[Bug target/104104] [12 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: number of operands mismatch for `vxorps'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104104 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 52219 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52219=edit gcc12-pr104104.patch Untested fix.

[Bug target/104104] [12 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: number of operands mismatch for `vxorps'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104104 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|Assembler

[Bug sanitizer/101476] AddressSanitizer check failed, points out a (potentially) non-existing stack error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101476 --- Comment #5 from Stas Sergeev --- Another problem here seems to be that pthread_cancel() doesn't unpoison the cancelled thread's stack. This causes dtors to run on a randomly poisoned stack, depending on where the cancellation happened. That

[Bug fortran/95372] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.c:1687

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95372 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #4 from

[Bug tree-optimization/103121] [12 Regression] Warnings in cp/optimize.c causing build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103121 --- Comment #20 from Andrew Macleod --- I think the anaylsis in comment 5 and onward needs to be redone since it was using rangers debug output to see something wrong, but the pass isn't even using ranger.. It is using EVRP as we determined in

[Bug target/104104] New: Assembler messages: Error: number of operands mismatch for `vxorps'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104104 Bug ID: 104104 Summary: Assembler messages: Error: number of operands mismatch for `vxorps' Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug ipa/103378] [12 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error: semantic interposition mismatch) since r12-5412-g458d2c689963d846

--- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- Still seems to be going wrong with gcc trunk dated 20220118.

[Bug middle-end/104103] [12 regression] many excess errors from g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C after r12-6606

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104103 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c++/104074] [12 Regression] [c++17] Maybe rejected code: is not a valid type for a template non-type parameter since r12-6022-gbb2a7f80a98de3fe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104074 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/104074] [12 Regression] [c++17] Maybe rejected code: is not a valid type for a template non-type parameter since r12-6022-gbb2a7f80a98de3fe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104074 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c4a54adb2164315d18fd8980c0fc37eb3d22252 commit r12-6697-g3c4a54adb2164315d18fd8980c0fc37eb3d22252 Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug testsuite/104103] New: [12 regression] many excess errors from g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C after r12-6606

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104103 Bug ID: 104103 Summary: [12 regression] many excess errors from g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C after r12-6606 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/98504] [11/12 Regression] bootstrap broken in libgo on ia64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98504 --- Comment #11 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #10) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > > Any update on the status on current trunk? > > I can give it a try later this week.

[Bug target/104102] New: __builtin_frame_address(1) desn't work on riscv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104102 Bug ID: 104102 Summary: __builtin_frame_address(1) desn't work on riscv Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/103692] [11/12 Regression] ICE in add_init_expr_to_sym, at fortran/decl.c:2062

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103692 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d01a2722671bef37b931fd1f121e44b27e68268 commit r12-6695-g0d01a2722671bef37b931fd1f121e44b27e68268 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/103721] [12 regression] wrong code generated for loop with conditional since r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103721 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod --- > How does equivalence handling in the Ranger world work once you traverse the > backedge of a loop? There are 2 aspects. Ranger itself registers equivalence sets by basic block, not by name. All

[Bug middle-end/102860] [12 regression] libgomp.fortran/simd2.f90 ICEs after r12-4526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug sanitizer/101476] AddressSanitizer check failed, points out a (potentially) non-existing stack error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101476 --- Comment #4 from Stas Sergeev --- Thread 3 "X ev" hit Breakpoint 4, __sanitizer::UnsetAlternateSignalStack () at ../../../../libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_posix_libcdep.cpp:190 190 void UnsetAlternateSignalStack() { (gdb) n 194

[Bug libstdc++/104101] [12 Regression] libstdc++ shared_ptr_atomic fails on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104101 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-18

[Bug libstdc++/104101] New: [12 Regression] libstdc++ shared_ptr_atomic fails on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104101 Bug ID: 104101 Summary: [12 Regression] libstdc++ shared_ptr_atomic fails on AIX Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/101476] AddressSanitizer check failed, points out a (potentially) non-existing stack error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101476 --- Comment #3 from Stas Sergeev --- Why does it check for a redzone on a non-leaf function? GetAltStackSize() calls to a glibc's getconf and that overwrites a canary. Maybe it shouldn't use/check the redzone on a non-leaf function?

[Bug c++/104007] [12 Regression] new (std::nothrow) S[n] always calls ~S since r12-6328-gbeaee0a871b6485d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104007 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/104007] [12 Regression] new (std::nothrow) S[n] always calls ~S since r12-6328-gbeaee0a871b6485d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104007 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ca21601704c4a637f3cefa7c8814920782354d8 commit r12-6694-g7ca21601704c4a637f3cefa7c8814920782354d8 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/104049] [12 Regression] vec_select to subreg lowering causes superfluous moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104049 --- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #3) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > We need to understand the issue at least. > > I think that it is not an RA problem. > > IRA assigns

[Bug middle-end/103163] [12 Regression] stack_limit_rtx is created too early causing nregs field on REG to be zero (gcc.target/nios2/nios2-stack-check-1.c and gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103163 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/103163] [12 Regression] stack_limit_rtx is created too early causing nregs field on REG to be zero (gcc.target/nios2/nios2-stack-check-1.c and gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103163 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a0837b8fb96f50f2e60222ce289cc2542bbb477 commit r12-6693-g3a0837b8fb96f50f2e60222ce289cc2542bbb477 Author: Sandra Loosemore

[Bug middle-end/102860] [12 regression] libgomp.fortran/simd2.f90 ICEs after r12-4526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/104049] [12 Regression] vec_select to subreg lowering causes superfluous moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104049 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > We need to understand the issue at least. I think that it is not an RA problem. IRA assigns quite reasonable registers. LRA just generates 2 reloads for

[Bug sanitizer/101476] AddressSanitizer check failed, points out a (potentially) non-existing stack error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101476 Stas Sergeev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stsp at users dot sourceforge.net ---

[Bug fortran/104100] New: Passing an allocated array to a C bind function alters the bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104100 Bug ID: 104100 Summary: Passing an allocated array to a C bind function alters the bounds Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/104077] bogus/missing -Wdangling-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104077 Bug 104077 depends on bug 104082, which changed state. Bug 104082 Summary: Wdangling-pointer: 2 * false positive ? https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104082 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/104082] Wdangling-pointer: 2 * false positive ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104082 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Blocks|

[Bug libstdc++/93590] [diagnostic] The header is deprecated since C++17, but no warning for #include-ing it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93590 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-18 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/101124] [12 Regression] pair(0, 0) was intended to be deprecated, but is rejected now

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101124 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/104098] [11/12 Regression] bits/stl_iterator.h fails to compile for __cplusplus > 201703L and with __cpp_concepts undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104098 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed for trunk, backport to follow.

[Bug libstdc++/104098] [11/12 Regression] bits/stl_iterator.h fails to compile for __cplusplus > 201703L and with __cpp_concepts undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104098 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e13e95bd274148a825bc9527efac49e99080dd64 commit r12-6692-ge13e95bd274148a825bc9527efac49e99080dd64 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/101124] [12 Regression] pair(0, 0) was intended to be deprecated, but is rejected now

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101124 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:302343d8dd30e34516f74a61ec758d80a6c4d1db commit r12-6691-g302343d8dd30e34516f74a61ec758d80a6c4d1db Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/104099] [12 Regression] basic_string(nullptr) constructor should not be present before C++23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104099 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-18 Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/104099] New: [12 Regression] basic_string(nullptr) constructor should not be present before C++23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104099 Bug ID: 104099 Summary: [12 Regression] basic_string(nullptr) constructor should not be present before C++23 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/104098] [11/12 Regression] bits/stl_iterator.h fails to compile for __cplusplus > 201703L and with __cpp_concepts undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104098 --- Comment #3 from Richard Corden --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > Is this an issue for a non-GCC tool with incomplete C++20 support? > It is yes. Thanks for the quick reply.

[Bug libstdc++/104098] [11/12 Regression] bits/stl_iterator.h fails to compile for __cplusplus > 201703L and with __cpp_concepts undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104098 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/104038] ranger infinite loop on a PHI statement while building Clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104038 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/104038] ranger infinite loop on a PHI statement while building Clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104038 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:254ada46ae0f21bd6f40314214f969f368328e22 commit r12-6678-g254ada46ae0f21bd6f40314214f969f368328e22 Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug libstdc++/104098] [11/12 Regression] bits/stl_iterator.h fails to compile for __cplusplus > 201703L and with __cpp_concepts undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104098 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/103388] [12 Regression] missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103388 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- We thread one edge at a time, so we don't know ahead of time how many copies there would be. It could be restructured to go ahead and register these threads, then compute the copy cost on a more global

[Bug target/95082] LE implementations of vec_cnttz_lsbb and vec_cntlz_lsbb are wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95082 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt --- *** Bug 103981 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/103981] powerpc64le: Wrong code generated for vec_cntlz_lsbb, vec_cnttz_lsbb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103981 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/104098] New: bits/stl_iterator.h fails to compile for __cplusplus > 201703L but with __cpp_concepts undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104098 Bug ID: 104098 Summary: bits/stl_iterator.h fails to compile for __cplusplus > 201703L but with __cpp_concepts undefined Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/104096] ICE with parameterized derived type (PDT)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104096 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug analyzer/104062] [12 Regression] ICE in get_or_create_cast, at analyzer/region-model-manager.cc:482 since r12-6476-g4f34f8cc1d064bfa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104062 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from David

[Bug fortran/104097] New: parameterized derived type (PDT) with type-bound procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104097 Bug ID: 104097 Summary: parameterized derived type (PDT) with type-bound procedure Product: gcc Version: og11 (devel/omp/gcc-11) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/104096] New: ICE with parameterized derived type (PDT)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104096 Bug ID: 104096 Summary: ICE with parameterized derived type (PDT) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/103989] [12 regression] std::optional and bogus -Wmaybe-unitialized at -Og since r12-1992-g6feb628a706e86eb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103989 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/103989] [12 regression] std::optional and bogus -Wmaybe-unitialized at -Og since r12-1992-g6feb628a706e86eb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103989 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c952126870c92cf293d59ffb1497e402eb8fc269 commit r12-6677-gc952126870c92cf293d59ffb1497e402eb8fc269 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/103989] [12 regression] std::optional and bogus -Wmaybe-unitialized at -Og since r12-1992-g6feb628a706e86eb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103989 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e89b2a270d31d7298d516ae545e256645992c7b9 commit r12-6676-ge89b2a270d31d7298d516ae545e256645992c7b9 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug middle-end/102948] [12 Regression] 60% build time regression on gamess with g:31855ba6b16cd138d7484076a08cd40d609654b8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102948 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/102950] [11/12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk&11.2.0 vs 10.3.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102950 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug testsuite/102964] [12 regression] libgomp.c/doacross-1.c fails after r12-4725

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102964 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/103121] [12 Regression] Warnings in cp/optimize.c causing build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103121 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #19 from Richard

[Bug modula2/104065] [12 Regression] trunk 20220117 fails to build modula2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104065 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/103195] [12 Regression] tfft2 text grows by 70% with -Ofast since r12-5113-gd70ef65692fced7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103195 --- Comment #6 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- > So nothing to see? I guess our unit growth limit doesn't trigger because it's > a small (benchmark) unit? Yep, unit growths do not apply for very small units. ipa-cp heuristics still IMO

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/103195] [12 Regression] tfft2 text grows by 70% with -Ofast since r12-5113-gd70ef65692fced7a

> So nothing to see? I guess our unit growth limit doesn't trigger because it's > a small (benchmark) unit? Yep, unit growths do not apply for very small units. ipa-cp heuristics still IMO needs work and be based on relative speedups rather then absolute for the cutoffs.

[Bug tree-optimization/103195] [12 Regression] tfft2 text grows by 70% with -Ofast since r12-5113-gd70ef65692fced7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103195 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- So nothing to see? I guess our unit growth limit doesn't trigger because it's a small (benchmark) unit?

[Bug tree-optimization/103281] [9/10/12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103281 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|12.0

[Bug tree-optimization/103423] [12 Regression] 19% cpu2006 wrf compile time regression with -flto since r12-2353-g8da8ed435e9f01b3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103423 --- Comment #6 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- > Fixed, the links now show better than ever numbers. It is only fixed by not inlining enough (since I added --param max-inline-functions-called-once). Without LTO we still have quite

[Bug c++/103329] [11/12 Regression] Code divergence in debug info with -fdump-tree-original since r11-291-g0f50f6daa140186a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103329 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/103373] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in add_constraint, at cp/constraint.cc:1077 since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103373 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/103388] [12 Regression] missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103388 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-11-23 00:00:00 |2022-1-18 Status|NEW

[Bug modula2/104065] [12 Regression] trunk 20220117 fails to build modula2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104065 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 103423, which changed state. Bug 103423 Summary: [12 Regression] 19% cpu2006 wrf compile time regression with -flto since r12-2353-g8da8ed435e9f01b3 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103423 What

[Bug tree-optimization/103423] [12 Regression] 19% cpu2006 wrf compile time regression with -flto since r12-2353-g8da8ed435e9f01b3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103423 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/103623] [12 Regression] error: unable to generate reloads (ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4132), or error: insn does not satisfy its constraints (ICE in extract_constrain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103623 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/104095] g++ diagnosis may use non-standard terminology: "constant" instead of "literal", "integer" instead of "integral"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104095 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/104093] Make -Wvexing-parse warn on declaration of void functions as well

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104093 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/103641] [11/12 regression] Severe compile time regression in SLP vectorize step

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103641 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug fortran/103662] [12 Regression] TBAA problem in Fortran FE triggering in gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103662 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/103724] [9/10/11/12 Regression] invalid warning: iteration 7 invokes undefined behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103724 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/103725] [9/10/11/12 Regression] warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when simplifying conditional to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103725 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug debug/103788] [9/10/11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103788 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/103852] [10/11/12 Regression] Alias template argument deduction is available in C++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103852 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 103899, which changed state. Bug 103899 Summary: [12 Regression] make profiledbootstrap fails due to uninitialized warning in expr.c https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103899 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/103899] [12 Regression] make profiledbootstrap fails due to uninitialized warning in expr.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103899 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/104074] [12 Regression] [c++17] Maybe rejected code: is not a valid type for a template non-type parameter since r12-6022-gbb2a7f80a98de3fe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104074 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/103952] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE: in cp_finish_decl, at cp/decl.c:7933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103952 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/104004] [12 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104004 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug preprocessor/104030] [12 Regression] -Wbidi-chars should not warn about UCNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104030 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Keywords|

[Bug c++/104095] New: g++ diagnosis may use non-standard terminology: "constant" instead of "literal", "integer" instead of "integral"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104095 Bug ID: 104095 Summary: g++ diagnosis may use non-standard terminology: "constant" instead of "literal", "integer" instead of "integral" Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/104039] [9/10/11/12 Regression] AArch64 Redundant instruction moving general to vector register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104039 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/104049] [12 Regression] vec_select to subreg lowering causes superfluous moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104049 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/104054] [9/10/11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -Os -funroll-loops since r8-3946-gfe94440235cfaa57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104054 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/104058] [12 Regression] 6-7% x264_r regression with -march=native -Ofast -funroll-loops -flto on x86 since r12-6420-gd3ff7420e941931d32ce2e332e7968fe67ba20af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104058 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Depends on|

[Bug target/103676] [10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2671

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103676 --- Comment #23 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #22) > If we consider such an inline asm invalid, we could error on it, ICE is not > the right thing. But what exactly should we error on? Alternative I think

[Bug middle-end/103987] [12 Regression] ice in ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_range, at tree-ssa-alias.c:840 since r12-5236-g5aa91072e24c1e16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103987 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/103987] [12 Regression] ice in ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_range, at tree-ssa-alias.c:840 since r12-5236-g5aa91072e24c1e16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103987 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ed40db0f12994e64434dc2e0590ba1da7ba5f60 commit r12-6672-g3ed40db0f12994e64434dc2e0590ba1da7ba5f60 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug ipa/101354] [11 regression] naked function mishandled - store optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101354 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/101221] Inaccurate error message for wrong template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101221 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/101354] [11 regression] naked function mishandled - store optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101354 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:806d0ce8cb0c1b690e6b5774a5eb3a1404a21253 commit r11-9477-g806d0ce8cb0c1b690e6b5774a5eb3a1404a21253 Author: Martin Liska

[Bug c++/104084] [12 regression] Internal compiler error: tree check: expected target_expr, have compound_expr in build_new_1 since r12-6375-g6cd51207f5732b52

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104084 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/54948] template unnecessarily displayed as "A< template-parameter-1-1 >" not "A"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54948 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/104094] New: Alias template shown in diagnostic with wrong template parameter name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104094 Bug ID: 104094 Summary: Alias template shown in diagnostic with wrong template parameter name Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/86369] constexpr const char* comparison fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86369 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

<    1   2   3   >