https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281
--- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes, it is slow. Five sequential dependent integer instructions instead of
one load instruction. Depending on how you benchmark this you possibly won't
see the slowness, the values are stored to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103872
Bug ID: 103872
Summary: testcase fail in gcc.dg/analyzer/pr103526.c on
riscv64-unknown-elf-gcc
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski ---
Going to finish reducing the testcase using valgrind since it is an use after
free bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
==20277== Invalid write of size 8
==20277==at 0xB1C11C: name_lookup::search_unqualified(tree_node*,
cp_binding_level*) (in
/home/apinski/upstream-gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/cc1plus)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281
--- Comment #17 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
One thing, I'm wondering, is if it is really 'slow' using instructions to build
the const (even with 5 insns).
For example, there seems no big difference in runtime between the below two
pieces of code on a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24016
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281
--- Comment #16 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Thanks, Alan!
I saw your patches in this PR. They would help us to get the sequence of what
we are thinking. And as you said in the comments: it is a big problem for
fixing insn and rtl cost.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95424
Zhao Wei Liew changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52097|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95424
--- Comment #4 from Zhao Wei Liew ---
Comment on attachment 52097
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52097
Optimization for both unsigned and signed integer X
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95424
--- Comment #3 from Zhao Wei Liew ---
Comment on attachment 52097
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52097
Optimization for both unsigned and signed integer X
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95424
Zhao Wei Liew changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52091|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103871
--- Comment #1 from Egor Pugin ---
11.2.1 fails
g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 11.2.1 20211203 (Red Hat 11.2.1-7)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103871
Bug ID: 103871
Summary: [11.2.1/12 Regression] co_await causes build error
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783
--- Comment #7 from shorne at gmail dot com ---
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 09:59:57PM +, shorne at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783
>
> --- Comment #6 from shorne at gmail dot com ---
> Ok, let me have a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103862
Alejandro Colomar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103810
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Note also that there is a proposal for C23 (N2854) to allow such
functions, including changing the requirements on va_start to make it
possible to read their arguments.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103870
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103870
--- Comment #1 from Petro Karashchenko ---
I would expect "bgt" instruction instead of "bne" in such case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103870
Bug ID: 103870
Summary: ARM: Wrong branch instruction with optimization O2 and
higher
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783
--- Comment #6 from shorne at gmail dot com ---
Ok, let me have a look.
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021, 5:34 AM giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783
>
> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103869
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |c++
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
Rereducing via PR 100129 so I don't hit the hash-table-verification issue
(which is not modules related) but rather try to find the GC issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103756
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89971
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103756
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c684aa50d4eef28bb59ebb4664f362662845cd6
commit r12-6156-g6c684aa50d4eef28bb59ebb4664f362662845cd6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89971
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5545d1edcbdb1701443f94dde7ec97c5ce3e1a6c
commit r12-6155-g5545d1edcbdb1701443f94dde7ec97c5ce3e1a6c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Noble ---
> Yes, and even with that fixed, more checks for $is_hosted are needed for
> stdint.h types. I have a patch for that too, but I'm not happy with it yet.
I'm willing to test out patches if you need. In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783
--- Comment #5 from Giulio Benetti ---
Dear Stafford,
here we go again, after updating libgeos to version 3.10.1 the same bug shows
up. This happens with libgeos but not with protobuf that is fixed. I'm sure
i pass -mcmodel=large.
Can you help
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77465
--- Comment #3 from Ed Catmur ---
Sent patches to mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/587495.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103869
Bug ID: 103869
Summary: better diagnostics surrounding uses of -fms-extensions
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103390
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I thought I had a fix for this that involved making gfc_is_simply_contiguous
smarter about intrinsics and other function calls, but after writing more test
cases I found that this one still ICEs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Nicolas Noble from comment #6)
> While a bit tangential from the narrow topic of this bug, it may be
> noteworthy that I just tried using the --with-newlib kludge here, and
> compilation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100057
--- Comment #42 from cqwrteur ---
And std::format shit is an absolute log4j vuln but wg21 wastes time on this
instead of fixing iostream.
LOL.
We see wg21 as a joke.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100057
--- Comment #41 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #38)
> (In reply to Nicolas Noble from comment #33)
> > At the moment, I don't understand if it's possible to spawn a cross compiler
> > with a freestanding libc and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
Nicolas Noble changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pi...@nobis-crew.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103854
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103480
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644
--- Comment #15 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Created attachment 52094
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52094=edit
Tentative patch, adding IEEE_FMA and IEEE_SIGNBIT
I am attaching a tentative patch for the issue. I also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101073
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95454
Eric Estievenart changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steve+gcc at tecwec dot eu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fxcoudert at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101597
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
Bug 99861 depends on bug 100052, which changed state.
Bug 100052 Summary: [11/12 regression] ICE in compiling
g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C after r11-8118
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 100052, which changed state.
Bug 100052 Summary: [11/12 regression] ICE in compiling
g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C after r11-8118
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103769
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexander.lelyakin@googlema
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is actually a dup of bug 103769.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 103769 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101597
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Testcase that reproduces even with current trunk (started also with r12-2132):
// PR c++/101597
// { dg-do compile }
// { dg-options "-O2 -Warray-bounds" }
typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
struct S { virtual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103769
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||GC, ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 99722, which changed state.
Bug 99722 Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: segmentation fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99722
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99722, which changed state.
Bug 99722 Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: segmentation fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99722
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 99722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99722
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100129
Bug 100129 depends on bug 99861, which changed state.
Bug 99861 Summary: [modules] ICE in hashtab_chk_error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 99861, which changed state.
Bug 99861 Summary: [modules] ICE in hashtab_chk_error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99948
Bug 99948 depends on bug 99861, which changed state.
Bug 99861 Summary: [modules] ICE in hashtab_chk_error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99722
Bug 99722 depends on bug 99861, which changed state.
Bug 99861 Summary: [modules] ICE in hashtab_chk_error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
Bug 99479 depends on bug 99861, which changed state.
Bug 99861 Summary: [modules] ICE in hashtab_chk_error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99861, which changed state.
Bug 99861 Summary: [modules] ICE in hashtab_chk_error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 99861 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 100052, which changed state.
Bug 100052 Summary: [11/12 regression] ICE in compiling
g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C after r11-8118
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861
Bug 99861 depends on bug 100052, which changed state.
Bug 100052 Summary: [11/12 regression] ICE in compiling
g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C after r11-8118
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 100129, which changed state.
Bug 100129 Summary: [modules] ICE free(): invalid pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100129
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 100129, which changed state.
Bug 100129 Summary: [modules] ICE free(): invalid pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100129
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 100129 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100129
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 99737, which changed state.
Bug 99737 Summary: [modules] malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99737
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99737, which changed state.
Bug 99737 Summary: [modules] malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99737
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 99737 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99737
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103868
--- Comment #1 from ashenglandelbro at protonmail dot com ---
Created attachment 52092
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52092=edit
.ii for the file that failed to compile
Compressed as an xz as the raw text is 8mb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103868
Bug ID: 103868
Summary: ICE at end of coroutine when using asio
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96840
--- Comment #5 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
I think I was wrong and this has not regressed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96840
--- Comment #4 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
Seems like this regressed. Do I open a new bug report?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103186
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rpsalmi at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103867
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103867
Bug ID: 103867
Summary: Redefinition of typeinfo name of default argument
lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103012
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE with |[11 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression] wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103808
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52441f18db7e051c16f2e6e12f415b93cb5450c4
commit r12-6153-g52441f18db7e051c16f2e6e12f415b93cb5450c4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103012
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dbe26b949c6142b278ab7af2bac4545e8d524f2
commit r12-6151-g1dbe26b949c6142b278ab7af2bac4545e8d524f2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103860
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1820137ba624d7eb2004a10f9632498b6bc1696a
commit r12-6150-g1820137ba624d7eb2004a10f9632498b6bc1696a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-30
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
--disable-dlopen doesn't help anyway, we still get:
checking whether the /home/jwakely/build-mips-elf/gcc/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/jwakely/build-mips-elf/gcc/./gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
More generally, it would be good if --with-newlib wasn't needed as a kluge to
mean "no libc" as well as "libc is newlib". It's surprising to users that
--without-headers doesn't mean "no libc", but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> libstdc++-v3/configure.ac has:
>
> # Libtool setup.
> if test "x${with_newlib}" != "xyes" && test "x${with_avrlibc}" != "xyes";
> then
> AC_LIBTOOL_DLOPEN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100057
--- Comment #40 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I opened Bug 103866 for this build error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
libstdc++-v3/configure.ac has:
# Libtool setup.
if test "x${with_newlib}" != "xyes" && test "x${with_avrlibc}" != "xyes"; then
AC_LIBTOOL_DLOPEN
fi
AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
ACX_LT_HOST_FLAGS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103866
Bug ID: 103866
Summary: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL not compatible with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100057
--- Comment #39 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #38)
> (In reply to Nicolas Noble from comment #33)
> > At the moment, I don't understand if it's possible to spawn a cross compiler
> > with a freestanding libc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54586
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The difficulty is that every case where configure sets gcc_no_link is generated
from the same file: ../config/no-executables.m4
So adding something in there doesn't actually give you any context.
Each
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54586
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12258
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Carlos Galvez from comment #6)
> This problem seems to be back in GCC 9 and 11:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103862
As pointed out in a comment there, it's a different case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100057
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100057
--- Comment #37 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh shut up, you tedious clown. Cut the attacks and abuse or I'll block every
account you try to create here (as happens in every other venue where you try
to share your opinions by attacking people).
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
