https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33720
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61798
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32789
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42616
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82623
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64534
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103421
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13421
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oss at malat dot biz
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81801
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102512
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92243
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Even lowering of VEC_PERM for this case:
#define vector __attribute__((vector_size(16)))
vector char f(vector char a)
{
a = __builtin_shufflevector (a, a,15,14,13,12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0);
return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92243
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89063
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55894
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-01-07 00:00:00 |2021-12-28
--- Comment #5 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55894
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83220
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48227
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80817
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-05-20 00:00:00 |2021-12-28
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103855
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
unsigned int optimized(unsigned int a, unsigned int b) {
return (unsigned long long)a / b;
}
unsigned int unoptimized(unsigned int a, unsigned int b) {
unsigned long long all = a;
return all /
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103855
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The other way to fix this is during expand, look for the smallest mode which
fits the range of the two operands of TRUNC_DIV_EXPR and there is a div optab
for that mode and use that mode.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103855
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103855
--- Comment #1 from Zhao Wei Liew ---
After some research, I decided to look into value range propagation (VRP). I
compiled with `-fdump-tree-vrp` and the VRP files contained the following for
`optimized()`:
For the file ending in .vrp1,
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847
--- Comment #7 from matoro ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #6)
> I can try debugging it with ssh access. I'll want to build my own copy of
> gccgo. Let me know where I should send the public key. Thanks.
matoro_gcc_bugzilla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103855
Bug ID: 103855
Summary: Missed optimization: 64bit division used instead of
32bit division
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847
--- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
I can try debugging it with ssh access. I'll want to build my own copy of
gccgo. Let me know where I should send the public key. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103802
--- Comment #4 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Or restore the previous recip count check by comment out the if condition to
avoid bb in loop turns cold?
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/recip-3.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90794
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] -O3 |[9/10 Regression] -O3 with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90794
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.1.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84939
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.1.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88917
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2019-01-18 00:00:00 |2021-12-28
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103793
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103793
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44372676e81358de29d5c853685a7664a95d8a96
commit r12-6140-g44372676e81358de29d5c853685a7664a95d8a96
Author: Xionghu Luo
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69899
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 97992 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97992
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847
--- Comment #5 from matoro ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #4)
> There don't seem to be any sparc64-linux machines in the GCC compile farm,
> so I can't recreate this myself.
>
> Are you able to recreate the problem while
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83892
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||85047
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101974
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
/* This is a request to merge an internal specification for
a function declaration involving arrays but no explicit
attribute access. */
tree vblist =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101974
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39751
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Severity|minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39751
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||v.barinov at samsung dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94153
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39751
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haoxintu at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95927
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101717
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-08-02 00:00:00 |2021-12-28
Target Milestone|12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101072
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.1.0, 12.0
Target Milestone|11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95985
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95145
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-28
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89971
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a testcase which clang accepts but GCC rejects:
int b;
int e;
#define a(...) b /##__VA_OPT__(c) e
int y = a();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89764
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> I can reproduce it even with 9.3, 10.1 and 11.1.
> On the other side, on the bisect-seed box I can't reproduce, strange.
Even on godbolt I can only reproduce it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ipa |c
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103852
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103854
Bug ID: 103854
Summary: ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper, at
fortran/class.c:1618
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103851
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is an even more reduced testcase:
struct _Deque_base {
long _M_map_size;
int *_M_start;
int *_M_finish;
};
void morphologicalFilter1D() {
#pragma omp parallel
{
struct _Deque_base vals[4];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103851
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103789
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94474
--- Comment #15 from Bernd Edlinger ---
While there are certainly empty subranges that could be avoided,
there are also completely empty subroutines, which cannot be
avoided without losing the ability to inspect the procedure
variable at this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103853
Bug ID: 103853
Summary: std::forward_list::merge should check if __list !=
this
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
Alexander von Gluck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103724
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103802
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103852
Bug ID: 103852
Summary: Alias template argument deduction is available in
C++17 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103756
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93645
--- Comment #15 from Fangrui Song ---
-- is definitely rare, but not non-existent.
In GCC, there is {-,--}specs.
In Clang, there are --cuda-path, --ptxas-path, --hip-path, --classpath, etc.
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #14)
> >
> > I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
There don't seem to be any sparc64-linux machines in the GCC compile farm, so I
can't recreate this myself.
Are you able to recreate the problem while running under gdb? A backtrace from
the point of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99968
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db25655fa5dd23bba684ec7db628643c19e64d6a
commit r12-6136-gdb25655fa5dd23bba684ec7db628643c19e64d6a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103742
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Created attachment 52078 [details]
> gcc12-pr103742.patch
>
> Untested fix that fixes it in the r12-6030 tree.
Thank you for the patch. It fixes both the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103813
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] Crash in |[11 Regression] Crash in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103837
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103838
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103813
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9258ac53cfcbe546e8b86a433e59343538743f74
commit r12-6135-g9258ac53cfcbe546e8b86a433e59343538743f74
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103837
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c5fd3616f73fbcd241cc3a5e09275c2b0c49bd4
commit r12-6134-g3c5fd3616f73fbcd241cc3a5e09275c2b0c49bd4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103838
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:78ee8381bf0ebd09a92936bdb9e1b5c9fc85ad88
commit r12-6133-g78ee8381bf0ebd09a92936bdb9e1b5c9fc85ad88
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103851
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103851
Bug ID: 103851
Summary: ICE in gimple_range_global at gcc/value-query.cc:424
since r12-3433-ga25e0b5e6ac8a77a
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101715
--- Comment #15 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
clang's compiler-rt fails to build for quite a while due to this ICE.
Trying to poke at the failure. I shrunk the example slightly further:
template struct S {
S & bar() noexcept(A::value);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94474
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Andrew Burgess from comment #0)
> + This bug report has a bit of history. Originally there was a GCC
> patch here:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01459.html
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93645
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88602
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
In addition to Skia, Firefox gfx library now contains more clang specific
vector code:
gfx/wr/swgl/src/vector_type.h
control vector implementation of some shader rountines (seen in the
rasterflood-gradient
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103642
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100366
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.3|11.2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100660
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103012
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103821
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85428
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
For the first testcase, here is a reduced testcase:
template char hh= 0;
static_assert(<0> != <1>, "should not be equal");
- CUT
Note the above is even valid C++14.
And here is the reduced valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85428
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Barry Revzin from comment #1)
> Also rejected as non-constant comparison.
That is a different issue and was fixed for GCC 10.3.0 and GCC 11+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 91693, which changed state.
Bug 91693 Summary: Comparing addresses of templated inline vars gets bogus "not
a constant expression" error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91693
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85428
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jorg.brown at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103836
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84345
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 103834 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103834
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84345
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100978
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103850
--- Comment #3 from Martin Reinecke ---
Just for completeness, this is the CPU I'm running on:
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 23
model : 96
model name : AMD Ryzen 7 4800H with Radeon Graphics
stepping:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 94716, which changed state.
Bug 94716 Summary: comparison of address of template variables should be
constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94716
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
