version 12.0.0 20210610 (experimental) [master revision
5ad76ad7f5b:c64ab1c4fe0:cce1697e6fe0134616ebc8f7040d99e66c12241a] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk abc.c ; ./a.out
0
$ gcc-trunk -O3 abc.c ; ./a.out
4
$ cat abc.c
int a[10];
int b, d, g;
volatile char c;
short e;
volatile int f;
int main() {
for (; d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101024
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101024
Bug ID: 101024
Summary: Missed min expression at phiopt1
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101020
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100995
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100995
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26dbe85a3781af913639b17bc966f4a0b8209f3b
commit r12-1375-g26dbe85a3781af913639b17bc966f4a0b8209f3b
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98871
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Latest patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/572515.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98512
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
Latest patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/572515.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100946
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100946
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae96e217ef82502312bed7e195a30ca5c67ca7ef
commit r11-8549-gae96e217ef82502312bed7e195a30ca5c67ca7ef
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67829
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67829
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edec2660ff4890ecf8cc191f7c92cf527de51fe2
commit r12-1374-gedec2660ff4890ecf8cc191f7c92cf527de51fe2
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100946
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:206db06ee380f490db0293af4ea7a4d590abd78c
commit r12-1373-g206db06ee380f490db0293af4ea7a4d590abd78c
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101022
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cel at us dot ibm.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89021
--- Comment #56 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a325bdd195ee96f826b208c3afb9bed2ec077e12
commit r12-1372-ga325bdd195ee96f826b208c3afb9bed2ec077e12
Author: Peter Bergner
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100577
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100577
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80495610eb8c3b1395073cebd26a079d81b73403
commit r11-8547-g80495610eb8c3b1395073cebd26a079d81b73403
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100770
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100770
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bee80d74f7ebc8e1ada913aa059dedc0976f28c0
commit r10-9908-gbee80d74f7ebc8e1ada913aa059dedc0976f28c0
Author: Patrick Palka
-with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-1366-20210610095751-g6fcba9ef23e-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20210610 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100770
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a35c5a5fc3eb610b77833855048163486c2fdb49
commit r11-8546-ga35c5a5fc3eb610b77833855048163486c2fdb49
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101010
--- Comment #2 from Hedayat Vatankhah ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> Does the type_info::name() string match what you're looking for?
No, not at all. Looks like I've not clearly described my intent.
First of all,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101018
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101022
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
Looks like the proper pattern should be altivec_eqv1ti.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101022
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101022
Bug ID: 101022
Summary: rs6000: __builtin_altivec_vcmpequt expands to wrong
pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101019
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100690
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100690
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f5cda0e646822bbd01e642ed28a4f4f0cca8c59
commit r10-9907-g8f5cda0e646822bbd01e642ed28a4f4f0cca8c59
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100690
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6ccaf17ddbe8adb76475826be02580790ab28ca
commit r11-8545-gc6ccaf17ddbe8adb76475826be02580790ab28ca
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100993
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Rejecting __builtin_* declarations was previously discussed in bug 32455.
If we do, it would probably be worth testing building various software
with the patched GCC to see what issues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100631
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100631
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1f54b2b7d876c72ab05afb0df214aba205f94ad
commit r10-9904-gb1f54b2b7d876c72ab05afb0df214aba205f94ad
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100631
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:648c786bc6451115604c60abcc7977b3c6987ae4
commit r10-9903-g648c786bc6451115604c60abcc7977b3c6987ae4
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100631
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b93d61be5a5a93e95783b80c58b297e215badf1
commit r11-8542-g3b93d61be5a5a93e95783b80c58b297e215badf1
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100631
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd4db3ddc3639e03f557010b8e0e947e4b51633e
commit r11-8541-gfd4db3ddc3639e03f557010b8e0e947e4b51633e
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100639
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100639
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8bd39bc10eac3028dbf509b27457172360e6e8c
commit r10-9902-gc8bd39bc10eac3028dbf509b27457172360e6e8c
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100639
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a50cc70f1b5ce3ae11528095fa3a1feadb206357
commit r11-8540-ga50cc70f1b5ce3ae11528095fa3a1feadb206357
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97770
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #18)
>
> That's going to work I guess but it will pessimize general optimization
> which no longer know this is computing popcount (not sure if the old
> version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100967
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100967
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3cf5b2930c22497617a535802b0c55248d688069
commit r9-9579-g3cf5b2930c22497617a535802b0c55248d688069
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100967
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06b794846f1d8fa55133a257f6d7af39398b9cdc
commit r10-9901-g06b794846f1d8fa55133a257f6d7af39398b9cdc
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100967
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:228bcaca4286196d33741256dcd54b60e58b2b2f
commit r11-8539-g228bcaca4286196d33741256dcd54b60e58b2b2f
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100967
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ae4a73057dd26e7f09b5ba5190b84b1bbea4368
commit r12-1369-g5ae4a73057dd26e7f09b5ba5190b84b1bbea4368
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101021
Bug ID: 101021
Summary: PSHUFB is emitted instead of PSHUFD, PSHUFLW and
PSHUFHW with -msse4
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90651
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dcde4afec2a25a5fa69d1e5eec022768340fa1ab
commit r9-9578-gdcde4afec2a25a5fa69d1e5eec022768340fa1ab
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101010
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70867
--- Comment #13 from yuta tomino ---
Sorry, perhaps my example is illegal in Ada 2012.
"aliased" is required to return a reference of a part of the parameter.
Randy explained the change in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670
Seth Johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johnsonsr at ornl dot gov
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101020
Bug ID: 101020
Summary: [12 regression] Several test case failures after
r12-1316
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101019
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101019
Bug ID: 101019
Summary: GCC should consider using PLI/SLDI/PADDI to load up
64-bit constants on power10
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67014
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner ---
Are these tests valid for long double == double? Ie, do we just need to
disable them when using -mlong-double-64 or are these real bugs? I'm guessing
the latter for most of these tests, but just checking.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101018
Bug ID: 101018
Summary: ICE when enabling OpenMP on a simple loop with SVE
intrinsics (aarch64)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100085
--- Comment #13 from Steven Munroe ---
"We want to use plain TImode instead of V1TImode on newer cpus."
Actually I disagree. We have vector __int128 in the ABI and with POWER10 a
complete set arithmetic operations for 128-bit in VRs.
Also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100938
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100980
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100913
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100788
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to seberg from comment #11)
> Does that mean that fixing the `#line` directives (or inserting additional
> ones) should be able to fix the issue? (Or work around it, if you consider
> it a bug.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98401
David Ledger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidledger at live dot com.au
---
-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210610 (experimental) [master revision
:71aa05def:4f625f47b4456e5c05a025fca4d072831e59126c] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
typedef v32qi __attribute__((vector_size(32)));
__attribute__((target_clones("arch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100930
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
Carl Love implemented these on trunk yesterday. They will be backported to GCC
11 in a week or so, at which point we can close this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100611
David Ledger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidledger at live dot com.au
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99576
David Ledger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidledger at live dot com.au
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101016
SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |sripar01 at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101016
Bug ID: 101016
Summary: Arm: vld1q polymorphic variants failing with
__ARM_undef undefined reference error during linking.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101013
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101015
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-10
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101014
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amacleod at redhat dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101009
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101015
Bug ID: 101015
Summary: Poor diagnostic for deprecated alias-declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101008
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 50979
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50979=edit
gcc12-pr101008.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101014
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Unfortunately, the reduction is stuck at 200KB. Please let me know if you can
analyze the original test-case?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92806
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This seems to be fixed now:
a.C:8:9: required by the constraints of 'template concept foo'
a.C:8:25: error: constraint 'trait::value [with T = int]' has type
'trait::', not 'bool'
8 | concept foo =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101006
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97407
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See also PR 89370 comment 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101006
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||67491
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101014
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101014
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101014
Bug ID: 101014
Summary: [12 Regression] Big compile time hog with -O3 since
r12-1268-g9858cd1a6827ee7a
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101013
Bug ID: 101013
Summary: Rejects-valid for alias template in a different
namespace with a lambda in unevaluated context
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101008
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101007
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101007
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
But it is actually caused by r12-760-g94de7e225c1fda079052c3f0725c926437d56c94
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101012
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101009
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
(overlap_iterations_a = [0])
(overlap_iterations_b = [0]))
(build_classic_dist_vector
dist_vector = ( 1
)
)
)
(compute_affine_dependence
stmt_a: g[1].c = 1;
stmt_b: *f.0_1 = g[1];
) -> no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101012
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C code seems to be:
putRGBAAseparate8bittile_w(int *cp, unsigned char *g) {
char *a, *r;
unsigned *b;
int _x;
for (; _x; _x -= 8) {
*cp++ = *r++ | (unsigned)*g++ << 8 | *b++ << 16 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101012
Bug ID: 101012
Summary: ice in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101009
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection, wrong-code
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
Bug ID: 101011
Summary: Inconsistent debug info for "while (1);"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101007
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: in extract_insn, at|[12 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101003
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cce1697e6fe0134616ebc8f7040d99e66c12241a
commit r12-1357-gcce1697e6fe0134616ebc8f7040d99e66c12241a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101010
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101010
Bug ID: 101010
Summary: Feature request: add builtins to provide mangled
symbols, optionally with a prefix
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101009
Bug ID: 101009
Summary: wrong code with "-O3 -fno-tree-sra"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d19a50ea1e5e9858bb7cd258fa4f9db89ecfcb2
commit r12-1355-g7d19a50ea1e5e9858bb7cd258fa4f9db89ecfcb2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
