https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96926
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4)
> I think perhaps it's wrong to do substitution at this point because X has no
> default argument. Giving it a default argument causes clang 10 to also
> reject
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98844
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96926
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Further reduced:
template struct A {
using type = typename T::type;
};
template class B {
template ::type X>
B(U);
};
struct C {
B b;
C();
};
int main() {
C c;
}
We run into trouble trying to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98820
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98810
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[C++20] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98804
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-02-12
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97034
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Alternative patch that I'm more happy about:
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -28761,6 +28761,7 @@ build_deduction_guide (tree type, tree ctor, tree
outer_args, tsubst_flags_t com
tree ded_fn =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96926
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97742
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97296
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97296
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98326
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96905
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94546
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac001ddd0cb635dec0145bf577ac796894bda398
commit r11-7204-gac001ddd0cb635dec0145bf577ac796894bda398
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97246
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac001ddd0cb635dec0145bf577ac796894bda398
commit r11-7204-gac001ddd0cb635dec0145bf577ac796894bda398
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96905
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86d8ecf28e6c20b3e6866a5b1551a339edc8d14d
commit r10-9363-g86d8ecf28e6c20b3e6866a5b1551a339edc8d14d
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20408
--- Comment #25 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:031e97207463710797625382baff112b6c3ade51
commit r10-9362-g031e97207463710797625382baff112b6c3ade51
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98326
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:031e97207463710797625382baff112b6c3ade51
commit r10-9362-g031e97207463710797625382baff112b6c3ade51
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97034
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Candidate patch:
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -27279,7 +27279,10 @@ type_dependent_expression_p (tree expression)
&& DECL_UNIQUE_FRIEND_P (expression)
&& (!DECL_FRIEND_CONTEXT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98969
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
As noted above, the ICE is fixed, but the leak false positive is not yet fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98969
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:467a48205279cab368dbeb02879e4b721516
commit r11-7202-g467a48205279cab368dbeb02879e4b721516
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99064
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:467a48205279cab368dbeb02879e4b721516
commit r11-7202-g467a48205279cab368dbeb02879e4b721516
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97034
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Arthur O'Dwyer from comment #5)
> Is mine the same bug? Mine is also a regression (trunk crashes where GCC
> 10.2 had succeeded).
>
> // https://godbolt.org/z/Ysh6as
> struct C { void f(auto)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99078
Bug ID: 99078
Summary: Optimizer moves struct initialization into loop
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644
--- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor ---
I looks like this might be another opportunity to use the predicate analysis
from tree-ssa-uninit.c (once it's generalized).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96966
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
No change in GCC 11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21860
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87296
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
I should note: The changes are too intrusive to backport.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 87296, which changed state.
Bug 87296 Summary: [8/9/10/11 Regression] -Wstringop-overflow false positive
due to using MEM_REF type of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87296
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87296
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21433
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99074
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98959
--- Comment #17 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #16)
> The question I have is, there are 2 expanders which I think we also need to
> guard with similar tests. They are vsx_load_ and vsx_store_.
> Segher, I assume
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98959
--- Comment #16 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #14)
> We should definitely not be allowing the AltiVec "& ~16" flavors into these
> patterns. I'm not certain whether your fix is the best way to achieve that,
> but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21433
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Created attachment 50171
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50171=edit
Proposed patch.
Patched to remove the CONSTRUCTOR code and replace it with an assert that it
doesn't come up. Tested
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99077
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-ios_failure.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-ios_failure.cc
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
__ios_failure(const char* s) : failure(s)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99077
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99077
Bug ID: 99077
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] Cannot build libstdc++ with
-fno-rtti
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12277
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-01-11 00:00:00 |2021-2-11
Known to fail|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95888
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Summary|[9/10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95888
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60dbb46b5b3c52d0483d676eabd4dfe32110e61b
commit r10-9360-g60dbb46b5b3c52d0483d676eabd4dfe32110e61b
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97246
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96905
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98959
--- Comment #15 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> The important difference from my auto-host.h to your auto-host.h which
> causes this ICE is that you don't have HAVE_LD_LARGE_TOC defined.
> Manually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81866
--- Comment #8 from Sokolov Viacheslav ---
looks like the following is the same bug: https://godbolt.org/z/1vTqs3
template
struct A
{
template
struct B
{
};
};
A<>::B b;
results in (on trunk)
: In substitution of 'template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96474
Sokolov Viacheslav changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||soko.slav at yandex dot ru
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99076
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99076
Bug ID: 99076
Summary: Unclear error message when trailing angle bracket is
missing
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99041
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9)
> Fixed on trunk.
>
> I will check whether we need this on the GCC10 branch as well. I believe we
> probably will.
Confirmed, we need this on GCC10 as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95888
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95888
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:88cfd531c69b3c1fe7a3c183d83cfeacc8f69402
commit r11-7197-g88cfd531c69b3c1fe7a3c183d83cfeacc8f69402
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99041
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner ---
Fixed on trunk.
I will check whether we need this on the GCC10 branch as well. I believe we
probably will.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99041
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2432c47970024db6410708b582a901259dabaae1
commit r11-7196-g2432c47970024db6410708b582a901259dabaae1
Author: Peter Bergner
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59048
AK changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hiraditya at msn dot com
--- Comment #17 from AK
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99075
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99070
--- Comment #4 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, I see the fail with -mcpu=power9. Looks like I botched something with
addressing and allowed D-form addresses when it should be DS-form. On power10
this would result in selection of a prefix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99070
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In my case (it was a cross-compiler from x86_64-linux)
../configure --target powerpc64-linux-gnu --disable-bootstrap
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99070
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |acsawdey at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98897
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98897
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d3b9a3e70e634c7c48bb12bb35ec8219024f98b
commit r10-9358-g9d3b9a3e70e634c7c48bb12bb35ec8219024f98b
Author: Paul Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, using the r10-135 compiler, seems things go wrong during RA.
In *.ira, we have:
(insn 35 34 217 2 (parallel [
(set (reg:DI 544 [ _29 ])
(minus:DI (reg:DI 542 [ _26 ])
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99055
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Created attachment 50170
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50170=edit
Valgrind leak output with patch from comment #1 applied.
Attached is Valgrind leak output with the patch from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79246
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And this one which is probably something minor but I haven't investigated:
FAIL: 30_threads/promise/requirements/lwg3466.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99058
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce43c906049b828c0472d8499b52ac6233c869d0
commit r11-7194-gce43c906049b828c0472d8499b52ac6233c869d0
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79246
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't see that error now, but do see these:
FAIL: 27_io/ios_base/failure/cxx11.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '5', this reader only handles
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98910
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99074
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99075
Bug ID: 99075
Summary: Wrong classification of functions memchr and memcpy
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99074
Bug ID: 99074
Summary: gcc 8 and above is crashing with dynamic_cast<>() on
null pointer with optimization level -O1 and above
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99033
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99033
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2dcdd15d0bafb9b45a8d7ff580217bd6ac1f0975
commit r11-7193-g2dcdd15d0bafb9b45a8d7ff580217bd6ac1f0975
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Enabling -fno-forward-propagate triggers the problem.
seurer@genoa:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-10-test$ whichgcc
Now at commit g:a7eb97ad269b6509bd7b31ca373daea98e4d7e85, r10-135
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99073
Bug ID: 99073
Summary: Preprocessing with -CC adds unwanted junk
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99063
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99063
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0da1c0cb7661ee9111bc475efddae80a026de34
commit r11-7192-gf0da1c0cb7661ee9111bc475efddae80a026de34
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98262
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Jager ---
I've now had the same `gcc_unreachable` reached when compiling code that uses
`-mpcrel` with a thread-local variable. It may be that `m68k_decompose_address`
doesn't properly handle all cases, or that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82178
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82178
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97582
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE|[9/10 Regression] ICE tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97582
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb168f779c87c1e0c37d22ea82dfb93ff8c873bc
commit r11-7191-gcb168f779c87c1e0c37d22ea82dfb93ff8c873bc
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #5)
> I too am able to duplicate this on a native powerpc64 LE machine. Changing
> any of the compilation options (-Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98931
akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96311
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If I compare
void
foo ()
{
constexpr int used = 0;
[](auto unused)
{
return used;
};
}
void
bar ()
{
constexpr int used = 0;
[](int unused)
{
return used;
};
}
then in bar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98931
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrea Corallo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38c5703449c0638618ba6896f0d039c3868ad4e0
commit r11-7190-g38c5703449c0638618ba6896f0d039c3868ad4e0
Author: Andrea Corallo
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95000
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
gcc version 11.0.0 20210210 (experimental) [master revision
bd0e37f68a3:deed5164277:72932511053596091ad291539022b51d9f2ba418]
PASS for me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 98772, which changed state.
Bug 98772 Summary: Widening patterns causing missed vectorization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98772
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98772
Joel Hutton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94713
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98772
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joel Hutton :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4af29981ab57ad7ef4467e371e4145cce9c16eaa
commit r11-7189-g4af29981ab57ad7ef4467e371e4145cce9c16eaa
Author: Joel Hutton
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96166
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99072
Bug ID: 99072
Summary: [modules] Compiling header unit with partial
preprocessing (-E -fdirectives-only) twice causes CRC
mismatch
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93695
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 50168
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50168=edit
Assembler output from broken revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98998
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99071
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
