https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60301
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10778
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41628
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68183
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59263
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56626
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2015-10-20 00:00:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56626
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55902
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Host|i686-w64-ming
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47029
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44968
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96032
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101630
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85527
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66368
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66195
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |---
Build|hppa64-hp-hpux11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67062
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51837
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49706
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63989
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57868
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65873
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56540
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64331
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89262
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97405
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.2|---
Last reconfirmed|2020-10-14 00:00:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48200
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65861
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87256
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101478
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 89028, which changed state.
Bug 89028 Summary: 8-byte loop isn't vectorized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89028
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89028
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92929
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95270
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94061
--- Comment #3 from Frank Heckenbach ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2)
> How do you define it? It works if we define it as
>
> auto operator <=> (const B& b) const {
> return A::operator<=>(b);
> }
>
> but not if it's def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103769
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Slightly simpler executable example without recursion:
template using t = T;
template struct s {};
template s...> f() { return {};}
int main() { f(); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83079
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103949
--- Comment #8 from Jörn Heusipp ---
> Note in newer versions of glibc, libpthread is all intergrated into libc and
> there is no issues again.
>
> For Mac OS X/darwin you don't need -lm -pthread because libc has it.
Two examples where it wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103949
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab ---
This is only a matter of QoI and/or documentation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103949
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
If you want __STDC_NO_THREADS defined file a bug about that but gcc will need
to record which versions of glibc has C11 thread defined or not.
You could use __has_include extension which will handle that mos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103949
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
>You did not address any of the standard violating behavior concerning
>advertising thread support at all.
There is no standard violating behavior with respect to thread support. Again
the C/C++ standard d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103949
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103949
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note in newer versions of glibc, libpthread is all intergrated into libc and
there is no issues again.
For Mac OS X/darwin you don't need -lm -pthread because libc has it.
>gcc libstdc++ implements std::th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103949
Jörn Heusipp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103950
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
>That happens even if -funsigned-char is used.
Yes because in this case, GCC is using char internally and forgetting it is
signed by default when calling a function as shown by my patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103950
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Summary|printf("\xff") i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103950
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-08
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39439
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
To clearify here, -shared and shared libraries in general accept undefined
referneces while linking. You can change the behavior of that, if using GNU
binutils, the option would be -Wl,--no-allow-shlib-undefi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103949
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also gcc implements the compiler, it is up to the other vendor to implement the
rest of the c library. Gcc does not implement printf either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80528
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103949
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103950
--- Comment #1 from Thorsten Otto ---
In gimple_fold_builtin_printf(), a call to printf() with a
single-character-string is optimized to putchar(). However that is also done
with non-ascii-characters, which in the case of printf("\ff") will call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103950
Bug ID: 103950
Summary: printf("\xff") incorrectly optimized to putchar(-1)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103943
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94061
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103949
Bug ID: 103949
Summary: gcc fails to provide a standard conforming C11 or
C++17 environment even when specifying -std=c11 or
-std=c++17
Product: gcc
Version: unk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103948
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> diff --git a/gcc/optabs-tree.c b/gcc/optabs-tree.c
> index 78e388d82f6..871366f3b7e 100644
> --- a/gcc/optabs-tree.c
> +++ b/gcc/optabs-tree.c
> @@ -502,6 +502,9 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103615
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68694
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.3 |---
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55288
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.0 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103948
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
diff --git a/gcc/optabs-tree.c b/gcc/optabs-tree.c
index 78e388d82f6..871366f3b7e 100644
--- a/gcc/optabs-tree.c
+++ b/gcc/optabs-tree.c
@@ -502,6 +502,9 @@ expand_vec_cond_expr_p (tree value_type, tree cmp_op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41874
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.0 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26950
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.0 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95507
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.3 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96184
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.0|11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92680
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92680
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
It looks like the problem is fixed in ./mpfr-4.1.0/:
AC_DEFUN([MPFR_C_REALFP_FORMAT],
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CC])
AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_AWK])
AC_REQUIRE([AC_OBJEXT])
AS_VAR_PUSHDEF([my_Type_var], [mpfr_cv_c_$1_fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92680
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49137
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69725
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69725
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://www.mail-archive.com/gmp-bugs@gmplib.org/msg00687.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103948
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103948
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 52146
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52146&action=edit
The complete testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103948
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 52145
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52145&action=edit
Patch that illustrates the problem on x86 target
This patch should vectorize all integer relational operations w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103948
Bug ID: 103948
Summary: Vectorizer does not use vec_cmpMN without vcondMN
pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47591
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51d464b608b38b9e2007948d10b1e0f1dcec142c
commit r12-6382-g51d464b608b38b9e2007948d10b1e0f1dcec142c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
85 matches
Mail list logo