[Bug target/99488] dwz: /usr/lib/gcc/mips64el-linux-gnuabi64/11/go1: Found two copies of .debug_line_str section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99488 --- Comment #11 from YunQiang Su --- This problem will happen when gcc is configured with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean Option.

[Bug fortran/100132] Optimization breaks pointer association

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100132 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055946.html

[Bug fortran/100132] New: Optimization breaks pointer association

ing with -O1 or -O2, curiously not with -O3 unless -fcheck=recursion is used Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.0.1 20210417 (experimental) GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210417 GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20210417 Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui

[Bug tree-optimization/100115] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100115 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- The reason why the warning tends to disappear in a simpler test case is because of the limit (I just had it happen with my reduction). Don't spend more time on it than you already have, I'll work with the

[Bug target/95816] Aarch64 jumps between Hot/Cold sections does not clobber registers x16/x17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95816 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-17 Keywords|

[Bug c++/95763] Feature request: compiler warning if line width exceeds N symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95763 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Severity|normal

[Bug middle-end/88175] GCC should not warn within implicit copy-constructor (or should report the implicit function in a special way)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88175 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely --- Why is that needed? It says the location is something like: In member function ‘info& info::operator=(const info&)’, or: In copy constructor ‘info::info(const info&)’, If that isn't explicitly defined

[Bug middle-end/100062] Can't put DECL_STATIC_CONSTRUCTOR/DESTRUCTORs decls on comdat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100062 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Since you say this happens on a DSO level why is this not achieved via some > additional object at link-time (like crt*.o)? It sounds like you place > the CDTOR

[Bug libstdc++/100128] Behavior and performance depends on order of ctype.h and stdlib.h include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100128 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > Glibc should probably act as though __NO_CTYPE is implicitly defined by > __cplusplus, so that the effect is independent of the order of includes. Or it

[Bug bootstrap/95364] contrib/gcc_update -r 8712 does not work with git

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95364 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |trivial Summary|[Regression]

[Bug libstdc++/100128] Behavior and performance depends on order of ctype.h and stdlib.h include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100128 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Travis Downs from comment #0) > Evidently, the behavior and definitions exposed by these headers should not > depend on the order of include. I suspect there are other cases besides the >

[Bug c++/100124] Why is "flexible array member '...' in an otherwise empty '...'" an issue?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100124 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||69698 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor

[Bug tree-optimization/95034] Failure to convert xor pattern (made out of or+and) to xor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95034 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/100114] libasan built against latest glibc doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk so far, guess some backporting will be useful.

[Bug c/51971] unclear/unverified restrictions on attribute((const|pure))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51971 David Stone changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davidfromonline at gmail dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/88175] GCC should not warn within implicit copy-constructor (or should report the implicit function in a special way)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88175 --- Comment #18 from Jonny Grant --- Hello Martin It looks better. May I ask, if the "implicitly generated copy assignment" and "copy constructor" could be mentioned in the warning that they were implicitly generated? Thank you, Jonny

[Bug c++/100131] [meta-bug] internal compiler error: in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100131 Alexander Lelyakin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexander.lelyakin@googlema

[Bug c++/99227] [meta] [modules] Bugs relating to header-units of STL header files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Lelyakin --- During last two and a half weeks 3 bugs was closed: 99283 - in assert_definition 99284 - in key_mergeable 99427 - non-constant condition for static assertion 99246 ICE in write_location was reopened

[Bug c++/100131] New: [meta-bug] internal compiler error: in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100131 Bug ID: 100131 Summary: [meta-bug] internal compiler error: in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/100115] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100115 --- Comment #2 from Boris Kolpackov --- > I'm trying to reduce the test case to something manageable but that can take > many hours, even days. Right. On our side we have spent hours, even days trying to suppress this warning (both by

[Bug d/99914] d: Template symbols not overridable by normal symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99914 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bda519596543e49f77914b5677693e86be5d01d0 commit r11-8234-gbda519596543e49f77914b5677693e86be5d01d0 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Tue

[Bug middle-end/100130] R section flag handling doesn't cope with intervening decls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100130 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-17 Ever

[Bug middle-end/100130] New: R section flag handling doesn't cope with intervening decls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100130 Bug ID: 100130 Summary: R section flag handling doesn't cope with intervening decls Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/58876] No non-virtual-dtor warning in std::unique_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58876 DB changed: What|Removed |Added CC||db0451 at gmail dot com --- Comment #10 from DB

[Bug fortran/98534] Intrinsic functions failing with unlimited polymorphic actual arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98534 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|pault at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/100027] ICE on storage_size with polymorphic argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100027 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug sanitizer/100114] libasan built against latest glibc doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9f462fb372fb02da032cefd6b091d7582c425ae commit r11-8230-gd9f462fb372fb02da032cefd6b091d7582c425ae Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/99555] [OpenMP/nvptx] Execution-time hang for simple nested OpenMP 'target'/'parallel'/'task' constructs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99555 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/100129] New: [modules] ICE free(): invalid pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100129 Bug ID: 100129 Summary: [modules] ICE free(): invalid pointer Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/99722] [modules] internal compiler error: segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99722 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Lelyakin --- All so far found examples of such error message change its behavior if you add the parameter: --param=hash-table-verification-limit=1000 Most of them to the error message: ICE in hashtab_chk_error.

[Bug c++/100002] internal compiler error: in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from