https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100085
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91540
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Currently on the trunk we get:
andl%edi, %esi
movl$43, %eax
movzbl %sil, %esi
subl%esi, %eax
Which is close.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22568
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15)
> The expr.c patch yes. The tree-ssa-phiopt.c patch, no. Tree-ssa-phiopt.c
> needs more code rework because of the new infrastructures so I have not
> gotten ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89263
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||25290
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89263
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sergey.ignatchenko at ithare
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85605
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
vregs
ktvdviry.c:7:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770
0x6912fa _fatal_insn(char const*, rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char
const*)
/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-12.0.0_alpha20210523/work/gcc-12-20210523/gcc/rtl-error.c:108
0x69131a _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91383
Sandy Martel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Sandy.Martel@lexisnexisrisk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66022
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100726
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100728
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100697
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Missing fwprop for argument |Scheduler before RA causes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100735
Bug ID: 100735
Summary: -fno-trampolines doc wrongly implies it affects C, C++
etc.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100660
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc084c487e997e7f47cee55467628ade4488538b
commit r12-1009-gdc084c487e997e7f47cee55467628ade4488538b
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100722
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100722
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c01c4331112aaf45f0de20ed8883dbeab83ed896
commit r12-1006-gc01c4331112aaf45f0de20ed8883dbeab83ed896
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Sun M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734
Bug ID: 100734
Summary: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:291:8:
internal compiler error: in from_mode_char, at
attribs.h:304
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100724
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.5.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe03f4fc9548b3fdbff3c8284a994feaa7d6307d
commit r12-1005-gfe03f4fc9548b3fdbff3c8284a994feaa7d6307d
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100733
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note in older versions of GCC (8.x), disabling phiopt1 is needed instead of
phiopt2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100733
Bug ID: 100733
Summary: -fcompare-debug failure for pr85213.c at -O1
-fdisable-tree-phiopt2
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-debu
: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210523 (experimental) [master revision
:c92372ce3:15d30d2f20794d29ceabcfd57d230d6387284115] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
d4(i) { __builtin_sprintf(d4, "%s", i); }
$ gcc-trunk -O3 -Wall mutant.c
mutant.c:1:1: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100721
David Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidfromonline at gmail dot
com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
--- Comment #2 from Harald van Dijk ---
There are more missing or wrong includes here: looking at the code, it's also
using functions from without including that, but that one gets
implicitly included for me even on this old G++ so happens to n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
--- Comment #1 from Harald van Dijk ---
The full configure line I used for reproducing this on glibc, btw:
../gcc-11.1.0/configure --prefix=$HOME/gcc-11.1.0-run CC=gcc-4.8.5
CXX=g++-4.8.5 --enable-languages=c,c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
Bug ID: 100731
Summary: GCC 11 fails to build using GCC 4.8 because of missing
includes
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100730
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100726
--- Comment #7 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > > I really doubt anything before Windows XP is supported really.
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100700
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Right, and of course there are many -Wreturn-type cases where no switches or
enums are involved at all.
The warning is about the missing return from the end of the function, not about
the switch that happ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100726
--- Comment #6 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > I really doubt anything before Windows XP is supported really.
>
> I have no interest in making the filesystem libr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100721
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100726
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I really doubt anything before Windows XP is supported really.
I have no interest in making the filesystem library work on old versions of
Windows. If we expe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100704
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100730
Bug ID: 100730
Summary: h8300-linux: unused parameter, statement may fall
through, control reaches end of non-void function
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100725
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100729
Bug ID: 100729
Summary: Inconsistency in -Wformat-extra-args when
first-to-check is 0 and format string is NULL
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100611
John Eivind Helset changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jehelset at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100728
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
"could not read lto-wrapper output"
38 matches
Mail list logo
