https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102447
Ikarashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s.ikarashi at fujitsu dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102584
--- Comment #1 from thrustl at hotmail dot com ---
-fdump-tree-optimized looks fine, with one unsigned and one signed constant:
;; Function main (main, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1383, cgraph_uid=1,
symbol_order=0)
int main ()
{
int D.1386;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102584
Bug ID: 102584
Summary: [OpenRISC] backend generates wrong halfword constant
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85730
Gabriel Ravier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gabravier at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102583
Bug ID: 102583
Summary: [x86] Failure to optimize 32-byte integer vector
conversion to 16-byte float vector properly when
converting upper part with -mavx2
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102582
--- Comment #1 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
Never mind. It looks like
C934 (R927) If type-spec appears, it shall specify a type with which each
allocate-object is type compatible.
it should do that, and nvfortran and ifort are the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102582
Bug ID: 102582
Summary: allocate treats all variables as type CHARACTER after
use of CHARACTER(LEN=NNN)::
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344
--- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley ---
"ro at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344
>
> Bug ID: 102344
>Summary: gm2/pim/fail/TestLong4.mod FAILs
>Product: gcc
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51536|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101104
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d91056851c5c60f226e3192fb955d018b53eb66f
commit r12-4104-gd91056851c5c60f226e3192fb955d018b53eb66f
Author: Patrick McGehearty
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102581
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
git blame says:
f5ff3a8ed4ca (Jan Hubicka 2021-08-28 20:57:08 +0200 349) /* We assume
that containment and lossless merging
f5ff3a8ed4ca (Jan Hubicka 2021-08-28 20:57:08 +0200 350) was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102581
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
/* We assume that containment and lossless merging
was tested earlier. */
gcc_checking_assert (!contains (a) && !a.contains (*this)
&& !merge (a,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102581
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102577
--- Comment #2 from Krzysztof Małysa ---
Could you explain why this is correct? For example, quoting a relevant part of
the C++ standard will do. As I said, I couldn't find WHY this is the expected
behavior. I need to understand it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102581
Bug ID: 102581
Summary: ice in forced_merge, at ipa-modref-tree.h:352 with
-fno-strict-aliasing and -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102580
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102580
Bug ID: 102580
Summary: Failure to optimize signed division to unsigned
division when dividend can't be negative
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101765
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fdf0b6ce6c1cfa1c328c0c40473c71ca11fd8303
commit r12-4103-gfdf0b6ce6c1cfa1c328c0c40473c71ca11fd8303
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99710
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:650beb110538097b9c3e8600149b333a83e7e836
commit r12-4102-g650beb110538097b9c3e8600149b333a83e7e836
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100673
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8009c79b64b532d8a0966fe3c6d636369df6e35d
commit r12-4101-g8009c79b64b532d8a0966fe3c6d636369df6e35d
Author: John Eivind Helset
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101133
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b54a7226368bf86361e5c9d8ae523193037a0ac
commit r12-4100-g1b54a7226368bf86361e5c9d8ae523193037a0ac
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99575
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ee1ab15c237ffb50be1a5ce9c5e542b16df4d12
commit r12-4099-g0ee1ab15c237ffb50be1a5ce9c5e542b16df4d12
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95520
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a3abacbaebc5583885600840cf2d968341be0275
commit r11-9065-ga3abacbaebc5583885600840cf2d968341be0275
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:082b3588ee01399b93fe73acd2ac181ec2ee3536
commit r11-9064-g082b3588ee01399b93fe73acd2ac181ec2ee3536
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95520
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf455aa06f95edf15b3ee619b1096dde716fed64
commit r10-10165-gbf455aa06f95edf15b3ee619b1096dde716fed64
Author: Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99215
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ddef3142151a3e88743aa4a990062d953a16c04e
commit r10-10164-gddef3142151a3e88743aa4a990062d953a16c04e
Author: Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99617
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6bc4823dc4264dfec956cb559ed8f9d78cac2b0a
commit r10-10162-g6bc4823dc4264dfec956cb559ed8f9d78cac2b0a
Author: Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102454
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1ef1020c424d8f3ca1486ce12408819f4746fd6
commit r11-9063-ga1ef1020c424d8f3ca1486ce12408819f4746fd6
Author: Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102563
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||suochenyao at 163 dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102565
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102575
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42300
--- Comment #3 from Ryan Sundberg ---
I've stumbled upon this 30 year old bug also while trying to build a gcc cross
compiler. The behavior is that LIBRARY_PATH="" is different than having
LIBRARY_PATH not set at all in the environment. As Lluis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42300
Ryan Sundberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ryan at arctype dot co
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102579
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-03
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102579
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102579
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102577
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102578
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102579
Bug ID: 102579
Summary: Failure to optimize out allocation if volatile read is
present in the middle
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102560
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 51540
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51540=edit
patch in testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98703
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, the IMAGPART_EXPR of .*_OVERFLOW is a hand-written forward pattern
matching, for this PR one would need pattern matching in the backwards
computation (like operator*::op1_range) that would not go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102578
--- Comment #2 from eggert at cs dot ucla.edu ---
Created attachment 51539
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51539=edit
false alarm with 'gcc -O2 -S -Wreturn-type'
Attached is the third and final example I got from Coreutils
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98703
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I can't remember what Andrew's plan was for complex numbers, possibly for next
release when we handle floats. We have somewhat of a kludge to know that the
result of REALPART_EXPR and IMAGPART_EXPR are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102578
--- Comment #1 from eggert at cs dot ucla.edu ---
Created attachment 51538
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51538=edit
false alarm with 'gcc -O2 -S -Wimplicit-fallthrough=5'
I'm adding another example of the problem, taken
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102578
Bug ID: 102578
Summary: false alarm on noreturn via static function
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 51536
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51536=edit
A patch
Please try this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100583
--- Comment #3 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
Thank you.
> The solution is to use the include and remove the gcm file altogether.
Is this still the case? I still get an ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Can we convert
_1 = __atomic_fetch_or_4 (, 1, 0);
_2 = (int) _1;
_5 = _2 & 1;
to
_1 = __atomic_fetch_or_4 (, 1, 0);
_2 = _1 & 1;
_5 = (int) _2;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102577
Bug ID: 102577
Summary: Function frame size in relation to variables in
conditional subscopes
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102576
--- Comment #1 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
`` is specified as including ``.
It doesn't with with that either:
```C++
import;
namespace {
constexpr void test() {
for (const int i : {0, 1, -1}) { }
```
```
error: deducing from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102576
Bug ID: 102576
Summary: [modules] Importing doesn't permit
implicit uses
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102573
--- Comment #4 from wjf <13508417 at qq dot com> ---
Hi Andrew,
I've updated my gcc to 10.2.1, and find while it did show what you said for my
initial code snippet, it won't warn me anything, nor report error at runtime
with -fsanitize=address
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102575
Bug ID: 102575
Summary: Failure to optimize double _Complex stores to use
largest loads/stores possible
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102574
Bug ID: 102574
Summary: d: gdc driver ignores -static-libstdc++ when
automatically linking libstdc++ library
Product: gcc
Version: 9.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
--- Comment #3 from H.J.
.zero 4
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 12.0.0 20211003 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 pr102566]$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |12.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102565
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
I can reproduce this with r12-4090, but not with r12-4097. Might be the same as
PR102563.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102572
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
if (!useless_type_conversion_p (masktype, TREE_TYPE (vec_mask)))
{
poly_uint64 sub1 = TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (TREE_TYPE
(mask_op));
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102572
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102573
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to wjf from comment #2)
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I know that adding "-fsanitize=address" could detect the
> stack-use-after-scope in runtime. But why not just delete the copy member in
>
63 matches
Mail list logo
