https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943
alig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||info at gha3mi dot com
--- Comment #8 from alig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96348
--- Comment #4 from Brian Oh ---
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 6:03 AM pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96348
>
> --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
> So one thing is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101481
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note this is an older regression but I only marked it as 11/12 as
-ftree-loop-distribute-patterns is now enabled at -O2 rather than just -O3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101481
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101482
Bug ID: 101482
Summary: The resolution of #32907 is too restricted
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101481
Bug ID: 101481
Summary: -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns can slow down and
increases size of code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96237
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 96542, which changed state.
Bug 96542 Summary: Failure to optimize simple code to a constant when storing
part of the operation in a variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96542
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96542
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96542
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:704e8a825c78b9a8424c291509413bbb48e602c7
commit r12-2381-g704e8a825c78b9a8424c291509413bbb48e602c7
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101317
--- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-July/056249.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101479
--- Comment #4 from Simon Thornington ---
I'll add that changing close_to_zero from
fabs(x) < 0.5
to
x == 0.0 || fabs(x) < 0.5
everything starts to work as I'd expect again...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96227
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96227
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101205
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98956
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480
Bug ID: 101480
Summary: Miscompiled code involving operator new
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101233
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100138
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101226
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Component|d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101233
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9107b139f4492d504df37e943882405e6aefdb7e
commit r11-8762-g9107b139f4492d504df37e943882405e6aefdb7e
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100138
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e63d08cb9bc001232734eed32e4bc3814a279a9
commit r11-8761-g2e63d08cb9bc001232734eed32e4bc3814a279a9
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101393
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Franz Sirl from comment #4)
> How about something along this patch? It's not fully done (no good idea
> about SPEC stuff like "mcpu=7400: -mppc %{!mvsx:%{!maltivec:-maltivec}};"
> yet),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101393
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Franz Sirl from comment #3)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #1)
> > The -many is problematic, that is the whole point of this. As in this
> > example: on different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66968
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
To reproduce the std::tuple error above, use this code at r12-2379
#include
std::tuple t;
auto a = std::get<1>(t);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66968
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3dbc7b809a62167b36f217ab5f43207be19e5908
commit r12-2379-g3dbc7b809a62167b36f217ab5f43207be19e5908
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96348
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
So one thing is Windows is LLP64IL32 target while x86_64 Linux is LP64 target.
So if you are comparing windows to Linux and use long type, you might be
getting the major difference there.
There might be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101362
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101470
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101479
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
If you want -ffast-math and fetestexcept still, add -ftrapping-math to the end
of the command line.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101479
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101479
--- Comment #1 from Simon Thornington ---
x_not_zero -> could_be_zero sorry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101479
Bug ID: 101479
Summary: vectorized impossible conditional floating point
operations still cause traps (-ffast-math, -O3)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210716 (experimental) [master revision
:2c298de71:d97d71a1989e9ee8e1b8563b351c42b7732da108] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
struct obj {
int n;
list l;
} main() {
obj o = (struct obj *)((char *)({ 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101477
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-16
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101477
Bug ID: 101477
Summary: Wrong location for unexpanded parameter pack in
function template
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66968
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-08-21 00:00:00 |2021-7-16
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99664
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101233
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8b3861496bffae8b813ea196c1c5b27f79fbe69
commit r12-2378-ga8b3861496bffae8b813ea196c1c5b27f79fbe69
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99664
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d04b0c75794545f1f7a942764285e21eaf2915a1
commit r12-2377-gd04b0c75794545f1f7a942764285e21eaf2915a1
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100949
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100949
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1847a11f4ad8960a57384ed1ef2d0292c65166ed
commit r9-9627-g1847a11f4ad8960a57384ed1ef2d0292c65166ed
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101476
Bug ID: 101476
Summary: AddressSanitizer check failed, points out a
(potentially) non-existing stack error
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100949
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4669f3830fc80921b0e8a0a8d45451820283cc46
commit r10-9985-g4669f3830fc80921b0e8a0a8d45451820283cc46
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101453
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101453
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e06b1c5ac00b1bd0339739d3d9377c90852a83c9
commit r12-2373-ge06b1c5ac00b1bd0339739d3d9377c90852a83c9
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101453
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101468
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101468
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94ba897be8b59ef5926eed4c77fd53812fb20add
commit r12-2372-g94ba897be8b59ef5926eed4c77fd53812fb20add
Author: Martin Sebor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101257
--- Comment #5 from Gregory Tucker ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Gregory Tucker from comment #2)
> > Created attachment 51165 [details]
>
> I think:
> uint32_t *w = (uint32_t *) data;
>
> Should need the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101475
Bug ID: 101475
Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow storing a compound literal
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101470
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0)
> After realizing that clangs -gline-tables-only is an alias for -g1, I looked
> at gcc's -g1 and found it does have line table info (since gcc 4.9), but
> emits a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101474
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-fipa-icf generates worse |SRA sometimes produces
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101474
Bug ID: 101474
Summary: -fipa-icf generates worse code for identical function
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101374
Hafiz Abid qadeer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abidh at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100795
--- Comment #7 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #6)
> (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #2)
> > ranges::inplace_merge has the same issue:
> >
> >
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
> >
> > int main() {
> > std::array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101257
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Gregory Tucker from comment #2)
> Created attachment 51165 [details]
I think there are some aliasing violations here.
We store to buf (which is unsigned char array) as a mixture of unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101257
--- Comment #3 from Gregory Tucker ---
Comment on attachment 51165
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51165
Hash reference function test case
edit: Fails test case on -O2, passes on -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101257
Gregory Tucker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greg.b.tucker at intel dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100795
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101457
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bf6e1f89dbd2c67c419d3d4e94085208611262f
commit r12-2362-g3bf6e1f89dbd2c67c419d3d4e94085208611262f
Author: Tamar Christina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101393
--- Comment #4 from Franz Sirl ---
Created attachment 51164
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51164=edit
Half-baken trial patch
How about something along this patch? It's not fully done (no good idea about
SPEC stuff like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55664
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-16
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53863
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84895
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43253
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101393
--- Comment #3 from Franz Sirl ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #1)
> The -many is problematic, that is the whole point of this. As in this
> example: on different subtargets there are different machine code
> translations for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101473
Bug ID: 101473
Summary: LTO makes debug info depend on toolchain path
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100349
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100895
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101231
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101214
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101231
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1af937eb6246ad7f63ebff03590e9eede33aca81
commit r12-2357-g1af937eb6246ad7f63ebff03590e9eede33aca81
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101214
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:73464a472aa4e86359f1a5dc529394fe5152fec0
commit r12-2356-g73464a472aa4e86359f1a5dc529394fe5152fec0
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #248 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to John Buddery from comment #247)
> For clarification, I assume this is using the HP aCC compiler for binutils
> etc., rather than the bundled /usr/ccs/bin cc ?
Correct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #247 from John Buddery ---
Looks good, that's a lot of gcc versions!
For clarification, I assume this is using the HP aCC compiler for binutils
etc., rather than the bundled /usr/ccs/bin cc ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101110
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #246 from The Written Word
---
Created attachment 51163
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51163=edit
Build script and patches
Build script for zlib, gmp, mpfr, mpc, binutils 2.25.1, 2.30, 2.32, and GCC
4.4.6,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #245 from The Written Word
---
(In reply to John Buddery from comment #238)
> Was your 11.1 build successful ?
Our rebuild of 11.1.0 completed successfully. I haven't tested it though. I am
going to try earlier GCC releases and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101456
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
We need to verify that LOADING the zero YMM register won't trigger
SSE<->AVX transition penalty.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101472
Bug ID: 101472
Summary: AVX-512 wrong code for consecutive masked scatters
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101471
--- Comment #1 from Kastax ---
Attachment size limit is too strict for me to include "the preprocessed file
(*.i*) that triggers the bug"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101471
Bug ID: 101471
Summary: AVX512 incorrect writemask generated for
_mm512_fpclass_ps_mask in O0
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101464
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101470
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 51161
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51161=edit
Demonstrator patch
I wrote a demonstrator patch that makes the two mentioned differences
disappear.
It also drops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101470
Bug ID: 101470
Summary: Support -gline-tables-only
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101380
puspmvqyfzxrbytwsu at niwghx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Segmentation fault in |Segmentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #244 from John Buddery ---
I tried a gcc 11 build with patched 2.30 binutils and it worked.
I also tried building binutils 2.36 with just /opt/aCC/bin and no gcc.
I didn't get any gnu99 errors, but it did fail because plugin-api.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101448
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86681
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Do you have the command line for the tattr-1.c test? The verbose options line
appears to contain the options for a different test. I could not reproduce the
problem with these options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101467
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101467
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df0d7486ec9bca8a77ca106d9fbb60f819dd9cec
commit r12-2350-gdf0d7486ec9bca8a77ca106d9fbb60f819dd9cec
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
Bug ID: 101469
Summary: wrong code with "-O2 -fPIE" for SH
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101467
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[r12 regression] ICE on |[12 regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101467
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Summary|[r12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101462
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101468
Bug ID: 101468
Summary: [r12 regression] new Wstringop-overflow tests failures
since r12-2338
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101467
Bug ID: 101467
Summary: [r12 regression] ICE on aarch64 after r12-2324
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91602
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
