https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100982
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e198d93d49f89a3b69f9b4e4c305f9f8b511027a
commit r11-8560-ge198d93d49f89a3b69f9b4e4c305f9f8b511027a
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98842
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f11586945fffd0ff808c16f2f341f9e85d83749
commit r11-8559-g4f11586945fffd0ff808c16f2f341f9e85d83749
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100824
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ba1680d3e9f3bb99783519a08eed6435f131045
commit r11-8558-g2ba1680d3e9f3bb99783519a08eed6435f131045
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100824
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:950535915868cd0b7f3dbad4321de913f01bddfc
commit r11-8556-g950535915868cd0b7f3dbad4321de913f01bddfc
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100824
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a842cb9c255f66f38ddd36b10c60920ed5f189de
commit r11-8555-ga842cb9c255f66f38ddd36b10c60920ed5f189de
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100944
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|unexpected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100999
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100999
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ecbe8af2c38e22d3db99a57e21531fd523700492
commit r10-9910-gecbe8af2c38e22d3db99a57e21531fd523700492
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101038
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ code is:
typedef char quint8;
typedef struct {
quint8 green, blue;
} CharPixel;
CharPixel *equalize_equalize_map;
int equalize_i;
void equalize() {
unsigned low_0, high_0, low_1, high_1;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2)
> The first test is for _Float128. What goes wrong there?
>
> For all these tests yo
..u have to figure out what is going wrong. After that it will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101002
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The first test is for _Float128. What goes wrong there?
For all these tests yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101023
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101038
Bug ID: 101038
Summary: ice in vect_optimize_slp
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100085
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
We *have* TImode already, but most 128-bit scalars currently use V1TImode.
This often leads to reduced performance because that is not a scalar mode,
does not get all optimisations we have generically
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 96560, which changed state.
Bug 96560 Summary: Substitution triggers compile-time error when it shouldn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96560
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96560
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96560
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0d73a66ae3962fa83309527d85613d72a6aa43d
commit r12-1398-gb0d73a66ae3962fa83309527d85613d72a6aa43d
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92469
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
This isn't completely fixed:
[hjl@gnu-clx-1 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./
/export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr97032.c -m32
-fdiagnostics-plain-output -O2 -mincoming-stack-boundary=2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101037
--- Comment #2 from Björn Sundin ---
Created attachment 50987
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50987=edit
A short ping-pong example program.
The preprocessed file was too large so I attached the original C++ source
instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101037
--- Comment #1 from Björn Sundin ---
The preprocessed file was too big. Should I attach the original C++ source or a
compressed version of the preprocessed file instead?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The variant with typespec and non-constant length is incorrectly rejected:
program p
integer :: n = 2
print *, [character(n) :: 'a', 'b']
end
All versions since at least gcc-7 give:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101037
Bug ID: 101037
Summary: std::atomic_flag deadlock on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100999
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a30552af7073aba16af6798a1e6cd0a345b06586
commit r11-8553-ga30552af7073aba16af6798a1e6cd0a345b06586
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101036
Bug ID: 101036
Summary: ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2430
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100999
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68f46862d33707450bdf70cfddd91ae2a12527a8
commit r12-1396-g68f46862d33707450bdf70cfddd91ae2a12527a8
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101035
Bug ID: 101035
Summary: ICE: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1751
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101016
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b13f297f01c943aa167f7c6eb94bed40dce0d553
commit r12-1395-gb13f297f01c943aa167f7c6eb94bed40dce0d553
Author: Srinath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101033
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101033
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97202
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If the invalid special member is defined out of the class body, you get another
error:
template
struct F
{
F();
};
template
inline F::F() { }
101032.C:4:8: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘)’
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97202
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kevin.c.eady at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101032
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101034
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96392
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a761829ae06a754f72ff957cbedb21f4d98fab70
commit r12-1394-ga761829ae06a754f72ff957cbedb21f4d98fab70
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101034
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
any#L272 has the same typo:
template
__emplace_t, initializer_list<_Up>, _Args&&...>
emplace(initializer_list<_Up> __il, _Args&&... __args)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
--- Comment #8 from Qirun Zhang ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> Fixed on trunk sofar. Keep more testcases coming ;) (I have a hunch this
> code has more issues...)
Thanks, Richard. Will do.
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
I see this also with the source code for ./gcc.target/i386/pr100936.c
and flag -g:
$ /home/dcb/gcc/results.20210611.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc -c -g
./gcc.target/i386/pr100936.c
./gcc.target/i386/pr100936.c:5:1: internal compiler error: in add_dwarf_attr,
at
dwarf2out.c:4493
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101034
Bug ID: 101034
Summary: wrong constraint in std::any's constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96392
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b02ed4b87685c0f7c5da9b46cde3ce56fcfd457
commit r12-1393-g5b02ed4b87685c0f7c5da9b46cde3ce56fcfd457
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Summary|[11/12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8b80b8aa3d9a7abbcb59b651ea5e84c2ea12d0b
commit r12-1392-gb8b80b8aa3d9a7abbcb59b651ea5e84c2ea12d0b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101032
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101033
Bug ID: 101033
Summary: Error message for spelling error in copy assignment
operator could be improved
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101032
Bug ID: 101032
Summary: Regression on parser with g++11 using experimental
c++20 (compiles under c++17)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101015
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
This is because dump_decl does the decoration for TYPE_DECL_ALIAS_P:
1228 if (TYPE_DECL_ALIAS_P (t)
1229 && (flags & TFF_DECL_SPECIFIERS
1230 || flags &
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948
--- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
I am looking into this.
I think I already have a patch for the ICE, but there are further problems
which I am trying to solve.
Best regards,
José Rui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99939
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5ed0148347beea1bd34795de146a2454c36
commit r12-1391-gc5ed0148347beea1bd34795de146a2454c36
Author: Srinath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101023
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101022
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Hi Carl -- while you're in there, can you please remove these?
+BU_P10_OVERLOAD_2 (VRLQ, "vrlq")
+BU_P10_OVERLOAD_2 (VSLQ, "vslq")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98940
Bug 98940 depends on bug 100974, which changed state.
Bug 100974 Summary: [C++23] Implement if consteval
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100974
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100974
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100974
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:117c64266405e244da4dae3ae7b60905af63b955
commit r12-1390-g117c64266405e244da4dae3ae7b60905af63b955
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Simpler IL:
int a;
char b, e;
static char *c =
static long d;
void f(void);
void __attribute__((noipa)) h() {
int g = 0;
for (; g < 2; ++g) {
d = *c;
*c = 1;
b = 0;
}
f();
}
void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 50985
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50985=edit
test-case
I see the following issue when not using an optimization level:
$ g++ gcc_issue.cc -c
gcc_issue.cc: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|wrong code at -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031
Qirun Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #1
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: qrzhang at gatech dot edu
Target Milestone: ---
It appears to be a recent regression.
$ gcc-trunk -v
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210611 (experimental) [master revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101020
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-11
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101023
--- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Here it is:
>
Thank you, I probably wouldn't be able to get back to this until next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101023
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
// { dg-do run { target lp64 } }
(or ! ia32 if you want).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101023
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100949
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 101028, which changed state.
Bug 101028 Summary: [12 Regression] SLP compile-time hog since
r12-1329-gce670e4faafb296d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101028
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101028
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9ec5ebb605936684e95b8dcc12e43ba7d8f2cb4
commit r12-1388-gb9ec5ebb605936684e95b8dcc12e43ba7d8f2cb4
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101023
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101030
Bug ID: 101030
Summary: gcc internal error with Wconversion
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jim Walker from comment #0)
> /opt/gcc-10.2.0/include/c++/10.2.0/type_traits:918:52: error: non-constant
> condition for static assertion
> 918 |
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101008
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101007
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
--- Comment #1 from Jim Walker ---
Adding version output:
/opt/gcc-10.2.0/bin/g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 10.2.0
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
Bug ID: 101029
Summary: unexpected error: non-constant condition for static
assertion in gcc 10/11, but not 9 (clang also fine)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101024
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I have a start but there are a few patterns that need to be moved.
An example is from gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr66726-4.c:
#define SAT(x) (x < 0 ? 0 : (x > 255 ? 255 : x))
void
foo (unsigned char *p, int i)
{
*p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101017
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101026
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbd8a8041292f2ec2c22be43c8d3e74b37b2bc88
commit r12-1387-gfbd8a8041292f2ec2c22be43c8d3e74b37b2bc88
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100897
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Leonard von Merzljak from comment #2)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> Thank you for your comment. I tried it out and can confirm that I don't get
> a stack-overflow anymore if I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101008
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4bdcdd8fa8d7659e5a19a930cf2f0332127f8a46
commit r12-1386-g4bdcdd8fa8d7659e5a19a930cf2f0332127f8a46
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101007
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a984da88a35b42f444d1f9eeba77aa520b950d35
commit r12-1385-ga984da88a35b42f444d1f9eeba77aa520b950d35
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101028
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101028
Bug ID: 101028
Summary: [12 Regression] SLP compile-time hog since
r12-1329-gce670e4faafb296d
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101021
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100897
--- Comment #2 from Leonard von Merzljak ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> for symmetric transfer to work without stack overflow, it relies on an
> indirect tailcall.
>
> For some GCC targets indirect tail-calls are not available
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101021
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fa991d1d74cb1ce96c48ede70ae0be7a9683ce3
commit r12-1384-g1fa991d1d74cb1ce96c48ede70ae0be7a9683ce3
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-11
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79201
--- Comment #5 from Raphael C ---
I can confirm you now get
f:
mov eax, 1
ret
with gcc 8 onwards.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79185
--- Comment #17 from Raphael C ---
Tested in gcc 11.1 with -O2
ai(__int128, __int128):
mov r9, rdi
mov rax, rdx
mov r8, rsi
mov rdx, rcx
add rax, r9
adc rdx, r8
ret
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100788
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100788
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bf728aecc4fea46b4490e950b9ae229f90597b0
commit r12-1383-g8bf728aecc4fea46b4490e950b9ae229f90597b0
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101009
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Summary|[10/11/12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101009
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:336c41dbcb21740f8964021e157bc69ca547059b
commit r12-1381-g336c41dbcb21740f8964021e157bc69ca547059b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101009
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> With -O2 -fno-tree-sra -fno-tree-pre -ftree-loop-distribution even GCC 10
> miscompiles the code. For dg-torture:
That started with
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
