https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100255
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14786c8bcec1b90901673f79a6c3ca449815fd9e
commit r10-9792-g14786c8bcec1b90901673f79a6c3ca449815fd9e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23330
Bug 23330 depends on bug 23659, which changed state.
Bug 23659 Summary: Should able to add dereferencing (statements with VUSE)
without rerunning may_alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23659
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23659
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13603
Bug 13603 depends on bug 21890, which changed state.
Bug 21890 Summary: SecurityManager is incomplete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21890
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21890
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7625
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89764
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89357
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100375
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da9c085ddbfe61e5954c8ec4e996240fa3a994c0
commit r11-8346-gda9c085ddbfe61e5954c8ec4e996240fa3a994c0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100412
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Or just change the test name to make it unique.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91993
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |10.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91759
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |8.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100414
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] ICE: in |[11/12 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100414
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-04
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100384
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af5b2b911dd80ae9cc87404b7e7ab807cf6655d4
commit r12-436-gaf5b2b911dd80ae9cc87404b7e7ab807cf6655d4
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 4 May 2021, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373
>
> --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100414
Bug ID: 100414
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: in dominated_by_p, at
dominance.c:1120 with -O -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-429-20210504051736-g00d8545d705-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20210504 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
--- Comment #39 from Richard Biener ---
Martin - this is another one, is there sth simple safe that can be done on the
8 branch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > Doesn't reproduce on x86_64-linux with bootstrapping with in-tree mpfr 4.1.0
>
> it might well be some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Doesn't reproduce on x86_64-linux with bootstrapping with in-tree mpfr 4.1.0
it might well be some corner-case, but Darwin is PIC by default, so it might be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85887
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100412
Bug ID: 100412
Summary: [11/12 regression] PASS & FAIL for same test
aarch64-qemu: gcc.dg/Wvla-parameter-[23].c pr?
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100329
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Doesn't reproduce on x86_64-linux with bootstrapping with in-tree mpfr 4.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100398
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100329
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a310bb73edc9548e08d1fa28e7a56246caf27757
commit r12-431-ga310bb73edc9548e08d1fa28e7a56246caf27757
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100398
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2326627eb19d8c21251fd60479f1a190621c475b
commit r12-430-g2326627eb19d8c21251fd60479f1a190621c475b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100230
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9225a497de15bf3e8beb8df402e1b8cf9ba2b8ac
commit r10-9791-g9225a497de15bf3e8beb8df402e1b8cf9ba2b8ac
Author: Alex Coplan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100396
--- Comment #4 from vopl at bk dot ru ---
I understand what you're saying. But, apparently, there is still corruption in
the calculus of the substituted Args, please look at this code (thanks to
johny5):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100410
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|10.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chantry.xavier at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100410
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100411
--- Comment #2 from Liu Hao ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1)
> Can you post the configure line?
As you wish, but it is very long (I have no idea why they have been there):
```
$ ../gcc/configure --prefix=/mingw64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100410
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100411
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100410
--- Comment #2 from Xavier ---
It looks like it's already fixed in 10.3 and 11.1 :
https://godbolt.org/z/W98edbPEx
Do you confirm the code is correct, and it was a bug of 10.1 and 10.2 only ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100411
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100410
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think you need align(1) also and not just packed attribute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100329
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100329
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
I don't think we can have any reasonable placement decision at that point.
Which leaves to reject operands defined in asm goto for reassociation - not too
bad I guess.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100329
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100411
Bug ID: 100411
Summary: GCC 11 branch bootstrap ICE on x86_w64-w64-mingw32
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100329
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So we run into
static void
insert_stmt_after (gimple *stmt, gimple *insert_point)
{
...
else
/* We assume INSERT_POINT is a SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT of some SSA_NAME,
thus if it must end a basic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100329
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-linux-gnu |
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100366
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is that FRE sees
[local count: 1073741824]:
_6 = vec_2(D)->D.33436._M_impl.D.32749._M_start;
_7 = vec_2(D)->D.33436._M_impl.D.32749._M_finish;
if (_6 != _7)
goto ; [70.00%]
else
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100410
Bug ID: 100410
Summary: [10 regression] optimization bug with -O3
-fno-strict-aliasing
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100397
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100404
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100397
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08fff201c92109b5476a4cc211c71de557ec87b1
commit r12-399-g08fff201c92109b5476a4cc211c71de557ec87b1
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100404
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100404
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
There is -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100402
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Works on x86_64-linux.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100398
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100398
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
Bug ID: 100409
Summary: C++ FE elides pure throwing call
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100355
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #2)
> Tried that, but it's not taken into account.
>
> ieee.exp uses c-torture-execute, maybe that function does not honor dg
> directives? (none of the tests under
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91914
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 4 May 2021, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91914
>
> Martin Sebor changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100408
Bug ID: 100408
Summary: [nvptx][OpenMP] Enable SIMT for user-defined reduction
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization, openmp
301 - 362 of 362 matches
Mail list logo
