Hi,
this is patch that moves updates to WPA time. Does it work for you?
Honza
2020-10-27 Jan Hubicka
* ipa-modref.c (modref_summaries_lto::duplicate): Check that no clones
happens after modref.
(modref_transform): Rename to ...
(update_signature): ... this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589
Bug ID: 97589
Summary: Segementation fault when allocating coarrays.
Product: gcc
Version: coarray_native
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928
--- Comment #31 from Richard Biener ---
The following is a testcase triggering the
/* FORNOW: outer loop induction with SLP not supported. */
if (STMT_SLP_TYPE (stmt_info))
return false;
test:
double image[40];
void
foo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97567
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #3)
> The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48722d158cbf692c24025e345ec570f66aa5
>
> commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417
--- Comment #4 from jiawei ---
I had did some tests with this problem and find:
foo.c
#include
extern volatile bool active;
int foo(void)
{
if (!active) {
return 42;
} else {
return -42;
}
}
code generated in foo.s
foo:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14e19b82c1e67ead60c3095ac23347317298904b
commit r11-4423-g14e19b82c1e67ead60c3095ac23347317298904b
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
> It still fails for me with g:2118438f49f0c193abe3fa3def350a8129045746
> Commit Date: Mon Oct 26 19:05:53 2020 +0100
The PowerPC64 issue is different, let me have a quick look at it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
> There is code in modref-transform that is supposed to update the
> summary. It produces debug output about it, but to be honest I am not
> sure where it will land since we now materialize lazily. Can you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87952
Giuseppe D'Angelo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dangelog at gmail dot com
---
> So the _bfd_safe_read_leb128.constprop removes the first unused argument:
>
...
>
> But the analysis is bogus:
>
> ipa-modref: call to _bfd_safe_read_leb128.constprop/17919 does not clobber
> ref:
> bytes_read alias sets: 7->7
>
> The _read is always modified in the function (if it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
> So the _bfd_safe_read_leb128.constprop removes the first unused argument:
>
...
>
> But the analysis is bogus:
>
> ipa-modref: call to _bfd_safe_read_leb128.constprop/17919 does not clobber
> ref:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
>
> --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
> Thanks for reporting this.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
So the _bfd_safe_read_leb128.constprop removes the first unused argument:
bfd_vma
_bfd_safe_read_leb128 (bfd *abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
bfd_byte *data,
unsigned int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Points to the following statements:
../bfd/../../bfd/dwarf2.c:2321:13
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=bfd/dwarf2.c;h=977bf43a6a181d97fa3ae71329478f9f263b090f;hb=HEAD#l2321
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
One can trigger it only with one debug counter value:
-fdbg-cnt=ipa_mod_ref:869-869 (and multiple LTRANS partitions).
The only changed function is in:
comp_unit_maybe_decode_line_info (struct comp_unit *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Thanks for reporting this.
The expansion of assignments to misaligned ssa names
does not handle the case of misaligned stores, which
would result in incorrect code without the assertion.
I have an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97588
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
So e.g. addr2line is miscompiled:
$ as --32 --compress-debug-sections -o compress.o
/tmp/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/dw2-compress-2.s
The .s file is part of the test-suite.
$ ./addr2line 0x0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97588
Bug ID: 97588
Summary: Overzealous SRA of boolean bitfields
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70940
--- Comment #12 from Rimvydas (RJ) ---
Missing #include in testsuite gives
/z/gg/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/memory_resource/new_delete_resource.cc:
In function 'bool aligned(void*)':
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|[11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97581
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #1)
> No, this would be definitely wrong.
Agreed.
> If the original code does not make you happy, do you think sth. along
>
> #define SZ (SZU64 * (sizeof (uint64_t) /
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
I'm going to analyze it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97560
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18cb6195fda69ea8ab8b8a5290dd8c9f8d52b0e6
commit r11-4404-g18cb6195fda69ea8ab8b8a5290dd8c9f8d52b0e6
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
Created attachment 49445
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49445=edit
Don't extract memory from operand for normal memory constraint.
I'm testing this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97532
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
Created attachment 49444
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49444=edit
Fix invalid address for special memory constraint
I'm testing this patch.
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
