[Bug lto/99898] Possible LTO object incompatibility on gcc-10 branch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99898 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- This is not the first time versioning of LTO objects have come up with respect to the bug fix releases.

[Bug target/99890] The -mstrict-aglign doesn't support the ARM targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99890 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/99890] The -mstrict-aglign doesn't support the ARM targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99890 --- Comment #2 from ZhangMin --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Because it is a target specific option. > What exactly are you trying to do? > > most instructions in ARMv7+ support unaligned data. Although armv7 + supports non

[Bug c++/99902] New: Deduced return type of lambda in default template argument takes return type from variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99902 Bug ID: 99902 Summary: Deduced return type of lambda in default template argument takes return type from variable template Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug driver/99896] g++ drops -lc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99896 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at suse dot de --- Comment #6 from

[Bug c++/99643] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error in build_over_call, involving array new and copy elision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99643 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]

[Bug c++/99643] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error in build_over_call, involving array new and copy elision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99643 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3d3bb0f03dbd02512ab46979088ee8e22520c24 commit r11-7980-gc3d3bb0f03dbd02512ab46979088ee8e22520c24 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/93383] ICE on accessing field of a structure which is non-type template parameter, -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383 --- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek --- template struct A {}; template struct S { void foo(S<+a>); };

[Bug c++/93383] ICE on accessing field of a structure which is non-type template parameter, -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hewillk at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/99897] ICE Segmentation fault when operator appear in template parameter-list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99897 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/99901] New: static const class var implemented with constexpr doesn't emit symbols in C++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99901 Bug ID: 99901 Summary: static const class var implemented with constexpr doesn't emit symbols in C++17 mode Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug driver/99896] g++ drops -lc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99896 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- The bug is in gdb because re_search cannot be paired with regcomp.

[Bug c++/91416] ICE in cp_check_const_attributes, at cp/decl2.c:1408

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91416 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a809d8a737da1ccebcd93065fc57fc0f4d94894a commit r11-7975-ga809d8a737da1ccebcd93065fc57fc0f4d94894a Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug driver/99896] g++ drops -lc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99896 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #2) > I don't understand. AFAICT, it's dropped. It's not moved to the end, > because -lc is already at the end without specifying -lc. OK, it's dropped because

[Bug target/99900] feature request: 16-bit x86 C compiler / support compilation of (VirtualBox) BIOS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99900 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug c/99900] New: feature request: 16-bit x86 C compiler / support compilation of (VirtualBox) BIOS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99900 Bug ID: 99900 Summary: feature request: 16-bit x86 C compiler / support compilation of (VirtualBox) BIOS Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/99453] libstdc++*-gdb.py installation depends on library naming

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99453 --- Comment #4 from Philippe Blain --- Patch posted: - https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/567650.html (gcc-patches) - https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2021-April/052291.html (libstdc++)

[Bug driver/99896] g++ drops -lc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99896 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- regcomp and re_search are always incompatible.

[Bug c++/99899] New: ICE: in do_auto_deduction, at cp/pt.c:29630

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99899 Bug ID: 99899 Summary: ICE: in do_auto_deduction, at cp/pt.c:29630 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/93301] Wrong optimization: instability of uninitialized variables leads to nonsense

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93301 --- Comment #17 from Martin Uecker --- (In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #16) > (In reply to Martin Uecker from comment #15) > > I do not think the C standard can be read in a way where reading a variable > > can yield a different value

[Bug lto/99898] Possible LTO object incompatibility on gcc-10 branch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99898 --- Comment #1 from ohaiziejohwahkeezuoz at xff dot cz --- I figured object files contain the version of the compiler, so the previous version was GCC: (GNU) 10.2.1 20201110 (built from releases/gcc-10 at that date)

[Bug tree-optimization/93301] Wrong optimization: instability of uninitialized variables leads to nonsense

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93301 --- Comment #16 from Vincent Lefèvre --- (In reply to Martin Uecker from comment #15) > I do not think the C standard can be read in a way where reading a variable > can yield a different value each time (except if the access is UB). For >

[Bug c++/99874] [11 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault when declared variable template of template lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99874 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libfortran/98301] random_init() is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98301 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #49770|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug driver/99896] g++ drops -lc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99896 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > > With g++, we have instead: > > ... > > collect2 ... main.o foo.o -lpcre2-posix ... > > ... > > It isn't dropped,

[Bug c++/99643] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error in build_over_call, involving array new and copy elision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99643 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/99898] New: Possible LTO object incompatibility on gcc-10 branch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99898 Bug ID: 99898 Summary: Possible LTO object incompatibility on gcc-10 branch Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/93301] Wrong optimization: instability of uninitialized variables leads to nonsense

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93301 Martin Uecker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||muecker at gwdg dot de --- Comment #15

[Bug c++/99897] New: ICE Segmentation fault when operator appear in template parameter-list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99897 Bug ID: 99897 Summary: ICE Segmentation fault when operator appear in template parameter-list Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/91217] [8/9/10 Regression] Returning std::array from lambda results in an extra copy step on return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91217 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]

[Bug libgomp/99892] Does GCC 4.8.1 really support OpenMP?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99892 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to ZhangMin from comment #0) > However, in version 4.8.1, only a few processors such as PowerPC support - > pthread option, and the more commonly used arm and x86 processors do not > support this

[Bug translation/90183] ambiguous diagnostics "only available with"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90183 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-03 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug driver/99896] g++ drops -lc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99896 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > With g++, we have instead: > ... > collect2 ... main.o foo.o -lpcre2-posix ... > ... It isn't dropped, it's moved to the end: main.o foo.o -lpcre2-posix

[Bug c/99894] Does GCC 4.8.1 support OpenCL?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99894 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- This is not a bug report. lease use the gcc-help mailing list for basic question about GCC, don't report bugs to ask questions.

[Bug target/99891] Can GCC 4.8.1 Support TI c6x taregts?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99891 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- And if you're comparing a recent Ti compiler with GCC 4.8.1, I hope you realise that GCC 4.8.1 is eight years old.

[Bug target/99891] Can GCC 4.8.1 Support TI c6x taregts?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99891 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- This seems like something you should ask on the mailing list, it's not a bug.

[Bug translation/90183] ambiguous diagnostics "only available with"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90183 --- Comment #3 from Roland Illig --- In the German translation of GCC I consistently use "available since".

[Bug driver/99896] New: g++ drops -lc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99896 Bug ID: 99896 Summary: g++ drops -lc Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver Assignee:

[Bug fortran/99818] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_tree_for_caf_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:2186

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99818 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc27115d6107f219e6f3dc610c99210005fe9dc5 commit r11-7972-gfc27115d6107f219e6f3dc610c99210005fe9dc5 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sat

[Bug c++/96645] [9/10/11 Regression] std::variant default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #8) > Any opinions on what our behavior should be? Should there be an LWG issue? Yes, we want an LWG issue. That might then result in a new core issue too, if we

[Bug target/68081] Cygwin GCC cannot compile program that uses __builtin_ia32_rdseed64_step

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68081 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID

[Bug fortran/99818] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_tree_for_caf_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:2186

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99818 --- Comment #4 from G. Steinmetz --- > Have you ever tried to put a tent up in a storm? ... geez, how difficult and lengthy ... The number of bug reports is admittedly increasing, but the number of still unknown bugs is decreasing, isn't it?

[Bug target/99891] Can GCC 4.8.1 Support TI c6x taregts?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99891 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99895] New: Function parameters generated wrong in call to member of non-type template parameter in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99895 Bug ID: 99895 Summary: Function parameters generated wrong in call to member of non-type template parameter in lambda Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgomp/99892] Does GCC 4.8.1 really support OpenMP?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99892 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/99894] Does GCC 4.8.1 support OpenCL?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99894 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/99894] New: Does GCC 4.8.1 support OpenCL?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99894 Bug ID: 99894 Summary: Does GCC 4.8.1 support OpenCL? Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/99893] New: C++20 unexpanded parameter packs falsely not detected (lambda is involved)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99893 Bug ID: 99893 Summary: C++20 unexpanded parameter packs falsely not detected (lambda is involved) Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libgomp/99892] New: Does GCC 4.8.1 really support OpenMP?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99892 Bug ID: 99892 Summary: Does GCC 4.8.1 really support OpenMP? Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp

[Bug c/99891] New: Can GCC 4.8.1 Support TI c6x taregts?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99891 Bug ID: 99891 Summary: Can GCC 4.8.1 Support TI c6x taregts? Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/99890] The -mstrict-aglign doesn't support the ARM targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99890 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug c/99890] New: The -mstrict-aglign doesn't support the ARM targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99890 Bug ID: 99890 Summary: The -mstrict-aglign doesn't support the ARM targets Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/99882] [11 Regression] ICE in bswap_view_convert, at gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:988 since r11-7946-g5b9a65ecbeb22ef6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99882 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/99863] [10 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-forwprop -mno-sse2 since r10-7268-g529ea7d9596b26ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] wrong|[10 Regression] wrong code

[Bug target/97653] [11 Regression] Incorrect long double calculation with -mabi=ibmlongdouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97653 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug target/99889] Add powerpc ELFv1 support for -fpatchable-function-entry* with "o" sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99889 Bug 99889 depends on bug 98125, which changed state. Bug 98125 Summary: [11 Regression] New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 What|Removed

[Bug target/99888] Add powerpc ELFv2 support for -fpatchable-function-entry*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99888 Bug 99888 depends on bug 98125, which changed state. Bug 98125 Summary: [11 Regression] New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 What|Removed

[Bug testsuite/98125] [11 Regression] New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/99889] New: Add powerpc ELFv1 support for -fpatchable-function-entry* with "o" sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99889 Bug ID: 99889 Summary: Add powerpc ELFv1 support for -fpatchable-function-entry* with "o" sections Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/99888] New: Add powerpc ELFv2 support for -fpatchable-function-entry*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99888 Bug ID: 99888 Summary: Add powerpc ELFv2 support for -fpatchable-function-entry* Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/99882] [11 Regression] ICE in bswap_view_convert, at gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:988 since r11-7946-g5b9a65ecbeb22ef6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99882 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a40015780f8cc49476741b6914bd5ee97bd10f1d commit r11-7971-ga40015780f8cc49476741b6914bd5ee97bd10f1d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/99863] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-forwprop -mno-sse2 since r10-7268-g529ea7d9596b26ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99863 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c7473688e78dc41fd4312a983453df195dd7786 commit r11-7970-g9c7473688e78dc41fd4312a983453df195dd7786 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/97653] [11 Regression] Incorrect long double calculation with -mabi=ibmlongdouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97653 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cda41ce0e8414aec59e6b9fbe645d96e6e8193e2 commit r11-7969-gcda41ce0e8414aec59e6b9fbe645d96e6e8193e2 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug testsuite/98125] [11 Regression] New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b680b9049737198d010e49cf434704c6a6ed2b3f commit r11-7968-gb680b9049737198d010e49cf434704c6a6ed2b3f Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: