https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98686
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I am changing the word 'defined' to 'declared'.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99094
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99094
Bug ID: 99094
Summary: [AIX] Thread local uninitialized data allocated in
.comm
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98686
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99093
Bug ID: 99093
Summary: [missed optimization] Missed devirtualization
involving internal-linkage class type (but only
sometimes)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98996
--- Comment #2 from YunQiang Su ---
Created attachment 50180
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50180=edit
it generates subreg instead of reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89807
--- Comment #1 from Hannes Domani ---
(In reply to Nickolay Kolchin-Semyonov from comment #0)
> uint8_t a = (v >> 24) & 0xFF; // ERROR: produces warning
> uint8_t a2 = v >> 24; // ERROR: produces warning
I think the '& 0xFF' part is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96900
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-02-14
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92539
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
>From the vrp1 dump it seems that it should be possible to determine that bb 8
and later are unreachable. Might the predicate analysis help here as well?
int main ()
{
const char * last;
int i;
const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90663
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|10.0|10.2.0, 11.0
--- Comment #4 from Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99092
Bug ID: 99092
Summary: Using -O3 and -fprefetch-loop-arrays to compile BLAS
on Apple M1 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|10.0|10.2.0, 11.0
--- Comment #7 from Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99091
Bug ID: 99091
Summary: constexpr variable evaluated at runtime
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95647
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98825
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
Bug ID: 99090
Summary: gsplit-dwarf broken on riscv64-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99089
Bug ID: 99089
Summary: unnecessary zero extend before AND
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417
--- Comment #61 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jim Wilson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18fabc35f47f0abf4ec14d147098ec4e0734d2a3
commit r11-7237-g18fabc35f47f0abf4ec14d147098ec4e0734d2a3
Author: Levy Hsu
Date: Sat Feb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417
--- Comment #60 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jim Wilson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a4953810bac524e19126a2745c75fed58db962c2
commit r11-7236-ga4953810bac524e19126a2745c75fed58db962c2
Author: Jim Wilson
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99027
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
ler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20210213/configure
--prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-bootstrap
--enable-multiarch --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99087
Bug ID: 99087
Summary: suboptimal codegen for division by constant 3
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98439
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98439
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05402ca65a6696a8f20a3dbcb18f47ba3bdfa268
commit r11-7235-g05402ca65a6696a8f20a3dbcb18f47ba3bdfa268
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99086
Bug ID: 99086
Summary: including and defaulting spaceship operator
causes compiler segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93721
Nikita Kniazev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nok.raven at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98996
--- Comment #1 from YunQiang Su ---
96=64+32, so the rtl should be a ldl/ldr + lwl/lwr
It should be:
(insn 377 376 378 16 (set (reg:SI 499)
(unspec:SI [
(mem:BLK (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 216 [ _65 ])
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99027
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99065
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98897
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Bader at lrz dot de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67744
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96166
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] |[10 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96166
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f3a743b688f4845e1798eed9b2e2284e891da11
commit r11-7233-g0f3a743b688f4845e1798eed9b2e2284e891da11
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99083
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
This should be a no-op. According to the documentation:
--q--
Macro: REG_ALLOC_ORDER
If defined, an initializer for a vector of integers, containing the numbers
of hard registers in the order in which
36 matches
Mail list logo
