https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99233
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:395dac0ab6dad8aaef1180e961a5cd51da649f23
commit r10-9645-g395dac0ab6dad8aaef1180e961a5cd51da649f23
Author: Vladimir N. M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b7c97f25b271f826958873bda4fafc4cfc5b60d
commit r10-9644-g1b7c97f25b271f826958873bda4fafc4cfc5b60d
Author: Vladimir N.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99850
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last recon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65182
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31199d95de1304e200554bbf98b2d8a6a7298bec
commit r11-7932-g31199d95de1304e200554bbf98b2d8a6a7298bec
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99850
Bug ID: 99850
Summary: [P1102R2] reject valid lambda syntax in C++23
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99845
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 65182, which changed state.
Bug 65182 Summary: -Wuninitialized fails when pointer to variable later passed
to function (fixed? add testcase?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65182
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65182
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63943
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99844
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99844
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-31
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99849
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
There's a backtrace:
(gdb) p exp
$1 = (tree) 0x777ddea0
(gdb) p debug_tree(exp)
unit-size
align:64 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x773e0d20
fields
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99849
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-31
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99849
Bug ID: 99849
Summary: ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:11556 since
r5-5407-g30d5d8c5189064c8
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99747
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Lelyakin ---
Not seen anymore.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99848
Bug ID: 99848
Summary: Parameter packs not expanded in type-constraint
placeholder
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99847
--- Comment #2 from ⎓ ---
The same thing is with other way around. I.e.:
void ntoh(uint16_t idata, uint8_t *odata) {
odata[0] = idata >> 8;
odata[1] = idata & 0xff;
}
results with:
move.l 8(%sp),%a0
move.w 6(%sp),(%a0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99809
--- Comment #3 from 康桓瑋 ---
More reduced:
template
concept C = true;
void f(auto... args) {
[](C auto) {};
}
int main() { f(); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99748
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99469
--- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan ---
Started with r8-6635-g3f26f054872c375e7f9a80ede7a56036d9b57597.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99847
Bug ID: 99847
Summary: Optimization breaks alignment on CPU32
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:285f65a59cebd20d8222c515eb15debd35f9f4a1
commit r10-9643-g285f65a59cebd20d8222c515eb15debd35f9f4a1
Author: Christophe Ly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99445
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2531859bf5bf6cf1f29c0dca85fd26e80904a5d
commit r11-7931-ga2531859bf5bf6cf1f29c0dca85fd26e80904a5d
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05de07136a8c288086def19fa7a6ed817e26c6aa
commit r11-7930-g05de07136a8c288086def19fa7a6ed817e26c6aa
Author: Christophe Lyon
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99786
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97849
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99786
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c1d6e89994109e1b6efb5f13890be5586edeb75
commit r11-7929-g7c1d6e89994109e1b6efb5f13890be5586edeb75
Author: Christophe Lyon
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99792
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #2)
> Ok, I'd guess it just exposes a latent backend / rtl-optimization issue then
Yes, I would expect the same.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99834
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su ---
Hi Richard and all, thanks for analyzing these reports!
I have some more cases, and wonder whether you folks would prefer that I open a
meta issue report and append these (and others that we find) to that rep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97849
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad8c55c1df32839cf74704b68a072772b14bd1e2
commit r10-9642-gad8c55c1df32839cf74704b68a072772b14bd1e2
Author: Prathamesh Kulkarn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99792
--- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan ---
Ok, I'd guess it just exposes a latent backend / rtl-optimization issue then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860
--- Comment #60 from jyong at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks all for debugging and finding a solution.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99792
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99785
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99284, which changed state.
Bug 99284 Summary: [modules] ICE in key_mergeable, at cp/module.cc:10441
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99284
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99284
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99223, which changed state.
Bug 99223 Summary: [modules] stdl header-unit ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99223
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99241
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 99223 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99223
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99785
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jeff Muizelaar from comment #14)
> re: __builtin_shuffle vs __builtin_shufflevector - It looks like
> __builtin_shuffle doesn't support constructing vectors of a different size
> than input typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99813
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3753ceff562d8614a94a164b312f389812bd6cd8
commit r10-9641-g3753ceff562d8614a94a164b312f389812bd6cd8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99818
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Started with r11-7188-gff6903288d96aa1d.
Thanks, Gerhard and Martin.
Have you ever tried to put a tent up in a storm? Sometimes maintaining gfortran
feels just lik
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99753
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f87a08caf42e45162e934c7120a677565149708a
commit r10-9639-gf87a08caf42e45162e934c7120a677565149708a
Author: Martin Liska
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
--- Comment #19 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #18)
> Please somebody do it quick then (not omitting necessary testing, of course).
I am working on it. It is my highest priority work. The patch is ready. If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99840
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99839
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98601
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99818
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98611
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96531
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97103
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98990
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98990
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c76d503527394839f9192ee27abbc0626b4e40d8
commit r10-9637-gc76d503527394839f9192ee27abbc0626b4e40d8
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95468
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:78e6c55b0d0d2d49f489c581cf8d5a8125b28563
commit r10-9636-g78e6c55b0d0d2d49f489c581cf8d5a8125b28563
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97103
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a834e6d59d74ccaefbcbbed5ea7ee25305057853
commit r10-9634-ga834e6d59d74ccaefbcbbed5ea7ee25305057853
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98611
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57b0df85b7e4b50198a8d3a09d57c52f0d994ba8
commit r10-9635-g57b0df85b7e4b50198a8d3a09d57c52f0d994ba8
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96531
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a834e6d59d74ccaefbcbbed5ea7ee25305057853
commit r10-9634-ga834e6d59d74ccaefbcbbed5ea7ee25305057853
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97653
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Actually, there is code to handle that already, just with typos and omissions
in it.
So perhaps better:
2021-03-31 Jakub Jelinek
PR target/97653
* config/rs6000/t-linux (IBM128_STATIC_OBJ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99845
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Alternatively, compile with -fcheck-new to tell the compiler that *all*
operator new overloads can return a null pointer. That means it always checks
for null, even for overloads that are declared as potent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97653
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, just completely untested possibility:
--- libgcc/config/rs6000/t-float128.jj 2021-03-30 18:11:52.572091848 +0200
+++ libgcc/config/rs6000/t-float128 2021-03-31 13:55:47.199756547 +0200
@@ -90,8 +90,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99828
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
> ?? obviously bad reduction.
Fixed with:
$ cat 3.i
enum { false, true } * __memcpy();
_Bool kasan_check_range();
void *memcpy(void *dest, void *src, long len) {
if (kasan_check_range(len, false, 0) || k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99845
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99845
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Keith Halligan from comment #0)
> class MemAlloc {
> public:
> MemAlloc() {}
> void* operator new[](size_t sz, const std::nothrow_t& nt) {
> return ::operator new(sz, nt);
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98601
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #3 from Ri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98601
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #2 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99845
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced:
namespace std {
using size_t = decltype(sizeof(0));
struct nothrow_t { } const nothrow = { };
}
void* operator new(std::size_t);
void* operator new[](std::size_t);
void operator delete(void*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98601
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97653
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99838
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99845
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98601
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|aarch64: ICE in |[8/9/10/11 Regression]
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98119
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1393938e4c7dab9306cdce5a73d93b242fc246ec
commit r11-7927-g1393938e4c7dab9306cdce5a73d93b242fc246ec
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98776
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i at maskray dot me
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99836
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99828
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99828
>
> --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
> All right, I vanished the test-case:
>
> $
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95842
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a42a5600c5917541481c3de29a95c1cb169edc6b
commit r10-9630-ga42a5600c5917541481c3de29a95c1cb169edc6b
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99846
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 96974, which changed state.
Bug 96974 Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vector_types_for_stmt
compiling for SVE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99845
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The interesting thing is that doing
#include
struct X
{
~X(){}
};
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
X *p = new (std::nothrow) X[argc];
}
properly conditionalizes this store:
TARGET_EXPR , (const st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99845
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
--- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99845
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99447
--- Comment #25 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99447
>
> --- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99447
> >
> > --- Comment #21 from Matthias Klose ---
> > buil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99808
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c611209a3422d2a2dc10bc804986db9bfb80a62e
commit r10-9629-gc611209a3422d2a2dc10bc804986db9bfb80a62e
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99037
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a92899b08e61d503a2897f2f66b064eb84706bc
commit r10-9628-g1a92899b08e61d503a2897f2f66b064eb84706bc
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99808
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a92899b08e61d503a2897f2f66b064eb84706bc
commit r10-9628-g1a92899b08e61d503a2897f2f66b064eb84706bc
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99447
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7145b4bb6c8729a1e782373cb6256c06ed60465
commit r11-7926-gd7145b4bb6c8729a1e782373cb6256c06ed60465
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Wed M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99447
--- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99447
>
> --- Comment #21 from Matthias Klose ---
> building with trunk 20210330 using these parameters didn't succeed:
>
> make[1]: Entering directory '/packa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99828
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
All right, I vanished the test-case:
$ cat 1.i
inline __attribute__((__always_inline__)) __attribute__((gnu_inline)) void *
memcpy();
void *apply_relocate_add_write = memcpy;
$ touch 2.s
$ cat 3.i
enum { fal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99846
Bug ID: 99846
Summary: [11 regression] std::variant comparison operator error
for recursive type
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99447
--- Comment #22 from Matthias Klose ---
this is a compiler configured with --enable-default--pie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99447
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99447
--- Comment #21 from Matthias Klose ---
building with trunk 20210330 using these parameters didn't succeed:
make[1]: Entering directory '/packages/tmp/guymager-0.8.12'
g++ -c -pipe -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/packages/tmp/guymager-0.8.12=.
-flto=a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99828
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Yeah, and then maybe diagnose this "ODR violation". Still
I think we do have this kinds of divergence (like glibcs
fortification), so I am not sure we want to warn by default.
>
> __attribute__((__always_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96135
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
See also PR96573
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96573
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
See also PR96135
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99835
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
> But inside a SCC the order is arbitrary anyway. Note I'd only re-order SCCs
> and keep the postordering the same otherwise.
We compile leaf functions first to be able to propagated to their
callers. In ord
101 - 200 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
