[Bug libstdc++/100017] [11/12 regression] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' -- canadian compilation fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 --- Comment #28 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Ofer Shinaar from comment #27) > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #23) > > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #22) > > > *** Bug 101060 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** > >

[Bug rtl-optimization/102850] New: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102850 Bug ID: 102850 Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:196 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/102744] [12 regression] -O2 vectorization causes Wzero-length-array-bounds-2.c to fail on arc-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102744 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f commit r12-4523-g3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f Author: liuhongt Date: Thu Oct

[Bug tree-optimization/102706] [12 regression] -O2 vectorization causes regression in Warray-bounds-48.c on many targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102706 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f commit r12-4523-g3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f Author: liuhongt Date: Thu Oct

[Bug tree-optimization/102462] vectorization breaks diagnostic for array out of bound detect.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102462 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f commit r12-4523-g3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f Author: liuhongt Date: Thu

[Bug middle-end/102697] [12 Regression] overflow warning missing after -O2 vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102697 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f commit r12-4523-g3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f Author: liuhongt Date: Thu Oct

[Bug middle-end/102722] [Disgnostic]Xpass for gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-68.c after O2 vectorization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102722 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f commit r12-4523-g3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f Author: liuhongt Date: Thu Oct

[Bug target/102834] gcc.target/i386/avx512f-pr96891-3.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102834 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #1) > Created attachment 51632 [details] > 32-bit avx512f-pr96891-3.s It relies on the existence of the pattern one_cmpldi2_doubleword, so that the avx512bw_cmpv64qi3

[Bug c++/102846] Misleading suggestion to include cassert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102846 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c/102849] New: missing warning for unsigned bitfield tests for negativity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102849 Bug ID: 102849 Summary: missing warning for unsigned bitfield tests for negativity Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/102848] New: missing warning for bitfield overflow in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102848 Bug ID: 102848 Summary: missing warning for bitfield overflow in C Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/102847] [12 regression] r12-4504 breaks powerpc64 build on power 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102847 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Component|bootstrap

[Bug target/102767] [12 Regression] ICE in rs6000_builtin_vectorization_cost, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:5216

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102767 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/102372] [12 regression] ICE in gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_1.f90 after r12-3482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102372 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/102847] [12 regression] r12-4504 breaks powerpc64 build on power 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102847 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug bootstrap/102847] New: [12 regression] r12-4504 breaks powerpc64 build on power 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102847 Bug ID: 102847 Summary: [12 regression] r12-4504 breaks powerpc64 build on power 7 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/102846] New: Misleading suggestion to include cassert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102846 Bug ID: 102846 Summary: Misleading suggestion to include cassert Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug d/102837] [12 regression] Many 32-bit gdc tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102837 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > It is one of the following: > g:8088a33df5f62fd6416fb8cb158b791e639aa707 Most likely this one.

[Bug d/102837] [12 regression] Many 32-bit gdc tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102837 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- It is one of the following: g:8088a33df5f62fd6416fb8cb158b791e639aa707 g:053234120de7f87b050df78f0d9819ca4214 g:efa5449a094d3887e124d400ff0410af2c745b2d

[Bug fortran/102843] [12 regression] gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90 fails after r12-4457

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102843 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/102843] [12 regression] gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90 fails after r12-4457

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102843 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/102842] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set at 02 or greater

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102842 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10 Regression] ICE in |[10/11/12 Regression] ICE

[Bug fortran/102845] New: Memory leak with nested OpenMP parallelism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102845 Bug ID: 102845 Summary: Memory leak with nested OpenMP parallelism Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/102842] [10 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set at 02 or greater

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102842 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Component|other

[Bug tree-optimization/102844] [9/10/11/12 Regression] vrp inserting assert causes miscompiling when doing update_ssa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102844 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11/12 Regression] vrp

[Bug tree-optimization/102844] [9/10/11/12 Regression] gcc-9.x miscompiles unsigned char expression in switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102844 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- > 1a438d160e1dc845882c2ecba99513a09a931623 It was definitely latent before this patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/102844] [9/10/11/12 Regression] gcc-9.x miscompiles unsigned char expression in switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102844 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Before: [local count: 25265782]: : nd.7_11 = _46; _12 = _46 + -128; _13 = (unsigned char) _12; dic = _13; goto ; [100.00%] [local count: 25265782]: : dic = 0; [local count:

[Bug rtl-optimization/102840] [12 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c by r12-4475

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102840 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from

[Bug tree-optimization/102844] [9/10/11/12 Regression] gcc-9.x miscompiles unsigned char expression in switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102844 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/102844] New: gcc-9.x miscompiles unsigned char expression in switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102844 Bug ID: 102844 Summary: gcc-9.x miscompiles unsigned char expression in switch Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/102840] [12 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c by r12-4475

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102840 --- Comment #3 from Roger Sayle --- With -m64, before: test: movq.LC1(%rip), %mm0 paddb .LC0(%rip), %mm0 movq%xmm0, x(%rip) ret And after: test: movq.LC2(%rip), %rax movq%rax, x(%rip)

[Bug bootstrap/102828] [12 Regression] ODR violation in gimple-predicate-analysis.h since g:94c12ffac234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102828 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug other/102843] New: [12 regression] gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90 fails after r12-4457

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102843 Bug ID: 102843 Summary: [12 regression] gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90 fails after r12-4457 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/31573] -Wall-all to enable all warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/100017] [11/12 regression] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' -- canadian compilation fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 --- Comment #27 from Ofer Shinaar --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #23) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #22) > > *** Bug 101060 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** > > I can confirm Yujie Yang's patch works. Just

[Bug testsuite/102841] libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/host_data-7.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102841 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libgomp |testsuite Keywords|

[Bug c/66918] Disable "inline function declared but never defined" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||44209 CC|

[Bug c/90690] Undocumented -Werror-implicit-function-declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90690 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to sandra from comment #2) > I think this has been fixed? In a recent-ish trunk build, I see gcc -Q > --help-warning prints > > -Werror-implicit-function-declaration >

[Bug target/101893] There is no vgbbd on p7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101893 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Clarke : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3cfbe5dc08b574bccc398256946cc03e2a767329 commit r12-4514-g3cfbe5dc08b574bccc398256946cc03e2a767329 Author: Paul A. Clarke Date:

[Bug testsuite/102719] [12 regression] several failures after r12-4337

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102719 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Clarke : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3cfbe5dc08b574bccc398256946cc03e2a767329 commit r12-4514-g3cfbe5dc08b574bccc398256946cc03e2a767329 Author: Paul A. Clarke Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/102840] [12 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c by r12-4475

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102840 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #1) > I believe this test case is poorly written, and not correctly testing the > original issue in PR target/22076 which concerned suboptimal moving of > arguments via

[Bug target/102783] [powerpc] FPSCR manipulations cannot be relied upon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102783 --- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Tue, 19 Oct 2021, segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102783 > > --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- > (In reply to

[Bug other/102842] [10 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set at 02 or greater

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102842 --- Comment #3 from tt_1 --- sure I can provide happily gcc -v of host: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/10.3.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with:

[Bug other/102842] [10 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set at 02 or greater

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102842 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-10-19 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/102840] [12 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c by r12-4475

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102840 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-10-19

[Bug other/102842] [10 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set at 02 or greater

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102842 --- Comment #1 from tt_1 --- Created attachment 51635 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51635=edit preprocessed source

[Bug other/102842] New: [10 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set at 02 or greater

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102842 Bug ID: 102842 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set at 02 or greater Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgomp/102838] [12 regression] Several tests SEGV in gomp_loop_ull_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug tree-optimization/102832] [12 Regression] ICE in vect_create_partial_epilog with -O3 -msve-vector-bits=128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102832 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/102833] [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-17.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102833 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-10-19 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/102840] [12 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c by r12-4475

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102840 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Target|

[Bug libgomp/102841] libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/host_data-7.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102841 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug libgomp/102841] New: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/host_data-7.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102841 Bug ID: 102841 Summary: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/host_dat a-7.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/102829] Redundant null check after atomic load from that address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102829 --- Comment #2 from Laurynas Biveinis --- FWIW adding "if (this == nullptr) __builtin_unreachable();" between __atomic_load_n and return fails to workaround this issue

[Bug libgomp/102838] [12 regression] Several tests SEGV in gomp_loop_ull_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Actually no, I'm wrong, there is gomp_mutex_t lock __attribute__((aligned (64))); in the middle of the structure, so the start of the structure is 64-byte aligned.

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 93183, which changed state. Bug 93183 Summary: SVE does not use neg as conditional https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 93183, which changed state. Bug 93183 Summary: SVE does not use neg as conditional https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/93183] SVE does not use neg as conditional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/102840] New: [12 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c by r12-4475

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102840 Bug ID: 102840 Summary: [12 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c by r12-4475 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/93963] Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/95048] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wstring-constructor of std::filesystem::path throws for non-ASCII characters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Christian Fersch from comment #9) > But is it possible to query the value of -fwide-exec-charset? I had quick > look and couldn't find anything. It's possible now:

[Bug fortran/92482] BIND(C) with array-descriptor mishandled for type character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92482 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/102839] filesystem::path::wstring runs in C locale / practically always throws

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > Martin, did you use -stdlib=libc++ with Clang? Otherwise you're just testing > libstdc++ again with a different compiler. I didn't, my bad. Will do it next

[Bug libstdc++/102839] filesystem::path::wstring runs in C locale / practically always throws

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- This is the same issue as PR 95048 comment 3 describes.

[Bug fortran/92482] BIND(C) with array-descriptor mishandled for type character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92482 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6920d5a1a2834e9c62d441b8f4c6186b01107d13 commit r12-4505-g6920d5a1a2834e9c62d441b8f4c6186b01107d13 Author: Tobias Burnus Date:

[Bug libstdc++/102839] filesystem::path::wstring runs in C locale / practically always throws

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #2 from Jonathan

[Bug target/102835] gcc.target/i386/avx512fp16-trunchf.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102835 --- Comment #1 from Hongyu Wang --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0) > > I wonder what's the best way to handle the difference? Just add > -fomit-frame-pointer > to the testcase or allow for the %ebp vs. %esp difference? For this

[Bug libstdc++/102839] filesystem::path::wstring runs in C locale / practically always throws

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-10-19 CC|

[Bug libgomp/102838] [12 regression] Several tests SEGV in gomp_loop_ull_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Possibly triggered by enabling vectorization at -O2? long long should for ia32 inside of structures (at least on linux but I think it is the same for solaris too) have just 32-bit alignment and nothing else

[Bug libstdc++/102839] New: filesystem::path::wstring runs in C locale / practically always throws

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839 Bug ID: 102839 Summary: filesystem::path::wstring runs in C locale / practically always throws Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libgomp/102838] [12 regression] Several tests SEGV in gomp_loop_ull_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug libgomp/102838] New: [12 regression] Several tests SEGV in gomp_loop_ull_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838 Bug ID: 102838 Summary: [12 regression] Several tests SEGV in gomp_loop_ull_init Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/102746] gcov returns 0 un erroneuos incovation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102746 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Илья Шипицин from comment #9) > ok, so we'll migrate to gcc-12 :) Yes, but please wait for the release of 12.1 that will happen at the end of April 2022. In the meantime, you can port to GCC

[Bug tree-optimization/102832] [12 Regression] ICE in vect_create_partial_epilog with -O3 -msve-vector-bits=128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102832 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/102375] [aarch64] Should allow space in target attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102375 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/102375] [aarch64] Should allow space in target attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102375 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b34f5c5ec75823d656b6882f12d46248402a2aa commit r12-4503-g6b34f5c5ec75823d656b6882f12d46248402a2aa Author: Martin Liska Date:

[Bug d/102837] [12 regression] Many 32-bit gdc tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102837 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug d/102837] New: [12 regression] Many 32-bit gdc tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102837 Bug ID: 102837 Summary: [12 regression] Many 32-bit gdc tests FAIL Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d

[Bug target/102836] gcc.target/i386/pieces-memset-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102836 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0) > It turns out that this happens because 32-bit Solaris/x86 only guarantees > 4-byte stack alignment following the i386 psABI, so defaults to > -mstackrealign. > >

[Bug target/102836] gcc.target/i386/pieces-memset-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102836 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug target/102836] New: gcc.target/i386/pieces-memset-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102836 Bug ID: 102836 Summary: gcc.target/i386/pieces-memset-1.c etc. FAIL Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/102835] gcc.target/i386/avx512fp16-trunchf.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102835 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug target/102835] New: gcc.target/i386/avx512fp16-trunchf.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102835 Bug ID: 102835 Summary: gcc.target/i386/avx512fp16-trunchf.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/102834] gcc.target/i386/avx512f-pr96891-3.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102834 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug target/102834] gcc.target/i386/avx512f-pr96891-3.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102834 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 51632 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51632=edit 32-bit avx512f-pr96891-3.s

[Bug target/102834] New: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-pr96891-3.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102834 Bug ID: 102834 Summary: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-pr96891-3.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/102833] [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-17.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102833 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug tree-optimization/102833] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-17.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102833 Bug ID: 102833 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-17.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/102825] std::move_only_function's implementation breaking existing code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102825 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/102825] std::move_only_function's implementation breaking existing code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102825 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9890b12c72c02828c691f22198c3e0afd8678991 commit r12-4500-g9890b12c72c02828c691f22198c3e0afd8678991 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug target/102783] [powerpc] FPSCR manipulations cannot be relied upon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102783 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #6) > Generically (and if the command-line options are such that floating-point > control / status bits are to be respected by optimizations), *any*

[Bug tree-optimization/102832] New: [12 Regression] ICE in vect_create_partial_epilog with -O3 -msve-vector-bits=128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102832 Bug ID: 102832 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in vect_create_partial_epilog with -O3 -msve-vector-bits=128 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/102745] CLASS → TYPE check fails after RESHAPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102745 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/92482] BIND(C) with array-descriptor mishandled for type character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92482 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #8 from Tobias

[Bug fortran/101309] Bind(C): gfortran creates invalid C descriptor for result of TRANSPOSE intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101309 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/101308] Bind(C): gfortran does not create C descriptors for scalar pointer/allocatable arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101308 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/102827] [12 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 20 does not dominate use in block 19) since r12-4398-g9b2ad21ab3ebc21a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102827 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/102827] [12 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 20 does not dominate use in block 19) since r12-4398-g9b2ad21ab3ebc21a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102827 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d996799a507f9f4c379b55b004233be92fa63380 commit r12-4498-gd996799a507f9f4c379b55b004233be92fa63380 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/102783] [powerpc] FPSCR manipulations cannot be relied upon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102783 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > Even out-of-line does not help if there are visible CSE/association > opportunities across such call. Yeah, good point. > A workaround is to make the

[Bug fortran/92284] Subroutine with bind(c) attribute causing varied problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92284 Bug 92284 depends on bug 92189, which changed state. Bug 92189 Summary: Fortran-written bind(C) function with allocatable argument does not update C descriptor on exit https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92189 What

  1   2   >