https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97577
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
…or, sometimes, it ICEs w/ "internal compiler error: in
linemap_macro_map_lookup, at libcpp/line-map.c:1001".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97692
ninos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52792
Paul "TBBle" Hampson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p_hampson at wargaming dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97434
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97931
Bug ID: 97931
Summary: missing -Wuninitialized initializing an aggregate
member with itself
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sbenzel at acm dot org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97916
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And the default is -std=gnu++17.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For debug/ tests I guess it isn't really used, just documents that the testcase
is valid C++11 or later, because debug/ tests iterate over various debug
options rather than C++ standard options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918
--- Comment #9 from Jan Engelhardt ---
The new g++.dg/debug/localclass2.C test file you added is marked "target
c++11", but it seems I can only cause the crash with -std=c++17 or later
standards. Should the test file perhaps be amended?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97899
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97861
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89d9c634dc5c10b499c23297ef70133066946790
commit r11-5214-g89d9c634dc5c10b499c23297ef70133066946790
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97861
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27c5416fc8a4c2b33a0d6b6a26da2518791e0464
commit r11-5213-g27c5416fc8a4c2b33a0d6b6a26da2518791e0464
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97926
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Confirmed (needs -O0).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97879
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #4)
> Elemental actual arguments are some of those arrays involved.
> Obviously one should not remove some of them in the middle of code
> generation.
> It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97879
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df90f070378583f295dd972db4400f324752a240
commit r11-5209-gdf90f070378583f295dd972db4400f324752a240
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87085
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to ncm from comment #8)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> > (In reply to chengming from comment #4)
> > > Created attachment 44602 [details]
> > > ELF file
> > >
> > > compiled with command
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87085
ncm at cantrip dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ncm at cantrip dot org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97930
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97930
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ugh, we need that base class to make assignment operators work correctly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
and got unavoidably bigger in C++20 due to the extra algos
in std::ranges.
includes so is larger. We can almost certainly replace
with and for 's
purposes, it doesn't use the ranges algos.
got a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96351
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97930
Bug ID: 97930
Summary: pair is not a structural type
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52830
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Last reconfirmed|2014-05-30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97701
--- Comment #5 from Alex Coplan ---
Perhaps more conveniently, simply changing the 0 to a 1 on the RHS of the
ternary operator, the following testcase still ICEs at -O3 on trunk:
extern char a[][12][18][17][17];
extern short
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97515
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Macleod ---
Created attachment 49607
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49607=edit
tweak testcase
The fix for PR 93781 changed the order of some evaluations in the testcase.
the problem is that we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911
--- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks! It is indeed working again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97701
--- Comment #4 from Alex Coplan ---
Indeed, you can recover the ICE on trunk by adding -fno-ssa-phiopt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95853
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97727
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Andrea Corallo
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48b21baa8c7883065aebe0726e6fd3d874a8aedd
commit r10-9058-g48b21baa8c7883065aebe0726e6fd3d874a8aedd
Author: Andrea Corallo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97727
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrea Corallo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f671b3d79fe1ff729e1a3478e38c4839e439d90b
commit r11-5203-gf671b3d79fe1ff729e1a3478e38c4839e439d90b
Author: Andrea Corallo
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97929
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97701
--- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan ---
A bisect in the other direction shows that Jakub's r11-4717-g3e190757f:
commit 3e190757fa332d327bee27495f37beb01155cfab
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Wed Nov 4 10:55:29 2020
phiopt: Optimize x ? 1024 :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96189
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97726
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrea Corallo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86706296b7e5be80c84846a9a72c4d50fa26ee79
commit r11-5201-g86706296b7e5be80c84846a9a72c4d50fa26ee79
Author: Andrea Corallo
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95922
--- Comment #3 from Gabriel Ravier ---
Hm, I guess with the andn it avoids a move, though that isn't much. I posted
this here months ago actually, so idk really what I was thinking... I guess it
might help in some further transformations, but it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97929
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
My bet is
9fc9573f9a5 [2/3] [vect] Add widening add, subtract patterns
exposed the latent issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose ---
just checked with today's trunk and --enable-checking=yes,extra,rtl
working there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97929
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97929
Bug ID: 97929
Summary: ICE: in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219
(vect_get_num_vectors)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97909
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod ---
It should be able to access the currently known global values that have been
computed, or if there isn't one, it could still go and calculate a global
range. Which is what the default condition would be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Dominique, are your compilers configured with --enable-checking=yes,extra,rtl
> ?
Only --enable-checking=yes (the default for experimental).
My instrumented compiler r11-5060 also works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
Dominique, are your compilers configured with --enable-checking=yes,extra,rtl ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97873
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
For the record, the removal of compare triggers:
- for linux x86_64 defconfig: 93 times
- for x86_64 GCC bootstrap: 360 times
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #34 from John David Anglin ---
Still fails on hppa2.0-hp-hpux11.11:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/
-B/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc
-11/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/bin/ -B/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-11/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/lib/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cbbc28706164873d0323d1a6c7988be3f4d971c9
commit r10-9057-gcbbc28706164873d0323d1a6c7988be3f4d971c9
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cbbc28706164873d0323d1a6c7988be3f4d971c9
commit r10-9057-gcbbc28706164873d0323d1a6c7988be3f4d971c9
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a186d72afd6cfb13efd4a0ec82049d79892334fd
commit r10-9056-ga186d72afd6cfb13efd4a0ec82049d79892334fd
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b11c74b0e357652a1f1f0d937455310a6389
commit r10-9055-gb11c74b0e357652a1f1f0d937455310a6389
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:640ebeb336050887cb57417b7568279c588088f0
commit r11-5199-g640ebeb336050887cb57417b7568279c588088f0
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:640ebeb336050887cb57417b7568279c588088f0
commit r11-5199-g640ebeb336050887cb57417b7568279c588088f0
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97922
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced:
namespace test {
inline namespace internal {
struct Type1 { };
}
}
namespace test {
struct Type1; //Type1 is actually in an inline namespace
}
template struct P { };
using Type = P;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97922
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-20
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97928
Bug ID: 97928
Summary: -fstack-clash-protection probe miss
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52830
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Reduced testcase (-g -std=c++17 -O1 -flto):
namespace N {
template
bool c;
}
namespace {
class A {};
class B {};
using D = class C {};
class E {};
}
namespace O::P::Q {
struct F {};
}
namespace O::R {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88101
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1bea0d0aa5936cb36b6f86f721ca03c1a1bb601d
commit r11-5196-g1bea0d0aa5936cb36b6f86f721ca03c1a1bb601d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:410b8f6f41920dad200cd709f9f3de8b840a995c
commit r11-5195-g410b8f6f41920dad200cd709f9f3de8b840a995c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95862
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97421
--- Comment #8 from Roman Zhuykov ---
*** Bug 97440 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97440
Roman Zhuykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 49605
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49605=edit
test case
that's my unsuccessful extraction attempt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
Bug ID: 97927
Summary: gfortran: ICE in lookup_field_for_decl, at
tree-nested.c:288
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97851
Roman Zhuykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97421
--- Comment #7 from Roman Zhuykov ---
*** Bug 97851 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97421
Roman Zhuykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-20
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97421
Roman Zhuykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhroma at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92651
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> Sure. Another option would be to enhance STV even further
> (or add some peephole patterns - combine runs before STV2) to
> transform the
>
> psubd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97873
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97873
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Fixed by:
commit fdace7584056de2f63bde2e3087f26beb6b0f97d
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Fri Nov 20 10:26:34 2020 +0100
i386: Optimize abs expansion [PR97873]
The patch introduces absM named pattern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96929
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 49603
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49603=edit
gcc11-pr96929.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97925
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97924
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97924
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, that's who we expand that:
:
[pr97924.c:10:15] _1 = [pr97924.c:10:15] r_5(D)->obj;
[pr97924.c:9:10] if (_1 != 0B)
goto ; [INV]
else
goto ; [INV]
:
[pr97924.c:10:46] v_8 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97923
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97919
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 97921 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97921
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97919
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97917
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97910
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97701
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
92 matches
Mail list logo
