https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104688
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1861b9a9f13c6406a2eb146b2da0a41d044f
commit r11-9729-g1861b9a9f13c6406a2eb146b2da0a41d044f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104910
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c3225c8b7c7f74a53aaae6ed5b6463b55bf7a92
commit r11-9728-g9c3225c8b7c7f74a53aaae6ed5b6463b55bf7a92
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104814
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17de662ec26786053caab2cea34c76814352ea4d
commit r11-9727-g17de662ec26786053caab2cea34c76814352ea4d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ddc0d2593fb4d2eb432e24018d36dd3f337a8138
commit r11-9726-gddc0d2593fb4d2eb432e24018d36dd3f337a8138
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104806
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7c0962d0c7882b8c019363257c8b632d6c11d5e
commit r11-9725-gb7c0962d0c7882b8c019363257c8b632d6c11d5e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104775
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ef4d28e59e3117dd1457e9ad08b7e1b48ab9830
commit r11-9724-g2ef4d28e59e3117dd1457e9ad08b7e1b48ab9830
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104589
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7737259ceaa490a1cc75415efa00f3631a7e17df
commit r11-9723-g7737259ceaa490a1cc75415efa00f3631a7e17df
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104675
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a2772a3fe41bc0c33c4620540dae0103dcf7289
commit r11-9722-g1a2772a3fe41bc0c33c4620540dae0103dcf7289
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104681
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b59d29392774b115bea0066b4ad1eb2b959a3a2b
commit r11-9721-gb59d29392774b115bea0066b4ad1eb2b959a3a2b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104674
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:acb9ea44fcceea0a54a89c7f94af4338c10759ef
commit r11-9720-gacb9ea44fcceea0a54a89c7f94af4338c10759ef
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104675
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1305c28bc0665504643ff364595b7d6bb222745d
commit r11-9719-g1305c28bc0665504643ff364595b7d6bb222745d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104601
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d29a0b50687dc42e17dc4a4fe335afafefeada4e
commit r11-9718-gd29a0b50687dc42e17dc4a4fe335afafefeada4e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104617
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e046995094df30be16e37f639efe77887197a22
commit r11-9717-g4e046995094df30be16e37f639efe77887197a22
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102656
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92374fd237cdbdf4d2c08ffb216d2ebcc799dc4b
commit r11-9716-g92374fd237cdbdf4d2c08ffb216d2ebcc799dc4b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #44 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #43)
> One thing I found by experiments:
> Insert 64 vaddps %xmm18, %xmm19, %xmm20(no dependence between each other,
> just emulate for pipeline) before stalled load,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #43 from Hongtao.liu ---
One thing I found by experiments:
Insert 64 vaddps %xmm18, %xmm19, %xmm20(no dependence between each other, just
emulate for pipeline) before stalled load, stlf stall case is as fast as no
stall cases on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105091
--- Comment #2 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
starting to process insn 14
v: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20,
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40,
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105091
--- Comment #1 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Checking the dumps from dse1, some "stack memory store" are deleted
incorrectly.
12: %3:DI=call [`runtime.newobject'] argc:0
REG_CALL_DECL `runtime.newobject'
13: r117:DI=%3:DI
REG_DEAD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104915
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
Created attachment 52705
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52705=edit
Patch pending for GCC13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105091
Bug ID: 105091
Summary: RTL dse1 remove stack mem storing incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84685
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104944
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104944
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression] incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104284
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Summary|[9/10/11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104108
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] [c++17+] |[10 Regression] [c++17+]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102990
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Summary|[9/10/11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101371
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84685
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fa9022aa30b9c4dde965a0406943c8c0af5eb54
commit r11-9715-g0fa9022aa30b9c4dde965a0406943c8c0af5eb54
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fa9022aa30b9c4dde965a0406943c8c0af5eb54
commit r11-9715-g0fa9022aa30b9c4dde965a0406943c8c0af5eb54
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104944
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe641f6a44959ff8b9d9f7af11b8b806c5f1375a
commit r11-9714-gfe641f6a44959ff8b9d9f7af11b8b806c5f1375a
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104284
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a2b944c18936f9dfa880e8ff54906cfe90e89e8
commit r11-9713-g2a2b944c18936f9dfa880e8ff54906cfe90e89e8
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104108
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58e08fb6ffd0842c7b813eb7122fe8660df33bf1
commit r11-9712-g58e08fb6ffd0842c7b813eb7122fe8660df33bf1
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102990
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ba2a7e7474135b717c344030b114ffd6ad8ed7a
commit r11-9711-g6ba2a7e7474135b717c344030b114ffd6ad8ed7a
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101371
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da47a84e277c7fbeebbf9c1e7dc1e8ba3277fe53
commit r11-9710-gda47a84e277c7fbeebbf9c1e7dc1e8ba3277fe53
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105087
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105074
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105087
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3734527dfa0d10a50aee2f088d3732fd65bf
commit r12-7869-g3734527dfa0d10a50aee2f088d3732fd65bf
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105074
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1203e8f7880c9751ece5f5302e413b20f4608a00
commit r12-7868-g1203e8f7880c9751ece5f5302e413b20f4608a00
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103597
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #6)
> I'm marking this as middle-end; as mentioned in the commit message, I
> removed the folding from the front-end because it was interfering with a
> middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105087
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Am testing a fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105090
Bug ID: 105090
Summary: BFI instructions are not generated on
arm-none-eabi-g++
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105084
--- Comment #3 from Li Shaohua ---
Thanks a lot for your explanation. That makes sense to me :).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105086
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod ---
Ranger VRP doesn't simulate edges the same way VRP does. It looks like VRP
simulates the back edge twice and the second time notes that the MAX value is
greater than it was before and "projects" the max to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59426
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59426
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83a21c993449a32b98916814ed8ca237b3276912
commit r12-7863-g83a21c993449a32b98916814ed8ca237b3276912
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103291
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102123
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103968
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102045
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104847
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105087
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
#include "analyzer-decls.h"
extern void inner_alloc (void **);
void * __attribute__((noinline))
outer_alloc (void)
{
void *result;
inner_alloc ();
return result;
}
void test_1 (void)
{
void *p,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103769
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105087
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
#include "analyzer-decls.h"
extern void *inner_alloc (void);
void * __attribute__((noinline))
outer_alloc (void)
{
return inner_alloc ();
}
void test_1 (void)
{
void *p, *q;
p = outer_alloc ();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104107
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression] parsing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104107
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:450e82794245c49248711f1479c491d84cb46c57
commit r11-9708-g450e82794245c49248711f1479c491d84cb46c57
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95036
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:450e82794245c49248711f1479c491d84cb46c57
commit r11-9708-g450e82794245c49248711f1479c491d84cb46c57
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99445
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bf2e1bfc9858516e028137b313e4c689b0c8cd4
commit r11-9707-g3bf2e1bfc9858516e028137b313e4c689b0c8cd4
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104847
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07d7e8b8ae2879241207631fcaeaa83e5e85a240
commit r11-9706-g07d7e8b8ae2879241207631fcaeaa83e5e85a240
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103769
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bf2e1bfc9858516e028137b313e4c689b0c8cd4
commit r11-9707-g3bf2e1bfc9858516e028137b313e4c689b0c8cd4
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102045
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14146bb58f279659279cd189bf95c3b0cb5fe1ac
commit r11-9705-g14146bb58f279659279cd189bf95c3b0cb5fe1ac
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103968
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97390a9914672f5ce73c169b3ae7fd4bba25c2fe
commit r11-9704-g97390a9914672f5ce73c169b3ae7fd4bba25c2fe
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102123
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e952290874d6b99946dc02e125c0fb0e9b13a1e3
commit r11-9703-ge952290874d6b99946dc02e125c0fb0e9b13a1e3
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103291
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10dcd13ff7a9f0fbbae8749929e8808792c76395
commit r11-9702-g10dcd13ff7a9f0fbbae8749929e8808792c76395
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105087
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-28
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105089
Bug ID: 105089
Summary: CTF for a defined extern variable is ambiguous
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105067
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105064
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11 Regression] requires
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105067
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23e57329c6516a81a8d3eb21b365ca8a0ec0c41b
commit r12-7861-g23e57329c6516a81a8d3eb21b365ca8a0ec0c41b
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105064
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ecb4882e362e80a1bf172453ac9b366edbb4e89c
commit r12-7860-gecb4882e362e80a1bf172453ac9b366edbb4e89c
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105088
--- Comment #1 from Simon Marchi ---
Looking at the .s, I see that gcc attempts to pass "/tmp/cwd/test.c" as the
name of the file at index 0:
.file 0 "/home/simark" "/tmp/cwd/test.c"
If gas did put "/tmp/cwd/test.c" as the name in the line
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105068
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cccbb776589c1825de1bd2eefabb11d72ef28de8
commit r12-7859-gcccbb776589c1825de1bd2eefabb11d72ef28de8
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Mar 28
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105088
Bug ID: 105088
Summary: Small DWARF 5 spec violation in line table when
passing an absolute path
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105086
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105087
Bug ID: 105087
Summary: fanalyzer double free false positive with vasprintf
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220328 (experimental) (GCC)
- releases/gcc-11.2.0
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --disable-multilib --disable-bootstrap
--enable-languages=c,c++
--prefix=/zdata/compiler_cac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105085
Bug ID: 105085
Summary: Excess errors from new test case
gcc.dg/analyzer/untracked-1.c in
r12-7809-g5f6197d7c197f9
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104818
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104818
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0127fb1b78a36a7b228d4b3fe32eedfc8d273363
commit r12-7858-g0127fb1b78a36a7b228d4b3fe32eedfc8d273363
Author: Tom de Vries
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105068
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105078
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104787
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
--- Comment #2 from Jason
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103597
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |debug
--- Comment #6 from Jason
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105084
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Neither is false positive, both are real bugs in your test programs.
The fact that on the second testcase a violation isn't reported at -O0 and is
at -O2 depends on the ordering of the global variables (we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105078
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105078
--- Comment #5 from Siddhesh Poyarekar ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> Note the libQt6 version of the function looking approximately like this:
>
This doesn't warn anymore (and doesn't crash either) because objsz cannot get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105084
--- Comment #1 from Li Shaohua ---
Sorry, the triggering program should be the following:
$cat a.c
int a[] = {3};
int b = 7;
main() {
unsigned int *c =
*c = a[-1];
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105061
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52701
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52701=edit
gcc12-pr105061.patch
After reading what template-introduction is I think that is the right fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105084
Bug ID: 105084
Summary: ASAN false positive on global-buffer-overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101487
Yang Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105003
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102869
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc50d9a252c89c1bac78192bd0884ff23f2bf48b
commit r12-7857-gfc50d9a252c89c1bac78192bd0884ff23f2bf48b
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc50d9a252c89c1bac78192bd0884ff23f2bf48b
commit r12-7857-gfc50d9a252c89c1bac78192bd0884ff23f2bf48b
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105003
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc50d9a252c89c1bac78192bd0884ff23f2bf48b
commit r12-7857-gfc50d9a252c89c1bac78192bd0884ff23f2bf48b
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105079
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 52700
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52700=edit
Proposed patch
The attached patch handles the case from Comment #0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105072
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Created attachment 52699
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52699=edit
Patch pending for GCC13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892
--- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez ---
This is an invalid test. The variable "a" is being used before being set. I
think we should actually remove the test from the testsuite.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102990
--- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek ---
I was planning to backport the fix to 11, yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102990
--- Comment #12 from Jean-Michaël Celerier ---
In any case many thanks for fixing this !
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
