https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103771
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103771
--- Comment #38 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37)
> Is this now "good enough" for GCC 12?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104519
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103771
--- Comment #37 from Richard Biener ---
Is this now "good enough" for GCC 12?
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: asolokha at gmx dot com
Target Milestone: ---
gcc 12.0.1 20220213 snapshot (g:58aeb75d4097010ad9bb72b964265b18ab284f93) ICEs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103008
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #14)
> Created attachment 52428 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> The attached patch implements:
>
> fmod (a, p) = a - trunc (a/p) * p
> drem (a, p) = a - roundeven
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102276
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
It's difficult, see the recent discussion on introducing explicit live-in
markers for the purpose of stack slot sharing and exactly these case of
testcases.
The "simplest" suggestion was to promote the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670
Bug 88670 depends on bug 104501, which changed state.
Bug 104501 Summary: vector lowering for VEC_COND_EXPR does not consider smaller
vectors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104501
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55001
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104501
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103008
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103008
>
> --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104519
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104514
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104507
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Nelson ---
Yeah, that was my thought as well (though I'm 99% unfamiliar with the GCC
codebase).
Some more bisecting reveals that this was introduced with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95508
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104523
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
apinski@xeond:~/src/upstream-gcc$ ~/upstream-gcc/bin/gcc t.ii -std=c++20
-fmodules-ts
PyBind11Module.cpp:5:9: internal compiler error: tree check: expected none of
template_decl, have template_decl in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104523
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104517
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
yes adding -save-temps causes the difference, interesting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104523
--- Comment #2 from Juanjo Alvarez ---
Created attachment 52434
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52434=edit
.ii file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104517
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
No, it still fails w/ 20220213 snapshot
(g:58aeb75d4097010ad9bb72b964265b18ab284f93). You should try adding -save-temps
to the command line.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104517
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I can't reproduce it on the trunk.
I wonder if it was fixed by the patch which fixed PR 104459.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #49 from Maciej W. Rozycki ---
*** Bug 98724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98724
Maciej W. Rozycki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104507
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #48 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72b0526bd4582338228ab81088b73dbf1ca565ee
commit r11-9565-g72b0526bd4582338228ab81088b73dbf1ca565ee
Author: Maciej W.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98724
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72b0526bd4582338228ab81088b73dbf1ca565ee
commit r11-9565-g72b0526bd4582338228ab81088b73dbf1ca565ee
Author: Maciej W.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #47 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4493c5a2030d9191761d159067815b5f0325a9d2
commit r12-7220-g4493c5a2030d9191761d159067815b5f0325a9d2
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98724
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4493c5a2030d9191761d159067815b5f0325a9d2
commit r12-7220-g4493c5a2030d9191761d159067815b5f0325a9d2
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104523
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104523
Bug ID: 104523
Summary: G++ crash when compiling a simple module that includes
pybind11/stl.h
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104514
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104519
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104519
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 104521 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104521
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104519
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104521
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|wrong code at -O2 and -O3 |[12 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104522
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: in |ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104522
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103008
--- Comment #15 from Dave.Love at manchester dot ac.uk ---
"ubizjak at gmail dot com" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103008
>
> --- Comment #14 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> Created attachment 52428
> -->
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104117
--- Comment #24 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #22)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #20)
> > On testing, this is not sufficient - one ends up with ICEs when we reject a
> > valid (UNSPEC-wrapped) address
bootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220213 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104154
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104154
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Created attachment 52432
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52432=edit
Testcase #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104153
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104521
--- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su ---
>From Compiler Explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/Y37Wo9e8c
/configure --disable-bootstrap
--prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk --enable-languages=c,c++
--disable-werror --enable-multilib --with-system-zlib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.1 20220213 (experimental) [master r12-7216-g7e204bd2f18] (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104520
Bug ID: 104520
Summary: Unexpected behavior with STORAGE_SIZE intrinsic with a
dummy argument that is unlimited polymorphic
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104519
--- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su ---
>From Compiler Explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/s7Eco5EGb
compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.1 20220213 (experimental) [master r12-7216-g7e204bd2f18] (GCC)
[683] %
[683] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
[684] %
[684] % gcctk -Os small.c
[685] % ./a.out
Aborted
[686] %
[686] % cat small.c
char a, b;
int main() {
for (b = -7; b; b += 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104228
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57da34939703a6e6d3267a0d25d1fb9369d3ac0e
commit r12-7217-g57da34939703a6e6d3267a0d25d1fb9369d3ac0e
Author: Mikael Morin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 103468, which changed state.
Bug 103468 Summary: [modules] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass walloca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103468
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103468
Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100583
--- Comment #5 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
This was fixed somewhere along the way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 103468, which changed state.
Bug 103468 Summary: [modules] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass walloca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103468
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103468
Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 103118, which changed state.
Bug 103118 Summary: [modules] ICE tree check in get_merge_kind at cp/module.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103118
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 103118, which changed state.
Bug 103118 Summary: [modules] ICE tree check in get_merge_kind at cp/module.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103118
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103118
Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104514
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is forbidden by C++, but I've started writing a proposal for a language
feature to support this use case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79754
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103771
--- Comment #36 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e204bd2f189850cb940677c99d8d93eb7dd40cd
commit r12-7216-g7e204bd2f189850cb940677c99d8d93eb7dd40cd
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79754
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e89144e8a3984608da2d31f18776df51d9e0f352
commit r11-9564-ge89144e8a3984608da2d31f18776df51d9e0f352
Author: Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103856
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104518
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104518
Bug ID: 104518
Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed: missing 'PHI' def with
-fsanitize=address -fnon-call-exceptions
-fsignaling-nans -fharden-compares
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104507
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Nelson ---
Had a few moments to do some testing/bisecting, and found the commit that fixed
this in mainline.
commit 9927ecbb42d5be48fa933adc26f8601fab5007ca
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Thu Oct 28 10:05:14 2021
65 matches
Mail list logo
