[Bug tree-optimization/98908] Failure to optimize arithmetic involving struct members into operating on the entire struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98908 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53947 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/98907] Failure to optimize abs pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98907 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/98927] New: Code using _mm_extract_epi16 compiles with -O3 but not on other optimization modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98927 Bug ID: 98927 Summary: Code using _mm_extract_epi16 compiles with -O3 but not on other optimization modes Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98295] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:4312

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98295 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a4f8e2fc771bea21aaac44433e75510362e208c1 commit r10-9335-ga4f8e2fc771bea21aaac44433e75510362e208c1 Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/97582] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have error_mark in add_function_candidate, at cp/call.c:2146 since r9-6405-gbddee796d0b4800b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97582 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/98519] rs6000: @pcrel unsupported on this instruction error in pveclib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98519 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/98519] rs6000: @pcrel unsupported on this instruction error in pveclib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98519 --- Comment #21 from Michael Meissner --- I have patches that fix the problem in the hook. My original idea of not allowing prefixed insns in the hook doesn't work because when the hook is called, it only sees pseudo registers. So what my

[Bug target/98093] ICE in gen_vsx_set_v2df, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:3276

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98093 luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug analyzer/96374] Analyzer erroneously rejects certain diagnostics due to path-feasibility being used on shortest path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96374 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a2750086d57d1a2251d9239fa4e6c2dc9ec3a86 commit r11-7029-g8a2750086d57d1a2251d9239fa4e6c2dc9ec3a86 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug analyzer/93355] Missing diagnostic for missing fclose in intl/localealias.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93355 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a2750086d57d1a2251d9239fa4e6c2dc9ec3a86 commit r11-7029-g8a2750086d57d1a2251d9239fa4e6c2dc9ec3a86 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug analyzer/93355] Missing diagnostic for missing fclose in intl/localealias.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93355 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2f639c4a781016ad146d44f463714fe4295cb6e commit r11-7028-gf2f639c4a781016ad146d44f463714fe4295cb6e Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug analyzer/96374] Analyzer erroneously rejects certain diagnostics due to path-feasibility being used on shortest path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96374 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2f639c4a781016ad146d44f463714fe4295cb6e commit r11-7028-gf2f639c4a781016ad146d44f463714fe4295cb6e Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug other/98926] [11 regression] several ICEs after r11-7011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug d/98921] [11 regression] libphobos: junk in generated symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98921 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/98921] [11 regression] libphobos: junk in generated symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98921 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13ec4505c04c6cadfc22ec1b23fd6edf745ca183 commit r9-9216-g13ec4505c04c6cadfc22ec1b23fd6edf745ca183 Author: Iain Buclaw Date:

[Bug d/98921] [11 regression] libphobos: junk in generated symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98921 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38c2d9598b1b2f23b24f96fd8f58a89344b93609 commit r10-9334-g38c2d9598b1b2f23b24f96fd8f58a89344b93609 Author: Iain Buclaw

[Bug d/98921] [11 regression] libphobos: junk in generated symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98921 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a481021a65d6237b0c509a76fcd9c1f32c4558e commit r11-7027-g6a481021a65d6237b0c509a76fcd9c1f32c4558e Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Tue

[Bug target/98093] ICE in gen_vsx_set_v2df, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:3276

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98093 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > It's fixed on master, can we close it now or do we need a backport to active > branches? If someone filled in the known-to-work / known-to-fail fields we

[Bug d/98921] [11 regression] libphobos: junk in generated symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98921 --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #2) > diff --git a/gcc/d/dmd/dmangle.c b/gcc/d/dmd/dmangle.c > index f6eee52afbf..73d9ac5367f 100644 > --- a/gcc/d/dmd/dmangle.c > +++ b/gcc/d/dmd/dmangle.c > @@ -822,7

[Bug target/70053] Returning a struct of _Decimal128 values generates extraneous stores and loads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70053 --- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool --- Please open a separate bug for x86 problems.

[Bug other/98926] [11 regression] several ICEs after r11-7011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 CC|

[Bug other/98926] New: [11 regression] several ICEs after r11-7011

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926 Bug ID: 98926 Summary: [11 regression] several ICEs after r11-7011 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug fortran/95038] Not treating function result name as a variable.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95038 --- Comment #9 from Bill Long --- The original test is not conforming due to the missing IMPORT statement. However, the error message , which I assume is for the second non-blank line in the listing, seems odd. The standard says "If RESULT

[Bug c++/95192] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in handle_assume_aligned_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:2996

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95192 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95038] Not treating function result name as a variable.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95038 Ev Drikos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drikosev at gmail dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug inline-asm/98847] Miscompilation with c++17, templates, and register keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98847 --- Comment #8 from programmerjake at gmail dot com --- Can the fix for this be backported to gcc 8 and 9 too? Thanks!

[Bug analyzer/98918] [11 Regression] Analyzer false positives due to sm-state involving UNKNOWN pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98918 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/98918] [11 Regression] Analyzer false positives due to sm-state involving UNKNOWN pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98918 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11d4ec5d45c02a19b8ff9d7f26800637ad563e05 commit r11-7024-g11d4ec5d45c02a19b8ff9d7f26800637ad563e05 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/98925] Extend modref to handle return slot optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98925 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka --- > If I don't overstimate modref and alias analysis destructor should disappear > completely in the example below (from https://gcc.gnu.org/PR98499#c4): > > struct string { > char * _M_buf; > // local

[Bug tree-optimization/98499] [11 Regression] Possibly bad std::string initialization in constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/98499] [11 Regression] Possibly bad std::string initialization in constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499 --- Comment #12 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Should be fixed in gcc-11. (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #9) > It is also relatively easy to track the EAF flags here, I will try to get > quick stats on how often this makes difference (and

[Bug tree-optimization/98925] New: Extend modref to handle return slot optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98925 Bug ID: 98925 Summary: Extend modref to handle return slot optimization Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug c++/98924] New: Ambiguous name in concept-id diagnosed as parser error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98924 Bug ID: 98924 Summary: Ambiguous name in concept-id diagnosed as parser error Product: gcc Version: 11.0 URL: https://godbolt.org/z/Txrvos Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98893] start_cleanup_cnt needs modularizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98893 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- I think the right direction is to use lambdas. That would make the cleanup function have a scope attached or related to the variable being dtord. Howevr, we cannot use actual lambdas, as that'd disturb

[Bug tree-optimization/98499] [11 Regression] Possibly bad std::string initialization in constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sergei Trofimovich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11056ab7687f7156846e93557c9171b77713bd7e commit r11-7022-g11056ab7687f7156846e93557c9171b77713bd7e Author: Sergei Trofimovich

[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stephan.oostveen@nextlevel-

[Bug c++/98919] auto declaration of multiple variables allows inconsistent types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98919 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/98919] auto declaration of multiple variables allows inconsistent types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98919 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think this is a duplicate of an existing (quite old) bug.

[Bug c++/96840] [11 Regression] Recursive substitution in constrained commutative operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96840 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug d/98921] [11 regression] libphobos: junk in generated symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98921 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- diff --git a/gcc/d/dmd/dmangle.c b/gcc/d/dmd/dmangle.c index f6eee52afbf..73d9ac5367f 100644 --- a/gcc/d/dmd/dmangle.c +++ b/gcc/d/dmd/dmangle.c @@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ public: void visit(IntegerExp *e)

[Bug d/98921] [11 regression] libphobos: junk in generated symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98921 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/98923] [11 regression] bootstrap on powerpc64 fails after r11-6995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98923 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/98923] New: [11 regression] bootstrap on powerpc64 fails after r11-6995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98923 Bug ID: 98923 Summary: [11 regression] bootstrap on powerpc64 fails after r11-6995 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/98729] [11 Regression] GCC 11 MinGW Windows build doesn't generate working PE executables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98729 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug ada/98724] [11 Regression] gnat build failure on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98724 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-01 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug d/98921] [11 regression] libphobos: junk in generated symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98921 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug lto/98922] New: -fstack-usage not working with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98922 Bug ID: 98922 Summary: -fstack-usage not working with -flto Product: gcc Version: 8.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug d/98921] New: [11 regression] libphobos: junk in generated symbol

Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: powerpc64-*-* $ /daten/gcc/gcc-20210201/Build/./gcc/gdc -B/daten/gcc/gcc-20210201/Build/./gcc/ -B/usr/powerpc64-suse-linux

[Bug tree-optimization/97960] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 since r8-6511-g3ae129323d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97960 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Indeed, r11-5904-g4cf70c20cb10acd6fb1016611d05540728176b60 fixed it. I'll add the testcase into the testsuite after testing it.

[Bug middle-end/97487] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_simple_binop, at optabs.c:939 since r8-3977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97487 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/98920] New: [10/11 Regression] uses regexec without support for REG_STARTEND with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98920 Bug ID: 98920 Summary: [10/11 Regression] uses regexec without support for REG_STARTEND with -fsanitize=address Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/98884] Implement empty struct optimisations on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98884 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- x86-64 is handled correctly according to the psABI, see https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/blob/master/x86-64-ABI/low-level-sys-info.tex The empty classes will end up with NO_CLASS and thus aren't

[Bug c++/98919] New: auto declaration of multiple variables allows inconsistent types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98919 Bug ID: 98919 Summary: auto declaration of multiple variables allows inconsistent types Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/97172] [11 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘ssa_name’ is not supported in LTO streams since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/97172] [11 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘ssa_name’ is not supported in LTO streams since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172 --- Comment #26 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0718336a5284dd5b40fd6691a94d6be93a80f279 commit r11-7018-g0718336a5284dd5b40fd6691a94d6be93a80f279 Author: Martin Sebor Date:

[Bug libstdc++/98034] std::atomic_signed_lock_free and std::atomic_unsigned_lock_free not defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98034 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0) > C++20 adds these typedefs. And the __cpp_lib_atomic_lock_free_type_aliases feature test macro.

[Bug lto/98504] [11 Regression] bootstrap broken in libgo on ia64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98504 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose --- a trunk 20210130 build without LTO did succeed.

[Bug c++/98835] False positive -Wclass-memaccess with class with ref-qualified copy-assignment operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98835 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2f8e378d64f65645e5f9c41a8221ca102c71208 commit r11-7014-gc2f8e378d64f65645e5f9c41a8221ca102c71208 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Mon

[Bug target/98884] Implement empty struct optimisations on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98884 --- Comment #6 from David Brown --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > If GCC and Clang are ABI incompatible on this, then one of the two compilers > is buggy. So, it is needed to look at the EABI and find out which case it > is.

[Bug c++/98295] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:4312

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98295 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/98295] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:4312

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98295 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e534fb7d8256a605b6bdc12451d209af1bed329 commit r11-7013-g7e534fb7d8256a605b6bdc12451d209af1bed329 Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug analyzer/98918] [11 Regression] Analyzer false positives due to sm-state involving UNKNOWN pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98918 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Analyzer false positives|[11 Regression] Analyzer

[Bug c++/98355] [9 Regression] ICE in has_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:5628

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98355 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98355] [9/10 Regression] ICE in has_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:5628

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98355 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c616e86e8bc76f867242b4aba372736d1c8cbf80 commit r10-9332-gc616e86e8bc76f867242b4aba372736d1c8cbf80 Author: Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/98355] [9/10 Regression] ICE in has_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:5628

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98355 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/98355] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in has_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:5628

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98355 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bab669f2fc643cb1673aecd177eec1c773e9e48e commit r11-7012-gbab669f2fc643cb1673aecd177eec1c773e9e48e Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug analyzer/98918] Analyzer false positives due to sm-state involving UNKNOWN pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98918 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/98884] Implement empty struct optimisations on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98884 --- Comment #5 from David Brown --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Note, for ABI compatibility or incompatibility it might be better to check > what happens when some argument is passed after the empty structs. Because > at least

[Bug analyzer/98918] New: Analyzer false positives due to sm-state involving UNKNOWN pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98918 Bug ID: 98918 Summary: Analyzer false positives due to sm-state involving UNKNOWN pointers Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/98570] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98570 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/98912] valgrind error in default_elf_asm_output_ascii

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98912 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- For varasm.c line 8285 is for (p = s; p < limit && *p != '\0'; p++) So either the limit is wrong or there are some un-init bytes in the string. My money is on option 2 ;-> Maybe a suitable

[Bug lto/98912] valgrind error in default_elf_asm_output_ascii

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98912 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/98570] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98570 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e0a231a4aa2407bb7167daf98a37795a67364d8 commit r11-7011-g6e0a231a4aa2407bb7167daf98a37795a67364d8 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug target/98093] ICE in gen_vsx_set_v2df, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:3276

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98093 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- It's fixed on master, can we close it now or do we need a backport to active branches?

[Bug lto/98912] valgrind error in default_elf_asm_output_ascii

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98912 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/98917] SVE: wrong code with -O -ftree-vectorize -msve-vector-bits=128 --param=aarch64-autovec-preference=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98917 --- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #1) > Is this a 11 regression? It's hard to tell given the dependency on --param=aarch64-autovec-preference=2.

[Bug fortran/98915] OpenACC 'routine with a name' directive does not compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98915 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/88115] Incorrect result from alignof in templates, if also using __alignof__.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88115 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug go/98823] go testsuite and timeouts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98823 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Got it stuck again over the weekend: kojibui+ 9992 101 0.1 884512 29120 ?Sl Jan31 968:04 \_

[Bug preprocessor/95253] [10/11 Regression] Build failure on MSys. Wrong dependency file escaping on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95253 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|[10/11 Regression]

[Bug target/98917] SVE: wrong code with -O -ftree-vectorize -msve-vector-bits=128 --param=aarch64-autovec-preference=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98917 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/84494] Invalid constexpr with default assignment operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84494 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/84494] Invalid constexpr with default assignment operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84494 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b303ef6cc8a5913345cbcd91abf13075ab2aec9 commit r11-7007-g1b303ef6cc8a5913345cbcd91abf13075ab2aec9 Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug c++/84494] Invalid constexpr with default assignment operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84494 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/96282] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96282 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f426e4f63451e937c943606d3142b1ac6b70467a commit r10-9331-gf426e4f63451e937c943606d3142b1ac6b70467a Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug target/97528] [9/10 Regression] ICE in decompose_automod_address, at rtlanal.c:6298 (arm-linux-gnueabihf)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'm backporting stuff to older branches in batches and don't plan to do it for 9 or 8 in the near future. If anyone beats me with the backports, I certainly won't mind.

[Bug rtl-optimization/98863] [11 Regression] WRF with LTO consumes a lot of memory in REE, FWPROP and x86 specific passes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863 --- Comment #36 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4311ae206da13a9bfdb4245feb400dbee0f528a0 commit r10-9330-g4311ae206da13a9bfdb4245feb400dbee0f528a0 Author: Richard

[Bug target/97528] [9/10 Regression] ICE in decompose_automod_address, at rtlanal.c:6298 (arm-linux-gnueabihf)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528 --- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- If the patch tests cleanly we should apply it to GCC 9 and 8 too (if applicable)

[Bug middle-end/97971] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in process_alt_operands, at lra-constraints.c:3110

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97971 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 50110 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50110=edit gcc11-pr97971.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/98899] [10/11 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16198 since r10-1280-g78f7607db4c53f8c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98899 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug target/97528] [9/10 Regression] ICE in decompose_automod_address, at rtlanal.c:6298 (arm-linux-gnueabihf)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528 avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98899] [10/11 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16198 since r10-1280-g78f7607db4c53f8c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98899 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/98917] New: SVE: wrong code with -O -ftree-vectorize -msve-vector-bits=128 --param=aarch64-autovec-preference=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98917 Bug ID: 98917 Summary: SVE: wrong code with -O -ftree-vectorize -msve-vector-bits=128 --param=aarch64-autovec-preference=2 Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug middle-end/98088] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_oacc_collapse_init, at omp-expand.c:1533

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98088 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/38319] Memory leaks in allocatable component expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38319 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #11) > Related / same issue: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-January/055654.html Hi Tobias, Over the weekend, I had a stab at fixing this recent issue. I

[Bug rtl-optimization/98863] [11 Regression] WRF with LTO consumes a lot of memory in REE, FWPROP and x86 specific passes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Summary|WRF with LTO

[Bug rtl-optimization/98287] [10/11 Regression] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:10000 with -O2 -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-forwprop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98287 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 50108 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50108=edit gcc11-pr98287.patch I'd be afraid it could be hundreds of patterns potentially affected by this. So I think it is

[Bug c++/98531] [11 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_a.H etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98531 --- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth --- I've now managed to test your v2 patch, with mixed results: * On Solaris 11.4: the libstdc++ failures are gone the new tests PASS however, the old g++.dg/modules tests continue to ICE as before * On

[Bug rtl-optimization/98863] WRF with LTO consumes a lot of memory in REE, FWPROP and x86 specific passes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863 --- Comment #35 from Richard Biener --- So on the gcc-10 branch with 4311ae206da1, 5ea7be5068f17, 99c96e797d9662c8, 99dafea9bfebb and 327ec3ea29b58 cherry-picked we top out at 2.5GB and RTL forwprop is not measuably increasing RSS footage. This

[Bug rtl-optimization/98863] WRF with LTO consumes a lot of memory in REE, FWPROP and x86 specific passes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot

  1   2   >