[Bug c++/100490] New: gcc 11.1.0 hangs forever while building its own libstdc++ (c++17 floating_from_chars.cc) on aarch64 linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100490 Bug ID: 100490 Summary: gcc 11.1.0 hangs forever while building its own libstdc++ (c++17 floating_from_chars.cc) on aarch64 linux Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #47 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- I downloaded [Bradleys-Mac-mini:~/programs/gcc/gcc-mainline] lucier% git log -1 --oneline 2254b3233b5 (HEAD -> master, origin/trunk, origin/master, origin/HEAD) PR middle-end/100325 -

[Bug c++/100489] [10.3/11/12 REGRESSION] ICE in cp/constexpr.c:3556

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100489 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100440] allocated() gives True for unallocated variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100440 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl --- On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 06:49:11PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #7) > > There is no default initialization in the code below. default > > initialization is

[Bug c++/100489] New: [10.3/11 REGRESSION] ICE in cp/constexpr.c:3556

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100489 Bug ID: 100489 Summary: [10.3/11 REGRESSION] ICE in cp/constexpr.c:3556 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/100440] allocated() gives True for unallocated variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100440 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100440] allocated() gives True for unallocated variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100440 --- Comment #8 from David.Smith at lmu dot edu --- That is not good. The expected results from my test case with debug prints commented out should be this: Sample 10. Eigenvalue from matrix powers. Iterationeigenvalue approximation

[Bug web/100480] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100480 --- Comment #4 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com --- This is essentially a bug in gcc's component "web". The website should inform clearly who can one contact (either in public or in private) to make a formal complaint. This is rally nothing

[Bug ada/100488] [12 Regression] trunk 20210508 fails to build ada on x86_64-linux-gnux32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100488 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug ada/100486] Ada build fails for 32bit Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-08

[Bug fortran/98411] [10/11] Pointless: Array larger than ‘-fmax-stack-var-size=’, moved from stack to static storage for main program variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411 Ryo Furue changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ryofurue at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/42587] bswap not recognized for memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42587 Peter Cordes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter at cordes dot ca --- Comment #12

[Bug ada/100488] New: [12 Regression] trunk 20210508 fails to build ada on x86_64-linux-gnux32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100488 Bug ID: 100488 Summary: [12 Regression] trunk 20210508 fails to build ada on x86_64-linux-gnux32 Product: gcc Version: 9.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug tree-optimization/100487] New: A possible divide by zero bug in jump_table_cluster::emit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100487 Bug ID: 100487 Summary: A possible divide by zero bug in jump_table_cluster::emit Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/100486] New: Ada build fails for 32bit Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486 Bug ID: 100486 Summary: Ada build fails for 32bit Windows Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug fortran/46991] [OOP] polymorphic assumed-size actual arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46991 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7920c05ce0b737da1abf644cf4b3fa862a1b3df1 commit r12-636-g7920c05ce0b737da1abf644cf4b3fa862a1b3df1 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Fri

[Bug c++/100485] New: False positive in -Wmismatched-new-delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100485 Bug ID: 100485 Summary: False positive in -Wmismatched-new-delete Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/100482] namespaces as int in decltype expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100482 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Ever confirmed|0

[Bug web/100480] Where to file complaints re project-maintainers?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100480 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's an invalid bug report, because it's not a bug in GCC. I don't know how to answer your question, because it's not clear who you want to contact. Which maintainers? There are many of them listed in

[Bug testsuite/100484] [12 regression] Test case gcc.dg/sso-9.c fails after r12-622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100484 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/100467] [12 regression] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100467 --- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger --- Rainer, I would be happy if you could give this patch a try. Thanks Bernd.