[Bug target/64691] Suboptimal register allocation for bytes comparison on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64691 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/30128] byte independent store not done in some cases due to truncation of addition too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30128 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Strange code generated |byte independent store not

[Bug tree-optimization/61481] Poor optimization of simple small-sized matrix routines with constant data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61481 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/59986] Unnecessary edges in the CFG due to setjmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59986 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/59786] GIMPLE invariant motion misses opportunity to reduce register pressure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59786 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/59786] GIMPLE invariant motion misses opportunity to reduce register pressure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59786 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/34653] operation performed unnecessarily in 64-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34653 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization --- Comment #10 from

[Bug target/35926] Pushing / Poping ebx without using it.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35926 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/40168] finding common subexpressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40168 --- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski --- With the trunk on the second testcase, SLP works but we get stuff like: _2 = (*b_420(D))[80]; _4 = (*b_420(D))[79]; _538 = {_2, _4}; _980 = _538 * vect__1.182_559; Shouldn't that just be loading a

[Bug tree-optimization/28850] missed call -> jmp transformation; redundant unwind stuff with empty finally

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28850 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-08-25 21:59:14 |2021-12-24 Keywords|patch

[Bug ipa/39298] Optimize away only set but not used variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39298 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/91721] Missed optimization for checking nan and comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91721 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/86892] RTL CSE commoning trivial constants across call and/or too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86892 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Build|powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g | |nu

[Bug middle-end/38518] Excessive compile time with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38518 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Host|suse-linux-x86_64 | Component|rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/48064] Optimizer produces suboptimal code for e.g. x = x ^ (x >> 1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48064 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|windows 32 |i686-*-* x86_64-*-*

[Bug c++/24314] Extra "template<>" in partial specialization is compiled successfuly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24314 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c++/24314] Extra "template<>" in partial specialization is compiled successfuly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24314 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/63809] Missing warning on extra template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63809 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/63809] Missing warning on extra template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63809 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Reduced testcase: template struct binary_traits{}; template <> template struct binary_traits { typedef int result_type; }; - CUT This is rejected since GCC 8 with: :6:8: error: too many

[Bug c++/65923] False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mferoldif at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/84435] -Wliteral-suffix warns on a using-directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84435 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/50986] weak static data members with constant initializers emitted in .rodata, leading to segfault on startup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50986 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #4 from Andrew

[Bug c++/81557] Detect unused const char * and STL string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81557 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/79517] using a deque supresses compiler warning for undefined behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79517 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed, though with a reduced testcase, I got the opposite effect of having the constructor/deconstructor causing the warning to show up while not having it causes it not to show. struct g { g();

[Bug c++/39992] cc1plus exhausts memory with deeply nested unclosed constructor parens

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39992 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-25

[Bug c++/39992] cc1plus exhausts memory with deeply nested unclosed constructor parens

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39992 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||terra at gnome dot org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/63295] Insane memory use on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63295 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/72768] Potential bug about the order of destructors of static objects and atexit() callbacks in C++?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72768 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #9 from Andrew

[Bug c++/7748] Static objects in dynamic library with non-default priority not initialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7748 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/7748] Static objects in dynamic library with non-default priority not initialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7748 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- First problem looks like: S.C:16:50: error: attributes after parenthesized initializer ignored [-fpermissive] 16 | S s2 (65534) __attribute__((init_priority(65534))); |

[Bug c++/67324] Failures in Assignable concept's requires-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67324 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Keywords|

[Bug c++/66472] -Wshadow gets confused by using statements in template classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- GCC even warns for: template struct Foo : T { typedef T Base; Foo(int size) : Base(size) {} using Base::size; }; While clang does not even warn for this case: struct Foo { Foo(int size) {} int

[Bug c++/37667] Initialization of global variables and functions with constructor attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37667 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/103825] ICE on switch on enum class in bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103825 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/103825] New: [12 Regression] ICE on switch on enum class in bitfield

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103825 Bug ID: 103825 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE on switch on enum class in bitfield Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/89543] Don't modify TREE_NO_WARNING during folding in place

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89543 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/89543] Don't modify TREE_NO_WARNING during folding in place

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89543 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53431] C++ preprocessor ignores #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 --- Comment #47 from Lewis Hyatt --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #46) > If you don't get much attention to the patch, it may be worth pinging it. > But before that, I would also suggest submitting all the cleanups separately >

[Bug c++/100084] using enum lookup isn't type-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100084 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luizfvalle at pm dot me --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/103824] Enum class shadowed by class member in using-enum-declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103824 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84214] recip and slp passes conflict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84214 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I am almost want to say the new testsuite failure that just happened on the trunk is caused by this too: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/587355.html

[Bug c++/103824] New: Enum class shadowed by class member in using-enum-declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103824 Bug ID: 103824 Summary: Enum class shadowed by class member in using-enum-declaration Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/84083] [missed optimization] loop-invariant strlen() not hoisted out of loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84083 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/61562] Compiler crash when combining -Wstrict-overflow=4 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61562 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/55277] [4.8 regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1217

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55277 Bug 55277 depends on bug 32647, which changed state. Bug 32647 Summary: spill failures with hard-register variable https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32647 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/32647] spill failures with hard-register variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32647 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/35696] Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35696 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

[Bug target/103785] [12 Regression] Ada bootstrap ICEs on i?86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103785 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- Before (insn 8 5 70 2 (set (reg:SI 1 dx [92]) (const_int 714200473 [0x2a91d599])) "/export/gnu/import/git/gitlab/x86-gcc-test/gcc/ada/sem_type.adb":2563:7 70 {*movsi_internal} (expr_list:REG_EQUIV

[Bug target/103785] [12 Regression] Ada bootstrap ICEs on i?86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103785 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > Created attachment 52055 [details] > Good and bad asm > > --- good.s2021-12-24 11:24:26.531365375 -0800 > +++ bad.s 2021-12-24 11:24:30.769344666 -0800 > @@ -10,7

[Bug target/103785] [12 Regression] Ada bootstrap ICEs on i?86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103785 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 52055 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52055=edit Good and bad asm --- good.s 2021-12-24 11:24:26.531365375 -0800 +++ bad.s 2021-12-24 11:24:30.769344666 -0800

[Bug target/103785] [12 Regression] Ada bootstrap ICEs on i?86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103785 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- sem_type.adb is miscompiled.

[Bug c/100854] TS 18661-3 and backwards-incompatible setting of __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100854 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-24 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/103797] Clang vectorized LightPixel while GCC does not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103797 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f921393e339090566c1589d81009caa954de90d commit r12-6113-g8f921393e339090566c1589d81009caa954de90d Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Fri

[Bug target/95046] Vectorize V2SFmode operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f921393e339090566c1589d81009caa954de90d commit r12-6113-g8f921393e339090566c1589d81009caa954de90d Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Fri

[Bug testsuite/103823] g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C fails on darwin with "using serial compilation of 2 LTRANS jobs"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- if that is not viable you could prune it locally to the specific test, or add the prune to the general set in testsuite/lib (perhaps making it darwin-specific).

[Bug testsuite/103823] g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C fails on darwin with "using serial compilation of 2 LTRANS jobs"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823 --- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Any reason not to move the test to the lto testsuite?

[Bug testsuite/103823] g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C fails on darwin with "using serial compilation of 2 LTRANS jobs"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-24

[Bug lto/103823] g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C fails on darwin with "using serial compilation of 2 LTRANS jobs"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/99936] [modules] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header* on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #6) > At the same time, they appear to show up only intermittently in linux test > results, and haven't been fixed on the 11 branch either. Are C++ modules >

[Bug other/78766] GCC Awk scripts use the non-POSIX /^{/ regex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78766 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||skunk at iskunk dot org --- Comment #4

[Bug bootstrap/53607] opt-functions.awk --> "awk: There is a regular expression error."

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53607 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug other/78766] GCC Awk scripts use the non-POSIX /^{/ regex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78766 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Keywords|

[Bug c++/99936] [modules] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header* on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936 --- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- At the same time, they appear to show up only intermittently in linux test results, and haven't been fixed on the 11 branch either. Are C++ modules considered experimental, or generally buggy?

[Bug lto/103823] New: g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C fails on darwin with "using serial compilation of 2 LTRANS jobs"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823 Bug ID: 103823 Summary: g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C fails on darwin with "using serial compilation of 2 LTRANS jobs" Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/80552] Make consecutive relative line numbers more maintainable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80552 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/99936] [modules] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header* on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #4) > Currently still fails on x86_64-apple-darwin21 > (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-December/743901.html), > as well as the future

[Bug hsa/86948] Internal compiler error compiling brig.dg/test/gimple/mulhi.hsail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86948 --- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #7) > A default expansion for MULT_HIGHPART_EXPR was proposed as part of > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/551316.html > I'll split off just that

[Bug c++/99936] [modules] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header* on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/58203] memset/memcpy are discarded with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58203 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||goswin-v-b at web dot de --- Comment #6

[Bug lto/65199] Linker failure with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65199 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug lto/58203] memset/memcpy are discarded with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58203 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-24 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug lto/48983] No diagnostic message about no space left on device with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48983 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org ---

[Bug lto/50666] bad error reporting for TMPDIR full

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50666 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/85047] cdd2a01 (and others) FAIL with -flto (VLA type in struct causes issues)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85047 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking, |

[Bug lto/85047] cdd2a01 (and others) FAIL with -flto (VLA type in struct causes issues)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85047 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/87499] VLA in struct, nested functions and LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87499 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/50676] Partitioning may fail with presence of static variables referring to function labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50676 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Simple testcase from the other bug: /* { dg-do link } */ /* { dg-options "-flto-partition=max -flto -O2" } */ /* { dg-require-effective-target lto } */ /* Test for putting static with label references into

[Bug lto/50676] Partitioning may fail with presence of static variables referring to function labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50676 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 83375 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug lto/83375] partitioner partitions static arrays with label references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83375 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug hsa/86948] Internal compiler error compiling brig.dg/test/gimple/mulhi.hsail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86948 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov --- How does your patch expand 64-bit highpart multiply (i.e. with 128-bit full product) on 32-bit targets?

[Bug lto/94150] Improve LTO diagnosis for LTO triggered warnings/error: print source.o or source.a(lib.o) when printing location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94150 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug lto/94150] Improve LTO diagnosis for LTO triggered warnings/error: print source.o or source.a(lib.o) when printing location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94150 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- There is a nice testcase in bug 96969 comment #1.

[Bug lto/94150] Improve LTO diagnosis for LTO triggered warnings/error: print source.o or source.a(lib.o) when printing location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94150 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alan at octopull dot co.uk --- Comment

[Bug lto/96969] ODR violations do not list the translation unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96969 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/86490] lto1: fatal error: multiple prevailing defs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86490 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor --- Comment #19 from Andrew

[Bug lto/67357] -Wodr warnings from types in anonymous namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67357 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED See Also|

[Bug lto/61052] g++ generated code segfaults when using LTO together with "extern template", non-LTO compiled files, and gold linker

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61052 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/43581] exception handling broken across shared libraries with -fuse-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43581 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/61192] Conflict between global register and function name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61192 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cnsun at uwaterloo dot ca --- Comment

[Bug ipa/100888] ICE: symtab_node::verify failed, symtab_node::verify()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100888 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/61192] Conflict between register and function name for lto on sparc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61192 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-12-24 Known to fail|

[Bug libbacktrace/103822] libbacktrace make check fails with GNU Make 3.81

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103822 --- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Oops wrong type of quotes, needs double quotes: diff --git a/libbacktrace/Makefile.am b/libbacktrace/Makefile.am index 8874f41338a..d200e3a9433 100644 --- a/libbacktrace/Makefile.am +++

[Bug libbacktrace/103822] New: libbacktrace make check fails with GNU Make 3.81

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103822 Bug ID: 103822 Summary: libbacktrace make check fails with GNU Make 3.81 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/63997] gcc.dg/lto/pr61526 failing on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63997 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug lto/52722] ICE in lto_output_varpool_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52722 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||link-failure Target Milestone|---

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug driver/81829] [7 Regression] /usr/bin/gcc-{ar,nm,ranlib} segfault without arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81829 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||theivorytower at gmail dot com ---

[Bug lto/80717] LTO wrappers segfault if run with absolute path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80717 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.3 Status|WAITING

[Bug testsuite/63997] gcc.dg/lto/pr61526 failing on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63997 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|lto |testsuite Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/47334] g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C -O2 -flto FAILs without visibility

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47334 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|lto |middle-end See Also|

  1   2   >