[Bug tree-optimization/103761] [12 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2239

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103761 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug fortran/55214] Program fail to evaluate where clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55214 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/64097] Bug with nested WHERE constructs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64097 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/103744] [12 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:889 since r12-5612-g10833849b55401a52f2334eb032a70beb688e9fc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103744 --- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #5) > (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #4) > > The apparently related case: > I think this is actually a separate bug. Could you open a new PR for

[Bug tree-optimization/103761] New: [12 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2239

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103761 Bug ID: 103761 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2239 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/69695] slice of an array retains pointer attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69695 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.3.0 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/68101] Provide a way to allocate arrays aligned to 32 bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68101 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/58002] [IR tracking] Pointer function results in non pointer context: Shall use a temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58002 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Ifort also produces: > > 420 420 I should say using -stand f03 and -stand f95.

[Bug fortran/58002] [IR tracking] Pointer function results in non pointer context: Shall use a temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58002 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Ifort also produces: 420 420

[Bug fortran/56156] Reject calls to external procedures using non-module declared TYPEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56156 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.4 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug driver/66765] gfortran passing fortran-specific options to ld and collect2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66765 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug fortran/45396] Apply front-end pass also for arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45396 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug fortran/49331] Accepts invalid specification expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49331 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0) > gfortran currently compiles http://www.fortran.com/iso_varying_string.f95 > with -std=f2003 without any error. File does not exist any more :(. (In reply to

[Bug fortran/57079] [Fortran-dev] version/type/attribute fields not set with CLASS components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57079 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Something changed in GCC 8 and we get: : x_22 = __builtin_malloc (144); if (x_22 == 0B) goto ; [INV] else goto ; [INV] : _gfortran_os_error (&"Allocation would exceed memory

[Bug fortran/57611] [Fortran-Dev Regression] Too much memory allocated (gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_alloc_2.f90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57611 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I can't reproduce this even in GCC 4.9.4.

[Bug fortran/49592] [OOP] Non-polymorphic ALLOCATE with polymorphic SOURCE= rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49592 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||5.5.0 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/45425] Bounds check applied before MASK of WHERE construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45425 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Last

[Bug fortran/43837] Set TREE_NOTHROW also on libgfortran library calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43837 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug fortran/43172] Unnecessary array temporary - non-pointer/non-target does not alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43172 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last

[Bug fortran/41911] Unnecessary copying of array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41911 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last

[Bug fortran/88404] ICE (tree check) with -fsanitize=thread on Fortran2003 code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88404 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/77390] generates INDIRECT_REF of void type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77390 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|WAITING

[Bug c/103649] -Wno-attribute=foo::bar implies no arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103649 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/103649] -Wno-attribute=foo::bar implies no arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103649 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6afb8a68a9113897ccf39e40983e042ed90d7aed commit r12-6052-g6afb8a68a9113897ccf39e40983e042ed90d7aed Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug fortran/103412] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103412 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 09:07:44PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Alternative patch: > Either patch fixes the problem and I'll offer that

[Bug fortran/77415] ICE: tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type in create_function_arglist, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2263

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77415 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.1.0 --- Comment #3 from Andrew

[Bug fortran/66907] Correct code produces "Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66907 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.1.0 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/55824] [OOP] ICE with ALLOCATE and SOURCE= TRANSPOSE/RESHAPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55824 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.1.0 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/103590] ICE: find_array_spec(): Missing spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103590 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.9.4 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1062d2b022575e2ab942236478029cd637f937a5 commit r9-9875-g1062d2b022575e2ab942236478029cd637f937a5 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 103260 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/103260] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6857 since r6-4614-g57e596204fceef2e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103260 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a28d6903677629c23bac53ff061eb80f22d51006 commit r10-10346-ga28d6903677629c23bac53ff061eb80f22d51006 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/103260] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6857 since r6-4614-g57e596204fceef2e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103260 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/103759] [12 Regression] memcpy-chk failure for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103759 --- Comment #2 from Siddhesh Poyarekar --- I've posted a candidate fix: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/20211217212347.72617-1-siddh...@gotplt.org/

[Bug c++/103760] Invalid expression inside lambda inside compound requirement causes an error instead of concept satisfaction failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103760 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid --- Comment #1 from

[Bug fortran/103412] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103412 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/103755] {has,use}_facet() and iostream constructor performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103755 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > Created attachment 52025 [details] > Alternative implementation v2 > > The diagnostic regression is easy to fix with a static assertion before > calling

[Bug c++/103760] New: Invalid expression inside lambda inside compound requirement causes an error instead of concept satisfaction failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103760 Bug ID: 103760 Summary: Invalid expression inside lambda inside compound requirement causes an error instead of concept satisfaction failure Product: gcc

[Bug c++/92944] [concepts] redefinition error when using constrained structure template inside namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92944 --- Comment #2 from Ed Catmur --- Sorry, meant to link this: https://quuxplusone.github.io/blog/2021/10/27/dont-reopen-namespace-std/

[Bug c++/103681] [9/10/11 Regression] Unusual behavior for tail padding with different c++ standards and NSDMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103681 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression]

[Bug c++/83264] std::initializer_list with a single element selects the wrong overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83264 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Resolution|INVALID

[Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854 --- Comment #141 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- Created attachment 52027 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52027=edit CPU and Memorty usage reports for compilling all.i, _num.i, and compiler.i

[Bug middle-end/51446] -fno-trapping-math generates NaN constant with different sign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446 --- Comment #17 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- (In reply to lucier from comment #16) > Created attachment 52026 [details] > CPU and Memorty usage reports for compilling all.i, _num.i, and compiler.i Sorry, added comment to wrong PR.

[Bug middle-end/51446] -fno-trapping-math generates NaN constant with different sign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446 --- Comment #16 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- Created attachment 52026 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52026=edit CPU and Memorty usage reports for compilling all.i, _num.i, and compiler.i

[Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines

x-gnu Configured with: ../../gcc-mainline/configure --prefix=/pkgs/gcc-mainline --enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c --disable-multilib --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 12.0.0 20211217 (experimental) (GCC) I'll a

[Bug c++/95949] mame build succeeds with -O3 but fails with -O2 and all -O3 flags added manually

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95949 --- Comment #11 from Julian Sikorski --- I can still reproduce this with mame master (0b418d65bae66baa9f334c6daa6dcb4148909f7f) and mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc 11.2.0-5.

[Bug tree-optimization/103759] [12 Regression] memcpy-chk failure for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103759 Siddhesh Poyarekar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/103758] bogus warning: misspelled term 'decl' in format; use 'declaration' instead [-Wformat-diag]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103758 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/103759] [12 Regression] memcpy-chk failure for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103759 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/103759] New: [12 Regression] memcpy-chk failure for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103759 Bug ID: 103759 Summary: [12 Regression] memcpy-chk failure for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/103749] Misleading error message on template/non-template conflict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103749 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/103749] Misleading error message on template/non-template conflict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103749 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fae016862631da70e6482fe3173a111248f8b9bc commit r12-6049-gfae016862631da70e6482fe3173a111248f8b9bc Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug c++/102051] [coroutines] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102051 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-17

[Bug libstdc++/103755] {has,use}_facet() and iostream constructor performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103755 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #52024|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/103624] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103624 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/103624] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103624 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87ae8d7613a8b15d0d729b38ffd49153f1314799 commit r12-6048-g87ae8d7613a8b15d0d729b38ffd49153f1314799 Author: Segher

[Bug target/103624] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103624 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7194397966e6a007cee42360f96834377c3121a4 commit r12-6047-g7194397966e6a007cee42360f96834377c3121a4 Author: Segher

[Bug c++/103758] bogus warning: misspelled term 'decl' in format; use 'declaration' instead [-Wformat-diag]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103758 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Incidentally, this error ("% invalid in condition"); in cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq should be adjusted as well.

[Bug c++/103758] bogus warning: misspelled term 'decl' in format; use 'declaration' instead [-Wformat-diag]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103758 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/103758] New: bogus warning: misspelled term 'decl' in format; use 'declaration' instead [-Wformat-diag]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103758 Bug ID: 103758 Summary: bogus warning: misspelled term 'decl' in format; use 'declaration' instead [-Wformat-diag] Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/103754] [11,12][ice][modules] import bits/stdc++.h and map

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103754 --- Comment #5 from Egor Pugin --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Sadly it looks like modules are no where near prime time. Seems so. I set up my tooling and trying to play with them, but there are a lot of issues. Does someone

[Bug ipa/103734] IPA-CP opportunity for imagick in SPECCPU 2017

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103734 pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/103755] {has,use}_facet() and iostream constructor performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103755 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 52024 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52024=edit Alternative implementation This seems like a much simpler approach. This causes

[Bug c++/103358] what is the first constructor argument of lambda coroutine promise_type?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103358 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/83264] std::initializer_list with a single element selects the wrong overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83264 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't know what the "right" behaviour is. I don't think any compiler except GCC actually implements 2137, as it causes problems. I'm not even sure if this is a case where 2137 applies!

[Bug c++/100772] Templated coroutine new function's arguments have incorrect value categories/overload selection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100772 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/100127] [coroutines] internal compiler error compiling promise with custom awaiter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100127 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2466a8d0dd40d05cb4a239d7d4a21bbd9ffab698 commit r12-6046-g2466a8d0dd40d05cb4a239d7d4a21bbd9ffab698 Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug c++/100772] Templated coroutine new function's arguments have incorrect value categories/overload selection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100772 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:921942a8a106cb53994c21162922e4934eb3a3e0 commit r12-6045-g921942a8a106cb53994c21162922e4934eb3a3e0 Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug c++/96517] ICE in is_this_parameter when accessing constexpr method of a field inside coroutine lambda (with optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96517 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39d2ec41509e3b0d130215a65d7aacbd064b5532 commit r12-6044-g39d2ec41509e3b0d130215a65d7aacbd064b5532 Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/103757] [F18] compiler rejects import, {none, all, only}, does not recognize the keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103757 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug c++/83264] std::initializer_list with a single element selects the wrong overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83264 --- Comment #5 from Ruslan Altynbaev --- Actually DR 2137 describes that: https://wg21.link/cwg2137

[Bug middle-end/102080] [12 Regression] avx512vl related ICE, on firefox-92 gcc ICEs: in expand_insn, at optabs.c:7946 by r12-2679

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102080 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/102080] [12 Regression] avx512vl related ICE, on firefox-92 gcc ICEs: in expand_insn, at optabs.c:7946 by r12-2679

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102080 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/84573] missing warning on an uninstantiated function template returning T with no return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84573 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor

[Bug target/103750] [i386] GCC schedules KMOV instructions that destroys performance in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103750 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #0) > Testcase: ... > The assembly for this produces: > > vmovdqu16 (%rdi), %ymm1 > vmovdqu16 32(%rdi), %ymm2 > vpcmpuw $0,

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 102944, which changed state. Bug 102944 Summary: Many gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-*.c failures https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102944 What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/102944] Many gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-*.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102944 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/103744] [12 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:889 since r12-5612-g10833849b55401a52f2334eb032a70beb688e9fc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103744 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/103744] [12 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:889 since r12-5612-g10833849b55401a52f2334eb032a70beb688e9fc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103744 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e781cb93d7d908f1f4f1611d0034eccbd1478e91 commit r12-6041-ge781cb93d7d908f1f4f1611d0034eccbd1478e91 Author: Richard Sandiford

[Bug tree-optimization/103744] [12 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:889 since r12-5612-g10833849b55401a52f2334eb032a70beb688e9fc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103744 --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #4) > The apparently related case: I think this is actually a separate bug. Could you open a new PR for it?

[Bug c++/84573] missing warning on an uninstantiated function template returning T with no return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84573 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/84250] Symbol collision when using both Address and Undefined Behavior sanitizers (-fsanitize=address,undefined)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84250 --- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to chefmax from comment #10) > Hi Marek, sorry, I'm not really tracking this anymore :(. Hi, understood. > I don't remember exactly why option 1) from >

[Bug target/103750] [i386] GCC schedules KMOV instructions that destroys performance in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103750 --- Comment #8 from Thiago Macieira --- Update again: looks like the issue was the next line I didn't paste, which was performing _kortestz_mask32_u8 on an __mmask16. The type mismatch was causing this problem. If I Use the correct

[Bug c++/83264] std::initializer_list with a single element selects the wrong overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83264 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- https://wg21.link/cwg1467

[Bug c++/83264] std::initializer_list with a single element selects the wrong overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83264 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||Cwg1467 Resolution|---

[Bug target/103750] [i386] GCC schedules KMOV instructions that destroys performance in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103750 --- Comment #7 from Thiago Macieira --- I should add the same is not happening for Char == char, meaning the returned type is an __mmask32 (unsigned) vmovdqu8(%rsi), %ymm2 vmovdqu832(%rsi), %ymm3 vpcmpub

[Bug c++/83264] std::initializer_list with a single element selects the wrong overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83264 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Maybe another case of DR 2137 (PR 85577)

[Bug target/103750] [i386] GCC schedules KMOV instructions that destroys performance in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103750 --- Comment #6 from Thiago Macieira --- It got worse. Now I'm seeing: .L807: vmovdqu16 (%rsi), %ymm2 vmovdqu16 32(%rsi), %ymm3 vpcmpuw $6, %ymm0, %ymm2, %k2 vpcmpuw $6, %ymm0, %ymm3, %k3

[Bug target/103750] [i386] GCC schedules KMOV instructions that destroys performance in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103750 --- Comment #5 from Thiago Macieira --- Maybe this is running afoul of GCC's thinking that a simple register-register move is free? I've seen it save a constant in an opmask register, but kmov{d,q} is not free like mov{l,q} is.

[Bug testsuite/102944] Many gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-*.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102944 --- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- > I don't see any of the FAILs or XFAILs listed in comment #0 with cross > compilers for any of the Targets. Can this report be resolved? The

[Bug c++/83264] std::initializer_list with a single element selects the wrong overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83264 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/35835] Compiler fails to recognize match of local "extern" declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35835 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/14769] [DR 426] Block extern incorrectly resolved to file-scope internal linkage object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14769 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tabloid.adroit at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/94764] block extern incorrectly resolved to external linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94764 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/14769] [DR 426] Block extern incorrectly resolved to file-scope internal linkage object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14769 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code |accepts-invalid Blocks|

[Bug c++/57533] When throwing local variable, it's being move-constructed even if not going out of scope.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57533 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.1.0 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/40225] Mishandled throw/catch with throw in constructor and rethrow in set_terminate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40225 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/103741] [12 Regression] ICE in prepare_vec_mask, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1808 since r12-5772-g06f2e7d49fc6341ea0128ccd83fd13705dd2c523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103741 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

  1   2   >