[Bug tree-optimization/96028] [11 Regression] SEGV in vect_create_constant_vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96028 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/96028] [11 Regression] SEGV in vect_create_constant_vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96028 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:105ecbea5f402713130fef4d41bb000e2d23493b commit r11-1788-g105ecbea5f402713130fef4d41bb000e2d23493b Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug debug/95343] IPA-SRA can result in wrong debug info about removed function arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95343 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:053c88093a45f175f446eda009f3312e4e508514 commit r11-1787-g053c88093a45f175f446eda009f3312e4e508514 Author: Martin Jambor Date: Th

[Bug target/90932] [nvptx] internal compiler error: in tree_to_shwi, at tree.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90932 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot com --- Co

[Bug fortran/96030] New: AArch64: Add an option to control 64bits simdclone of math functions for fortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96030 Bug ID: 96030 Summary: AArch64: Add an option to control 64bits simdclone of math functions for fortran Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/96029] New: Inconsistencies with associative/unordered containers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96029 Bug ID: 96029 Summary: Inconsistencies with associative/unordered containers Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug c++/95910] transform view in combination with single view calls const qualified begin even if it is not const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95910 --- Comment #2 from Rene Rahn --- Ok, thanks for the explanation. I do understand the issue now and why it causes the hard error and not an substitution failure. But honestly, given that it works for container because they are wrapped in a ref_v

[Bug middle-end/95830] [11 regression][MIPS/MSA] internal compiler error: in do_store_flag, at expr.c:12247 start with gcc-11-1445-g502d63b6d61

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95830 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug middle-end/95830] [11 regression][MIPS/MSA] internal compiler error: in do_store_flag, at expr.c:12247 start with gcc-11-1445-g502d63b6d61

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95830 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug c++/95700] read-md.c: "missing sentinel in function call" when building gcc with musl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Ilya Leoshkevich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d59a576b8b5e12c3a56f0262912090e2921f5daa commit r11-1785-gd59a576b8b5e12c3a56f0262912090e2921f5daa Author: Ilya Leoshkevich Date

[Bug fortran/52279] Fortran translation issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52279 --- Comment #5 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to markeggleston from comment #4) > Regarding comment 2. > > Using -fallow-invalid-boz results in an ICE. I'll create a new PR. Not true, tried it on the wrong file and jumped to

[Bug c++/94569] alignas(object) with a weaker (smaller) alignment than the alignas(type) of it's type compiles, inconsistent with the C++ standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94569 --- Comment #8 from Inbal Levi --- See here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45890

[Bug c++/94569] alignas(object) with a weaker (smaller) alignment than the alignas(type) of it's type compiles, inconsistent with the C++ standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94569 --- Comment #7 from Inbal Levi --- Not exactly. 94594 is talking about object's members impose their alignment on the object's type, whether this bug is talking about object type imposes its alignment on every object of that type (notice that in

[Bug fortran/52279] Fortran translation issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52279 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc do

[Bug tree-optimization/95961] ICE: in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2182

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95961 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug fortran/52279] Fortran translation issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52279 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0e7c73c515c305863620a821ee85bc557bfbef5 commit r11-1784-gd0e7c73c515c305863620a821ee85bc557bfbef5 Author: Mark Eggleston Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/96028] [11 Regression] SEGV in vect_create_constant_vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96028 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|SEGV in |[11 Regression] SEGV in

[Bug preprocessor/96027] Windows: gcc does not resolve long relative header paths correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96027 --- Comment #1 from Kai Köhne --- This was the result of a bug report for Qt : https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-85157

[Bug c/95857] [8/9/10 Regression] Silencing an unused label warning with (void)&&label; can make gcc segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95857 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression] |S

[Bug c/95857] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Silencing an unused label warning with (void)&&label; can make gcc segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95857 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/96015] [10/11 Regression] gcc-10.1.0 miscompiles Python on hppa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96015 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/96028] SEGV in vect_create_constant_vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96028 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #3) > > --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- > > Do I need some special flags? > > The -m64 is crucial: the test PASSes for me for the default -m32

[Bug tree-optimization/96028] SEGV in vect_create_constant_vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96028 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- > Do I need some special flags? The -m64 is crucial: the test PASSes for me for the default -m32.

[Bug tree-optimization/96028] SEGV in vect_create_constant_vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96028 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Do I need some special flags? > /tmp/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/obj/gcc/ > /home/rguenther/src/gcc3/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr95761.c > -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fno-diagnostics-show-line-numbers > -

[Bug tree-optimization/96028] SEGV in vect_create_constant_vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96028 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- David "fixed" this on trunk with the following, the testcase still fails on the branch and of course we don't know why it exhibits this particular behavior. commit b260e9123e3c80e0f4e18e6a6ac988d63042e741 A

[Bug tree-optimization/96028] SEGV in vect_create_constant_vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96028 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug tree-optimization/96022] ICE during GIMPLE pass: slp in operator[], at vec.h:867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96022 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/96028] New: SEGV in vect_create_constant_vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96028 Bug ID: 96028 Summary: SEGV in vect_create_constant_vectors Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimiza

[Bug tree-optimization/96022] ICE during GIMPLE pass: slp in operator[], at vec.h:867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96022 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5d9f7834ab809841c4ccc90bca74808b4bcaf8d commit r11-1782-gd5d9f7834ab809841c4ccc90bca74808b4bcaf8d Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/95961] ICE: in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2182

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95961 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c9669a0e6cbf477a03024522943197bdb2682d4 commit r11-1781-g5c9669a0e6cbf477a03024522943197bdb2682d4 Author: Fei Yang Date: Thu

[Bug preprocessor/96027] New: Windows: gcc does not resolve long relative header paths correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96027 Bug ID: 96027 Summary: Windows: gcc does not resolve long relative header paths correctly Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

Re: How GCC treats ice-on-invalid-code?

> You mean, an ICE is perfectly valid as the first (and obviously then > only) error diagnostic the compiler prints for “garbage input”? > If so, I don't think that's true. What counts as “garbage” seems > a bit too subjective for that anyway. When the input is totally nonsensical, e.g. generated

[Bug c++/94569] alignas(object) with a weaker (smaller) alignment than the alignas(type) of it's type compiles, inconsistent with the C++ standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94569 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/65685] Reducing alignment with alignas should be rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65685 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 94569 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/65685] Reducing alignment with alignas should be rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65685 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sinbal2l at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/94594] struct containing an aligned obj with stronger alignment, change the alignment accordingly instead of throwing an error, inconsistent with the C++ standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94594 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Keywords|

[Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/96022] ICE during GIMPLE pass: slp in operator[], at vec.h:867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96022 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348 --- Comment #42 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ece21ff6ea9d969d3b6aae82136622a7126eefc1 commit r11-1778-gece21ff6ea9d969d3b6aae82136622a7126eefc1 Author: Martin Liska Date: Tue

[Bug target/96015] [10/11 Regression] gcc-10.1.0 miscompiles Python on hppa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96015 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/95584] ICE in generic_correspondence, at fortran/interface.c:1260

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95584 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc do

[Bug fortran/95446] False positive for optional arguments of elemental procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95446 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc do

[Bug target/96026] New: overlap register bewteen DEST and SOURCE in different machine mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96026 Bug ID: 96026 Summary: overlap register bewteen DEST and SOURCE in different machine mode Product: gcc Version: 9.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/95706] New test case gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

<    1   2