[Bug go/100389] New: "invalid type conversion" error for string-based error type

2021-05-02 Thread ben.hutchings at essensium dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100389 Bug ID: 100389 Summary: "invalid type conversion" error for string-based error type Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/92729] [avr] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept in future releases

2021-05-02 Thread abebeos at lazaridis dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729 --- Comment #57 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com --- Just fascinating! Bountysource violated its own processes, and payed out the bounty without waiting for the votes. See, even without a dispute, there is a 2 week voting period ("The bounty

[Bug go/100388] New: import seems to define identifiers in package block not file block

2021-05-02 Thread ben.hutchings at essensium dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100388 Bug ID: 100388 Summary: import seems to define identifiers in package block not file block Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/100169] Test gcc.dg/sms-10.c fails on power10

2021-05-02 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100169 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- The SMS pass is notorious for slight changes making its cost model decide too do things the other way around. Is that what is happening here? Was SMS' decision a good decision (or at least

[Bug c++/100386] Not all constant brace-init-lists receive symbols

2021-05-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100386 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/100382] [12 Regression] go.test/test/fixedbugs/issue16095.go hang since r12-248

2021-05-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100382 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/100387] ranges::minmax compares moved-out value

2021-05-02 Thread hewillk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100387 --- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 --- Also, in std::shift_right: std::move(std::move(__first), std::move(__dest_head), std::move(__result)); return __result; we return the moved-out __result.

[Bug fortran/99819] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_defer_symbol_init, at fortran/trans-decl.c:841

2021-05-02 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99819 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/100387] New: ranges::minmax compares moved-out value

2021-05-02 Thread hewillk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100387 Bug ID: 100387 Summary: ranges::minmax compares moved-out value Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/100386] New: Not all constant brace-init-lists receive symbols

2021-05-02 Thread jengelh at inai dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100386 Bug ID: 100386 Summary: Not all constant brace-init-lists receive symbols Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/100385] New: overload resolution for function call expression on object selects `operator auto` conversion candidate.

2021-05-02 Thread mizvekov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100385 Bug ID: 100385 Summary: overload resolution for function call expression on object selects `operator auto` conversion candidate. Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status:

[Bug libgomp/100352] [11/12 Regression] libgomp.fortran/async_io_1.f90 -O0 execution test

2021-05-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100352 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a13a50047ef1814a7bda2392f728bf28f81b17ce commit r12-344-ga13a50047ef1814a7bda2392f728bf28f81b17ce Author: Tobias Burnus Date:

[Bug c++/100384] Compiling in c++17 mode breaks compilation of functions named visit()

2021-05-02 Thread aacid at kde dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100384 --- Comment #1 from Albert Astals Cid --- Created attachment 50734 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50734=edit error log

[Bug c++/100384] New: Compiling in c++17 mode breaks compilation of functions named visit()

2021-05-02 Thread aacid at kde dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100384 Bug ID: 100384 Summary: Compiling in c++17 mode breaks compilation of functions named visit() Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

2021-05-02 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #45 from Iain Sandoe --- the i386 backend code already sets : TARGET_CALL_FUSAGE_CONTAINS_NON_CALLEE_CLOBBERS to true unconditionally. So, it seems that it might be necessary to find some way to adjust CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE.

[Bug bootstrap/100373] [12 Regression] Darwin, Compare-debug fail after r12-248-gb58dc0b803057

2021-05-02 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe --- this happens with mpfr-4.x sources and not with mpfr-3.1.6.

[Bug debug/100383] New: cfi sections directive detection fails with binutils 2.36

2021-05-02 Thread ssbssa at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100383 Bug ID: 100383 Summary: cfi sections directive detection fails with binutils 2.36 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/100382] [12 Regression] go.test/test/fixedbugs/issue16095.go hang since r12-248

2021-05-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100382 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/100382] New: [12 Regression] go.test/test/fixedbugs/issue16095.go hang since r12-248

2021-05-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100382 Bug ID: 100382 Summary: [12 Regression] go.test/test/fixedbugs/issue16095.go hang since r12-248 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/100381] New: new static_assert((std::__is_complete_or_unbounded(...)) failure from g++ 11.1.0

2021-05-02 Thread gilles.gouaillardet at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100381 Bug ID: 100381 Summary: new static_assert((std::__is_complete_or_unbounded(...)) failure from g++ 11.1.0 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status:

[Bug rtl-optimization/100377] needless stack adjustment when passing struct in register

2021-05-02 Thread luc.vanoostenryck at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100377 --- Comment #3 from Luc Van Oostenryck --- > I thought there was one which I filed which is much older than those but I > can't find it. Probably also related to PR36409 and PR49157

[Bug target/100375] [12 Regression] trunk 20210501 ftbfs for nvptx-none

2021-05-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100375 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7911a905276781c20f704f5a91b5125e0184d072 commit r12-343-g7911a905276781c20f704f5a91b5125e0184d072 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/100366] spurious warning - std::vector::clear followed by std::vector::insert(vec.end(), ...) with -O2

2021-05-02 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100366 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-02 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/93808] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [SH] Ruby crashes with 'Illegal Instruction' with -fcrossjumping

2021-05-02 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93808 --- Comment #32 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #31) > Ah, I forgot to add -O1 and -fno-cross-jumping to CFLAGS. > > Are the builtin_traps() optimized out for -O2? > > I'm building with

[Bug target/98341] [11/12 Regression] Ada bootstrap fails with erroneous memory access on m68k

2021-05-02 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] Ada |[11/12 Regression] Ada

[Bug target/98341] [11/12 Regression] Ada bootstrap fails with Storage_Error stack overflow or erroneous memory access on m68k

2021-05-02 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou --- > Note sure if this is related, but the 32bit Windows build of 11.1.0 fails in > a similar way: Not all build failures are similar because they affect the Ada compiler! Please open a separate TN for your

[Bug target/93808] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [SH] Ruby crashes with 'Illegal Instruction' with -fcrossjumping

2021-05-02 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93808 --- Comment #31 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #30) > Created attachment 50717 [details] > Build log for ruby 2.5 with Oleg's patch applied Ah, I forgot to add -O1 and -fno-cross-jumping

[Bug target/98341] [11/12 Regression] Ada bootstrap fails with Storage_Error stack overflow or erroneous memory access on m68k

2021-05-02 Thread reiter.christoph at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341 Christoph Reiter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||reiter.christoph at gmail dot com

[Bug target/100336] file trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386-isa.def doesn't get installed ok ?

2021-05-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100336 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e1ecc984ef71fc80d0fb7e91ac38af16ccb1943 commit r12-342-g6e1ecc984ef71fc80d0fb7e91ac38af16ccb1943 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: