[Bug c++/97974] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected overload, have function_decl in get_class_binding_direct, at cp/name-lookup.c:1332

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97974 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:936d500dfc17f58f2507ecd0f7f26e4f197052ee commit r11-8120-g936d500dfc17f58f2507ecd0f7f26e4f197052ee Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug target/100028] [9/10/11 Regression] arm64 failure to generate bfxil

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100028 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/100028] New: arm64 failure to generate bfxil

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100028 Bug ID: 100028 Summary: arm64 failure to generate bfxil Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/84006] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in storage_size() with CLASS entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84006 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrfsousa at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/100027] ICE on storage_size with polymorphic argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100027 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055922.html

[Bug fortran/100025] ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055921.html

[Bug fortran/100024] ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100024 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055921.html

[Bug fortran/100027] New: ICE on storage_size with polymorphic argument

ter (or allocatable) array argument. Tested on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.0.1 20210410 (experimental) GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210410 GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20210410 Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui

[Bug bootstrap/100026] cross build GCC from clang fails: configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++11 language features is required.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100026 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/100026] New: cross GCC from clang fails: configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++11 language features is required.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100026 Bug ID: 100026 Summary: cross GCC from clang fails: configure: error: *** A compiler with support for C++11 language features is required. Product: gcc Version:

[Bug fortran/100025] New: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

all with missing explicit interface. Tested on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.0.1 20210410 (experimental) GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210410 Does not ICE on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20210410 Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui

[Bug fortran/100024] New: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

all with missing explicit interface. Tested on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.0.1 20210410 (experimental) GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210410 Does not ICE on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20210410 Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui

[Bug fortran/100018] ICE on missing polymorphic argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100018 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Path posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055916.html

[Bug c++/98800] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid use of non-static member function in trailing return type since r8-2724

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98800 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82198676c80764ca7cf05f891afaee83b9179dd1 commit r11-8118-g82198676c80764ca7cf05f891afaee83b9179dd1 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/97399] [9/10 Regression] g++ 9.3 cannot compile SFINAE code with separated declaration and definition, g++ 7.3 compiles

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97399 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82198676c80764ca7cf05f891afaee83b9179dd1 commit r11-8118-g82198676c80764ca7cf05f891afaee83b9179dd1 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug analyzer/100011] [11 Regression] ICE in analyzer when generating path for -Wanalyzer-unsafe-call-within-signal-handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100011 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/100011] [11 Regression] ICE in analyzer when generating path for -Wanalyzer-unsafe-call-within-signal-handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100011 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec633d3777bd71f7bde5e671b61ec18e5b7b43ea commit r11-8117-gec633d3777bd71f7bde5e671b61ec18e5b7b43ea Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug target/100000] non-leaf epologue/prologue used if MVE v4sf is used for load/return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Summary|arm:

[Bug target/100023] apple target cross compilation: fails configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100023 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 50550 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50550=edit config.log

[Bug target/100023] apple target cross compilation: fails configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100023 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID CC|

[Bug target/100023] New: apple target cross compilation: fails configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100023 Bug ID: 100023 Summary: apple target cross compilation: fails configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug c++/100022] Parameter packs not expanded with alignas specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100022 --- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 --- I think this is a dup of PR 16, correct me if i am wrong.

[Bug analyzer/99212] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c line 971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99212 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 --- Comment #10 from David Malcolm

[Bug analyzer/98599] [11 Regression] fatal error: Cgraph edge statement index out of range with -Os -flto -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98599 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|fatal error: Cgraph edge|[11 Regression] fatal

[Bug c++/100022] New: Parameter packs not expanded with alignas specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100022 Bug ID: 100022 Summary: Parameter packs not expanded with alignas specifier Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/99928] [OpenMP] reduction variable in combined target construct wrongly mapped as firstprivate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99928 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/567838.html

[Bug c++/87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403 Bug 87403 depends on bug 100020, which changed state. Bug 100020 Summary: RFE: Wmisleading-indentation (or similar warning) for certain missing semicolons? https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100020 What|Removed

[Bug c/88887] Warn on unexpected continuation of 'return' to new line in if statement.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/100020] RFE: Wmisleading-indentation (or similar warning) for certain missing semicolons?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100020 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/100021] New: [9/10/11 Regression] std::clamp unprofitable vectorization on -march=nehalem/.../broadwell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100021 Bug ID: 100021 Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] std::clamp unprofitable vectorization on -march=nehalem/.../broadwell Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/100020] RFE: Wmisleading-indentation (or similar warning) for certain missing semicolons?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100020 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Blocks|

[Bug c/100020] RFE: Wmisleading-indentation (or similar warning) for certain missing semicolons?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100020 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug bootstrap/89494] Bootstrap error when using GCC 4.2.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89494 --- Comment #30 from Piotr Kubaj --- With default flags: during RTL pass: cprop_hardreg In file included from /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/gcc10-devel/work/gcc-10-20210327/libgcc/unwind-c.c:32:

[Bug c++/100019] ICE Segmentation fault with try-catch block in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100019 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/100019] New: ICE Segmentation fault with try-catch block in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100019 Bug ID: 100019 Summary: ICE Segmentation fault with try-catch block in lambda Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/100020] New: RFE: Wmisleading-indentation (or similar warning) for certain missing semicolons?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100020 Bug ID: 100020 Summary: RFE: Wmisleading-indentation (or similar warning) for certain missing semicolons? Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/100018] New: ICE on missing polymorphic argument

) :: that that => this return end subroutine foo Tested on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.0.1 20210410 (experimental) GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210410 GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20210410 Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui

[Bug analyzer/100011] [11 Regression] ICE in analyzer when generating path for -Wanalyzer-unsafe-call-within-signal-handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100011 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-10

[Bug c++/99008] [10/11 Regression] ICE in set_constraints, at cp/constraint.cc:1256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99008 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/97974] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected overload, have function_decl in get_class_binding_direct, at cp/name-lookup.c:1332

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97974 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/99990] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimplifier on invalid va_arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c/99990] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gimplifier on invalid va_arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f7d77bd6d65aa1cf2e195d3776052705c6e636b commit r11-8116-g9f7d77bd6d65aa1cf2e195d3776052705c6e636b Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug c++/98800] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid use of non-static member function in trailing return type since r8-2724

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98800 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4 Keywords|

[Bug c++/98800] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid use of non-static member function in trailing return type since r8-2724

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98800 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- I'm getting a correct (if obscure) error message before the ICE: wa.C:4:71: error: use of ‘this’ in a constant expression 4 | template static auto func() -> enable_if_t()>; |

[Bug libstdc++/100017] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' x86_64-w64-mingw32 host cross toolchain fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 --- Comment #5 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 50548 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50548=edit linux build, FreeBSD host, Windows target The error still exists. It looks MSVCRT does not always define those C11 cfenv

[Bug d/99812] [11 regression] Many libphobos.druntime_shared etc. tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99812 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug d/99812] [11 regression] Many libphobos.druntime_shared etc. tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99812 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38258326dc9e5581e2cd6318ae1b5e675dd00d4a commit r11-8110-g38258326dc9e5581e2cd6318ae1b5e675dd00d4a Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Sat

[Bug target/99744] __attribute__ ((target("general-regs-only"))) doesn't work with GPR intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71958f740f1b8c47a86ea222418abee395d254a0 commit r11-8109-g71958f740f1b8c47a86ea222418abee395d254a0 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri Apr 9

[Bug libstdc++/100017] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' x86_64-w64-mingw32 host cross toolchain fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 --- Comment #4 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #2) > not a bug it looks like it is a bug here.

[Bug libstdc++/100017] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' x86_64-w64-mingw32 host cross toolchain fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/100017] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' x86_64-w64-mingw32 host cross toolchain fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/100017] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' x86_64-w64-mingw32 host cross toolchain fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- I tried to build a full host GCC toolchain from Linux to Windows and fenv_t does not exist.

[Bug libstdc++/100017] New: error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' x86_64-w64-mingw32 host cross toolchain fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 Bug ID: 100017 Summary: error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' x86_64-w64-mingw32 host cross toolchain fails to build Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status:

[Bug target/100016] multilib mingw-w64 links to the wrong multilib path because of libtool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100016 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- BTW. ucrt multilib should also provide as an option I think. m32 m64 mucrt32 mucrt64

[Bug ipa/98265] [10 Regression] gcc-10 has significantly worse code generated with -O2 compared to -O1 (or gcc-9 -O2) when using the Eigen C++ library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98265 Bug 98265 depends on bug 99989, which changed state. Bug 99989 Summary: [11 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning breaks bootstrap on riscv64 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99989 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 99989, which changed state. Bug 99989 Summary: [11 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning breaks bootstrap on riscv64 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99989 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/99989] [11 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning breaks bootstrap on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99989 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/99857] [11 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/declare-variant-1.c (test for excess errors) by r11-7926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99857 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/99849] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:11556 since r5-5407-g30d5d8c5189064c8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99849 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug middle-end/99989] [11 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning breaks bootstrap on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99989 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Can't verify it the above commit fixes it though, so keeping the PR open until somebody confirms it (or attaches preprocessed source so that I could verify with cross-compiler).

[Bug rtl-optimization/98601] [8/9/10 Regression] aarch64: ICE in rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1, at rtlanal.c:467

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98601 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]

[Bug lto/99849] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:11556 since r5-5407-g30d5d8c5189064c8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99849 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22aede7a1228617661105048a91fddd8797e141b commit r11-8108-g22aede7a1228617661105048a91fddd8797e141b Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug middle-end/99989] [11 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning breaks bootstrap on riscv64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99989 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e350d8539a4e28ddc30d0f08a4040f10b699135 commit r11-8107-g3e350d8539a4e28ddc30d0f08a4040f10b699135 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/98601] [8/9/10/11 Regression] aarch64: ICE in rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1, at rtlanal.c:467

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98601 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a493fcd27d6a1af896c4f5ef4ab1e0afe8a839d commit r11-8106-g7a493fcd27d6a1af896c4f5ef4ab1e0afe8a839d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/100009] [9 Regression] -march=native doesn't recognize tigerlake

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-10 Known to fail|

[Bug bootstrap/100013] libiberty error PATH_MAX does not exist on DJGPP host.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100013 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug ipa/99862] [meta-issue] various missed optimizations for dead code elimination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99862 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||meta-bug --- Comment #10 from Eric

[Bug target/97726] simd intrinsics tests fail on armeb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97726 --- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon --- Almost, but I still see vstn_lane_bf16_1.c failures in check-function-bodies on armeb. vdot-2-[12].c still fail, but I see failures on little-endian configs too, so probably a different issue (I didn't

[Bug middle-end/99857] [11 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/declare-variant-1.c (test for excess errors) by r11-7926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99857 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c9744fb3bf2fbf7cec5722f4b187eb553d98280 commit r11-8105-g1c9744fb3bf2fbf7cec5722f4b187eb553d98280 Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Sat

[Bug libgcc/100016] New: multilib mingw-w64 links to the wrong multilib path because of libtool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100016 Bug ID: 100016 Summary: multilib mingw-w64 links to the wrong multilib path because of libtool Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/100012] MSDOS DJGPP host no socket while libcody does not block this

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100012 --- Comment #3 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 50545 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50545=edit libgcov should include

[Bug c++/100012] MSDOS DJGPP host no socket while libcody does not block this

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100012 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 50544 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50544=edit there are more issues related to this I think the problem is that DJGPP toolchain defines __unix__ macro while it is

[Bug c++/95486] ICE for alias CTAD with non-dependent argument and constrained constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95486 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lnwirz at chem dot helsinki.fi ---

[Bug c++/99675] [10/11 Regression] ICE during template deduction since r10-5020-g1a291106384cabc7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99675 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/93085] ICE in get_class_binding_direct and alias_ctad_tweaks, with C++20 NTTP + CTAD + alias template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93085 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/100015] MSDOS DJGPP host build mallinfo was not declared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100015 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 50543 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50543=edit Demo patch

[Bug target/100015] New: MSDOS DJGPP host build mallinfo was not declared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100015 Bug ID: 100015 Summary: MSDOS DJGPP host build mallinfo was not declared Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3