[Bug libstdc++/100249] missing forwarding std::__invoke result in ranges::is_permutation and ranges::clamp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100249 --- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 --- (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0) > when the type of __proj_val is an rvalue reference, we need to convert it to > rvalue for the next std::__invoke call: https://godbolt.org/z/1G7aqxs3c. More simple case:

[Bug rtl-optimization/100253] New: [10/11/12 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-tree-bit-ccp -ftree-slp-vectorize (unaligned movdqa)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100253 Bug ID: 100253 Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-tree-bit-ccp -ftree-slp-vectorize (unaligned movdqa) Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug c++/100252] New: Internal compiler error during template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100252 Bug ID: 100252 Summary: Internal compiler error during template instantiation Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/98911] Add folding and remove expanders for x86 *pcmp{et,gt}* builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98911 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- Fixed in GCC12.

[Bug target/98911] Add folding and remove expanders for x86 *pcmp{et,gt}* builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98911 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c54a9f7259fce1a221270f21d8076c960c7d0163 commit r12-110-gc54a9f7259fce1a221270f21d8076c960c7d0163 Author: liuhongt Date: Tue Feb

[Bug analyzer/100244] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in describe_state_change)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100244 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE: |[11 Regression] ICE:

[Bug analyzer/100244] [11/12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in describe_state_change)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100244 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61bfff562e3b6091d5a0a412a7d496bd523868a8 commit r12-108-g61bfff562e3b6091d5a0a412a7d496bd523868a8 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #214 from Peter Bisroev --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #213) > Does this still happen with GCC 8 or above? Hi Andrew, yes it does from my last tests. As we have found out here, before newer versions of GCC can work on

[Bug ada/100251] New: Byte order mark in gnat.adc raises compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100251 Bug ID: 100251 Summary: Byte order mark in gnat.adc raises compilation error Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/100250] New: ICE related to -Wmaybe-uninitialized

-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: muecker at gwdg dot de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50670 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50670=edit minimized test case (possibly also affects 11.0) xgcc (GCC) 12.0.0 20210

[Bug target/99932] OpenACC/nvptx offloading execution regressions starting with CUDA 11.2-era Nvidia Driver 460.27.04

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99932 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- FIled https://developer.nvidia.com/nvidia_bug/3299227

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #6) > Fixed by r11-7864. Not sure if we want this test. It doesn't contain > __fp16 like the test in r11-7864. PR 99787 also has a testcase that could be done too.

[Bug bootstrap/100246] [11/12 Regression] GCC will not bootstrap with clang 3.4/3.5 [xcode 5/6, Darwin 12/13]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246 --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 50669 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50669=edit Patch that works around the clang issue/bug this is against GCC-11.1rc2, but not likely to need much/any amendment for

[Bug fortran/100158] Some issues with fortran testsuite files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100158 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The files testsuite/substr_{9,10}.f90 were moved by Tobias: r12-68-gac456fd981db6b0c2f7ee1ab0d17d36087a74dc2

[Bug fortran/100218] Allow target of the pointer resulting from the evaluation of function-reference in a variable definition context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100218 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/100154] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100154 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Fixed by r11-7864. Not sure if we want this test. It doesn't contain __fp16 like the test in r11-7864.

[Bug c++/100240] Compiler crashes with segmentation fault on a chrono library using nvcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100240 --- Comment #5 from Peter Taraba --- Also, not sure if this info helps, but this bug does not seem to appear with gcc 10.2 (I tried it on Manjaro KDE Plasma linux). So it's probably some new code which came after 10.2. Cheers.

[Bug fortran/100154] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100154 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0e7833b94953ba6b4a915150666969ad9fc66af commit r12-107-gd0e7833b94953ba6b4a915150666969ad9fc66af Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug analyzer/100244] [11/12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in describe_state_change)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100244 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #44 from Iain Sandoe --- unfortunately, wider testing showed sanitiser fails - so this has been reverted for now.

[Bug fortran/100218] Allow target of the pointer resulting from the evaluation of function-reference in a variable definition context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100218 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32c4d970ea3a9fc330d6aa8fd83f9dae0b9afc64 commit r12-106-g32c4d970ea3a9fc330d6aa8fd83f9dae0b9afc64 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug libstdc++/100249] New: missing forwarding std::__invoke result in ranges::is_permutation and ranges::clamp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100249 Bug ID: 100249 Summary: missing forwarding std::__invoke result in ranges::is_permutation and ranges::clamp Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/95486] ICE for alias CTAD with non-dependent argument and constrained constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95486 --- Comment #11 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- Thank you. But the first CE link: https://godbolt.org/z/cPWdGW, and with the addition in Comment 2: https://godbolt.org/z/Gezh5h5W4, they still ICE.

[Bug c++/100248] New: ICE with global "default" keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100248 Bug ID: 100248 Summary: ICE with global "default" keyword Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/100247] New: x86-64 bad register allocation for unsigned type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100247 Bug ID: 100247 Summary: x86-64 bad register allocation for unsigned type Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug jit/100242] libgccjit.so: error: in expmed_mode_index, at expmed.h:249

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100242 --- Comment #3 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50668 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50668=edit Smaller reproducer Ok, I figured out how to find the location of the error. In this case, it's caused by using the modulo

[Bug bootstrap/100246] [11/12 Regression] GCC will not bootstrap with clang 3.4/3.5 [xcode 5/6, Darwin 12/13]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Host||x86_64-darwin12, |

[Bug bootstrap/100246] New: [11/12 Regression] GCC will not bootstrap with clang 3.4/3.5 [xcode 5/6, Darwin 12/13]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246 Bug ID: 100246 Summary: [11/12 Regression] GCC will not bootstrap with clang 3.4/3.5 [xcode 5/6, Darwin 12/13] Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- I can't reproduce this with latest trunk :-(. Bisecting...

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Single, hopefully valid TU, no LTO needed: $ gcc -march=armv8-a -fPIC -O3 100241.c -fvisibility=internal -c 100241.c: In function ‘vp9_first_pass_encode_tile_mb_row’: 100241.c:32:1: error: unable to

[Bug target/82735] _mm256_zeroupper does not invalidate previously computed registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82735 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey Walton --- Add 9.3 to the know to fail list: $ gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0 Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

[Bug target/82735] _mm256_zeroupper does not invalidate previously computed registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82735 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey Walton --- I think we are seeing this bug in the field. We are catching lots of failed self tests as we test on multiple platforms, including Ubuntu 14 ERS and Ubuntu 16 LTS. The problem makes GCC 4.8.4 through 7.5

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Now reproduced with a single file. Reducing that...

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #43 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6600392bf71c4a9785f8f49948b611425896830 commit r12-103-gb6600392bf71c4a9785f8f49948b611425896830 Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|8.5 --- Comment #42 from Iain Sandoe

[Bug fortran/100218] Allow target of the pointer resulting from the evaluation of function-reference in a variable definition context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100218 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug fortran/100245] ICE on automatic reallocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100245 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-24

[Bug c++/88580] Parameter pack expansion fails (variadic constructor template inside a variadic class template)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88580 Rustam Abdullaev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rustamabd at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/100245] New: ICE on automatic reallocation

ved type. Seen on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210424 (experimental) GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.0.1 20210424 (prerelease) GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210424 GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20210424 Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui

[Bug analyzer/100244] New: [11/12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in describe_state_change)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100244 Bug ID: 100244 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in describe_state_change) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/96796] [9/10 Regression] aarch64: ICE during RTL pass: reload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96796 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e720d3033f84802147d2da9e923bd862cdb73164 commit r10-9764-ge720d3033f84802147d2da9e923bd862cdb73164 Author: Richard

[Bug target/100041] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4022

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100041 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED