https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96305
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96305
Bug ID: 96305
Summary: Unnecessary signed x unsigned multiplication with
squares or signed variables
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95886
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0e5ec934e7a7473275326e2aee58eaf252cdff1
commit r11-2301-gb0e5ec934e7a7473275326e2aee58eaf252cdff1
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu Jul 23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95907
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96190
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Sergei Trofimovich
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca47325f300462b6f4ea84de2103eef81a4a7684
commit r10-8527-gca47325f300462b6f4ea84de2103eef81a4a7684
Author: Sergei
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90415
Bernd Baumanns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||familiebaumanns at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94738
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 48922
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48922=edit
Patch adjusted for GCC8 and 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96304
--- Comment #2 from D. Richard Hipp ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Does -fno-strict-aliasing helps?
The problem goes away if I compile with -fno-strict-aliasing. I should have
thought to try that.
But, are we violating
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The patch applies and regtest cleanly down to GCC8.
IMO this is nasty wrong code and it should be fixed on all the active branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96304
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does -fno-strict-aliasing helps?
-around here:
https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/40c44d38104dfcb6
The forum post in the first link describes how to recreate the problem. I will
repeat that text here for completeness:
1. Download https://sqlite.org/tmp/gcc-problem-20200723/sftest.c (7.8MB) and
https://sqlite.org/tmp/gcc-problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92006
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
My draft of the standard says: the argument A
shall be a data object of any type. If it is polymorphic it shall not be an
undefined pointer. If it is unlimited polymorphic or has any deferred type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750
--- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Joseph C. Sible from comment #14)
> I notice this change affects -Os too, even though "lock orq $0,(%rsp)" is 6
> bytes and "mfence" is only 3 bytes.
Yes, we can emit mfence for -Os. I'm testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96213
--- Comment #2 from Arthur O'Dwyer ---
Here's a similar situation I just ran into again, somehow!
// https://godbolt.org/z/3TKG1z
struct S {};
template void f() {}
template void g() {}
int main() {
f(); // correctly errors out
g(); //
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95886
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8598657c607500512075f6c4ee3b10460c94903d
commit r11-2298-g8598657c607500512075f6c4ee3b10460c94903d
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a3980ada1bd99cf8df22284862693088e5d1ca7c
commit r10-8525-ga3980ada1bd99cf8df22284862693088e5d1ca7c
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:76a8ff3948ad5a36ccae7305a2e9a7c2499418e5
commit r10-8526-g76a8ff3948ad5a36ccae7305a2e9a7c2499418e5
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41c072bded24642d6b4a38e3f5e2890c1aa8c5a1
commit r8-10372-g41c072bded24642d6b4a38e3f5e2890c1aa8c5a1
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2fe9b1bf79037a90bc5146efe77417b888a86a0
commit r9-8762-gb2fe9b1bf79037a90bc5146efe77417b888a86a0
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93091
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96236
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 79627, which changed state.
Bug 79627 Summary: Ice with type of VLA in lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 79627, which changed state.
Bug 79627 Summary: Ice with type of VLA in lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89336
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92006
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 83583, which changed state.
Bug 83583 Summary: ICE in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at
cp/parser.c:38794
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83583
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83583
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86002
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96303
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96086
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96086
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6dd74062d215682e1f9b3ca618a9d38585dd4831
commit r10-8524-g6dd74062d215682e1f9b3ca618a9d38585dd4831
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bab0c51af90f475dab8f1b306737cd04b06d4b04
commit r10-8523-gbab0c51af90f475dab8f1b306737cd04b06d4b04
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96303
Bug ID: 96303
Summary: Ambiguous overload for operator!= for
std::__debug::bitset compiled with -std=c++20 and
-pedantic.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91525
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96224
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Could you be more explicit about what you would like?
How about:
mod::init ()
or
mod.init ()
to indicate the relevant namespace.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96018
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96018
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7be5add5534f4310b294f1b7ad8855a424edb8c1
commit r9-8761-g7be5add5534f4310b294f1b7ad8855a424edb8c1
Author: Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90623
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89871
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90301
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87032
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96220
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87765
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96302
Bug ID: 96302
Summary: Linux build of gnat/ada fails for lack of gnatdll
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4b3ea941b1a15cadb79e7ff8a36891131f8804b
commit r11-2296-gd4b3ea941b1a15cadb79e7ff8a36891131f8804b
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79367
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-checking, |rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96220
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:159c7ca3c3ce34e401b9e57734ecca8b37d8a0ec
commit r9-8760-g159c7ca3c3ce34e401b9e57734ecca8b37d8a0ec
Author: Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56673
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750
Joseph C. Sible changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||josephcsible at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35098
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96236
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5497677b497b95a261089d19f5295cc80f99a2b6
commit r10-8522-g5497677b497b95a261089d19f5295cc80f99a2b6
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|segher at gcc dot gnu.org |sayle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 68826, which changed state.
Bug 68826 Summary: [concepts] ICE in fold expression with requires
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68826
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68828
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 68826 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68826
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94065
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by David Edelsohn :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb0a835d643394d89b13d4f0ac12f2af3e78228d
commit r9-8759-geb0a835d643394d89b13d4f0ac12f2af3e78228d
Author: David Edelsohn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 68827, which changed state.
Bug 68827 Summary: [concepts] ICE in fold where requires parameter shadows
function argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68827
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68828
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 68827 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68827
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68828
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93690
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96301
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
The static array path has a different ICE, but the underlying cause is the
same.
test.d:20:18: internal compiler error: in convert_memory_address_addr_space_1,
at explow.c:302
20 | auto result
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96301
Bug ID: 96301
Summary: d: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during
RTL pass: expand on armhf/armel/s390x
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94048
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
||2020-07-23
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
This seems to be fixed since
gcc version 9.3.1 20200723 [revision r9-8756-g0a5be099c6f3p2] (GCC).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94738
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96220
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b9f6489081520b7cb10d3ddfae6f010e0986314
commit r10-8521-g5b9f6489081520b7cb10d3ddfae6f010e0986314
Author: Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96300
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96018
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3373a73172d0e39fe054ab2d4bbff746b36c0fe8
commit r10-8520-g3373a73172d0e39fe054ab2d4bbff746b36c0fe8
Author: Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96300
Bug ID: 96300
Summary: missing -Wuninitialized reading a struct member by a
conditionally assigned pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700
--- Comment #20 from vvinayag at arm dot com ---
(In reply to vvinayag from comment #18)
> (In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #17)
> > Created attachment 48917 [details]
> > aarch64 native build fix
> >
> > Could you please try the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95700
--- Comment #19 from vvinayag at arm dot com ---
Created attachment 48921
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48921=edit
Add -std=c++11 to the aarch64 native build fix
This patch adds CXX="$CXX -std=c++11" to the patch provided
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96278
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96295
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96293
lavr at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96293
--- Comment #2 from lavr at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov ---
I don't want my structure to be aligned at the int boundary. I want my
structure to reflect the actual data layout "byte","byte","short","int" as they
are laid out without any gaps, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94065
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.3|10.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96224
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> It seems to me something related to IPA SRA.
> @Martin: Can you please take a look?
I will but -fno-dce -fno-tree-dce strongly suggest this is a duplicate of PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Summary for node e/3:
Returns value
Descriptor for parameter 0:
(locally) unused
param_size_limit: 16, size_reached: 8, by_ref
* Access to unit offset: 0, unit size: 8, type: long int,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96299
Bug ID: 96299
Summary: Defaulted operator <=> implicitly deleted when a
member has operator < and operator == and return type
is specified
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r11-1715-g346bce6fe0cf1ed5f6a7ad732d2361d77b203c87.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
patch for the target hook posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/550534.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
@Martin: Can you please take a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96262
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
a patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/550427.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95486
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96267
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de8bfcc8e45d9c77c48c9f071836698aa6db5ff3
commit r11-2291-gde8bfcc8e45d9c77c48c9f071836698aa6db5ff3
Author: Dong JianQiang
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96285
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Hey Göran.
I like both your suggestions for the documentation update. Can you please send
a patch to the gcc-patches mailing list?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Trying 17, 14 -> 18:
17: r147:DI=r145:DI^r121:DI
REG_DEAD r145:DI
REG_DEAD r121:DI
14: r144:DI=r142:DI^r121:DI
REG_DEAD r142:DI
18: r148:DI=r144:DI^r147:DI
REG_DEAD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96294
--- Comment #4 from PengWang ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> See https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranStandards.
thanks a lot!!! ^_^
1 - 100 of 280 matches
Mail list logo
