https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97409
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kito at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96759
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:78fbe731a8822e819c4ca0e6d6f777c7a2f36bad
commit r11-3860-g78fbe731a8822e819c4ca0e6d6f777c7a2f36bad
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Wed Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97394
--- Comment #6 from Michael Morrell ---
Yes, thanks for the quick fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97413
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97413
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
='-O0 -ggdb3 ' CXXFLAGS='-O0 -ggdb3 ' --enable-valgrind-annotations
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 11.0.0 20201013 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97412
Bug ID: 97412
Summary: [concepts] ICE with requires requires and parameter
packs
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97390
--- Comment #6 from afernandez at odyhpc dot com ---
After reading some more documentation and the pdf that you mentioned, I concur
that the line doesn't follow OpenACC standards. I will keep looking into the
problem (maybe the PGI compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97406
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97411
Bug ID: 97411
Summary: [11 regression] bogus message from
gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c after r11-3840
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97410
Bug ID: 97410
Summary: missing -Warray-bounds with constant index from second
array element
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
support for (32bit)
> > > multilib.
> >
> > so I should build binutils with --disable-multilib?
>
> No, what I am saying is you don't have a new enough binutils.
I am using the latest binutils.
#define BFD_VERSION_DATE 20201013
/* The date below is automatically updated e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97409
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to fdlbxtqi from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > Sounds like the binutils does not have the needed support for (32bit)
> > multilib.
>
> so I should build binutils
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97394
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 49366
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49366=edit
[PATCH] analyzer: don't use in tests [PR97394]
Thanks for filing this bug. Does this patch fix the testsuite for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97409
--- Comment #2 from fdlbxtqi ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Sounds like the binutils does not have the needed support for (32bit)
> multilib.
so I should build binutils with --disable-multilib?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97409
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97409
Bug ID: 97409
Summary: riscv cross toolchain build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97408
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97408
Bug ID: 97408
Summary: Diagnose non-constant KIND argument to intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka ---
bug in SCC discovery. I am testing
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-modref.c b/gcc/ipa-modref.c
index 4f86b9ccea1..771a0a88f9a 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-modref.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-modref.c
@@ -1603,6 +1603,11 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97407
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95310
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk by r11-3372-d6587211c02c4e2566c4e545c09757f3fbb7adab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93083
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97407
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97407
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced:
template T&& declval;
template decltype(declval().begin()) begin_impl(R&);
template
using iter_type_impl = decltype(begin_impl(declval()));
template
struct unrelated
{
using erm =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97407
Bug ID: 97407
Summary: Expanding alias template in concept satisfaction error
is undesirable
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92422
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97404
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97406
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97406
Bug ID: 97406
Summary: Truncated pointer-to-member type in concept
satisfaction error
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
Aha, the code in question is:
# USE = nonlocal null { D.8330 D.22051 D.22054 D.22059 D.22060 } (nonlocal,
escaped, interposable)
# CLB = nonlocal null { D.8330 D.22051 D.22054 D.22059 D.22060 } (nonlocal,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
In WPA we seem to see the store to vector:
Propagated modref for push_without_duplicates/1089577
loads:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97390
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Error compiling acc data|[OpenAError compiling acc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97386
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f76949cee9560d04d5417481dbcda5ca089c9ebc
commit r11-3855-gf76949cee9560d04d5417481dbcda5ca089c9ebc
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97405
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.2
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97405
Bug ID: 97405
Summary: ICE in get_or_alloc_expr_for in code hoisting with SVE
intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
OK, I was poking a bit about the problem and indeed the bootstrapped gnat with
-O3 and PGO ices, while gnat built normally does not.
We fail:
#2 0x019b7dcb in _Z13variable_sizeP9tree_node
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Another test case. Of the buffer overflow in the four functions in it, only a
subset is diagnosed. The subset depends on the form of the assignment in the
IL which in turn changes from target to target.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96879
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
lowpart_subreg will not handle CONST the way we'd need (it will just wrap the
CONST into a SUBREG), but the question is if such imm rtxes can make it through
there, because if the offset is non-constant or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97404
Bug ID: 97404
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] aarch64: Wrong code since
r9-3666-g74ca1c01d
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95788
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96229
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95788
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b814b6b618c8b3f0ff71717b4929a6fdf950714
commit r10--g5b814b6b618c8b3f0ff71717b4929a6fdf950714
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96229
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e8cd9628dcaedbb96bd014e0865e1415484e84b
commit r10-8887-g1e8cd9628dcaedbb96bd014e0865e1415484e84b
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97086
--- Comment #3 from m farazma ---
Sorry the above example needs to be changed to this in order to reproduce the
bug:
```
#include
#include
int main(){
float a = -0.0;
std::cout << nearbyintf(a) << std::endl;
return 0;
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97390
--- Comment #4 from afernandez at odyhpc dot com ---
The code can be downloaded from GitHub:
git clone https://github.com/MPAS-Dev/MPAS-Model
cd MPAS-Model
git checkout atmosphere/v6.x-openacc
My experience with OpenACC is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97086
--- Comment #2 from m farazma ---
Wanted to point out the same happens when using "nearbyint":
```
#include
#include
int main(){
std::cout << nearbyintf(-0) << std::endl;
return 0;
}
```
expected: -0
actual: 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 97379, which changed state.
Bug 97379 Summary: [11 Regression] Invalid read of size 8 at
outgoing_range::calc_switch_ranges(gswitch*) (gimple-range-edge.cc:140) since
r11-3685-gfcae5121154d1c33
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97379
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97369
--- Comment #5 from Seager Du ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> That doesn't look like anything to do with GCC.
Yeap, Thank you for you help on the libstdc++.so issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97379
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:739526a19deaeac19c2429cc7567052834d3098e
commit r11-3852-g739526a19deaeac19c2429cc7567052834d3098e
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97369
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97392
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Thanks, Martin!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97390
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Thanks for checking/confirming that.
Next try:
(In reply to afernandez from comment #0)
> 6475 | !$acc data present([...]) async(counter+1)
> |1
> Error: Unclassifiable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97369
--- Comment #3 from Seager Du ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> You haven't provided sufficient information to tell, but I doubt there's a
> bug here.
>
> Please read these links and confirm if you're using the right
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97399
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92719
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Nikhil Benesch from comment #5)
> Ah, sorry, I was imprecise before. By “system gmp” I meant a gmp installed
> by Homebrew, as in `brew install gmp`.
So ... I am guessing that the default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97390
--- Comment #2 from afernandez at odyhpc dot com ---
Hi Thomas. That was a good guess but it's not the problem. The flag
'-ffree-line-length-none' is already on and there are many other long lines in
the code. The compilation completes when the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97403
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
In general it seems to me that ancestor fuction does not serve much use:
it could be replaced by passthrough with POINTER_PLUS parameter and
handle same information.
However it may make sense to have special
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93295
Steven Franzen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sfranzen85 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97403
Bug ID: 97403
Summary: Ancestor jump function should be generalized
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97382
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97382
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a673744dee7a80e6525fb0da87d053c8ccab6275
commit r11-3847-ga673744dee7a80e6525fb0da87d053c8ccab6275
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
of 'void f(T) [with T = int]':
:5:17: required from here
.../gcc-trunk-20201013/include/c++/11.0.0/concepts:57:15: required for the
satisfaction of '__same_as<_Tp, _Up>' [with _Tp = int; _Up = T]
.../gcc-trunk-20201013/include/c++/11.0.0/concepts:57:32: error: the value of
'std::is_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97380
--- Comment #2 from federico ---
I have an update:
if I remove the ELEMENTAL property from the assignment routines, I get this
error in both the PACK and the array assignments:
Error: Nonallocatable variable must not be polymorphic in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97387
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7)
> > Interesting, i get different ICE
> > during GIMPLE pass: slp
> > ../../gcc/ada/libgnat/s-os_lib.adb: In function
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97395
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97352
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
So a simpler testcase is the following (but hinting at the possibly not generic
enough solution to split the load group):
double a[6], b[6];
void foo()
{
a[0] = b[0];
a[1] = b[1];
a[2] = b[2];
a[3]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97401
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97349
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97349
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d3052a4755173f447cfcffa361086562033c8be
commit r8-10582-g5d3052a4755173f447cfcffa361086562033c8be
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97401
Bug ID: 97401
Summary: static int has a default value?
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97400
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97400
Bug ID: 97400
Summary: [10/11 Regression] SVE: wrong code since
r10-3906-g96eb7d7a64
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97399
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.5.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7)
> Interesting, i get different ICE
> during GIMPLE pass: slp
> ../../gcc/ada/libgnat/s-os_lib.adb: In function
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97387
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- gcc/config/i386/i386.md.jj 2020-10-01 10:40:09.955758167 +0200
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.md 2020-10-13 12:30:13.438172411 +0200
@@ -7039,6 +7039,18 @@ (define_expand "subborrow_0"
(set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
Interesting, i get different ICE
during GIMPLE pass: slp
../../gcc/ada/libgnat/s-os_lib.adb: In function
‘system__os_lib__normalize_pathname__missed_drive_letter’:
../../gcc/ada/libgnat/s-os_lib.adb:2133:7:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97349
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9c1ca3e2fc84b40dc2ab70d12064e3d0eb8abdd
commit r9-8992-gb9c1ca3e2fc84b40dc2ab70d12064e3d0eb8abdd
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97387
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97251
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Przemyslaw Wirkus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d121b3259b77203e62402024add1538c1bdf5fdf
commit r10-8885-gd121b3259b77203e62402024add1538c1bdf5fdf
Author: Alex Coplan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97399
--- Comment #1 from Renlin Li ---
Created attachment 49363
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49363=edit
test case 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97399
Bug ID: 97399
Summary: g++ 9.3 cannot compile SFINAE code with separated
declaration and definition, g++ 7.3 compiles
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97327
--- Comment #5 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Your other one:
-mcpu=cortex-m55+nomve -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve -mfloat-abi=softfp
This has cpu without mve and arch with mve.
Another fun caveat to look at is in:
-mcpu=cortex-m55
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97387
--- Comment #7 from fdlbxtqi ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Trying 10, 17 -> 18:
>10: r88:QI=ltu(flags:CCC,0)
> REG_DEAD flags:CCC
>17: {flags:CCC=cmp(r88:QI-0x1,r88:QI);clobber scratch;}
> REG_DEAD r88:QI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97327
--- Comment #4 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With -mcpu=cortex-m55+nomve should be equivalent to -march=armv8.1-m.main+dsp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97387
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #6 from Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97387
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97389
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97327
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon ---
Well, why does the warning remove the extensions? (+) It seems to indicate
they are not taken into account, which is confusing: it doesn't really say why
there is a conflict.
Why do you think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97327
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97379
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 49361
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49361=edit
proposed patch in testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97379
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
There's a read of a freed block while accessing the default_slot in
calc_switch_ranges.
default_slot->intersect (def_range);
It seems the default_slot got swiped from under us, and the valgrind
dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97398
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
And it's still present after latest Honza's patches as of
g:ca4938fa8e0e72fd59307f1f058db800c1e4a8f3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97392
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97392
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8e0e9417ccda583a1bf05ff08e86fdffbec62b3e
commit r11-3845-g8e0e9417ccda583a1bf05ff08e86fdffbec62b3e
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
