https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Should be fixed now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a774a6a2fbeaf7cbcb7a7afe433418f2d740b45b
commit r11-5190-ga774a6a2fbeaf7cbcb7a7afe433418f2d740b45b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
cvise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97920
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96849
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97926
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97926
Bug ID: 97926
Summary: ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1298
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97915
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97913
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
-fno-delete-null-pointer-check means that objects can live at address zero
so (((const int*)(& arr)) == 0u) is indeed not a constant expression. I
suppose
with -fno-delete-null-pointer-check C++ lacks a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97832
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Michael_S from comment #10)
> I lost track of what you're talking about long time ago.
> But that's o.k.
No problem - difficult PRs tend to be used as media to brain-dump and record
work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97909
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Note that all folding may only ever access SSA use-def chains and cannot rely
on immediate uses. Also it may not use context (aka gimple_bb of def stmts) so
I have a hard time seeing on-demand range
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97901
--- Comment #4 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Hi Richard, thank you to handle this!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417
--- Comment #42 from Jim Wilson ---
riscv_address_cost is a hook, so it is targetm.address_cost which is only
called from address_cost which is only called in a few places one of which is
in postreload.c so that is the one I would look at first.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97925
Bug ID: 97925
Summary: [GCOV]incorrect code coverage for function call for
when multiple Logical OR expressions of a "if"
statement in different lines
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97924
Bug ID: 97924
Summary: [GCOV]incorrect coverage for "?:" statement falls in
different lines
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417
--- Comment #41 from Levy ---
When putting the same debug_rtx(addr) at the first line of riscv_address_cost()
Unpatched one outputs:
(plus:DI (reg/f:DI 15 a5 [88])
(const_int 32 [0x20]))
(plus:DI (reg:DI 10 a0 [92])
(const_int 800
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97923
Bug ID: 97923
Summary: [GCOV]Wrong code coverage for multiple expressions
with Logical OR Operator at multiple lines
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97922
Bug ID: 97922
Summary: inline namespace caused confusing error message
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97921
Bug ID: 97921
Summary: [GCOV]inline function with an incremental argument
lead to incorrect coverage
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97920
Bug ID: 97920
Summary: [FINAL] -O2 segment fault due to extend derive type's
member being partially allocated
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97919
Bug ID: 97919
Summary: [GCOV]volatile member in struct lead to incorrect code
coverage
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
e-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 11.0.0 20201119 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97917
--- Comment #1 from Yibiao Yang ---
$ gcc --version; gcov --version
gcc (GCC) 10.0.1 20200419 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97917
Bug ID: 97917
Summary: [GCOV]incorrect code coverage for intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #24 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #22)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19)
> > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #16)
> > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15)
> > > > (In reply to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Even that should be fixed by the patch I've posted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
Thanks Jakub, that patch does seem to fix the AArch64 build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93917
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96788
Pascal Cuoq changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pascal_cuoq at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3f293348768667c07770e433ff00af51fee73a2
commit r11-5186-gd3f293348768667c07770e433ff00af51fee73a2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93781
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #48008|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93781
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0d8b5d83614d8f0d0e40c0520d4f40ffa01f8d9
commit r11-5185-gd0d8b5d83614d8f0d0e40c0520d4f40ffa01f8d9
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97916
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|documentation |
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97916
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |bootstrap
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97916
--- Comment #1 from Steven Benzel ---
/home/jonny/work/gcc_build/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/jonny/work/gcc_build/./gcc/
-B/home/jonny/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/home/jonny/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97916
Bug ID: 97916
Summary: Can't compile gcc-10.2.0 with --enable-fixed-point
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
g:f5d9bc8ae81abe46640477bc9e655aa093947f5f removed the dependency from
on for most targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876
--- Comment #5 from Eric Niebler ---
> Github's poor life choices should not be our problem ;-)
I thought you'd say that. :-)
> If clang-8 doesn't ship and doesn't work with GCC's
> , I would interpret that as you can't test with
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08b4d325711d5c6f68ac29443aba3fd7aa173ac8
commit r11-5183-g08b4d325711d5c6f68ac29443aba3fd7aa173ac8
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97864
--- Comment #6 from Brad Richardson ---
I recently updated to Big Sur, and have xcode version 12.2, but this initially
occurred on Catalina. I don't know exactly which version of xcode was installed
then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85016
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97864
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> Reverting the following snippet from my fix attempt for pr91651:
That snippet is necessary for the scalarizer during simplification.
The original ICE is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97864
--- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson ---
The above reduced version produces an ICE with gfortran 11.0.0 2020815 built
from source so this is not specific to Homebrew but is specific to macOS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97601
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97908
--- Comment #4 from Jan Engelhardt ---
>don't dlclose a library when you are using anything from it.
That's easier said then done when using C++, as (inline) functions and static
objects can potentially be instantiated in any object file. A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97513
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
Not quite: as of r11-5140, I see:
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/slp_perm_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve
scan-assembler-times \\trevb\\tz[0-9]+\\.d, p[0-7]/m, z[0-9]+\\.d\\n 1
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49595|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97832
--- Comment #10 from Michael_S ---
I lost track of what you're talking about long time ago.
But that's o.k.
Hi,
this ought to be fixed by g:0862d007b564eca8c9a48fca0e689dd3f90db828
sorry for the breakage. OBJ_TYPE_REF in obj-C frontend is odd.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97915
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
this ought to be fixed by g:0862d007b564eca8c9a48fca0e689dd3f90db828
sorry for the breakage. OBJ_TYPE_REF in obj-C frontend is odd.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #23 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #18)
> (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #17)
> -
>
> * I found that there was one incorrect case in libgfortran (where there is a
> direct reference to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559605.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97864
Damian Rouson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||damian at sourceryinstitute
dot or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97915
Bug ID: 97915
Summary: ICE in get_odr_type, at ipa-devirt.c:1930 in pre
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78928
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97860
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8156cfaa4c45f1249bbdda29d04b4fef84b7eafe
commit r11-5180-g8156cfaa4c45f1249bbdda29d04b4fef84b7eafe
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97523
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97523
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae48b74ca0c0ba33d396a6ebad7a1c0a6dadb1f7
commit r11-5179-gae48b74ca0c0ba33d396a6ebad7a1c0a6dadb1f7
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97895
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97895
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25056bdf94d5f3e66bef039702f7fae799ef16b9
commit r11-5178-g25056bdf94d5f3e66bef039702f7fae799ef16b9
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97700
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97745
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97772
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97819
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97820
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-19
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97852
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97908
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97913
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97913
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 97914 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97914
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97895
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97883
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97914
Bug ID: 97914
Summary: -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks not working properly
with constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97913
Bug ID: 97913
Summary: -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks not working properly
with constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97296
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
Current mainline with
1) fix to COMPONENT_REFs described above
2) improvement of ODR type having for THIS pointers
3) gimple_clobber fix (already approved)
4) compare_ao_refs fix for volatile accesses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97704
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97704
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97909
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Macleod ---
Yeah, I'm planning as one of the next steps to replace the
SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO/get_range_info interface with the new range_query interface
from value-query.h
Then we can wire that into the Ranger instance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97513
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97905
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97905
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:255483e5b70beade63efdf1f3efa6b814831da08
commit r11-5176-g255483e5b70beade63efdf1f3efa6b814831da08
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97904
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|richard.sandiford at arm dot com |rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97912
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> It would be good to remove the trivially copyable requirement, and store any
> type of suitable size and alignment to fit in the buffer.
Well, we'd still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97912
Bug ID: 97912
Summary: Get rid of location-invariant requirement in
std::function small object optimisation
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97873
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49588|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97908
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911
Bug ID: 97911
Summary: [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference
to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97910
Bug ID: 97910
Summary: [GCOV]"&&" lead to incorrect code coverage when
multiple expressions of a single statement fall in
different lines
Product: gcc
Version:
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
