[Bug target/103627] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103627 --- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha --- Should this PR be closed, or are there backports pending?

[Bug debug/104544] [10/11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104544 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/104543] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104543 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-02-15 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug debug/104544] New: [10/11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104544 Bug ID: 104544 Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -O2 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/104543] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104543 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/104543] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104543 --- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su --- >From Compiler Explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/s1WW4snzM

[Bug tree-optimization/104543] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104543 Bug ID: 104543 Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 96864, which changed state. Bug 96864 Summary: loop not vectorized due AVX512 condition handling https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96864 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/96864] loop not vectorized due AVX512 condition handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96864 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/96864] loop not vectorized due AVX512 condition handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96864 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- Fixed in GCC12 by r12-6756-g8bc700f4c3fbe405413db02281ef2918bfa831fc.

[Bug middle-end/102464] Miss optimization for (_Float16) sqrtf ((float) f16)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102464 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/104059] [12 Regression] cprop_hardreg propgates hard registers for mov instructions between different REG_CLASS without considering cost

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104059 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/104542] New: make_obj_using_allocator and uninitialized_construct_using_allocator lack constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104542 Bug ID: 104542 Summary: make_obj_using_allocator and uninitialized_construct_using_allocator lack constexpr Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/104541] New: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: maximum number of LRA assignment passes is achieved (30) with -O -fno-tree-ter -fsanitize-coverage=trace-cmp

ms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.0.1 20220214 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/104540] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in cfi_oprnd_equal_p with -O2 -fharden-conditional-branches -mforce-drap -mstackrealign --param=max-grow-copy-bb-insns=125

-linux-gnu-ld --with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-7228-20220214143106-g0a1a3afb5fb-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.0.1 20220214 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/104107] [9/10/11/12 Regression] parsing crashes on class template instantiation since r9-6853-g17838af989014f5e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104107 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c3309e3d0f5cb8f298f7604848d115f0992e04f commit r12-7236-g2c3309e3d0f5cb8f298f7604848d115f0992e04f Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/95036] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with variadic template template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95036 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c3309e3d0f5cb8f298f7604848d115f0992e04f commit r12-7236-g2c3309e3d0f5cb8f298f7604848d115f0992e04f Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug ipa/102513] [10/11/12 Regression] Many false positive warnings with recursive function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102513 --- Comment #10 from Feng Xue --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #8) > I am about to thest the following patch. In longer-run, it would be better > to never generate lattice values outside of the value_range but there is an > ordering

[Bug tree-optimization/104539] Failed to inline a very simple template function when it's explicit instantiated.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104539 --- Comment #1 from Cassio Neri --- Sorry, the last snippet above should be template inline int f() { return 0; }

[Bug tree-optimization/104539] New: Failed to inline a very simple template function when it's explicit instantiated.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104539 Bug ID: 104539 Summary: Failed to inline a very simple template function when it's explicit instantiated. Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/98465] Bogus -Wstringop-overread with -std=gnu++20 -O2 and std::string::insert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98465 Randy changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Randy at miningrigrentals dot com --- Comment

[Bug d/104538] gdc/d21: segfault on mips64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104538 --- Comment #1 from YunQiang Su --- This problem happens only for the new gdc code introduced in gcc-12.

[Bug d/104538] New: gdc/d21: segfault on mips64

Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org Reporter: syq at debian dot org Target Milestone: --- https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-12=mips64el=12-20220214-1=1644848228=0 The segment is from: gcc/d/dmd/ctfeexpr.d: UnionExp changeArrayLiteralLength(const ref Loc loc, TypeArray

[Bug ipa/104377] Unreachable code in create_specialized_node of ipa-prop.c?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104377 --- Comment #4 from Feng Xue --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #2) > (In reply to Feng Xue from comment #1) > > > > OK. I does missed something. Here we could not hold assumption that > > ipcp_decision_stage() only sees raw cgraph

[Bug c++/99215] coroutines: debugging with gdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99215 --- Comment #14 from Jarrod Smith --- I've been following this and experiencing the issue in gcc 10.2. I still see "" for all variables when debugging C++20 coroutines with gcc 11.2. Is there a workaround (e.g. using a certain branch of gcc) in

[Bug c++/104537] New: ICE when generic-lambda as function parameter fails to be converted to pointer to function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104537 Bug ID: 104537 Summary: ICE when generic-lambda as function parameter fails to be converted to pointer to function Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/104492] [12 Regression] Bogus dangling pointer warning at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104492 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Setting aside the question of warning about inequality expressions involving invalid pointers, it seems that if the annotation 'candidates ={v} {CLOBBER(eol)};' is to be interpreted as one would intuitively

[Bug target/99197] Built-ins for packing/unpacking __ibm128 not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99197 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/104536] [12 Regression] gcc-12-20220213 Fails to build on Cygwin: contraction ‘can%'t’ in format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104536 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |other Host|

[Bug bootstrap/104536] gcc-12-20220213 Fails to build on Cygwin: contraction ‘can%'t’ in format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104536 --- Comment #1 from James McKelvey --- Created attachment 52441 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52441=edit Config log

[Bug bootstrap/104536] New: gcc-12-20220213 Fails to build on Cygwin: contraction ‘can%'t’ in format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104536 Bug ID: 104536 Summary: gcc-12-20220213 Fails to build on Cygwin: contraction ‘can%'t’ in format Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/102276] -ftrivial-auto-var-init fails to initialize a variable, causes a spurious warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102276 --- Comment #9 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- having a patch in my local tree, under testing.

[Bug middle-end/104355] Misleading -Warray-bounds documentation says "always out of bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104355 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a1b179b08bc802280ca90ed4c6c8d8b25503e66 commit r12-7234-g7a1b179b08bc802280ca90ed4c6c8d8b25503e66 Author: Martin Sebor Date:

[Bug target/104253] libgcc missing __floatdiif

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104253 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16b65b08484237cc2845c4f5c4f15efe3a43a32c commit r12-7233-g16b65b08484237cc2845c4f5c4f15efe3a43a32c Author: Michael Meissner

[Bug tree-optimization/104526] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs. 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104526 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > and evrp properly figured out those ranges, that 1 / int is [-1, 1] and > that 2 >> [-1, 1] is [1, 2]. > But since r12-6924 the IL is: > c.0_1 = c; > _2 =

[Bug c++/104523] G++ crash when compiling a simple module that includes pybind11/stl.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104523 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/104535] New: don't use fmod?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104535 Bug ID: 104535 Summary: don't use fmod? Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee:

[Bug c++/95596] string literal wrong overload resolution (char* vs std::string)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95596 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johnsen.david at siemens dot com ---

[Bug c++/104534] write-strings does not follow C++ standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104534 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/104211] ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.cc:1720

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104211 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19b517dff37b8e25f6babf8883483be73cad8fb3 commit r12-7232-g19b517dff37b8e25f6babf8883483be73cad8fb3 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug c++/104534] New: write-strings does not follow C++ standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104534 Bug ID: 104534 Summary: write-strings does not follow C++ standard Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/104531] [12 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.cc:4547

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104531 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |c Keywords|ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/104533] New: [12 Regression] ICE in update_vtable_references, at ipa-visibility.cc:383

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104533 Bug ID: 104533 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in update_vtable_references, at ipa-visibility.cc:383 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/104531] [12 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.cc:4547

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104531 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at |[12 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c/104532] New: ICE in lvalue_p, at c/c-typeck.cc:4987

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104532 Bug ID: 104532 Summary: ICE in lvalue_p, at c/c-typeck.cc:4987 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/104531] New: ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.cc:4547

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104531 Bug ID: 104531 Summary: ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.cc:4547 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/104529] [12 Regression] inefficient codegen around new/delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104529 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #4

[Bug target/104529] [12 Regression] inefficient codegen around new/delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104529 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[missed optimization] |[12 Regression] inefficient

[Bug target/104529] [missed optimization] inefficient codegen around new/delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104529 --- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina --- I don't quite see how this is a CSE problem, There's only one of each constant and none of them are needed before the call. unlike in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86892 You don't need

[Bug ipa/103083] [10/11/12 Regression] Wrong code due to ipa-cp's bits value propagation since r10-5538-gc7ac9a0c7e3916f1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103083 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- I have changed the patch a bit and re-submitted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-February/590341.html

[Bug ipa/102513] [10/11/12 Regression] Many false positive warnings with recursive function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102513 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/104154] [12 Regression] Another ICE due to recent ifcvt changes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104154 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So the updated patch fixes the arc build regressions. I haven't looked at the thread with Segher, but I will as soon as I can. Mostly just wanted to let you know that the updated patch does indeed get

[Bug c/104510] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed: mismatching comparison operand types in verify_gimple_in_seq()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104510 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/86892] RTL CSE commoning trivial constants across call and/or too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86892 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/104529] [missed optimization] inefficient codegen around new/delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104529 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/104008] [11/12 Regression] New g++ folly compile error with gcc 11.x. Bisected to PR99445 c++: Alias template in pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008 Aleksei Latyshev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alex_700_95 at mail dot ru ---

[Bug libstdc++/100912] powerpc64le: ieee128 long double incorrectly printed when using shared libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100912 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/100912] powerpc64le: ieee128 long double incorrectly printed when using shared libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100912 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d50dede07de0923f0f320d385162e546445e640 commit r12-7231-g3d50dede07de0923f0f320d385162e546445e640 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/100806] deadlock in std::counting_semaphore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100806 Thomas Rodgers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/102276] -ftrivial-auto-var-init fails to initialize a variable, causes a spurious warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102276 --- Comment #8 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > If we just want to avoid the warning in cases like that (there is nothing > wrong in the testcases themselves, the warning just warns about an >

[Bug c++/104507] [10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: unexpected expression ‘(int)(__ret)’ of kind cast_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104507 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|[10/11

[Bug tree-optimization/104530] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs. 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104530 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/104530] New: [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs. 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104530 Bug ID: 104530 Summary: [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs. 11.2.0) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/104510] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed: mismatching comparison operand types in verify_gimple_in_seq()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104510 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/104527] [11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: accessed elt 1 of 'tree_vec' with 0 elts in hash, at cp/constraint.cc:2486

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104527 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104527] [11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: accessed elt 1 of 'tree_vec' with 0 elts in hash, at cp/constraint.cc:2486

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104527 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Priority|P3

[Bug testsuite/104423] [libgomp, testsuite] Add means to do accelerator-only testing in libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104423 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 52438 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52438=edit Tentative patch (GOMP_TARGET_ENV_ITER) A more generic solution using env var GOMP_TARGET_ENV_ITER, which allows us to

[Bug middle-end/102276] -ftrivial-auto-var-init fails to initialize a variable, causes a spurious warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102276 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/104513] [12 Regression] goto cdtor_label failures on arm since r12-5256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104513 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/104513] [12 Regression] goto cdtor_label failures on arm since r12-5256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104513 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02a981a8e512934a990d1427d14e8e884409fade commit r12-7230-g02a981a8e512934a990d1427d14e8e884409fade Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug fortran/100337] Should be able to pass non-present optional arguments to CO_BROADCAST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100337 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/104529] New: [missed optimization] inefficient codegen around new/delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104529 Bug ID: 104529 Summary: [missed optimization] inefficient codegen around new/delete Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/100337] Should be able to pass non-present optional arguments to CO_BROADCAST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100337 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae57aae60d1be821feccb3160f8fdd5987ecba79 commit r11-9568-gae57aae60d1be821feccb3160f8fdd5987ecba79 Author: Andre

[Bug middle-end/104522] ICE: in real_to_decimal_for_mode with -O -fdump-tree-all-details and long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104522 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 52437 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52437=edit gcc12-pr104522.patch Patch I'll test tonight.

[Bug tree-optimization/94294] [missed optimization] new+delete of unused local string not removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94294 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/104519] [12 Regression] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu and char as induction variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104519 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Btw, to me it seems that since we are resolving condition 1) statically we know that the difference of iv->base and final is positive with infinite precision and fits the unsigned niter_type. To avoid

[Bug fortran/103970] Multi-image co_broadcast of derived type with allocatable components fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103970 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/103790] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when playing with coroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103790 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:680ee9c333280df74e06e1bc9f3be218424f94b3 commit r11-9567-g680ee9c333280df74e06e1bc9f3be218424f94b3 Author: Andre

[Bug tree-optimization/104519] [12 Regression] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu and char as induction variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104519 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc index 386d5732ea0..9d9939642f6 100644 --- a/gcc/fold-const.cc +++ b/gcc/fold-const.cc @@ -14208,11 +14208,7 @@ multiple_of_p (tree type, const_tree top,

[Bug tree-optimization/104526] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs. 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104526 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/104528] [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gimple_bb)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104528 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/104522] ICE: in real_to_decimal_for_mode with -O -fdump-tree-all-details and long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104522 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- So my question is whether something should normalize those numbers and why decode_ieee_extended happily initializes an invalid number (its documentation of course might suggest it only expects valid

[Bug tree-optimization/102513] [10/11/12 Regression] Many false positive warnings with recursive function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102513 --- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor --- I am about to thest the following patch. In longer-run, it would be better to never generate lattice values outside of the value_range but there is an ordering problem, we need the complete VR info before

[Bug tree-optimization/104526] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs. 11.2.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104526 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/104528] [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gimple_bb)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104528 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a1a3afb5fb36e2d10ad92bf788e16d837451571 commit r12-7228-g0a1a3afb5fb36e2d10ad92bf788e16d837451571 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/104519] [12 Regression] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu and char as induction variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104519 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/104522] ICE: in real_to_decimal_for_mode with -O -fdump-tree-all-details and long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104522 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- The MODE_COMPOSITE_P handling can be surely enabled for other modes too, I have guarded it just because it slows compile time down a little bit and for usual IEEE754 modes it should be always true,

[Bug libstdc++/103891] clang-13 fails to compile libstdc++'s std::variant>: error: attempt to use a deleted function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103891 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:164a761a9f4798dc69ecab80097807636dc17d61 commit r12-7227-g164a761a9f4798dc69ecab80097807636dc17d61 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug debug/104517] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O1 -fopenmp -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104517 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-02-14

[Bug tree-optimization/104528] [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gimple_bb)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104528 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- At the start of IVOPTs we have (gdb) p debug_tree (cfun->x_current_loops->larray->m_vecdata[4]->nb_iterations) unit-size align:32 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1

[Bug tree-optimization/104528] [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gimple_bb)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104528 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/104514] add feature to create a pointer to a fixed address as constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104514 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, but this one asks for a new feature, not just "please make this kluge work again".

[Bug c++/104527] [11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: accessed elt 1 of 'tree_vec' with 0 elts in hash, at cp/constraint.cc:2486

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104527 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3

[Bug middle-end/104522] ICE: in real_to_decimal_for_mode with -O -fdump-tree-all-details and long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104522 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/104522] ICE: in real_to_decimal_for_mode with -O -fdump-tree-all-details and long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104522 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > > But I do wonder whether real_from_target needs fixing to handle invalid > > input gracefully which is

[Bug tree-optimization/104528] New: [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gimple_bb)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104528 Bug ID: 104528 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gimple_bb) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity:

[Bug c++/104507] [10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: unexpected expression ‘(int)(__ret)’ of kind cast_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104507 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/104506] [12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:87 on invalid symbol redeclaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104506 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/104522] ICE: in real_to_decimal_for_mode with -O -fdump-tree-all-details and long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104522 --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > But I do wonder whether real_from_target needs fixing to handle invalid > input gracefully which is ultimatively decode_ieee_extended? long double foo (void) {

[Bug target/104525] timeout on signed overflow at O0 fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104525 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

  1   2   >