[Bug target/101505] [10/11 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: incompatible types in 'PHI' argument 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101505 --- Comment #6 from David Binderman --- Further research suggests it also crashes with amdfam10, athlon-fx, athlon64, athlon64-sse3, barcelona, bdver1, bdver3, bdver4, btver1, btver2, eden-x2, eden-x4, k8, k8-sse3, nano, nano-1000, nano-2000,

[Bug c++/101783] New: unnecessary error when top level cv qualifier is dropped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101783 Bug ID: 101783 Summary: unnecessary error when top level cv qualifier is dropped Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/98411] [10/11/12 Regression] Pointless: Array larger than ‘-fmax-stack-var-size=’, moved from stack to static storage for main program variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.0 --- Comment #14 from

[Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/59921] Variable names should be ignored when qualified name lookup is applied to nested name specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59921 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c++/64562] Member functions with r-value reference for *this and deduced return type incorrectly rejected as ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64562 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to fail|

[Bug c++/59790] Inner template class specialization has no direct access to outer template class typedefs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59790 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||7.1.0, 7.5.0, 8.1.0 Known to work|

[Bug target/101505] [10/11 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: incompatible types in 'PHI' argument 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101505 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/59790] Inner template class specialization has no direct access to outer template class typedefs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59790 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://stackoverflow.com/q/ | |21095333/1073006

[Bug c++/61953] [C++11] The template parameter pack of a function template should be the last template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61953 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Clang and GCC both accept the code slightly. ICC accepts the code with a warning: (1): warning #2922: template parameter "U" cannot be used because it follows a parameter pack and cannot be deduced from the

[Bug c++/62310] fails to consider default initializers (NSDMIs) when checking inheriting constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62310 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/56480] Explicit specialization in a namespace enclosing the specialized template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #13

[Bug c++/60786] In C++11 an explicit instantiation with an unqualified name must be in the right namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60786 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/101782] New: [12 regression] Excess errors in g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C after r12-2729

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101782 Bug ID: 101782 Summary: [12 regression] Excess errors in g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C after r12-2729 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/101742] [12 Regression] ICE in expand_mult, at expmed.c:3585 since r12-2666-g29f0e955c97da002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101742 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/101772] [12 regression] ICE in ix86_expand_epilogue, at config/i386/i386.c:9267

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101772 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/101781] New: make_unique generating a warning with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101781 Bug ID: 101781 Summary: make_unique generating a warning with -fanalyzer Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/101742] [12 Regression] ICE in expand_mult, at expmed.c:3585 since r12-2666-g29f0e955c97da002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101742 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5738a64f8b3cf132b88b39af84b9f5f5a9a1554c commit r12-2748-g5738a64f8b3cf132b88b39af84b9f5f5a9a1554c Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Aug 3

[Bug target/101772] [12 regression] ICE in ix86_expand_epilogue, at config/i386/i386.c:9267

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101772 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09dba016db937e61be21ef1e9581065a9ed2847d commit r12-2747-g09dba016db937e61be21ef1e9581065a9ed2847d Author: H.J. Lu Date: Wed Aug 4

[Bug c++/101780] New: Missing initializers whereas structure has default initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101780 Bug ID: 101780 Summary: Missing initializers whereas structure has default initializers Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/62293] Obscure error message: declared as an 'inline' field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62293 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.2.0 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/52094] ICE on definition of nested class in wrong namespace scope with wrong nested-name-qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #8) > Comment 2 testcase fixed with r11-175. And the accepts invalid is recorded as PR 58661.

[Bug testsuite/100166] Some vold-vec-{load,store} tests fail when built with compiler configured with --with-cpu=power10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100166 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/100167] GCC configured for power10 fails the gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-div-longlong.c test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100167 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/100170] Gcc tests gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-{eq, ne}0-1.c fail on Power10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100170 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59465] g++ allows direct-initialization of an array of class type from another array in a mem-initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59465 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/100168] Test gcc.dg/pr56727-2.c fails on power10 code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100168 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61504] Move elision after cast to rvalue reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61504 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||6.4.0 Keywords|

[Bug c++/36961] fails to identify template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36961 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.1.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/61975] default template arguments do not work with out-of-class class declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61975 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2014-07-31 00:00:00 |2021-8-4 See Also|

[Bug c++/57857] argument of decltype used by no return value warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57857 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||5.5.0 Keywords|

[Bug c++/100977] [C++23] Implement C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100977 --- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > True, but is it worth changing on a tool that is one twice in a decade? Well, the question is self-answering ;)

[Bug c++/100977] [C++23] Implement C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100977 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- True, but is it worth changing on a tool that is one twice in a decade?

Re: Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW

> From: Andrew Pinski > Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 11:57:47 -0700 > Cc: Jonathan Wakely , GCC Bugs , > Andreas Schwab > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ instead. > > > > Which points to GCC Bugzilla, which doesn't have a "libiberty" > > component. So I suggest to add such a component on the

[Bug demangler/101779] New: Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101779 Bug ID: 101779 Summary: Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/57614] Friend declaration and qualified class member access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57614 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Keywords|

[Bug c++/100977] [C++23] Implement C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100977 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > - printf ("{ %s|%s|%s|%s|%s|%s|%s|%s|%s, %3d, %#06x },\n", > + printf ("{ %s|%s|%s|%s|%s|%s|%s|%s|%s|%s|%s, %3d, %#06x },\n", BTW: You can also use

[Bug c++/58040] Cannot take address-of public using-declaration of member from protected base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58040 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Matt Whitlock from comment #10) > So using declarations are not a direct replacement for user-defined thunks. Not even close.

Re: Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 8:46 AM Eli Zaretskii via Gcc-bugs wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 15:41:30 +0100 > > From: Jonathan Wakely > > Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, e...@gnu.org > > > > > The libiberty README says to report bugs to gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. > > > > Well that needs to be fixed. It

[Bug c++/100977] [C++23] Implement C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100977 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 51260 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51260=edit gcc12-pr100977-2-wip.patch Here is WIP incremental patch, but I'd prefer to do it in steps, first the above

[Bug c++/101765] ICE when using a VLA inside of a coroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101765 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Kacper Słomiński from comment #2) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1) > > I am not sure that a VLA can be used in a coroutine (neither can alloca, if > > I remember correctly) [so not

[Bug c++/53660] function pointer conversion function template with nested-name-specifier ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53660 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I don't think this is a bug. GCC, ICC and clang all reject it the same way. MSV rejects it with: (10): error C2783: 'c::operator enable_if<__formal>::t(void)': could not deduce template argument for 't'

[Bug c++/100977] [C++23] Implement C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100977 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 4 Aug 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs wrote: > plus various changes in the check_nfc function. > So, the first question is if the C11/N11/C99 etc. stuff should use

[Bug c++/100037] lookup doesn't find class template parameter in default member initializer of forward declared nested class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100037 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Last

[Bug c++/100037] lookup doesn't find class template parameter in default member initializer of forward declared nested class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100037 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- This has been a bug since NSDMI was implemented in GCC 4.7.0.

[Bug c++/99595] ICE when pack expansion with template lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99595 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.1.0 Target Milestone|11.3

[Bug c++/99595] [11/12 Regression] ICE when pack expansion with template lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99595 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.0 Summary|ICE when pack

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 80144, which changed state. Bug 80144 Summary: Concept introduced with "template" is not diagnosed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80144 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/80144] Concept introduced with "template" is not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80144 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/87709] c++17 class template argument deduction not working in a very specific case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87709 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/96908] [c++20] substitution failure if lambda in default template param

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96908 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-08-04 00:00:00 | --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---

[Bug c++/94141] c++20 rewritten operator== recursive call mixing friend and external operators for template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94141 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2020-05-21 00:00:00 |2021-8-4 --- Comment #5 from Andrew

[Bug tree-optimization/101778] bogus -Wstringop-overread on strncmp of a larger array and a shorter string with a large bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101778 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/101778] New: bogus -Wstringop-overread on strncmp of a larger array and a shorter string with a large bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101778 Bug ID: 101778 Summary: bogus -Wstringop-overread on strncmp of a larger array and a shorter string with a large bound Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/97279] GCC ignores the operation definition of the template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97279 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.1.0 Known to work|

[Bug c++/58040] Cannot take address-of public using-declaration of member from protected base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58040 --- Comment #10 from Matt Whitlock --- So using declarations are not a direct replacement for user-defined thunks. Today I learned! This makes using declarations decidedly less useful than I believed. Thank you for your time, Jonathan Wakely.

[Bug c++/96490] Template code with function pointers fails with very cryptic error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96490 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Seems fixed on the trunk. Maybe by the patch for PR 100893.

[Bug c++/96490] Template code with function pointers fails with very cryptic error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96490 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Seems fixed on the trunk.

[Bug c++/87910] Missing typename/template not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87910 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/94056] Bogus "private within this context" error is emitted after too-late template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94056 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Severity|normal

[Bug c++/93614] C++ compile error with struct in template class and < operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93614 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.1.0 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 79917, which changed state. Bug 79917 Summary: Internal compiler error with variadic template and concepts, internal compiler error: in tsubst_constraint, at cp/constraint.cc:1956

[Bug c++/79917] Internal compiler error with variadic template and concepts, internal compiler error: in tsubst_constraint, at cp/constraint.cc:1956

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79917 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/101765] ICE when using a VLA inside of a coroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101765 --- Comment #2 from Kacper Słomiński --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1) > I am not sure that a VLA can be used in a coroutine (neither can alloca, if > I remember correctly) [so not sure that this is ICE on valid, it could be > ICE

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 91277, which changed state. Bug 91277 Summary: test.cpp:5:55: internal compiler error: in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:41206 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91277 What

[Bug c++/91277] test.cpp:5:55: internal compiler error: in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:41206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91277 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 71543, which changed state. Bug 71543 Summary: [concepts] ICE on ill-formed declaration of a parameter with a constrained-type-specifier in a requires expression https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71543

[Bug c++/71543] [concepts] ICE on ill-formed declaration of a parameter with a constrained-type-specifier in a requires expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71543 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/101626] [12 Regression] ICE in verify_sra_access_forest, at tree-sra.c:2376

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101626 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/95808] Can mismatch non-array new/delete with array new/delete during constant evaluation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95808 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100553] [constexpr] new/delete matching fails when ref-counted pointers are stored in arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100553 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/97665] constexpr union array member incorrectly rejected as non-constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97665 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/85251] Using declaration for base class constructor looses explicit.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85251 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Thanks to ppalka who pointed out that [namespace.udecl] p13 does specify what should happen here: Constructors that are named by a using-declaration are treated as though they were constructors of the

[Bug c++/101777] Copying array of non-trivial type during constant evaluation is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101777 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/101777] New: Copying array of non-trivial type during constant evaluation is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101777 Bug ID: 101777 Summary: Copying array of non-trivial type during constant evaluation is incorrect Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/100017] [11/12 regression] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' -- cross toolchain fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 --- Comment #21 from cqwrteur --- 加QQ群1076846339 Get Outlook for Android From: yangyujie at alumni dot sjtu.edu.cn Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 3:45:37 AM To: unlv...@live.com

[Bug c++/101603] [meta-bug] pointer to member functions issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603 Bug 101603 depends on bug 58040, which changed state. Bug 58040 Summary: Cannot take address-of public using-declaration of member from protected base class https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58040 What|Removed

[Bug c++/58040] Cannot take address-of public using-declaration of member from protected base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58040 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100977] [C++23] Implement C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100977 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Incrementally, here is a makeucnid.c patch to also emit CXX23 and NXX23 flags (CXX23 for valid as C++23 identifier and NXX23 for valid as C++23 identifier but not as the first character), but doesn't

[Bug c++/58040] Cannot take address-of public using-declaration of member from protected base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58040 --- Comment #8 from Matt Whitlock --- Maybe this example will demonstrate it more clearly. /* begin example */ class PublicBase { public: void pub_base_pub_memb(); protected: void pub_base_prot_memb(); }; class ProtectedBase {

[Bug other/101711] Error when gcc cross compile libvtv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101711 ctice at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ctice at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/101761] Random hang with 29_atomics/atomic_ref/wait_notify.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101761 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-04

[Bug target/101761] Random hang with 29_atomics/atomic_ref/wait_notify.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101761 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0) > 29_atomics/atomic_ref/wait_notify.cc in 64-bit on Skylake server: > > It happens about once a few weeks. while true ; do ./a.out ; done will hang immediately.

[Bug bootstrap/101776] [12 Regression] Boootstrap broken on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101776 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Caused by having lt_prog_compiler_wl= being an empty string. Strange..

Re: Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW

> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 15:41:30 +0100 > From: Jonathan Wakely > Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, e...@gnu.org > > > The libiberty README says to report bugs to gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. > > Well that needs to be fixed. It should point to > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ instead. Which points to GCC Bugzilla,

[Bug target/100340] Bootstrap fails with Clang 12.0.5 (XCode 12.5)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100340 --- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #20) > I rarely build the jit, but will take a look when time permits. Actually, currently it seems that the JIT build is quite broken on Darwin; I have some draft

[Bug bootstrap/101776] [12 Regression] Boootstrap broken on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101776 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- There's missing '-Wl,' before the option. On x86_64 it's fine: [12038s] libtool: link: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-12.0.0+git187113/obj-x86_64-suse-linux/./gcc/xgcc

[Bug bootstrap/101776] New: [12 Regression] Boootstrap broken on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101776 Bug ID: 101776 Summary: [12 Regression] Boootstrap broken on s390x Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug sanitizer/101749] gcc -static-libasan broken because libasan.a needs __cxa_guard_release in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101749 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug sanitizer/101749] gcc -static-libasan broken because libasan.a needs __cxa_guard_release in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101749 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8) > Thanks for the full explanation. > So it seems it's fine on master, should I backport the fix to release > branches? Yes, please.

[Bug sanitizer/101749] gcc -static-libasan broken because libasan.a needs __cxa_guard_release in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101749 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- > It should. Before that change there is a block scope variable that needs > initialization and so that it is initialized just once (by the first thread > calling that function and other threads waiting

[Bug gcov-profile/101773] errors when writing to .gcda file are not checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101773 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/101773] errors when writing to .gcda file are not checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101773 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:929f2cf4105ccf12d0684c6d5838f58f0ee5e7c7 commit r12-2736-g929f2cf4105ccf12d0684c6d5838f58f0ee5e7c7 Author: Vincent Lefèvre Date:

[Bug gcov-profile/101773] errors when writing to .gcda file are not checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101773 --- Comment #8 from Vincent Lefèvre --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7) > May I please install the patch on your behalf? Yes. Thanks.

[Bug gcov-profile/101773] errors when writing to .gcda file are not checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101773 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška

Re: Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW

> The libiberty README says to report bugs to gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org. Well that needs to be fixed. It should point to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ instead.

[Bug gcov-profile/101773] errors when writing to .gcda file are not checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101773 --- Comment #6 from Vincent Lefèvre --- Created attachment 51259 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51259=edit added missing error check on fclose in gcc/gcov-io.c Well, not all errors are detected. There is a missing test in

[Bug debug/101598] [debug, ada] .loc generated for defs__struct1IP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101598 --- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger --- patch was posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-July/576027.html review here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/576520.html and here:

[Bug ada/101575] [gcc-11, -gdwarf-4] Missing .file directive causes invalid line info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Bernd Edlinger : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96c82a16b2076891a9974d0f0e96a0b85fbc2df4 commit r12-2735-g96c82a16b2076891a9974d0f0e96a0b85fbc2df4 Author: Bernd Edlinger Date:

<    1   2   3   4   >