https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53929
--- Comment #7 from jbeulich at suse dot com ---
For the problem originally reported here (operator name space collision) a
workaround could be introduced (e.g. a new operand to .intel_syntax to allow
suppressing the recognition of MASM-like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53929
--- Comment #6 from jbeulich at suse dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> The problem is that the intel asm syntax is just badly defined (broken by
> design). I'm not aware of any compiler that would emit for such testcases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97574
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97559
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97569
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ah right, so
int main()
{
struct A
{
struct B *b;
struct C {} *c;
};
using U = B;
using V = C;
}
For the `struct C {}` case that explicitly defines
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97558
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
But then in vect_fixup_scalar_cycles_with_patterns we leave us with
a reduction chain with eventually half irrelevant stmts because we
mix in-pattern and non-in-pattern stmts for gcc.dg/vect/pr83965-2.c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97576
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
The problem here is that clone materialization invalidates statement pointers
in refs. We clean these at the begining of late optimization, I guess it
should be done on demand during materialization (they are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97576
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97575
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97574
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97551
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97574
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think "nul" should work, but it looks like the error is in the linker,
ld.exe, not GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97558
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Huh. OK, so we're having a !relevant and !live stmt in the SLP tree, and the
removed check for !vectype caught this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97539
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So the fundamental issue is that we have a debug-only live use and we do not
have LC SSA for those. When vectorizer epilogue peeling then creates the
loop copy the debug use is still refering to the first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97577
Bug ID: 97577
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
get_location_from_adhoc_loc)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97559
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so as expected this is
static bool
statement_sink_location (gimple *stmt, basic_block frombb,
gimple_stmt_iterator *togsi, bool *zero_uses_p)
{
...
/* If this is a load
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97565
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97576
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97575
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97559
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97557
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97558
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919
--- Comment #6 from Libin Dang ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Using latest GCC release you can see what happens:
>
> $ g++ pr96919.cc --coverage && ./a.out && gcov a-pr96919.cc -t
> hello
> libgcov profiling
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97576
Bug ID: 97576
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error:
reference to dead statement)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
