https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104288
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Pedantically, even in the same bb the non-NULLness applies, but only for the
stmt with the non-NULL access (e.g. dereference or strcmp call like in this
testcase) or in stmts before it unless there is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67048
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95084
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|code sinking prevents |[11/12 Regression] code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104309
Bug ID: 104309
Summary: Elemental character function should not return array
of character variables of different lengths.
Product: gcc
Version: fortran-dev
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104107
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104308
Bug ID: 104308
Summary: no location info provided for
[-Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value] warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104289
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100853
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Summary|[11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104288
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod ---
The issue is that the routine to determine non-nullness is being called to
check for range-on-entry of the current block instead of just the dominators.
The trace shows:
24 range_on_entry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100086
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104147
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Looking at the PREV_WHITE uses, they look like:
if (token->type == CPP_PADDING)
{
avoid_paste = true;
if (print.source == NULL
|| (!(print.source->flags & PREV_WHITE)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100930
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104294
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
*** Bug 104295 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104295
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104294
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
I believe the testcase should be valid even without the user-defined deduction
guide since we should have synthesized an equivalent guide from the C(T)
constructor.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85390
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104294
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80871
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104307
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #0)
> w/ -Os -funroll-loops:
It's an obvious copy-paste error, of course. It fails the check w/ -mavx512f
-O2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100623
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104307
Bug ID: 104307
Summary: [11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length)
w/ -mavx512f -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97821
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|rguenth at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98886
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f10bec5ffa487ad3033ed5f38cfd0fc7d696deab
commit r12-6945-gf10bec5ffa487ad3033ed5f38cfd0fc7d696deab
Author: Nick Clifton
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f10bec5ffa487ad3033ed5f38cfd0fc7d696deab
commit r12-6945-gf10bec5ffa487ad3033ed5f38cfd0fc7d696deab
Author: Nick Clifton
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104294
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0)
> template
> struct B;
>
> template
> struct B {
> template
> struct C { C(T); };
> };
>
> int main() {
> B::C{0};
> }
>
> https://godbolt.org/z/h1jGhc5b4
In fact, if we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104147
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104151
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #10)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #4)
> > Also there's separate issue, codegen for below is not optimal
> > gimple:
> > _11 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(a_3(D))
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94372
Stafford Horne changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Stafford
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67969, which changed state.
Bug 67969 Summary: [concepts] bug with overloaded function when using
constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67969
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67969
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
--- Comment #37 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #36)
> HJ, does it make sense to backport these to branches since AFAIU they also
> address possible security issues?
Yes, Linux kernel needs it. I will work on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104306
Bug ID: 104306
Summary: Use secondary_reload for optimized interunit reg-reg
moves
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97821
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90348
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103006
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67969
Amir Kirsh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kirshamir at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103006
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Oh, and I think address-takens are really not an issue but the accesses based
on them which confuse the simplistic live analysis to not recognize those as
births.
So we _can_ introduce explicit birth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104305
Bug ID: 104305
Summary: Partial specialization with parameter pack is ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98675
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Schlüter ---
I've submitted this to clang's bug tracker as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53494
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104069
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
#c0 is fixed with the r12-6712-g2f714642e574c64e1c0e093cad3de6f8accb6ec7
change.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104269
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104189
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I suppose we can do this then:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/dg-options.exp
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/dg-options.exp
@@ -296,7 +296,6 @@ proc add_options_for_libatomic { flags } {
if {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103006
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103006
> >
> > --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104027
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pierre-Marie de Rodat
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2dbc237e8605bb87f8b25adc455436dcba41fce8
commit r12-6943-g2dbc237e8605bb87f8b25adc455436dcba41fce8
Author: Arnaud Charlet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103585
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 52317
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52317=edit
WIP patch
This is patch I made while working on this problem. It improves the escape
analysis of the first patch so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104253
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
LGTM, passed testing for me, are you going to post it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104304
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Likely started with r9-3836-g4be5c72cf3ea3ee9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104304
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104303
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198
--- Comment #14 from rdapp at linux dot ibm.com ---
Ok, this is triggered by the copy_rtx I introduced for the or1k failure:
+ rtx rev_cc_cmp = copy_rtx (cond_exec_get_condition (jump, /* get_reversed */
true));
because copy_rtx is called
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104301
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104303
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104304
Bug ID: 104304
Summary: Compiler allows using a lambda with a capture as
non-type template parameter (C++20)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104303
Bug ID: 104303
Summary: [12 regression] gnatmake is miscompiled by IPA/modef
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104302
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104302
Bug ID: 104302
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since
r12-6825-g2da90ad39bf8fa9e
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104301
Bug ID: 104301
Summary: --enable-cstdio=stdio_pure not passed down to
libstdc++-v3
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104298
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104300
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104300
Bug ID: 104300
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at
gimplify.c:2977 since r12-6326-ge948436eab818c52
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104298
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104299
Bug ID: 104299
Summary: Doc: stdio is not the only option in
--enable-cstdio=XXX
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103514
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:263a5944fc806396ecc3eff3d96277602e88ae2b
commit r12-6942-g263a5944fc806396ecc3eff3d96277602e88ae2b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104298
Bug ID: 104298
Summary: [12 Regression] Broken cross compilers
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104284
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104271
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104189
--- Comment #11 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #10)
> Applied on the mainline only since not appropriate for release branches.
OK, thanks! I will ask Matthias for including the patch in gcc-11 on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104291
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95123
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104287
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104287
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e97cfaa9f61429f6717fd35d73309b02f9c02e95
commit r12-6941-ge97cfaa9f61429f6717fd35d73309b02f9c02e95
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499
--- Comment #39 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:625f16c798757dcbfdded841f01d7c566d15c55c
commit r12-6939-g625f16c798757dcbfdded841f01d7c566d15c55c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104189
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104189
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23987912ddb4207de0714d81237f93f613557d1f
commit r12-6938-g23987912ddb4207de0714d81237f93f613557d1f
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.2.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104288
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104276
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
DSE could in theory prune live-bytes from a store inside a loop by looking at
SCEV / niter info. That'll cost though, and it's not clear where it would
nicely fit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104275
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
IPA-CP should figure this out but I guess to do good we need early inlining to
happen. I wonder if we can do some "local" IPA-CP to help early inlining?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104271
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499
--- Comment #38 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c7067cc92281dcbfeaf64116d8416f2092b4c10
commit r12-6936-g3c7067cc92281dcbfeaf64116d8416f2092b4c10
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
---
101 - 183 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
