[Bug target/103463] [12 Regression] ICE: in ix86_attr_length_immediate_default, at config/i386/i386.c:16686 with -Os -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103463 --- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3) > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1) > > It should be fixed by > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/585613.html > > Hmm, it looks to be

[Bug target/103463] [12 Regression] ICE: in ix86_attr_length_immediate_default, at config/i386/i386.c:16686 with -Os -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103463 --- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1) > It should be fixed by > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/585613.html Hmm, it looks to be broken again.

[Bug tree-optimization/103278] [12 Regression] Recent change to cddce inhibits switch optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103278 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de --- works for me

[Bug bootstrap/91972] Bootstrap should use -Wmissing-declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91972 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- To clarify, are we talking about adding it just in the gcc subdirectory, or any other subdirectories as well?

[Bug rtl-optimization/103485] [12 Regression] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:4013 with -O -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103485 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-30

[Bug target/103484] [12 Regression] ICE: in ix86_attr_length_immediate_default, at config/i386/i386.c:16686 with -O2 -fno-tree-bit-ccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103484 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |testsuite Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/103478] Possible regression in constexpr processing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103478 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-30

[Bug testsuite/103477] [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr103345.c fails after r12-5453

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103477 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |testsuite Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/103473] [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103473 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3 Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/103471] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103471 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Priority|P3

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Version|unknown

[Bug rtl-optimization/103485] New: [12 Regression] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:4013 with -O -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103485 Bug ID: 103485 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:4013 with -O -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/103484] New: [12 Regression] ICE: in ix86_attr_length_immediate_default, at config/i386/i386.c:16686 with -O2 -fno-tree-bit-ccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103484 Bug ID: 103484 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: in ix86_attr_length_immediate_default, at config/i386/i386.c:16686 with -O2 -fno-tree-bit-ccp Product: gcc Version:

[Bug middle-end/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479 --- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina --- Could you post the dce7 dump file if you have it?

[Bug target/95740] Failure to avoid using the stack when interpreting a float as an integer when it is modified afterwards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95740 --- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #4) > It can be fixed by > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 2 +- > gcc/config/i386/i386.h | 4 +++- > > modified

[Bug target/95740] Failure to avoid using the stack when interpreting a float as an integer when it is modified afterwards

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95740 --- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu --- It can be fixed by 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 2 +- gcc/config/i386/i386.h | 4 +++- modified gcc/config/i386/i386.c @@ -19194,7 +19194,7 @@

[Bug target/102239] powerpc suboptimal boolean test of contiguous bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102239 --- Comment #9 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8) > (In reply to luoxhu from comment #6) > > > > foo: > > > > .LFB0: > > > > .cfi_startproc > > > > rldicr. 3,3,29,1 > > > >

[Bug c/92479] missing warnings for unreachable codes with break (i.e. revive the subset of -Wunreachable-code that fits under clang's -Wunreachable-code-break)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92479 --- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > I'm going to re-interpret -Wunreachable-code-{return,break} to mean to > diagnose unreachable code _after_ a return stmt or a break stmt. It really > looks

[Bug target/102347] "fatal error: target specific builtin not available" with MMA and LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102347 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c7d489a1e6592bc73db03678c1231748fd7a126 commit r12-5590-g6c7d489a1e6592bc73db03678c1231748fd7a126 Author: Kewen Lin Date: Mon Nov

[Bug c++/103483] context-sensitive ranges change triggers stringop-overread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug c++/103483] New: constexpr basic_string triggers stringop-overread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483 Bug ID: 103483 Summary: constexpr basic_string triggers stringop-overread Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/103372] Warning on failure order defaulting to SEQ_CST if not a compile time constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103372 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/103372] Warning on failure order defaulting to SEQ_CST if not a compile time constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103372 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed. clang decides (on aarch64 at least) emits a conditional based on the argument, instead of special casing it to SEQ_CST .

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 Dmitry Vyukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dvyukov at google dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/94993] aarch64 incompatible with -mgeneral-regs-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94993 roland at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug translation/103482] New: Unnecessary ANDI instruction is generated for MIPS target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103482 Bug ID: 103482 Summary: Unnecessary ANDI instruction is generated for MIPS target Product: gcc Version: og10 (devel/omp/gcc-10) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- https://reviews.llvm.org/D113742

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I don't see this section in the upstream sources: > + # All XMM registers are caller-saved. Or maybe I am looking at the wrong branch

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL on machine without avx support when using thread sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12 Regression] SIGILL on |[12 Regression] SIGILL on

[Bug sanitizer/103466] [12 Regression] SIGILL due to use of vmovdqu when using thread sanitizer (merge from upstream)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103466 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|SIGILL due to use of|[12 Regression] SIGILL due

[Bug tree-optimization/103467] [12 Regression] ICE in range_def_chain::register_dependency since r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103467 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/103467] [12 Regression] ICE in range_def_chain::register_dependency since r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103467 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab202b659dbdfd3a1f45ffe7a5052f35b5e8fa6d commit r12-5587-gab202b659dbdfd3a1f45ffe7a5052f35b5e8fa6d Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug c++/103480] [10/11/12 Regression] -Werror=useless-cast with constexpr destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103480 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Add typename to make it C++14: namespace std { template struct __array_traits { typedef _Tp _Type[_Nm]; }; template struct array { typename __array_traits<_Tp, _Nm>::_Type _M_elems; }; } // namespace

[Bug c++/103480] [10/11/12 Regression] -Werror=useless-cast with constexpr destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103480 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|-Werror=useless-cast with |[10/11/12 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/103456] [12 Regression] gcc/gcc.c:9502:8: runtime error: load of address 0x0000009f5037 with insufficient space for an object of type 'const char' since r12-5548-g4a2007594cff78

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103456 Siddhesh Poyarekar changed: What|Removed |Added CC|siddhesh at redhat dot com | Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/103481] asan and ubsan work correctly on windows with clang + compiler-rt, however, libstdc++ does not correctly support it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103481 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Dup of bug 103453. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 103453 *** Also i think windows support for sanitizer is also viable for GCC. Very

[Bug libstdc++/103453] ASAN detection with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103453 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||unlvsur at live dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug libstdc++/103481] asan and ubsan work correctly on windows with clang + compiler-rt, however, libstdc++ does not correctly support it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103481 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug libstdc++/103481] New: asan and ubsan work correctly on windows with clang + compiler-rt, however, libstdc++ does not correctly support it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103481 Bug ID: 103481 Summary: asan and ubsan work correctly on windows with clang + compiler-rt, however, libstdc++ does not correctly support it Product: gcc

[Bug c++/103480] -Werror=useless-cast with constexpr destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103480 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- namespace std { template struct __array_traits { typedef _Tp _Type[_Nm]; }; template struct array { __array_traits<_Tp, _Nm>::_Type _M_elems; }; } // namespace std struct scope_guard { constexpr

[Bug analyzer/103217] analyzer false positive on leak warning when using indirect strdup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103217 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/103217] analyzer false positive on leak warning when using indirect strdup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103217 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:132902177138c09803d639e12b1daebf2b9edddc commit r12-5585-g132902177138c09803d639e12b1daebf2b9edddc Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug c++/103480] -Werror=useless-cast with constexpr destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103480 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/103480] New: [10,11,12]Werror=useless-cast with constexpr destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103480 Bug ID: 103480 Summary: [10,11,12]Werror=useless-cast with constexpr destructor Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/91288] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in add_symbol_to_partition_1, at lto/lto-partition.c:153 since r249224

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91288 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/99377] [modules] undefined std::string_view::empty() if referenced in inline exported function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99377 --- Comment #6 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- A workaround for static member functions: ```C++ template [[nodiscard]] consteval I max() { return std::numeric_limits::max(); } if (v == std::numeric_limits::max()) break; if (v ==

[Bug c++/99377] [modules] undefined std::string_view::empty() if referenced in inline exported function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99377 Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johelegp at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/103473] [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103473 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/103473] [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103473 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-29 Ever

[Bug preprocessor/103446] Invalid wide multibyte character constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103446 --- Comment #8 from Zloten --- Sorry for my late reply

[Bug preprocessor/103446] Invalid wide multibyte character constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103446 --- Comment #7 from Zloten --- It's very very strange. I've tested GCC 11.2.0(x86-64) and MinGW(x86-64). Both have the same problem. Let's do not use L suffix (it's implementation-defined). Let's use u suffix. For both: int test() {

[Bug fortran/101565] ICE in gfc_simplify_image_index, at fortran/simplify.c:8234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101565 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug analyzer/103217] analyzer false positive on leak warning when using indirect strdup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103217 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from David

[Bug target/103470] GNU-stack section not emitted on MIPS hard-float targets with MUSL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103470 --- Comment #1 from Ilya Lipnitskiy --- Created attachment 51900 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51900=edit proposed fix

[Bug target/102811] vcvtph2ps and vcvtps2ph should be used to convert _Float16 to SFmode with -mf16c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102811 --- Comment #24 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca5667e867252db3c8642ee90f55427149cd92b6 commit r12-5584-gca5667e867252db3c8642ee90f55427149cd92b6 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Mon

[Bug c++/97219] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Generic lambda does not find function declaration from enclosing block scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97219 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka --- Related testcase: void f() { extern void g(); [] (auto) { g(); }(0); } We started rejecting this one with r8-7277.

[Bug c++/97219] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Generic lambda does not find function declaration from enclosing block scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97219 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-29 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479 Bug ID: 103479 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/103467] [12 Regression] ICE in range_def_chain::register_dependency since r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103467 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod --- OK, got it. patch coming...

[Bug tree-optimization/92985] missed optimization opportunity for switch linear transformation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92985 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |tree-optimization

[Bug fortran/103474] ICE in simplify_cobound, at fortran/simplify.c:4415

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103474 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/96245] Failure to optimize arithmetic pattern in switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96245 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||llvm at rifkin dot dev --- Comment #11

[Bug tree-optimization/103072] Folding common switch code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103072 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/103476] --enable-maintainer-mode fails with "invalid separator" in libgfortran on POWER

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103476 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/103476] --enable-maintainer-mode fails with "invalid separator" in libgfortran on POWER

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103476 --- Comment #2 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de --- On 29.11.21 20:57, sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103476 > > --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- >

[Bug c++/103478] Possible regression in constexpr processing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103478 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug c++/103478] Possible regression in constexpr processing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103478 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- arguments to constexpr functions are not valid template arguments.

[Bug c++/103478] New: Possible regression in constexpr processing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103478 Bug ID: 103478 Summary: Possible regression in constexpr processing Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug testsuite/103469] [12 regression] c-c++-common/attr-retain-9.c fails after r12-5483

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103469 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/103469] [12 regression] c-c++-common/attr-retain-9.c fails after r12-5483

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103469 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f81c5a86dc03352682ac8ae3daa6ec507528a265 commit r12-5583-gf81c5a86dc03352682ac8ae3daa6ec507528a265 Author: Martin Sebor Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/103477] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr103345.c fails after r12-5453

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103477 Bug ID: 103477 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr103345.c fails after r12-5453 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/103476] --enable-maintainer-mode fails with "invalid separator" in libgfortran on POWER

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103476 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- 1202:$(srcdir)/generated/matmulavx128_c17.c;

[Bug fortran/103475] ICE in gfc_expr_attr, at fortran/primary.c:2782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103475 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/103476] New: --enable-maintainer-mode fails with "invalid separator" in libgfortran on POWER

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103476 Bug ID: 103476 Summary: --enable-maintainer-mode fails with "invalid separator" in libgfortran on POWER Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/103467] [12 Regression] ICE in range_def_chain::register_dependency since r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103467 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- Sorry for the probably misleading description. This PR is indeed filed against x86_64, "alpha" there means "pre-release gcc version". MALLOC_PERTURB_ and MALLOC_CHECK_ handling is implemented by glibc and

[Bug rtl-optimization/102356] [11/12 Regression] compile-time explosion at -O3 -g in var-tracking since r11-209-g74dc179a6da33cd0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102356 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/100340] Bootstrap fails with Clang 12.0.5 (XCode 12.5)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100340 --- Comment #28 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #27) > The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe > : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b333df9484c1697f3a80530a47aa90b1859e970 > > commit

[Bug fortran/103475] New: ICE in gfc_expr_attr, at fortran/primary.c:2782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103475 Bug ID: 103475 Summary: ICE in gfc_expr_attr, at fortran/primary.c:2782 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/103474] New: ICE in simplify_cobound, at fortran/simplify.c:4415

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103474 Bug ID: 103474 Summary: ICE in simplify_cobound, at fortran/simplify.c:4415 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/103467] [12 Regression] ICE in range_def_chain::register_dependency since r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103467 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod --- Hm.. I can't seem to reproduce, I built alpha cross with latest trunk, but it seems to compile, as does x86_64. What with the MALLOC_PERTURB_=3 MALLOC_CHECK_=3 ?

[Bug fortran/103473] [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103473 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/103455] [9/10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:27057

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103455 --- Comment #9 from Stephan Hartmann --- Bisect points to: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=4c2125ba18f40e57987a828bfd60e83024850e10

[Bug fortran/103473] New: [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103473 Bug ID: 103473 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in simplify_minmaxloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5287 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/103472] New: ICE in gfc_conv_ss_startstride, at fortran/trans-array.c:4527

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103472 Bug ID: 103472 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_ss_startstride, at fortran/trans-array.c:4527 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/103471] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103471 Bug ID: 103471 Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1114 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcc/103470] New: [10, 11, 12] GNU-stack section not emitted on MIPS hard-float targets with MUSL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103470 Bug ID: 103470 Summary: [10, 11, 12] GNU-stack section not emitted on MIPS hard-float targets with MUSL Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/103467] [12 Regression] ICE in range_def_chain::register_dependency since r12-4871-g502ffb1f389011b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103467 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,

[Bug other/103021] Make the path to etags used in the build system configurable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103021 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED --- Comment #4 from Eric

[Bug other/103021] Make the path to etags used in the build system configurable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103021 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Gallager : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:909b30a17e71253772d2cb174d0dae6d0b8c9401 commit r12-5581-g909b30a17e71253772d2cb174d0dae6d0b8c9401 Author: Eric Gallager Date:

[Bug testsuite/103469] New: [12 regression] c-c++-common/attr-retain-9.c fails after r12-5483

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103469 Bug ID: 103469 Summary: [12 regression] c-c++-common/attr-retain-9.c fails after r12-5483 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/94484] ICE in cp_finish_decl, at cp/decl.c:7447

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94484 --- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha --- *** Bug 97671 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/97671] ICE: tree check: expected var_decl or function_decl or field_decl or type_decl or concept_decl or template_decl, have parm_decl in push_template_decl, at cp/pt.c:6102

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97671 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/103449] [12 Regression] use-after-free in ipa_param_body_adjustments::prepare_debug_expressions(tree_node*) (ipa-param-manipulation.c:1283) since r12-4920-g1ece90ffa9ce63b4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103449 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor --- In my defense, even in my old code, in the call m_dead_ssa_debug_equiv.put (dead_ssa, *d) I would expect the load *d to be evaluated before the inline template function put is invoked and it feels

[Bug c++/103468] New: [modules] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass walloca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103468 Bug ID: 103468 Summary: [modules] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass walloca Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/103467] New: [12 Regression] ICE in range_def_chain::register_dependency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103467 Bug ID: 103467 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in range_def_chain::register_dependency Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/103464] [12 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 (with -ftree-vrp and ulimit -s 512) on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault since r12-5522-g661c02e54ea72fb5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103464 --- Comment #16 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13) > Note that r12-5522-g661c02e54ea72fb5 doubled the stack use of the frame by > adding another int_range_max local to range_of_phi. > > First of all in the

[Bug tree-optimization/103464] [12 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 (with -ftree-vrp and ulimit -s 512) on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault since r12-5522-g661c02e54ea72fb5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103464 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Macleod --- Created attachment 51897 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51897=edit Patch to not recurse for PHIs First, there was a bug in the original patch, proposed fix for PR 103440 has been

[Bug tree-optimization/103440] [12 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-5522-g661c02e54ea72fb5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103440 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod --- I need to adjust the original patch, I shouldn't have continued the loop when dealing with equivalences.An equivalence is not the same as an undefined value... we might be able to ignore the range

[Bug target/102976] MMA test case emits wrong code when building a vector pair

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102976 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b6cfe7c4ee98b2c38e6a6d98742f1efb2fc9a79 commit r11-9341-g2b6cfe7c4ee98b2c38e6a6d98742f1efb2fc9a79 Author: Peter Bergner

  1   2   3   >