sun

[Bug middle-end/94658] Incorrect transformation with -fstrict-aliasing

2020-04-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94658 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this is a dup of bug 57359.

[Bug c++/94590] Incorrectly accepts invalid C++11 braced initialisation of double from long double if sizeof(long double)==sizeof(double)

2020-04-19 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94590 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug d/94623] ice for ./gdc.test/compilable/interpret3.d

2020-04-19 Thread ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
.30 on fedora x86_64. > > The line that ices is the following: > > assert((*collateral->value->elements)[5]->type->ty == Tclass); > > Hopefully that is enough information to be able to attempt to reproduce > the problem. g++ host: gcc version 9.3.1 20200419 (GCC)

[Bug c++/94590] Incorrectly accepts invalid C++11 braced initialisation of double from long double if sizeof(long double)==sizeof(double)

2020-04-19 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94590 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/94660] Wrong subroutine called at runtime than the one called in the source code with deferred subroutines

2020-04-19 Thread innspg at yahoo dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94660 --- Comment #2 from innspg at yahoo dot fr --- The bug was reproduced with the following version of gfortran: 6.3.0, 7.3.0, 7.5.0, 8.2.0, 8.4.0 and 9.2.0. gfortran 4.8.5 produces the expected result The expected output when the program is ran

[Bug fortran/94660] Wrong subroutine called at runtime than the one called in the source code with deferred subroutines

2020-04-19 Thread innspg at yahoo dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94660 innspg at yahoo dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||innspg at yahoo dot fr ---

[Bug c++/94505] Logical operator inside fold-expression: strange warning

2020-04-19 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94505 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/94660] New: Wrong subroutine called at runtime than the one called in the source code with deferred subroutines

2020-04-19 Thread innspg at yahoo dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94660 Bug ID: 94660 Summary: Wrong subroutine called at runtime than the one called in the source code with deferred subroutines Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug c++/94310] using constructor inheritance breaks the code

2020-04-19 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94310 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Potential fix: --- a/gcc/cp/parser.c +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c @@ -16982,6 +16982,15 @@ cp_parser_template_name (cp_parser* parser, decl = strip_using_decl (decl); + if (TREE_CODE (decl) == USING_DECL +

[Bug lto/94659] New: Missing symbol with LTO and target_clones

2020-04-19 Thread yyc1992 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94659 Bug ID: 94659 Summary: Missing symbol with LTO and target_clones Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug c++/94628] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in invalid_nonstatic_memfn_p at cp/typeck.c:1979 since r9-640-g1268ecc26fc1289b

2020-04-19 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94628 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/93338] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

2020-04-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Likely another missing DECL_EXPR for variable-size stuff. TYPE_SIZE has > > (bitsizetype) (sizetype) _29 * 8 > > and _29 is released. This is confusing.

[Bug d/94609] FAIL: gdc.dg/runnable.d

2020-04-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94609 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc186077486fb6e5453157ad8507c66d0a34017c commit r10-7803-gfc186077486fb6e5453157ad8507c66d0a34017c Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Sun

[Bug c/94658] Incorrect transformation with -fstrict-aliasing

2020-04-19 Thread pascal_cuoq at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94658 --- Comment #1 from Pascal Cuoq --- Clang bug for the same optimization in Clang 10 filed at https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45607

[Bug d/94623] ice for ./gdc.test/compilable/interpret3.d

2020-04-19 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94623 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- Configure flags: ../trunk.git/configure --prefix=/home/dcb/gcc/results.20200416 \ --disable-bootstrap \ --disable-multilib \ --disable-werror \ --enable-checking=df,extra,fold,rtl,yes \

[Bug fortran/93338] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

2020-04-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Correction: Fails with -O, does not fail without optimization.

[Bug fortran/93338] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:282

2020-04-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93338 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- Works now, probably fixed by Paul's work on associate.

[Bug d/94653] gdc.test/fail_compilation/fail8631.d: valgrind error

2020-04-19 Thread ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94653 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/94652] gdc.dg/ubsan/pr88957.d: valgrind error

2020-04-19 Thread ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94652 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug d/94652] gdc.dg/ubsan/pr88957.d: valgrind error

2020-04-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94652 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62f3d4ea899cc1d03e9cf9e1e80b6b4835b4e428 commit r10-7802-g62f3d4ea899cc1d03e9cf9e1e80b6b4835b4e428 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Sun

[Bug d/94653] gdc.test/fail_compilation/fail8631.d: valgrind error

2020-04-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94653 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ace4b1acba8dc9b54b77631d7afd146eaa992c3a commit r10-7801-gace4b1acba8dc9b54b77631d7afd146eaa992c3a Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Sun

[Bug d/94623] ice for ./gdc.test/compilable/interpret3.d

2020-04-19 Thread ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94623 --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #2) > Host and target are the same: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Going to really have to need configure flags, host gcc version, glibc version, etc.

[Bug c/94658] New: Incorrect transformation with -fstrict-aliasing

2020-04-19 Thread pascal_cuoq at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94658 Bug ID: 94658 Summary: Incorrect transformation with -fstrict-aliasing Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/94347] Assignment pointer at declaration

2020-04-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94347 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/94347] Assignment pointer at declaration

2020-04-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94347 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82aa0d5b9b5e288f7f83f69089aef030965046fe commit r10-7798-g82aa0d5b9b5e288f7f83f69089aef030965046fe Author: Thomas König Date:

[Bug fortran/94347] Assignment pointer at declaration

2020-04-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94347 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba36d0b9d472c4193772878969d57d3d5ea1ee5a commit r10-7797-gba36d0b9d472c4193772878969d57d3d5ea1ee5a Author: Thomas König Date:

[Bug fortran/94347] Assignment pointer at declaration

2020-04-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94347 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57129] [8/9/10 Regression] Improve error message for conflicts between PROCEDURE and DERIVED.

2020-04-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57129 --- Comment #21 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e91c0a35e5d1af2018c379962cbe1008788aba72 commit r10-7796-ge91c0a35e5d1af2018c379962cbe1008788aba72 Author: Thomas König Date:

[Bug fortran/93500] ICE in gfc_numeric_ts, at fortran/expr.c:891

2020-04-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93500 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/93500] ICE in gfc_numeric_ts, at fortran/expr.c:891

2020-04-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93500 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4dc6437183aec5439b88b076315ad8f31794d24b commit r10-7795-g4dc6437183aec5439b88b076315ad8f31794d24b Author: Thomas König Date:

[Bug objc/94637] [10 Regression] @selector() broken for selectors containing repeated colons

2020-04-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94637 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1113ffbd619d0568fb3b37e9660d9e0ae7862f5 commit r10-7794-ge1113ffbd619d0568fb3b37e9660d9e0ae7862f5 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug preprocessor/94657] New: [patch] libcpp uses 'AR = ar' tool even if --build/--host are passed explicitly.

2020-04-19 Thread slyfox at inbox dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94657 Bug ID: 94657 Summary: [patch] libcpp uses 'AR = ar' tool even if --build/--host are passed explicitly. Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/94485] [10.0.1, c++2a] g++ optimizes away necessary code, accepts arbitrary inline asm

2020-04-19 Thread dimitri.gorokhovik at free dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94485 --- Comment #5 from Dimitri Gorokhovik --- Build "g++ (GCC) 10.0.1 20200418 (experimental)" does not reproduce the issue on the attached sample code anymore. However: -- adding an asm statement into the sample code gets the issue back. Tried

[Bug d/94609] FAIL: gdc.dg/runnable.d

2020-04-19 Thread ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94609 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug d/94609] FAIL: gdc.dg/runnable.d

2020-04-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94609 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a9ce39f8bbb2ae0798bec0ed2051a5f10b21122 commit r10-7793-g8a9ce39f8bbb2ae0798bec0ed2051a5f10b21122 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Sun